Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 135

S.O.

S e - Voice For Justice - e-news weekly


Spreading the light of humanity & freedom
Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.11..Issue.32........08/08/2015

Editorial : PAY UP Justice Shri H L DATTU - DAMAGES PAYMENT / FINAL SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO
CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA

I dont know whether secretariat staff of CJI office & DARPG / DPG officials are forwarding my
appeals for justice , e-mails to you or not. They will be held accountable for their lapses if any.
This notice is against the repeated failure of constitutional duties & indirect collusion with
criminals by previous CHIEF JUSTICEs OF INDIA. Notice is served against them , to the office of CJI
, NOT personally against you. At the individual level I do whole heartedly respect Honourable
Justice Shri H L DATTU.

Please refer my appeal for justice through DARPG ;

DLGLA/E/2013/00292

DEPOJ/E/2013/00679

In india democracy is a farce , freedom a mirage. the most basic freedom RIGHT TO
INFORMATION & EXPRESSION , is not honoured by the government,as the information opens up
the crimes of V.V.I.Ps & leads to their ill-gotten wealth. The public servants are least bothered
about the lives of people or justice to them. these type of fat cats , parasites are a drain on the
public exchequer . these people want ,wish me to see dead , wish to see HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
closed . so that, a voice against injustices is silenced forever , the crimes of V.V.I.Ps closed ,
buried forever.

To my numerous appeals , HRWs appeals to you ,you have not yet replied. It clearly shows that
you are least bothered about the lives of people or justice to them .it proves that you are hell
bent to protect the criminals at any cost. you are just pressurising the police to enquire me ,to
take my statement, to repeatedly call me to police station all with a view to silence me.all of you
enjoy legal immunity privileges ,why dont you have given powers to the police / investigating

officer to summon all of you for enquiry ?or else why dont all of you are not appearing before the
police voluntarily for enquiry ?at the least why dont all of you are not sending your statement
about the case to the police either through legal counsel or through post? you are aiding
criminals ,by denying me job oppurtunities in R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE PRESS mysore , city civil
court ,bangalore , distict court , mysore ,etc & by illegally closing my newspaper.
there is a gross, total mismatch between your actions and your oath of office. this amounts to
public cheating & moral turpitude on your part.

1.you are making contempt of the very august office you hold.
2.you are making contempt of the constitution of india.
3.you are making contempt of citizens of india.
4.you are sponsoring & aiding terorrism & organized crime.
5.you are violating the fundamental & human rights of the citizens of india and of neighbouring
countries.
6.you are violating & making contempt of the U.N HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTER to which india is a
signatory.
7.you are obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a citizen of india.

8. As a result of your gross negligence of constitutional duties you have caused me damages /
losses to the tune of RUPEES TWO CRORE ONLY.

you are hereby called upon to Pay damages to me and SHOW-CAUSE within 30 days , why you
cannt be legally prosecuted for the above mentioned crimes .

If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i
do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the
government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer
of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to
police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided
questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens
to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives ,
etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants , Chief

Justice of India & Jurisdictional District Magistrate will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus
levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this
complaint is & will be effective.

if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government of india is liable to pay


Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the
criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund.
afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension ,
property , etc of guilty judges , police officials , public servants & Constitutional fuctionaries.
Thanking you. Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.

Date : 27.06.2015..yours sincerely,


Place : Mysore , India.Nagaraja M R

Retired Judge Jyotsana Yagnik Threatened; Murder Convicts Out On Bail


An Appeal to Government of Gujarath , Natioanl Human Rights
Commission & Supreme Court of India

To ,

1.Honourable Supreme Court of India , New Delhi

2.National Human Rights Commission , New Delhi

Dear Madam / Sir ,

Subject : Threats to JUDGE

The civil society organizations and concerned citizens have taken


serious note of a news report (IE May 11, 2015) about the intimidation
of a retired judge, Ms Jyotsana Yagnik, who, in her capacity as
special judge had, in August 2012, convicted former Gujarat BJP
minister Maya Kodnani, former Bajrang Dal leader Babu Bajrangi and 30
others in the 2002 massacre of 97 Muslims in Naroda Patiya. Ms Yagnik
has received at least 22 threat letters since the verdict, as well as
blank phone calls at her home. The 62 year old judge has informed the
Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team about the threats
and phone calls, but instead of strengthening her protection, the
government has scaled down her security cover. The SIT convenor and
Additional DIG of Police has denied knowledge of the letters,
according to the news-report. Meanwhile convict Maya Kodnani,
condemned to life imprisonment as principal conspirator in a massacre,
has been out on bail since mid-2014, and convict Babu Bajrangi,
sentenced to imprisonment till death is now about to enjoy three
months bail for medical treatment.

The Indian criminal justice system is being politically degraded with


every passing day. With regard to the violence in Gujarat in 2002,
there have been instances of several encounter-accused policemen being
re-instated and cases against them being quietly dropped. Meanwhile in
Maharashtra, there is no sign that the murderers of Narendra Dabholkar
and Gobind Pansare will ever be caught. In Bihar, the acquittals of
those accused of massacring Dalits in Shankarbigha and Bathani-tola
show that the justice system is incapable or unwilling to punish those

who commit mass crimes. Now we have an upright judge being threatened,
whilst murder convicts guilty of heinous crimes are out on bail, and
suspended policemen obtain re-instatement.

