TSL3153 Marking Rubric - Sample

RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN
PROGRAM: PISMP Ambilan Januari 2011
TUGASAN PROJEK
SEMESTER: 2 Year 4
TAJUK KURSUS: Action Research II TESL Primary Education (Implementation and Reporting) (TSL3153)
A.
WRITTEN REPORT
Aspect
Criteria
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Reflection on teaching
experience /theoretical
framework
(10 marks)
EXCELLENT
DISTINCTION
CREDIT
PASS
FAIL
9-10
Outstanding description of
T&L experience that is
relevant to the focus of
study.
7-8
Very good description of
study.
6
Good description of T&L
experience that is relevant
to the focus of study.
5
Adequate description of
study.
0-4
Vague description of T&L
experience that is relevant
to the focus of study.
Perceptive reevaluation
of teaching experience
that is relevant to the
focus of study.
Very detailed reevaluation

of teaching experience
that is relevant to the
focus of study.
Detailed reevaluation of
teaching experience that
is relevant to the focus of
study.
Sensible reevaluation of
study.
Vague reevaluation of
study.
Deep interpretative
articulation of
assumptions, values and
beliefs about T&L in the
reflection on T&L
Very good interpretative

articulation of
reflection on T&L
Substantial articulation of
reflection on T&L
Appropriate interpretative
articulation of
reflection on T&L
Inappropriate/limited
interpretative articulation
of assumptions, values
and beliefs about T&L in
the reflection on T&L
Insightful discussion of the

gap between own values
and beliefs and T&L
practices.
Very good discussion of

the gap between own
values and beliefs and
T&L practices.
Good discussion of the

gap between own values
and beliefs and T&L
practices.
Adequate discussion of
the gap between own
T&L practices.
Flawed/limited discussion
of the gap between own
T&L practices.
RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN
TUGASAN PROJEK
SEMESTER: 2 Year 4
Aspect
Criteria
2.0 FOCUS OF
INVESTIGATION / \
ISSUE OF CONCERN
Problem Statement
(20 marks)
EXCELLENT
DISTINCTION
CREDIT
18-20
Substantial articulation of
the issue that relates to
the researchers
experience and students
needs.
15-17
Very good articulation of
the researchers
needs.
12-14
Good articulation of the
issue that relates to the
researchers experience
and students needs.
10-11
Appropriate articulation of
the researchers
needs.
0-9
Inappropriate/ limited
articulation of the issue
that relates to the
researchers experience
and students needs.
Exceptionally well justified

according to the following
criteria:
workability
significance
practicality
control
collaboration
relevance to school
Very well justified

criteria:
workability
significance
practicality
control
collaboration
relevance to school
Well justified according to

the following criteria:
Adequately justified
criteria:
workability
significance
practicality
control
collaboration
relevance to school
Inadequately justified
criteria:
workability
significance
practicality
control
collaboration
relevance to school
Focus of investigation and

opportunities for
improvement are very
clearly and appropriately
stated.

opportunities for
improvement are clearly
and appropriately stated.

opportunities for
improvement are logically
stated.

opportunities for
improvement are
adequately stated.

opportunities for
improvement are
inadequately stated.
workability
significance
practicality
control
collaboration
relevance to school
PASS
FAIL
RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN
TUGASAN PROJEK
SEMESTER: 2 Year 4
Aspect
EXCELLENT
DISTINCTION
CREDIT
PASS
FAIL
the information gathering
procedures and
convincing justification for
the use of the strategies.
5
The objective is fully and
very clearly stated
aspects:
focus
action
effect of action

procedures and
4
The objective is clearly
stated according to the
following aspects:
focus
action
effect of action
Good description of the

information gathering
procedures and
3
The objective is
satisfactorily stated
aspects:
focus
action
effect of action
procedures and
2.5
The objective is
adequately stated
aspects:
focus
action
effect of action
Vague description of the

information gathering
procedures and
0-2.4
The objective is
inadequately stated
aspects:
focus
action
effect of action
Highly focused and

