Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
MEES
SAAV
V II N
NGG D
D EE SS II G
GNN A
A II DD SS
Columns
Use Fig. 1 to determine a preliminary size For a 22 x 22 in. column at the 1st floor
for the tied column at the 1st floor level. level:
Try a 22 x 22 in. column (Ag = 484 in.2) Try 8-No. 11 bars (As = 12.48 in.2)
with a reinforcement ratio ρg greater than
0.020. Check Eq. (10-2) of ACI 318-99:
Least column dimension = 22 in. (governs) Reinforcement details are shown below.
Check clear spacing of longitudinal bars: See Sect. 7.8 for additional special
reinforcement details for columns.
8-No. 11
22″
22″
TT II M
MEES
SAAV
V II N
NGG D
D EE SS II G
GNN A
A II DD SS
Columns
18″
No. 3 tie
d2 = 9.00″
3-No. 9
d1 = 15.56″
18″
2-No. 9
3-No. 9
TT II M
MEES
SAAV
V II N
NGG D
D EE SS II G
GNN A
A II DD SS
Columns
Layer 3:
βd
φMn = φ 0.5C 1d 1b h − 1 1
1 − C 2 3 = 1 − 1.34
d 2.44
C2 = 0.79
d1 15.56
d i h
− di / 12
n
+ 87 ∑ A si 1 − C 2
i=1 d 1 2 Use 0.69
βd Layer 3:
φMn = φ 0.5C 1d 1b h − 1 1
1 − C 2 3 = 1 − 1.69
d 2.44
C2 = 0.74
d1 15.56
d i h
− di / 12
n
+ 87 ∑ A si 1 − C 2 Use 0.69
i=1 d 1 2
n d
φPn = φ C 1d 1b + 87 ∑ A si 1 − C 2 i
= 0.70{[( 0.5 × 2.15 × 15.56 × 18) d1
i=1
0.85 × 15.56
× 18 −
1.34 = 0.70 {(1.71 × 15.56 × 18)
+ 87[(3 × -0.34 )(9 − 15.56) + 87[(3 × -0.69) + (2 × 0.02)
+ (2 × 0.23)(9 − 9) + (3 × 0.69)]}
+ (3 × 0.69)(9 − 2.44 )]} / 12 = 0.70 ( 478 .9 + 3.5) = 338 kips
c − d1
ε s 1 = 0.003
c − d1
ε s 3 = 0.003
c c
4 − 2.44
= 0.003
4 − 15.56
= 0.003
4 4
= −0.0087 = 0.0012
fs 1 = E s ε s 1 fs 3 = E s ε s 3
= 29, 000 × (−0.0087 ) = −251 .4 ksi = 29, 000 × 0.0012 = 33 .9 ksi
> - 60 ksi, use fs1 = −60 ksi
C s3 = A s 3 fs 3 = 3 × 33 .9 = 102 kips
Ts1 = As 1 fs 1 = 3 × (−60) = −180 kips
C c = 0.85 fc′ ab
c − d1 = 0.85 × 4 × (0.85 × 4 ) × 18
ε s2 = 0.003
c = 208 kips
4 − 9
= 0.003
4 Total T = (-180) + (-120) = -300 kips
= −0.0038
Total C = 102 + 208 = 310 kips
Mns 1 = Ts 1 − d 1
h Compare simplified interaction diagram to
2 interaction diagram generated from the
PCA computer program PCACOL.
= (−180 ) − 15.56 / 12
18
2
= 98.4 ft - kips The comparison is shown on the next page.
As can be seen from the figure, the
comparison between the exact (black line)
Mns 2 = Ts2 − d2
h
and simplified (red line) interaction
2 diagrams is very good.
= (−120 ) − 9 / 12
18
2
=0
Mns 3 = C s 3 − d 3
h
2
= 102 − 2.44 / 12
18
2
= 55.8 ft - kips
3
Mn = 0.5C c (h − a) + ∑ Mnsi
i=1
= [ 0.5 × 208 × (18 − 3.4 )] / 12 + 154 .2
= 280 .7 ft - kips