An onslaught on justice is taking place in broad daylight. It is now


clear that the Modi-led government finds Indias criminal justice
system and independent judiciary to be an obstacle blocking its
long-term plans. The incidence of prejudice in the courts is nothing
new - the 1984 pogrom inaugurated a new era in the erosion of Indian
justice. The NDA government has given impetus to this process. The
ideological hooligans of the so-called Sangh parivar are convinced
they are above the law. Corruption does not merely have monetary
implications. The erosion of judicial independence taking place before
our eyes is also corruption. Building trustworthy public institutions
is a prolonged process that takes decades. But they can be destroyed
very rapidly, especially when state power is used (covertly or
openly), to intimidate judges like Ms Jyotsna Yagnik.

Criminals these days feel free to physically intimidate the judiciary,


and the police appear to be treating it as a minor matter. Threatening
a judge exemplifies a fascist mentality. Politicised justice breeds
hatred and despair among its victims. Those who manipulate justice, on
the other hand, are announcing their profound contempt for the very
value of justice. They are sending all of us a sinister message
justice is whatever we say it is. Let us remind ourselves, therefore,
that if justice becomes a device for strengthening one political group
at the expense of others, for eliminating enemies and assisting
allies, law will have cast off even the mask of neutrality. If
judicial decisions become predictable, this can only mean that the

judiciary has been compromised and hooliganism has entered the working
of the state at the highest levels. Only an alert public can defeat
this kind of politics.

By undermining the citizens faith in a fearless judiciary, the


elimination of law will threaten the very foundations of the
democratic state. All elected representatives should remember that the
Constitution is the fundamental statute of the Indian Union, which
protects us from violent and tyrannical behaviour by criminals and/or
persons in power. If they keep silent in the face of the ongoing
sabotage of justice, our MPs and MLAs shall be betraying their oath
of office. We ask all judicial, police & IAS officials to remember
their oath of loyalty to the Indian Constitution.

In light of the above, we demand that the Gujarat government take


immediate steps to ensure Ms Jyotsana Yagniks safety, and investigate
the threats she has received. If any harm comes to this judge, the
Gujarat government and its patron at the Centre will be held
responsible by public opinion.

We call upon all democratic civil society organizations and concerned


individuals to launch a campaign to strengthen the criminal justice
system and the autonomy of the judiciary. Instances of the perversion
of justice by any party, official or civil, should be highlighted and
resisted. Hereby , we appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India &
NHRC to protect the above judge from ruling junta.

Yours sincerely ,

Nagaraja Mysore Raghupathi ,

Editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice

Rethinking Rule Of Law In The Times Of Rape Bid On A Judge


By Samar

An attempt to rape a judge, that too in Judges Compound in Aligarh


which remains under twenty four hour vigil of the Provincial Armed
Constabulary speaks volumes about the status of law and order in Uttar
Pradesh, the most populous state of India. Who will be safe on the
streets when even a judge is not spared by the rapists? No one, in
fact is, as evidenced by the recent spate of incidents of sexual
violence against women from marginalised and dispossessed backgrounds.
The gruesome gang rape and murder of two minors in Badaun, the most
ghastly of them, has caused a national outrage just a few days before
this incident. The brazen attack on the mother of a rape survivor in
order to force her to withdraw the complaint against the accused,
currently in jail, in nearby Etah was another glaring example of total
collapse of rule of law in Uttar Pradesh.
Sadly, the state has never been known for maintaining even law and
order, forget enforcing rule of law. It has rather had the dubious
distinction of being the proverbial Bad Lands, the countryside run by
might and not by rulebooks. With both political and bureaucratic
leadership oscillating between the denial to dodging mode, the recent

cases of sexual assaults have merely reinforced the image. Think of a


Chief Minister saying that rapes were common and a Google search would
return many Badaun like incidents. Think of his father, a former
chief minister and current parliamentarian, terming rape as minor
mistake. The Director General of Police of the state, however, took
the crown by justifying the incidents of rape as normal in a state
of the size and population of Uttar Pradesh.
There were others, largely in the secular liberal intelligentsia of
the country, who saw a political conspiracy hatched by the Hindu right
behind defaming the state. They came up, rightly, with the data from
the National Crime Records Bureau that shows Madhya Pradesh as the
rape capital of India and raised questions over the undue scrutiny of
Uttar Pradesh. The intelligentsia, unfortunately, seems to have got it
wrong once again, first time being its silence on the cases where
victims came from dispossessed and marginalised communities. The lack
of outrage over sexual violence against women from Dalit, tribal,
minorities and other such communities until the cases are really gory,
as Badaun was, has led to a section of people losing faith in them, it
would do better not to lose all.
The question, however, is if the failure of a state in providing
security to its women can be used as an excuse to defend the total
collapse of rule of law in another? Should not a single case of rape
be horrifying enough for the state to wake up and fix the system? Can
a state really take refuge in competitive statistics and shirk from
its responsibility of maintaining law and order, at least? This is
exactly where that the government of Uttar Pradesh has failed and
failed absolutely. Thats not bizarre if one sees the number of
criminals in it right from its ranks and files to the ministry. After
all, the state has a dubious distinction of seeking the withdrawal of

rape charges against a minister in public interest.