appropriate research
questions.
Focused and appropriate

research questions.
Good research questions

which are pertinent to the
investigation.
Satisfactory research
questions, generally
focused and relevant, with
some gaps.
Research questions are

insufficient and/or
inappropriate.
Criteria
3.0 OBJECTIVE/
RESEARCH
QUESTIONS
(5 marks)
RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN
TUGASAN PROJEK
SEMESTER: 2 Year 4
Aspect
Criteria
4.0 TARGET GROUP/
PARTICIPANTS
(5 marks)
5.0 ACTION
5.1 Implementation of
Action
(5 marks)
5.2 Data Gathering

Methods
(5 marks)
EXCELLENT
DISTINCTION
CREDIT
PASS
FAIL
5
Very clear and detailed
description of participants;
number, gender, class /
position, academic
performance and other
unique aspects of
participants.
4
Clear description of
participants; number,
gender, class / position,
academic performance
and other unique aspects
of participants.
3
Good description of
of participants.
2.5
of participants.
0-2.4
Vague/Inappropriate
description of participants;
number, gender, class /
position, academic
performance and other
unique aspects of
participants.
5
Outstanding explanation
of steps/activities.
4
Very detailed explanation
of steps/activities.
3
Detailed explanation of
steps/activities.
2.5
Adequate explanation of
steps/activities.
0-2.4
Vague/confusing
explanation of
steps/activities.
Outstanding justification,
detailed rationale within
the scope of the action
plan.
5
the data gathering
methods and convincing
justification for the use of
methods.
Very good justification,

detailed rationale within
the scope of the action
plan.
4
the data gathering
methods and convincing
methods.
Good justification and

fairly detailed rationale
within the scope of the
action plan.
3
data gathering methods
and well-argued
methods.
Adequate justification
rationale within the scope
of the action plan with
more details required.
2.5
Adequate discussion of
data gathering methods
and some justification for
the use of methods.
Inadequate justified and

underdeveloped rationale
of the action plan.
0-2.4
Limited/Flawed
explanation of data
gathering methods.
RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN
TUGASAN PROJEK
SEMESTER: 2 Year 4
Aspect
Criteria
6.0 ANALYSIS AND
INTERPRETATION
OF DATA
(10 marks)
7.0 FINDINGS
(10 marks)
EXCELLENT
DISTINCTION
CREDIT
PASS
FAIL
9-10
the research instruments
with convincing
the instruments.
7-8
with convincing
the instruments.
6
research instruments and
good justification for the
use of the instruments.
5
with some justification for
the use of the
instruments.
0-4
Vague description of the
research instrument.
Limited justification for the
use of the instruments.
Judicious selection of data

analysis methods that
address the key aspects
of the problem.
Very good selection of

data analysis methods
that address the key
aspects of the problem.
Good selection of data

analysis methods that
address many aspects of
the problem.
Appropriate selection of
that address some
aspects of the problem.
Inappropriate/Flawed
selection of data analysis
methods and do not
address the problem.
Very clear and detailed

description of data
analysis methods with
highly convincing
justification.
9-10
Findings are highly
relevant to the study and
answer the research
questions.

with convincing
justification.
Good description of data

analysis methods with
fairly convincing
justification.
Data analysis methods

are generally outlined and
justified although with
possible gaps.
Data gathering methods

are insufficiently
explained.
7-8
Findings are relevant to
the study and answer the
research questions.
6
Findings are mostly
relevant to the study and
answer most of the
research questions.
5
The findings satisfactorily
answer the research
questions, with some
gaps.
0-4
The findings are
insufficient and/or
irrelevant to the study.
RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN
TUGASAN PROJEK
SEMESTER: 2 Year 4
Aspect
EXCELLENT
Criteria
8.0 SUGGESTIONS FOR
FURTHER
RESEARCH
(5 marks)
9.0 ACADEMIC WRITING
(20 marks)
DISTINCTION
CREDIT
PASS
FAIL
5
Highly critical evaluation
of the action taken.
4
Critical evaluation of the
action taken.
3
Good evaluation of the
action taken.
2.5
Satisfactory evaluation of
the action taken.
0-2.4
Limited/Flawed evaluation
of the action taken.
Perceptive suggestions
for further research.
Very good suggestions for

