Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
principle
Jathika Hela Urumaya tied himself up in ungainly knots in arguing that the country
does not need national policies. The focus was on education but this argument could
be applied verbatim to any other subject. His eminently confused ramblings were that
each party should have competing policies so that the voters could chose what suits
them the best. Consequently therefore, striving for unanimity in education policies, for
example, by major political parties was not desirable.
As these rank absurdities are forced down our throats, it may fairly be questioned as
to whether these characters have taken leave of their senses, if indeed they
possessed any in the first place. But then this is not an election based on principles at
any conceivable level. It is also not an election which offers a viable choice between
political parties (or indeed, politicians) distinguished by any remarkable sense of
worth. These were past luxuries that Sri Lankans could claim to only in infinitely
gentler times. The choices before us today are far more rudimentary.
anniversary of the Rathupaswela incident where three civilians died as a result of the
army shooting protestors demanding clean drinking water. Victims still languish without
justice and compensation.
These are all signs that our legal system has been systematically crippled. The judicial
institution faces a threefold crisis of legitimacy, credibility and capacity. By itself, the
19th Amendment does not ensure the accountability of the Judicial Service
Commission (JSC) for instance. And it is no answer to say that the JSC, as currently
constituted, will be presumed to act justly. Processes and institutions should not
depend on individuals. Internal checks and balances must be in place despite
particular individuals in office at particular times.
This week, the Cabinet decided that Bribery and Corruption commissioners
responsible for obstructing investigations would be investigated. But did it really take
almost a full seven months for this realization to dawn?
As this column had urged repeatedly, if the functionality of the Commission had been
swiftly restored in the flush of that magnificent Presidential election victory in January
2015, these complaints may now have been unnecessary.
That said, the law certainly does not suffice by and of itself. This election period has
seen (with some exceptions including Fridays shooting incident at Bloemendhal)
relatively far less election violations. It is simplistic however to attribute this purely to
It was not that the EC did not have sufficient powers before under the constitutional
scheme, as judicially expanded by the Supreme Court in its heyday when responding
to issues on constitutional principle rather than with underlying political motives. To
give credit where it is due, reduced election violations are less a matter of sufficient
law and more a direct result of the change in the Presidency this year.
Indeed, the one thread of sanity which we may grimly hold onto is the determination of
ordinary Sri Lankan voters who, despite all odds, persist in showing grit and guts
wholly lacking in their representatives. And one is reduced to veritably grinding ones
teeth when pompous politicians exuding insincerity from every pore, hold forth on how
they will relieve the burden of the poor innocent villager.
The time for both innocence and credulity in this land is now long past. Let us be clear
at least on that.
Posted by Thavam