Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
org
planken.org
Menu
Stephan
22 Comments
Recently, I accidentally selected a fair amount of code and before realizing this I had
pressed delete. I was able to restore the deleted code from one of the very frequent
backups I make throughout the day, but it is time consuming to open a second project,
find and copy the code. A simple undo would be so nice.
Edit: Even in ladder networks the undo function is not always available. It seems
inconsistent.
Update: this has improved considerably with V13 Update 5.
In the above example FC125 and FC135 have the same checksum but different time
stamps, so TIA Portal indicates this as a problem. It more or less forces a download or
else it will be impossible to monitor the block.
For STL networks there is no choice, you can only add a new ladder network, not a new
STL network. You have to insert a ladder network first, then add a new STL network
from there, then delete the ladder network. Seems like an oversight.
As soon as I add an object to the network, a new ladder network, here 43, is added:
A modification to the first STL comment causes the entire block comparison to fail:
The scroll wheel is supported. However, scrolling by hovering over a window without
highlighting it is not supported consistently. Some windows (like the assignment lists)
do not support scrolling with the scroll wheel at all. Really, Siemens?
Given these settings, this is what the screen looks like from within TIA Portal:
When printing it is ignoring the font settings. The STL font is also disproportionally
large compared to the text in the ladder logic:
With Step 7 5.x you could right-click and select a different format. Unfortunately, with
TIA Portal the format cannot always be changed. When monitoring values in ladder
networks, the format can be changed via right-click / modify / display format:
When monitoring interface values for FB/FC calls the format is almost always
hexadecimal, making it difficult to interpret. The format cannot be changed:
A nice feature is that the columns with displayed values can be moved sideways.
It would be better to display information in the status bar. Or move the tooltips above
the cursor. Or just don't pop them up when it is unnecessary, especially when
monitoring online.
Label name
In the classic Step 7, label names were allowed to start with underscores. Not anymore:
If you start typing a quote after the jump instruction a popup appears. From there it
allows you to select the jump label starting with an underscore:
This is not necessarily a huge deal, but it seems more like a bug than intentional
behavior.
In the picture, the gap between words MW366-MW498 is visually somewhat obvious,
but that is often not the case.
In TIA Portal, however, it is not possible to view the absolute addresses in (non
optimized) data blocks.
This is unfortunate since a lot of the literature is referring to these by their numbers.
Updates
November 13, 2014: With V13/Update 5 the undo functionality has greatly improved.
December 20, 2014: Service pack 1 improved the undo feature.
February 17, 2015: Added label name peculiarity.
February 17, 2015: Added online/offline checksum fail.
March 19, 2015: Added the address gap issue.
March 29, 2015: Added more pictures to illustrate the label name issue from February
17.
April 26, 2015: Added HMI object name issue.
May 29, 2015: Added the lack of absolute references in data blocks and of function
blocks.
Technology Step 7 Automation TIA Portal
Add new comment
Comments
great thanks.
I've done large projects in both. TIA definitely has time-saving features, especially
tag selection, better drag/drop of objects in ladder, etc. Hardware config is easier.
But it definitely has its quirks.
I have TIA Portal V13SP1. Every time I try to make/change screen objects visibility
tag the whole TIA Portal crashes!
Sorry to hear about your crashes. I have been fortunate enough that V13 SP1 has
only crashed once for me (I have, however, opted to reinstall everything with V13
SP1 and not update the existing installation that had V11 and V12). Have you tried
searching the support forum ?
This topic
that mentions crashes when deleting tags from the HMI picture.
this issue. In the past, they have often recommended re-installing the software,
very time-consuming. With TIA it often seems that project corruption can occur.
Evidently, the software is then not able to handle that gracefully.
Thank you for gathering issues altogether. I have to comment to underscored jump
labels, they are possible to use but you have to mark the label name with " ", e.g
"_RUN" and then it will define it correctly to STL.
Hmmm... I can't get that to work for me. I can define a jump label starting with an
underscore. But I can't seem to let TIA accept a jump statement with that in any
way.
If I type the label name after the jump instruction it is regarded invalid.