It is in this context that the rape attempt on a sitting judge must be
seen as a wakeup call for both the citizenry and the state. No people
can live in perpetual fear of violence against women and state's
inaction will merely increase both vigilantism and control of the
mobility of women in the name of safety, a dangerous thing for a
democracy. Parrying away the questions over the state of governance in
Uttar Pradesh is not going to serve any purpose, only bringing the
criminals to justice will. The state government must ensure speedy and
impartial justice to the victims and their families to restore their
faith in the system.

Alleging Sexual Harassment By High Court Judge, a Junior Judge Quits

NEW DELHI: A woman additional judge in Gwalior has resigned alleging


sexual harassment by a judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The
judge asked her to "dance to an item song" and influenced her transfer
to a remote location, she has alleged in a complaint to the President,
the Chief Justice of India and the Union Law Minister.

Chief Justice of India RM Lodha told NDTV on Monday morning, "I


haven't received the complaint officially... once I get it I will go
through the complaint. Normally we ask for a report on the complaint
from the Chief Justice of the High Court. In this case, I will seek a
report from the Chief Justice of Madhya Pradesh High Court and take

action accordingly. I will do my best for the institution."

The additional judge resigned on July 15 and wrote to the CJI and
others on August 1, Friday evening. "If this is how a mother, sister
and wife can be treated, who is herself no less than a judicial
officer duty-bound to protect society and law, what constitutional
goals are we serving?" said the woman, who ironically headed a Vishaka
committee against sexual harassment.

She has alleged that the High Court judge constantly pestered her and
once sent her a message through an official to "perform dance on an
item song" at a function at his home. She said she excused herself
saying it was her daughter's birthday.

She also alleged that when she spurned the judge's "various advances
and malicious aspirations", he targeted her professionally. "The
administrative judge, along with district judge and district judge
(inspection), possibly made a false, frivolous, baseless and malicious
reporting to the chief justice of MP and got me transferred on July 8,
in the mid-academic session of my daughters to a remote place Sidhi by
overruling the transfer policy of MP HC," she has complained.

She said her appeal for an eight-month extension to allow her


daughter's academic year to finish was rejected and has alleged that
the judge threatened to "spoil my career completely," when she pleaded
against the transfer.

"I was left with no option but to resign, so, I resigned on July 15 in
compelling, humiliating and disgraceful circumstances to save my

dignity, womanhood, self-esteem and career of my daughter," she has


written.

PIL Stop Robberies @ RBI by bank staff

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF

NAGARAJA . M.R

editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice


# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State
.
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Governor , Reserve Bank of India (RBI) & Others

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR
ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the
Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :


1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low
calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among
themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be
taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence
of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by
some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.

2. Eventhough , I have repeatedly appealed to RBI authorities since years seeking justice
regarding illegalities , irregularities in recruitment , currency handling , currency theft , etc @
RBI , they didnt provide justice at all.

3. For a common man it is a herculean task to get Rs.5000 loan from a bank , but rich &
connected get lakhs , crores of rupees loan quite easily from banks , how ?

4. When a common man , farmer defaults to pay loan of few thousands of rupees bank
immediately dispatches loan recovery agents / Rowdies , seizes his property & auctions and
recover their dues to last penny. Farmers are committing suicide unable to pay loans to escape
from ignominy .

5. Huge companies get crores of rupees loan from banks eventhough basically the project report
itself is at fault , not viable. Siphons off company resources by insider trading to their sister
concerns although bank representatives are very much their on the board of companies.

6 . Such companies default on loan dues to bank , but no recovery agents / rowdies are sent by
banks. Finally the company becomes bust.

7. Bank looses money , the company is declared as NON PERFORMING ASSET and government +
bank waives off interest or else loan itself.

8. End looser the public whose money went down the drain , profiteers company promoters ,
executives and bank manager. No recovery from their personal , family properties why ?

2. Question(s) of Law:

Is it right for banks , government to let out fraudsters without criminal prosecution ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of master minds of financial frauds.

4. Averment:

Covering up Financial Frauds. Please read details at :

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rbi---robberer-s-bureau-of-india ,

https://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/2015/07/19/rbi-robberers-bureau-of-india/ ,

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of
Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to
perform their duties & to answer the questions.

The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts
through e-mail , DARPG website & through regular mail requesting them to consider those as
PILs. But none ofthem were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See
How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of
citizens , commonmen & see howcareless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes
worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are
admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the
present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ
of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants , RBI authorities in the
following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in
the circumstances of the case.

c. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s RBI & M/s BRBNMPL , who denied job opportunities to
me under the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Kindly read full details at following web page :

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rbi---robberer-s-bureau-of-india ,

https://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/2015/07/19/rbi-robberers-bureau-of-india/ ,

Dated : 23rd July 2015 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India.PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

PIL Late Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF

NAGARAJA . M.R

editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice


# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,

Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State


.
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR
ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the
Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :


1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low
calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among
themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be
taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence
of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by
some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.

