Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Clinical laboratory in the 21st generation has evolved from simple observation and
description of blood and its components to a highly automated and extremely technical
science. However, some of the more basic tests have not changed dramatically over the
years. This research presents the significance of manual and semi automated methods that
can be used in lieu of automated instrumentation.
Although most routine cell-counting procedures in the laboratory are automated,
it may be necessary to use manual methods when counts exceed the linearity of an
instrument, when an instrument is nonfunctional and there is no backup, in remote
laboratories, or in a disaster situation when testing is done in the field.
The used of automated cell-counting analyzers has directly affected the
availability, accuracy, and clinical usefulness of the CBC and WBC differential count.
Some parameters that are available on laboratory instrumentation, but cannot be derived
manually, have provided further insight into various clinical conditions.
This research emphasizes the procedures for manual counting of leukocytes.
Manual cell counts and differentiation were originally the only means of enumerating and
classifying cellular elements in blood and body fluids. To a large extent, the laboratory
evaluation of leukocytes, erythrocytes, and platelets has now been automated. If
automated leukocyte is available, why must laboratory scientist learn manual techniques
for evaluating them? There are several reasons.
Thesis statement
Manual computation is relevant in counting white blood cell in patient.
Objectives
1. Emphasize how and why manual and semi-automated method would be
convenient in a laboratory in counting white blood cells in patients blood.
2. Ensure that the use of manual and semi-automated method in WBC count is
accurate.
Interfering factors that may lead to increase and decrease of white blood cell in patient
Factors that may lead to increase and decrease of white blood cells
Eating, physical activity and stress may cause an increased WBC count and alter
the different values. Final months in pregnancy and labor may be associated with
increased WBC levels. Patients who have had a splenectomy have a persistent wild to
moderate elevation of WBC counts. The WBC count tends to be lower in the morning
and higher in the late afternoon. The WBC count tends to be age-related. Normal
newborns and infants tend to have higher WBC count than adult. Drugs that may cause
increased WBC levels include adrenaline, allopurinol, aspirin, chloroform, epinephrine,
heparin, quinine, steroids and triamterene. Drugs that may decrease WBC levels include
antibiotics, anticonvulsants, antihistamines, antimetabolites, antithyroid drugs, arsenicals,
barbiturates, chemotherapeutic agents, diuretics, and sulfonamides.
Procedures that may take place in drawing white blood cell count in patients
Before the test is taken, explain the procedure to the patient and tell the patient
that no fasting is required. During the actual test is taken, Collect approximately 5 to 7 ml
of venous blood in a lavender-top tube. After the test is taken, apply pressure to the
venipuncture site.
counts. The reservoir contains 3% glacial acetic acid. A 25 ul capillary pipette is used to
aspirate the blood sample and make a 1:20 dilution in the reservoir. (Alternatively, the
Unopette containing ammonium oxalate and result in a 1:100 dilution may be used).
Procedure
(1) Dilute the specimen - let stand for 10 minutes to allow red cells to hemolyzed.
(2) Expel first 3 to 4 drops of diluted specimen to clean capillary bore.
(3) Charge the Hemacytometer (both sides) with the diluted specimen.
(4) Cells must settle for a minimum 3 to 5 minutes after placing Hemacytometer
in moist chamber.
(5) Count white blood cells. Use low power objective and low light. Viewed under
low power, leukocyte nuclei appear slightly iridescent but not retractile; cells should have
a visible cell wall and nucleus; use fine focus to differentiate them from artifacts. Count
all WBCs within the 9 large squares (1:100) and those WBCs touching upper and righthand perimeter lines. Count second side of Hemacytometer in the same manner.
Validation that each side of the chamber was charged equally - Total number of cells
counted on each side of the counting chamber should agree within 10 percent of each
other - calculate acceptable range using lower count.
Calculation
The depth of the counting chamber is 0.1 mm and the area counted is 4 sq mm (4
squares are counted, each with an area of 1.0 sq mm therefore, 4 X 1.0 sq mm = a total of
4 sq mm). The volume counted is: area X depth = volume. 4 mm2 X 0.1 mm = 0.4
mm3 (cubic millimeters).
Here is the formula:
Sources of Error
Improper collection of blood specimens causes variable results.
Wet or dirty pipets.
Not allowing cells to settle for an adequate amount of time.
Poor pipetting technique causes high or low counts. Poor pipetting technique
includes:
Undershooting Unopette with blood.
Overfilling Unopette with blood.
Air bubbles in the shaft.
Not mixing the blood specimen thoroughly.
8
Failure to expel 3 or 4 drops in the pipet tips before charging the Hemacytometer.
Overfilling the chamber of the hemacytometer, which causes erroneously high counts.
Not mixing the diluted specimen prior to filling the Hemacytometer.
Uneven distribution of cells in the counting chamber causes erroneous results.
Counting artifacts.
Dirty or scratched Hemacytometer.
Failure to mix anticoagulated blood thoroughly before use.
(HGB), platelets, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and mean platelet volume, and
automatically calculating hematocrit (HCT), mean corpuscular hemoglobin
(MCH), MCH concentration (MCHC), RBC distribution width, plateletcrit, and platelet
(PLT) distribution width. The other crucial considerations in automatic analyzers are the
speed with which they perform and the number of specimens they can process per batch
(reduction in turnaround time due to high throughput).
cells (variant lymphocytes from blasts). The monocytes tend to be underestimated and the
Lymphocytes tend to be overestimated.
Conclusion
11
12