If I start typing a quote as the first character after the jump instruction it will allow
the label name (with the underscore) to be selected from a list; it will reject the
result, though.
Anyone tried to connect via an eWon modem with the TIA portal?
It's a nightmare. We just installed a remote PC with the software and control it with
teamviewer.
Many crashes and small bugs makes the TIA portal a true pain in the ass.
When it came to installing service pack 1 for v13 I reinstalled everything from
scratch. I suspected that previous versions (I still had v11 and v12 as well but had
no need for it) could contribute to stability issues. I have "only" seen one crash
since.
Came in this morning and all blocks except two showed they were different. The
two were that last I worked on yesterday. Not a problem, as I am bench testing,
and a recompile and download solved it. However, what about on a live plant,
where it could be weeks, months even years between accessing the online code.
Operations don't like you stopping stuff. If I didn't have a new HMI requiring the
TIA Portal, I would not use it.
10
Me neither. I believe here is a problem with the code that performs the
comparison. Sometimes the checksum is identical but the time stamps aren't. Very
annoying as it won't allow monitoring.
11
hi, i am using TIA Portal v13. i am having a problem regarding alarms . here is a
system where alarms exceed 1000 per day . in thus software max numbr of data
records is 50,000 in statistics. but this is not enough for my observation . can
anybody have an idea how to increase this number. because i ve to analyse the
system month wise.
12
In older versions of WinCC alarm windows were limited to 1,000 alarms (probably a
fixed limit for performance reasons). However, via the reporting system or by
accessing the SQL tables any alarm could be accessed.
Not sure if this can be done with TIA Portal. Best to contact Siemens.
13
Dearstephen! in the statistics i can accesss upto 50,000 alarms . but its too less
for monthly observation.the alarm window still shows a list of 1000 in TIA portal. i
want the statistics numbr to be increased..
14
15
However, via the reporting system or by accessing the SQL tables any alarm could
be accessed..
16
Obviously, my previous attempts to point you to the Siemens support system have
fallen on deaf ears. Please head to Industry Support Siemens . Create an account
and open a support issue with Siemens, they are the professionals and will be able
to answer your question.
(I am not a user of WinCC in its new form, I can't help you with this, sorry.)
17
Offsets are shown in reference to the beginning of the structure in the DB rather
than beginning of the DB. Thus absolute address of the variable in the DB has to
be always carefully calculated.
The workaround is to open monitor table then drag & drop tag from the DB. In the
monitor table absolute address is shown in reference to the beginning of the DB.
Indeed, I miss viewing the absolute addresses as well. It seems to fit in with the
http://planken.org/2014/09/siemens-tia-portal-v13-issues[18/06/2015 09:46:58 a.m.]
18
Thanks for the tip on going online. I guess you could achieve the same from the
simulator if you're not connected.
Another thing that relates to the overwhelming preference of Siemens for symbolic
addressing is that when selecting SFBs and SFCs it mostly is referred to by
symbolic names as opposed to the absolute block numbers.
Thanks for the feedback. (I'll update the main post.)
19
I would love to try TIA portal if it would run without crashing all the time. Tried
reinstalling and downlowding the latest verisons but no luck. Open a project and
try to add a processor and crash every time. Siemens has no clue but at least V5.5
runs great. On my third try of an install but this time I got rid of LabView off my
computer. My computer is a Dell M4800 with an i7 and 16GB memeory and 1.2TB
of SSD so the processing power is not the issue.
20
The Siemens forums contain quite a few posts of people that experience crashes.
Where possible I would try to install and run from a virtualized environment, as
"clean" as possible. This is not always possible, I often use a CP5512 for Profibus
and MPI, for example and I've never been able to get that to work.
If you can't run TIA Portal virtualized, perhaps you can install Labview that way?
This way you'd still have access to it.
21
SAAD:
(1) Project -> retrieve.
(2) Or you could rename your .zap13 archive to .zip and handle it outside TIA.
22
Your name
Comment *
Save
Preview
Search
Weather
Photos
Archive
Recent posts
USER LOGIN
Username *
Password *
Request new password
Log in
CURRENT WEATHER
TAGS