2. Eventhough , I have repeatedly appealed years ago to union home ministry & supreme court
of india , to permit me to appear before Honourable Jain commission of Enquiry probing late PM
Rajiv Gandhi assassination case as well as before honourable Supreme Court of India as an
amicus curie to shed light on case , parallel investigation needed , I was not permitted.

3. Now , the Investigating Officer ( IO ) who probed the case himself is crying foul.

4. This amounts to cover-up of crimes & shielding of master minds of Rajiv assassination case by
supreme court of india.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Who master minded the assassination of Late Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi assassination. When
there is no justice to the family of former prime minister , what is the fate of commoners ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of master minds of assassination.

4. Averment:

Covering up Late PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination conspiracy & BOFORS SCAM

The CBI & GOI is more interested in favoring accused persons , Quattrochi & closing BOFORS
Case than punishing the guilty.
The GOI & investigating authorities have failed to punish the real master minds behind the Late
Prime minister Shri . Rajiv Gandhi assassination case .

When a responsible Indian citizen volunteered to appear before the supreme court of india as an
amicus curie , to give certain information before the court relating to this assassination , he was
not at all permitted. Instead he was threatened , attempts made to murder him , his news paper
was closed , his jobs were illegally snatched away , police & investigating agencies repeatedly
grilled him , THE PURPOSE IS TO SILENCE THAT PERSON . The Police failed to act upon his
complaints. The Supreme Court of India Failed to admit his PIL Petitions. ALL TO COVER UP THE
POWERS THAT BE .
who are covering-up late p.m. rajiv gandhi assassination case? who are those conspirators? who
are trying to silence me?
My sufferings began hand in hand with my crusade. I have raised various issues of social concern
from time to time at the appropriate levels, one of those is LATE P.M. RAJIV GANDHI
ASASSINATION CASE. where-in only the tools of the conspirators were punished where as the
conspirators are roaming free. i have raised this topic of inequity , travesty of justice and sought
a fair, proper enquiry& trial , at various forums. but to no avail.
the conspirators were disturbed by this and tried to silence me by threatening me, physically
assaulting me and even made attempts to murder me. they prevented me from appearing before
the JAIN COMMISSION OF ENQUIRY. they even manipulated the recruitment systems to deny me
the appointments in R.B.I.CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE, P.E.S. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MANDYA, N.I.E MYSORE , District Court Mysore & Illegally snatched away my job in RPG Cables
Ltd , Mysore . they even tried to silence me by forcibly closing down my newspaper publications
THE TESTUDO & VOICE OF CRUSADER.
my appeals for justice resulted only in police enquiries. the central intelligence bureau(I.B.) state
intelligence & state police personnel enquired me exhaustively number of times, but they never
did enquire the powers that be. any way these people dont have practical powers to enquire
such people. the highest constitutional functionaries who can order a proper enquiry, trial are
keeping mum inspite of repeated appeals. probably they are acting under the directions of
conspirators. thereby they are not only covering up the crime, they are actively sponsoring
terrorism , but are also violating my fundamental/human rights & obstructing me from
performing my fundamental duties as a citizen of india.

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of
Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to
perform their duties & to answer the questions.

The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts
through e-mail , DARPG website & through regular mail requesting them to consider those as
PILs. But none ofthem were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See
How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of

citizens , commonmen & see howcareless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes
worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are
admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the
present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ
of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases
to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in
the circumstances of the case.

c. To legally prosecute the public servants who are responsible for not giving press accreditation
to my web news papers , myself as a journalist and responsible for closure of my news papers.

d. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s RPG Cables Ltd , who denied job opportunities to me
under the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

e. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s PES College of Engineering , who denied job
opportunities to me under the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi
assassination case.

f. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s National Institute of Engineering , who denied job
opportunities to me under the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi
assassination case.

g. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s Reserve Bank Note Nudran Pvt Ltd , who denied job
opportunities to me under the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi
assassination case.

h. To legally prosecute authorities of Mysore District Courts & Bangalore District Courts , who
denied job opportunities to me under the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi
assassination case.

i. To legally prosecute persons responsible for attempts on my life.

j. to legally prosecute judges , police & CBI officials responsible for cover-up of late PM Rajiv
Gandhi assassination case.

K . To provide protection to life , liberty , livelihood , jobs of me , my family members &


dependants.

l. To reopen , reinvestigate assassination case of Late PM Rajiv Gandhi.

m. To legally prosecute authorities of supreme court of india for not answering show cause notice
issued to them and order them to answer the show cause notice as well as RTI questions given to
them by the petitioner.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Kindly read full details at following web page :

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/who-rae-covering---up ,

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/judges-cover-up-rajiv-assassination ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---pm-rajiv-assassination-cover-up

Dated : 20TH June 2015 ..FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India.PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

PIL - Telecables Scam

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF

NAGARAJA . M.R

editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice


# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State
.
....Petitioner

Versus

Cabinet Secretary ( Telecommunications) Government of India & Others

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR
ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the
Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :


1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low
calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among
themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be
taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence
of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by
some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.

