Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
PVP2002-1279
Manfred Lengsfeld
Fluor Daniel Inc.
manfred.lengsfeld @fluor.com
Kanhaiya L. Bardia
Fluor Daniel Inc.
ken.bardia@fluor.com
Jaan Taagepera
Valero Refining Co.
Jaan.taagepera@valero.com
Kanajett Hathaitham
Fluor Signature Services Inc.
ken.hathaitham @fluor.com
Donald G. LaBounty
Fluor Daniel Inc.
donald.la.bounty@fluor.com
Mark C. Lengsfeld
Crane Valves
lengsfeld @yahoo.com
ABSTRACT
The analysis of tank nozzles for API Standard 650 [1] tanks
is a complex problem. Appendix P of API 650 provides a
method for determining the allowable external loads on tank
shell openings. The method in Appendix P is based on two
papers, one by Billimoria and Hagstrom [2] and the other by
Billimoria and Tam [3]. Although Appendix P is optional,
industry has used it for a number of years for large diameter
tanks. For tanks less than 120 feet (33.6 m) in diameter,
Appendix P is not applicable.
In previously published papers [4-10], the authors used
finite element analysis (FEA) to verify the experimental results
reported by Billimoria and Tam for shell nozzles. The analysis
showed the variance between stiffness coefficients and stresses
obtained by FEA and API 650 methods for tanks.
In this follow-up paper, the authors present stiffness
coefficients for tank nozzles located away from a structural
discontinuity. Factors to establish spring rates for nozzles
varying from 6 to 48 inches and tank diameters from 30 feet to
300 feet and for nozzles at different elevations on the shell are
provided. Mathematical equations are provided together with
graphs for the stiffness coefficient factors.
NOMENCLATURE
B
D
Do
FR
KBc
=
=
=
=
Kc
KBL =
INTRODUCTION
KL
KBR =
KR
LB
Mc
ME
a
d
h
mc
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
1
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 06/03/2015 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
..... ~
l
:-----~LONGrlIlJDINAL
1
MOMENTM~,
.
+M~
Figure 1: Dimensions for nozzles per API 650
mL =
mR t =
t. =
tp =
DESCRIPTION
RESULTS
Stiffness coefficients vary with the location of the nozzle in
height on the tank wall. Stiffness coefficients increase as the
nozzle moves closer to a gross structural discontinuity. Factors
have been established to calculate spring rates for nozzles at
any location on the tank wall using as a basis the rates for
nozzles away from a discontinuity. Stiffness coefficients are
inverse proportional to the height, the lower the location on the
tank, the higher is the spring rate. Depending on the location of
the nozzle, the value for the stiffness coefficients from Figures
3a, 4a or 5a will be divided by the height factor from Figures
3b, 4b or 5b respectively.
LOADING
The same loadings were applied to all finite element models,
namely
P = 1,000 lbs
Radial,
ML = 10,000 in-lbs
Longitudinal Moment,
Mc = 10,000 in-lbs
Circumferential Moment,
ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
The procedure for the evaluation of stiffness coefficients is
as follows:
1. Calculate the distance B
2. Establish the height LB
3. Establish the height factor h
4. For a given nozzle on a tank with established wall
thickness read the stiffness coefficient from Figures
3a, 4a or 5a for the corresponding loading
5. From Figures 3b, 4b or 5b establish the stiffness ratio
factors mi
6. Divide the value of the spring rate from (4) by the
stiffness ratio factor from (5) to arrive at the stiffness
coefficient for the nozzle under consideration
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the
managements of Fluor Daniel, Valero Refining Co and CCI to
prepare and publish this paper. Special thanks to Gilbert
Chen, Avtar S. Mann and Dennis Mitchell for their review of
the manuscript and their encouragement.
REFERENCES
[1] American Petroleum Institute, API Standard 650 tenth
Edition, November 1998 "Welded Steel Tanks for Oil Storage"
[2] Billimoria, H.D., and Hagstrom, K.K, "Stiffness
Coefficients and Allowable Loads for Nozzles in Flat Bottom
Storage Tanks" Paper 77-PVP-19. ASME 1977
[3] Billimoria, H.D., Tam, K.K., 1980, "Experimental
Investigation of Stiffness Coefficients and Allowable Loads
for a Nozzle in a Flat Bottom Tank" ASME Publication 80C2/PVP-5
[4] Lengsfeld, M., Bardia, K.L, Taagepera, J., 1995 "Nozzle
Stresses Resulting from Piping Loads at Low-Type Nozzles in
API 650 Storage Tanks" ASME PVP-Vol. 315
[5] Lengsfeld, M., Bardia, K.L, Taagepera, J., 1996 "FEA vs.
API 650 for Low Tank Nozzles" ASME PVP-Vol. 336
[6] Lengsfeld, M., Bardia, K.L, Taagepera, J., 1997 "FEA vs.