further research.
Good suggestions for

further research.
Adequate suggestions for

further research.
18-20
The work demonstrates
highly critical, incisive
argument and a highly
appropriate conclusion
based on a full analysis.
15-17
The work demonstrates
critical, strong argument
and an appropriate
conclusion based on a
substantial analysis.
10-11
The work is conventional,
straightforward, and, on
balance, presents a
generally acceptable
argument and conclusion.
Presentation is excellent
in all respects.
Presentation is very good

in all respects.
Language is accurate and

clear and contains very
few errors.
Language is accurate and

clear and contains no
significant errors..
12-14
All major aspects of the
question are taken into
account with no notable
omissions. There is clear
evidence of ability to
synthesise ideas, and to
produce critically aware
material.
A good standard of
presentation is
maintained.
Language is intelligible at
all times and contains
some errors.
The suggestions for

further research are not
discussed.
0-9
The work contains some
obvious and significant
inadequacies in terms of
content, relevance, logic
and critical
judgement/argument.
Presentation is generally
clear and appropriate.
Presentation is generally
not clear.
Language is generally
clear and substantially
correct with no serious or
sustained
miscommunication.
Language is generally
faulty with numerous
errors which impede
communication.
RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN
TUGASAN PROJEK
SEMESTER: 2 Year 4
Aspect
EXCELLENT
Criteria
10.0 LIST OF
REFERENCES
(5 marks)
DISTINCTION
CREDIT
PASS
FAIL
5
A comprehensive range of
relevant literature is
chosen and used
appropriately.
4
A very good range of
relevant literature is
chosen and used
appropriately.
3
A good range of relevant
literature is chosen and
used appropriately in most
parts.
2.5
A core range of relevant
literature has been
consulted.
0-2.4
Insufficient coverage of
and familiarity with a
range of relevant
literature.
Excellent referencing and

bibliographical skills.
Very good referencing and

Good referencing and

Acceptable referencing
skills.
Limited quotations and

references are included in
the text.
Full compliance with APA

academic conventions.
A very good level of

compliance with APA
In compliance with APA

.
Acceptable level of
compliance with APA
Few if any technical

errors.
Few technical errors.
Several technical errors.
Some technical errors.
Inaccurate and
inconsistent use of APA
Numerous technical
errors.
RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN
TUGASAN PROJEK
SEMESTER: 2 Year 4
B.
ORAL PRESENTATION
Aspect
EXCELLENT
Criteria
1.0 DELIVERY
(20 marks)
DISTINCTION
CREDIT
PASS
FAIL
18-20
Very clear presentation
with highly confident
delivery.
15-17
Clear presentation with
confident delivery.
12-14
Fairly clear presentation
with some confidence in
delivery.
10-11
Satisfactory presentation.
0-9
Weak and unconvincing
presentation.
Eloquently articulated with

nearly flawless English.
Clearly articulated with

few linguistic errors in
English.
Effective use of media.
Articulated reasonably
well with some linguistic
errors English.
Competent use of media.
Linguistic errors at times

impede the flow of the
presentation.
Adequate use of media.
Linguistic errors
continually hamper the
flow of the presentation.
Ineffective /minimal use of
media.
Excellent time
management.
Very good time

management.
Fairly good time

management.
Adequate time
management.
Poor time management.
Captivates and highly

engages audience.
Highly engages audience.
Fairly engaging delivery

and audience attention is
maintained.
Somewhat engaging
delivery leading to
inconsistent audience
attention.
Uninteresting
delivery/Inability to
communicate with
audience.
Highly effective use of