2. Eventhough , certain PIJF companies were previously found to be involved in illegal practices ,
CPIO of DOT / BSNL is hiding information . Thereby , he is trying to shield criminals.

3. By this action CPIO of DOT / BSNL is aiding criminals.

2. Question(s) of Law:
DOT / BSNL has paid crores of rupees to PIJF Telecable manufacturers towards purchase of
cables. The money is from public exchequer , peoples money . That public money is swindled by
cable manufacturers with tacit support of DOT / BSNL officials. Why no prosecution of DOT / BSNL
officials & cable manufacturers ? are they above law ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Accountability for public money worth crores of rupees.

4. Averment:

Private companies in their greed for money are violating norms in league with public officials.
They have caused loss to the public exchequer.

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of
Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to
perform their duties & to answer the questions.

The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts
through e-mail , DARPG website & through regular mail requesting them to consider those as
PILs. But none ofthem were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See
How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of
citizens , commonmen & see howcareless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes
worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are
admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the
present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ
of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases
to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
(ii) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in
the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Kindly read full details at following web page :

CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED

http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,

http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218 ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---telecable-scam

Dated : 13th June 2015.. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India.. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

PIL - Killer Noodles , Medicines of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF

NAGARAJA . M.R

editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice


# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State
.
....Petitioner

Versus

Chief Secretary Government of Karnataka & Principal Secretaries , Food & Health , Government
of India
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR
ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the

Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :


1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low
calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among
themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be
taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence
of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by
some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.

2. Eventhough certain food products are banned & certain medicines are banned in developed
nations , still they are permitted to be manufactured & sold in india.

3. Eventhough certain food products & medicines are manufactured within stipulated limits of
ingredients in developed nations , the multinational companies cross those limits in india.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are the lives of millions of Indians cheaper , dispensable ? Are the lives of Indians cheaper than
the lives of white skinned people in developed nations.

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , protection of indians lives & prosecution of guilty public servants
who permitted manufacturers / sellers of killer noodles , killer colas & killer medicines.

4. Averment:
Multinational companies , private companies in their greed for money are violating norms by
established international bodies and making money by slowly killing people , by their fake food
products & fake medicines. Our own corrupt central government & state government public

servants are giving licenses , clearances to those companies to carry on their illegal businesses.
Who will bear the cost of loss of lives , damages to health of gullible public , hapless Indians ?

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of
Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to
perform their duties & to answer the questions.

The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts
through e-mail , DARPG website & through regular mail requesting them to consider those as
PILs. But none of
them were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See How duty
conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens ,
commonmen & see how
careless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the
present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High
Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ
of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases
to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
(ii) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in
the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Kindly read full details at following web page :

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/pil---threat-to-judge ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---killer-noodles-colas-medicines ,

Dated : 11th June 2015. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

..DECLARATION

Name : ...........................NAGARAJA.M.R.

Address : ...................LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP


WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE - 570017 INDIA

Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S - e Voice For Justice

Periodicity : WEEKLY

Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB

Donations : NOT ACCEPTED. Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either
for ourselves or on behalf of other organizations / individuals .

Monetary gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites
or web news paper or otherwise.

Owner/editor/printer/publisher : NAGARAJA.M.R.

Nationality : INDIAN

Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e clarion of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice
for Justice is donated to JSS Medical College , Mysore ( Donation No. 167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) ,
In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my body must
be handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of medical students.

Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e clarion of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for
Justice are donated to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural
Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my eyes must be handed over to Mysore Eye Bank ,
Mysore WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate eye transplantation to the needy.

Home page :

http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/sosevoiceforjustice/ ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper / , http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice /
,http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/ , http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,

http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com , http://paper.li/f-1368369249

Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,

UID Aadhaar No : 5703 5339 3479

Cell : 91 9341820313

I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my
knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of
investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must
be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the
complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty
culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type
of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything
untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run
accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police ,
revenue officials , District Magistrate & Chief Justice of India together with above mentioned
accused public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges ,
police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be
effective.

If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights ,
denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward like hit & run cases , murder
attempts , unnatural deaths , etc happens to me or to my dependents or to my family members In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be
responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as
compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus
,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the
money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of
guilty police officials , guilty Judges , guilty public servants & guilty Constitutional fuctionaries.

27th June 2015 Yours sincerely ,

Mysuru , India .Nagaraja M R

PIL - Accountability of Judges

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF

NAGARAJA . M.R editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice

# LIG 2 , No 761 , HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,

Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State

.....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR
ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF

MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,

Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion

Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low
calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among
themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air &
water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the
independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been
proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples representatives , police , public servants
& Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchills men
Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.

2. Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied citing
unavailability. If at all information is not truly available , why didnt the CPIO TRANSFER rti
application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law , Justice , Respective High Courts ,
etc.

3. Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each employee including
judges. If not on what basis they give promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person
who posess SR can give infor mation about guilty judges. Why CPIO not asking that person to
share infor mation ?

4. If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind bars.


Police spend thousands of rupees for investigation to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend
hours to hear that case & prepare judgements running into tens of pages sometimes even over &
above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police & judge themselves committ grave
crimes detrimental to national security , integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only coverup , WHY ? Are Judges & Police above Law ? Is Judges MAFIA at play ?

5. The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby , CPIO is also
committing a crime. With respect to previous RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First Appellate
Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by covering up judges & their crimes. Billions of
indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day , we lower middle class people toiling
hard to earn a few hundreds of rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to them / shame to
JUDGEs that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money , from taxes
paid by us still not do their constitutional duties properly.

2. Question(s) of Law:

Are Judges above Law & can go scot free ?

3. Grounds:

Requests for equitable justice , free expression & protection to life & liberty.

4. Averment:

GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED IN THE BELOW
MENTIONED WEB SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.

We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament & state legislative
assemblies. our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE
ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie
answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS
ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES
WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL
RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC
INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND
CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD &
CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN
LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC.
READ DETAILS AT :

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,

Atrocities on Women by JUDGES

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges

A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind ,

Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,

SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,

JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,

RTI & Land Golmaal

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,

Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India , New
Delhi to answer the following questions in public interest , for safeguarding national security ,
National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals within the judiciary &
police. Judges are not superior human beings , some of them have even became judges through
devious means other than merit , integrity. Judges are public servants drawing salary & perks
from public exchequer and accountable to public as any other common man is.

We salute our freedom fighters , military personnel & martyrs for all the sacrifices made by them.
Let us build a strong , Secular , Democratic India by getting rid off few corrupt elements , anti
nationals , traitors among public servants , among judiciary & among police who are greater
threat to Indias unity & integrity than Pakistani terrorists or chinese military.

Information input forms part of process of ones expression. Ones expression in any forms
written , oral , etc becomes information input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his
reply. Information & Expression are inseparable parts & form lifeline of a democracy. That is the
reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian
citizen. When a persons right to expression is violated , his other rights to equality , justice , etc
also are violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.

In a democracy , people have a right to know how the public servants are functioning. However
till date public servants are hiding behind the veil of Officials Secrets Act (which is of british
vintage created by british to suppress native indians). By this cover-up public servants are hiding
their own corruption , crimes , mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act is not being followed
intoto by public servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling affirming that CJI is under
RTI purview & bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.

Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India , DG & IGP of
GOK and others were not honored. The information I sought were answers to the following
questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past ,
present continuing injustices meted out to millions of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal work
practices of Indian judges , police & public servants . The information we sought would expose
the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals in public service. The information we are seeking are no
defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals ,
traitors in the public service & strengthens our national security , national unity & integrity.

Please read RTI First Appeal to following public authorities :

1. RTI Appellate Authority , O/O Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi.

2. RTI Appellate Authority , o/o RBI Governor , RBI HQ , Mumbai

3. RTI Appellate Authority , o/o Chief Minister , Government of Karnataka , Vidhana Soudha ,
Bangalore.

4. RTI Appellate Authority , BSNL Corporate office , New Delhi.

Hereby , i do request the honourable supreme court of india , for a Supreme Court monitored CBI
Enquiry into this whole issue as karnataka police are helpless , they don't have legal powers to
prosecute high & mighty , constitutional functionaries. They have not even enquired the guilty
VVIPs even once however Under pressure from higher-ups they repeatedly called me the
complainant to police station took statements from me all for closing the files.

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of
Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to
perform their duties & to answer the questions.

The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts
through e-mail , DARPG website & through regular mail requesting them to consider those as
PILs. But none of them were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See
How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of
citizens , commonmen & see how careless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes
worth crores of rupees.

That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any
High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:

In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ
of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases
to perform their duties & to answer the questions.

(ii) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed

necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

Read : https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---writ-of-mandamus-1 ,

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Date : 22nd April 2015.Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.

Place : Mysuru IndiaPetitioner in person

Enclosed :

RTI First Appeal to following public authorities :

1. RTI Appellate Authority , O/O Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi.

2. RTI Appellate Authority , o/o RBI Governor , RBI HQ , Mumbai

3. RTI Appellate Authority , o/o Chief Minister , Government of Karnataka , Vidhana Soudha ,
Bangalore.

4. RTI Appellate Authority , BSNL Corporate office , New Delhi.

RTI Appeals Not Answered - Crimes Cover-up

To ,

RTI Appellate Authority ,

O/O Chief Justice of India ,

Supreme Court of India ,

New Delhi.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF
KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,


EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low
calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among

themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air &
water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the
independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been
proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples representatives , police , public servants
& Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchills men
Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied citing
unavailability. If at all information is not truly available , why didnt the CPIO TRANSFER rti
application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law , Justice , Respective High Courts ,
etc.
Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each employee including
judges. If not on what basis they give promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person
who posess SR can give infor mation about guilty judges. Why CPIO not asking that person to
share infor mation ?
If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind bars. Police
spend thousands of rupees for investigation to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend
hours to hear that case & prepare judgements running into tens of pages sometimes even over &
above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police & judge themselves committ grave
crimes detrimental to national security , integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only coverup , WHY ? Are Judges & Police above Law ? Is Judges MAFIA at play ?
The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby , CPIO is also
committing a crime. With respect to previous RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First Appellate
Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by covering up judges & their crimes.
Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day , we lower middle class
people toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to
them / shame to JUDGEs that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from our
money , from taxes paid by us still not do their constitutional duties properly.
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED IN THE
BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament & state legislative
assemblies. our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE
ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie
answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS
ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES
WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL
RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC
INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND
CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD &
CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN
LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC.
READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind ,

Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,

SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,

JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,

RTI & Land Golmaal

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,

Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India ,
New Delhi to answer the following questions in public interest , for safeguarding national
security , National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals within the
judiciary & police. Judges are not superior human beings , some of them have even became
judges through devious means other than merit , integrity. Judges are public servants drawing
salary & perks from public exchequer and accountable to public as any other common man is.

Please give following information :

Main A :

1. Please give me The address of salary disbursing officer in supreme court of india. Salary
disbursing officer will be maintaining service records of all employees of supreme court of india
including judges. These records are used for disciplinary action , promotion , transfer of judges. If
not within SCI , please give the address of the outside public official who maintains service
records of supreme court judges and kindly compile information from him and give it to me
orelse transfer my RTI application to him.

2. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired supreme court judges with allegations
against them and the action taken thereof. Reasons for taking action / criminal prosecution or
not taking action.

3. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired high court judges with allegations
against them and the action taken thereof. Reasons for taking action / criminal prosecution or
not taking action.

4. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired district & taluk court judges with
allegations against them and the action taken thereof. Reasons for taking action / criminal
prosecution or not taking action.

5. Some of the high courts are demanding higher RTI application fees than stipulated by law.
Eventhough requisite fees has been paid before transfer of RTI application to high courts.
Please give me the details of action taken by supreme court of india against erring high courts.

6. Give me the List of petitions with date made by Shri . Nagaraja Mysore Raghupathi alias
Nagaraja M R TO SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH POST , THROUGH E-MAIL & THROUGH

website of DPG / DARPG. Action taken or not taken with reasons thereof with respect to each
petition.

7. Please give me list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme court of india , to safe
guard the HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS of Nagaraja M R editor of SOS e Clarion of
Dalit & SOS e Voice for justice. He repeatedly appealed to SCI highlighting violations of his
human rights & fundamental rights. After appealing to SCI only editor Nagaraja M R suffered
more injustices , attempts on his life , etc , may be JUDGEs MAFIA is in deal with outside
MAFIA. Police are helpless & practically dont have power to question supreme court judges &
other VVIPs. Did SCI constitute SCI monitored enquiry committee with full legal authority to look
into the issue.

8. Judges preach too much & practice less. They give lectures , judgements running into
hundreds of pages eliciting legality, moral virtues , humanity , etc. But cover up information
leading to crimes / accountability of judges. The judges committee like a mafia deals it within
without subjecting the accussed judge to public scrutiny & public trial. It is almost similar to a
whore / bitch giving a lecture on virginity to women. To refresh your memory , Please go
through following websites to know about facts , actual cases of crimes by judges. Please give
us information regarding action taken or not taken with reasons there of with respect to each
case mentioned in the following websites:

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

9. Please give me the list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme court of india to
safeguard the human rights of prisoners , witnesses & evidences .

10. Please give me the list of actions , follow up actions taken by high courts of india to
safeguard the human rights of prisoners , witnesses & evidences .

11. Please give me the list of supreme court judges , high court judges & district / taluk judges
(both serving & retired) who received favourable allotment of sites , etc which is nothing but a
form of kick back for favours shown by judge. Please give me the list of action taken or not
taken by supreme court of india with reasons thereof in each case.

12. Please give me the list of action taken against by supreme court of india against CPIO &
PIO of supreme court of india , who repeatedly failed to give me information . thereby , CPIO &
PIO are covering up crimes of guilty judges , violating RTI Act & violating human rights /
fundamental rights of editor Nagaraja M R together with public.

Main B :

1 . How many judges are booked for graft , sexual crimes , crimes against women ,
irregularities , amassing disproportionate wealth , failure of duty , getting illegal allotment of
sites & other crimes since independence till date , yearwise ?

2. what action taken casewise ?

3. are the action taken similar to commoners , common people committing same type of crimes ?

4. did all the cases handled by tainted judges subjected to review , retrial by other honest judges
?

5. how many advocates were prosecuted by court for influencing witnesses / evidences , for
tutored / concocted evidences , etc since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not
why ?

6. how many police officials / law enforcing officials were prosecuted by court for influencing ,
intimidating witnesses through threats , 3rddegree torture , for concocted evidences , etc since
independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?