API 650 for Low Tank Nozzles (2)" ASME PVP-Vol. 359
[7] Lengsfeld, M., Bardia, K.L, Taagepera, J., 1998 "Spring
Rates for Low Tank Nozzles" ASME PVP-Vol. 368
[8] Lengsfeld, M., Bardia, K.L, Taagepera, J., Hathaitham,
K., 1999 "Stress Factors for Low-Type Nozzles in API 650
Tanks" ASME PVP-Vol. 388
[9] Lengsfeld, M., Bardia, K.L, Taagepera, J., Hathaitham,
K., 1999 "Spring Rates for Low Tank Nozzles in API 650
Tanks" ASME PVP-Vol. 388
[10] Lengsfeld, M., Bardia, K.L., Taagepera, J., Hathaitham,
K., LaBounty, D.G., Lengsfeld, M.C., 2001 " Analysis of
Loads for Nozzles in API 650 Tanks" ASME PVP-Vol. 430
Ill]Bulletin 297, September1987, "Local Stresses in
Cylindrical Shells due to External Loadings on Nozzles"
Welding Research Council (WRC), New York
DISCUSSION
The graphs presented in this paper were constructed to be on
the conservative side.
The presented results may be interpolated to establish
stiffness coefficients for other nozzles, tank diameters and
shell thickness.
The purpose of this paper is to give the designer a simple
means to arrive at a spring rate at a nozzle to tank shell
connection.
For more complex or critical applications, it is
recommended to perform an FEA analysis including the
complete piping system.
CONCLUSION
The method presented in this paper provides the design
engineer a means to calculate stiffness coefficients at the shell
to nozzle junction. With these rates applied piping loads can
be established.
Once accurate piping loads have been established, stresses at
the nozzle-shell junction can be calculated using the methods
published previously [10].
The use of the finite element analysis models in determining
the stiffness coefficients for tank nozzles is recommended
when piping loads indicated by the method provided in this
paper are excessive and would result in expensive piping
systems.
Additional data for other tank sizes are being developed
350
300
.....
[.
30'Dia.xl/2"
250
o
30'Dia.x3/4"
200
1 gO'Dia.xa/4"
KBR =
100
2.3202x + 47.251
300'Dia.x3/4"
5O
0
30
20
10
40
50
Figure 3a
0.9
0,8
0.7
0.6
0.5I
0.4-
0.30.2
0.1
mR = -0.2504h 2 + 1.2516h - 0.0086
,,,
,
0.1
....
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
,,,,,
0.8
0.9
h=L/L B
Figure 3b
STIFFNESS C O E F F I C I E N T DUE T O C I R C U M F E R E N T I A L M O M E N T
200 -
180
T
.
3O'Oia.x3/4"
160 180'Dia.x,3/4"
140
8~
12o
7,
1oo.
ff,-
~.~
3O'Dia,xl/2"
P
KBc = 0.0421 x2 - 0 . 2 7 2 3 x + 9.9571
80120'Dia.x3/4"
60
40 .
=.
.
t
300'Dia.x3/4"
. . . . . . .
10
20
30
x
Nozzle Size (in)
40
50
Figure 4a
S T I F F N E S S RATIO DUE TO C I R C U M F E R E N T I A L M O M E N T
0.9
0.8
07
0.6
05
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.2
03
0.4
0.5
06
0.7
0.8
0.9
h=L/LB
Figure 4b
:eli
400
"~ 3001
2'1
"
.
I
.
/ . . . .
50 1
.....
,,~ = o.,3,~e-
I"
o.,,,x+,.o,,~
"
I-/
30'Dia.xl/2"
,20'Dia.x3/4"
.......
~
.
"
....
300'Dia.x3/4"
o|
t0
20
30
40
50
Figure 5a
0.9
0.8
0.7
.j 0.6
0.5
................................................................
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
m L = -0.2512h 2 + 0.641h + 0.6034
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
h=L/LB
Figure 5b
= 32.86 in
2) Establish the centerline distance of the
nozzle of no discontinuity influence
LB = B+0.5*D0
= 32.86 + 0.5 * 49.5
= 57.61 in
3) Establish the height factor
h = L/LB
28/57.61
0.486
4) From Figure 3a, 4a, 5a read the stiffness
coefficients
KBR = 280,000 lbs/in
(Fig. 3a)
KBC = 80,000 in-lbs/rad
(Fig. 4a)
KBL = 200,000 in-lbs/rad (Fig. 5a)
5) From Figure 4, 5, 6 read the coefficient
factor
mr
= 0.6 for Kr
( Fig. 3b)
mc
= 0.68 for Kc
(Fig. 4b)
mE
= 0.88 for KL
(Fig. 5b)
6)
Divide
the
stiffness
coefficients
established in step 4 by the factors from step
5 to arrive at the stiffness coefficients for the
nozzle under investigation.
Table 1
Size
Formulae
KBC = - 0 . 0 5 8 9 X 2 +
4.9447x + 2.4016
KR
Kc
280,000 / 0.6
466,000 lbs/in
= KBc/mc
80,000 / 0.68
117,600 in-lbs/rad
KL
KBL/me
200,000 / 0.88
227,000 in-lbs/rad
SAMPLE PROBLEM
Calculate
Material:
D =
t =
d =
t, =
L =
KBR/mR
SOLUTION
1) Calculate the distance where the bottom
discontinuity has no influence on the spring
rate
B
= 2(12*Dt) 5
= 2* (12"30"0.75) 0.5