Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Anthropogenic debris accumulation in marine environments has become
a serious problem in the last decades (Derraik, 2002).
Green turtles (Chelonia mydas) interact with marine debris in all their life
stages and in different geographic areas (Schuyler et al., 2013).
In the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean the ingestion of marine debris is one
of the main threats for immature green turtles when reach to neritic
habitats after their oceanic life stage (Gonzalez - Carman et al., 2013).
RESULTS
The first study, analyzed stranded green turtles along the Uruguayan coast trough 2005 to 2007, the mean SD
curved carapace length (CCL) = 39.7 6.0 cm (range 32.3 - 61.5 cm). 73.0% presented marine debris in their gut
contents (Table 1,[1]).
The second study, analyzed stranded green turtles along the Uruguayan coast trough 2009 to 2013, the mean
SD CCL = 40.0 7.0 cm (range 29.862.0). 72.2% presented marine debris in their gut contents (Table 1,[3]).
The last study, was performed during 2010 just in the Marine Protected Area Cerro Verde and adjacent areas, the
turtles presented mean SD CCL = 39.4 7.8 cm (range 29.8 58.5 cm). 82.6% of the turtles ingested marine
debris (Table 1,[2]).
In the three studies, the presence of marine debris decrease according with the turtle growth rate, with a
remarkable peak in study [3] from 80% in turtles shorter than 35 cm CCL to 58.8% in larger than 40 cm CCL.
A
B
Table 1: Review of studies conducted by Karumb along the Uruguayan coast between 2001 2013. Red square marks the studies analyzed in the present study. *Dead
turtles due to marine debris ingestion.
Study Type
Diet/Debris
(Stranding)
Study Area
% Solid
Debris
14.3
56
73.0
23
82.6
54
72.2
10
20.0
Stranding
Monitoring
N Turtles
Analyzed
Mortality
(Stranding)
Alive Turtles
123
34.9*
150
24.9*
25
76.0
Fig 1: Map of the Uruguayan coast. Three zones can be distinguished in coastal waters based on the differences in hydrological
characteristics: [IEZ] inner estuarine zone (350 km), [OEZ] outer estuarine zone (130 km) and [OZ] Oceanic zone (230 km). The letters
indicate the most important protected areas for juvenile green turtles in Uruguayan coastal waters: A, Marine Protected Area of Cerro
Verde; B, Marine protected area of Cabo Polonio. The red circles indicate the green turtles stranding locations of Vlez-Rubio et al. in
prep. (2009-2013, N=54).
CONCLUSION
In the last 10 years the presence of marine debris in green turtles has increased in great numbers in Uruguayan coastal waters. This update
represents the first step for a comprehensive review of the impact of marine debris for the green turtle stock located in this area of the South
Western Atlantic, and for the developing of future actions to mitigate this threat.
LITERATURE CITED
Derraik, J.G.B., 2002. The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 44, 842852.
Framian, M.B., Brown, O.B., 1996. Study of the Ro de la Plata turbidity front. Part I. Spatial and temporal distribution. Cont.
Shelf Res. 16 (10), 12591282.
Schuyler, Q., Hardesty, B.D., Wilcox, C., Townsend, K., 2013. Global analysis of anthropogenic debris ingestion by sea turtles.
Conserv. Biol.. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/cobi.12126.
Gonzalez - Carman, V., et al., 2014. Young green turtles, Chelonia mydas, exposed to plastic in a frontal area of the SW Atlantic.
Mar. Pollut. Bull. 78 5662.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Authors are really grateful to all Karumb members and volunteers who once formed part of the NGO. Also to all the persons (fishermen, Naval
Prefecture, life guard service, rangers, civil organizations and citizens). Also thanks for the support of all the ISTS 2015 sponsors.