Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
grant of bail to respondent No.2 Qadeer Ahmed. He was not only attributed specific role of firing
at the deceased but his participation is corroborated by presence of fire-arm injuries on the
person of deceased. The main ground which weighed with the learned High Court for grant of
bail to respondent No.2 Abdul Qadeer was that the recovery of kalashnikov was not made from
hint is not at all a valid ground. Accordingly, his case is not of further inquiry as contemplated
under section 497(2), Cr.P.C. and the grant of bail has prejudiced the case of
complainant/petitioner as it amounts to deeper appreciation of evidence. It is well-settled
principle of law that while granting bail only tentative assessment of evidence is to be made
whereas deeper appreciation of evidence is to be avoided, this principle has been ignored by
learned High Court while granting bail to respondent No.2. Reference can be made to the case of'
Nazir Ahmed (supra) wherein this Court cancelled the bail allowed to accused by High Court on
the ground that specific role of firing at deceased was attributed to accused. In the case of Raja
Muhammad Irshad referred (supra) bail granted to respondent was cancelled though he was
charged for the offence under section 109, P.P.C. in murder case and it was held that while
considering the request of the accused on bail, a deeper appreciation of evidence is not called for
and the Court seized of the matter in terms of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. is required to make
tentative assessment of evidence available on record.
8. As far as the case of respondent No.3 Abdul Ghaffar is concerned, there is a conflict between
the prosecution version and the medical evidence. As per prosecution case, he gave Chhuri blow
on the neck of the deceased whereas according to MLR as well as the diagram all the injuries
were caused with fire-arm weapon. As such his case is on different footing.
9. For the foregoing reasons impugned judgment dated 28-4-2006 to the extent of respondent
No.2 Qadeer Ahmed is set aside and the concession of bail granted to him is recalled. He is
directed to surrender before the learned trial Court. The petition to his extent is converted into
appeal and allowed. As far as respondent No.3 Abdul Ghaffar is concerned, learned counsel has
failed to make out a case for cancellation of his bail, as such the petition to his extent is
dismissed.
M.H./E-5/SC
Order accordingly.