media.
RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN
TUGASAN PROJEK
SEMESTER: 2 Year 4
Aspect
EXCELLENT
Criteria
2.0 CONTENT
ORGANISATION
(30 marks)
3.0 CONTENT
(30 marks)
DISTINCTION
CREDIT
PASS
FAIL
27-30
The introduction is very
clearly articulated.
23-26
The introduction is clearly
articulated.
18-22
The introduction is
articulated fairly well.
15-17
The introduction is
satisfactorily articulated.
0-14
Inappropriate/ limited
articulation of the
introduction.
A lack of organization of
information/ideas.
Excellent organization of
information/ideas.
Very good organization of

information/ideas.
Good organization of
information/ideas.
Satisfactory organization
of information/ideas.
Meaningful and detailed

conclusions based on
very strong evidence.
Meaningful conclusions
based on strong evidence.
Logical conclusions based

on reasonable evidence.
General conclusions
based on adequate
evidence.
Lacks conclusions.
27-30
Perceptive and targeted
focus on a particular issue
within a specific learning
context.
23-26
Appropriate and targeted
focus on a selected issue
within a specific learning
context.
15-17
Selection of an issue
identified; a further focus
required on alignment to
the learning context.
0-14
Inappropriate selection of
an issue and/or lack of
focus on a learning
context.
Very well supported

findings.
Well supported findings.
18-22
Appropriate selection of
an issue but focus is
broad/narrow in relation to
a specific learning
context.
Reasonably supported
findings.
Adequately supported
findings.
Inadequately supported
findings.
Highly appropriate range

of sources, very clear
identification of sources.
Very good range of

sources, clear
Good range of sources,

fairly clear identification of
sources.
Adequate range of
sources, acceptable
Inadequate range of
sources, poor /flawed
RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN
TUGASAN PROJEK
SEMESTER: 2 Year 4
Aspect
EXCELLENT
Criteria
4.0 QUESTION AND
ANSWER
(20 marks)
DISTINCTION
CREDIT
PASS
FAIL
18-20
Perceptive level of
familiarity with the topic.
15-17
Very high level of
familiarity with the topic.
12-14
Good level of familiarity
with the topic.
10-11
Sound level of familiarity
with the topic.
0-9
Poor level of familiarity
with the topic.
Demonstrated deep
interpretative and highly
convincing reasoning in
response to inquiry.
Demonstrated very good

reasoning in response to
inquiry.
Demonstrated sound
inquiry.
Demonstrated acceptable
inquiry.
Demonstrated
weak/minimal/flawed
inquiry.

TSL3153 Marking Rubric - Sample

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

TSL3153 Marking Rubric - Sample

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN

PROGRAM: PISMP Ambilan Januari 2011

Very detailed reevaluation

Very good interpretative

Insightful discussion of the

Very good discussion of

Good discussion of the

Exceptionally well justified

Very well justified

Well justified according to

Focus of investigation and

Focus of investigation and

Focus of investigation and

Focus of investigation and

Focus of investigation and

Very good description of

Good description of the

Vague description of the

Highly focused and

Focused and appropriate

Good research questions

Research questions are

5.2 Data Gathering

Very good justification,

Good justification and

Inadequate justified and

Judicious selection of data

Very good selection of

Good selection of data

Very clear and detailed

Very good description of

Good description of data

Data analysis methods

Data gathering methods

Very good suggestions for

Good suggestions for

Adequate suggestions for

Presentation is very good

Language is accurate and

Language is accurate and

The suggestions for

Excellent referencing and

Very good referencing and

Good referencing and

Limited quotations and

Full compliance with APA

A very good level of

In compliance with APA

Few if any technical

Few technical errors.

Several technical errors.

Some technical errors.

PROGRAM: PISMP Ambilan Januari 2011

Eloquently articulated with

Clearly articulated with

Linguistic errors at times

Very good time

Fairly good time

Poor time management.

Captivates and highly

Highly engages audience.

Fairly engaging delivery

Highly effective use of