7. how many police / law enforcement officials were prosecuted for lock-up deaths , fake
encounters , illegal detention , 3rd degree torture , etc since independence till date , yearwise ?
what action ? if not why ?

8. in how many cases police / law enforcement officials were made to pay compensation to
innocent victims who were wrongly charged , detained & tortured , murdered by police , since
independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?

9. in some cases , on appeal judgements of higher court turns down the judgement of lower
court. In how many such cases , lower court judge is made to pay compensation to victims of
their wrong judgement , since independence till date yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?

10. how many judges have defaulted in filing their annual financial returns giving out their
wealth , income details , yearwise since independence till date ? what action ? if not why ?

11. how you are verifying the annual financial returns of judges ?

12. since independence , how many convicts have been sentenced to death by hanging ,
yearwise ?

13. how many death sentances were carried out & how many are pending ?

14. how many police officials were made to pay compensation & prosecuted for defamation ,
when innocents falsely charged by police were acquitted , dropped from charges by courts ? if
not why ?

15. how many lower court judges were made to pay compensation & prosecuted for defamation ,
when innocents wrongly convicted by lower court , but on appeal higher courts acquitting ,
dropping them of charges ? if not why ?

16. are judges getting paid from public exchequer , for their expenses on liquor / alcohol , body
massages , etc in their TA DA bill while on tour , official visits , official parties hosted by judges
?

17. how many appeals for justice concerning public welfare , violation of human & fundamental
rights , threat to lives / livelihood , etc were made to supreme court of india , by nagaraja
mysore raghupathi alias nagaraja M R alias myself since 1990 till date ? appeals were made
through ordinary post , registered post , e-mail & by web through DARPG , DPG. What ACTION
taken by supreme court of india with respect to each appeal ?

18. due to negligence / connivance of supreme court judges injustices were meted out to public
& public are still suffering injustices. Crimes which could have been prevented by SC happened
eventhough brought to early notice of supreme court. What action against erring SC Judges ? if
not why ?

19. I have repeatedly offered my services to supreme court of india , to apprehend criminals
within judiciary , police & public service. What action taken by supreme court of india ? if not
why ?

20. in my legal struggle for justice , due to negligence / connivance of SCI judges I have
suffered murder attempts on my life , job losses , my newspaper closed , not getting press
accreditation to my web news papers , threats by rowdies , police , etc. what action against
erring chief justice of india ? if not why ?

21. I repeatedly appealed to supreme court of india to permit me to appear as amicus curie
before supreme court of india & jain commission of enquiry regarding late PM Rajiv Gandhi
assassination case. I was not permitted why ?

22. who are the judges covering-up Rajiv Gandhi assassination case ? what action taken ? if not
why ?

23. Law is one & same for all , but law enforcement & law interpretation is not same for
common people , Judges & Police ? why ?

NOTE : PLEASE TAKE NOTE THAT YOUR CONTINUED NEGLIGENCE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ,
JUSTICE TO EDITOR NAGARAJA M R LEADS TO THE THREAT TO THE LIFE , LIVLIHOOD OF
HIMSELF & HIS WHOLE FAMILY. YOU ARE LIABLE TO PAY COMPENSATION. DONT TRANSFER
THIS CASE , APPLICATION TO POLICE THEY DONT HAVE POWER TO ENQUIRE JUDGES LET ALONE
TAKE ACTION. PLEASE ENTRUST THE CASE TO TRANSPARENTLY CONSTITUTED SUPREME COURT
MONITORED ENQUIRY COMMITTEE TO LOOK INTO THE WHOLE ISSUE.

I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my
knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of
investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must
be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the
complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty
culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type
of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything
untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run
accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police ,
revenue officials , District Magistrate & Chief Justice of India together with above mentioned
accused public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges ,
police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be
effective.

If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights ,
denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward like hit & run cases , murder
attempts , unnatural deaths , etc happens to me or to my dependents or to my family
members - In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police
officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO
crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal
nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards
, the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc
of guilty police officials , guilty Judges , guilty public servants & guilty Constitutional
functionaries.

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995-2015 .

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :

CPIO , o/o Chief Justice of India , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733465 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

To ,

Shri. L.K. Govil ,


GM (Coordination) & RTI Appellate Authority ,
BSNL Corporate office ,
Room No .27 , IR Hall , Eastern Court Complex ,
Jan Path Road , New Delhi 110001.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF
KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,


EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low
calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among
themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air &
water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the
independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been
proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples representatives , police , public servants
& Judges. Some of the below mentioned DOT officials fall among the category of churchills
men Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters. To my previous RTI requests & appeals they tried
covering up crores worth SCAM by transferring application from one to the other at the end
by denying information to me, Does not the DOT possess information with respect to tenders
given by it to suppliers. Is it not the duty of DOT QUALITY Circle to monitor the supplies from
suppliers ? Then who has got it ? why dont you transfer the RTI application to that authority or
ask for information from them ?
We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO
HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING
QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH
I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL
STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE
VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS
FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO
THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING
TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS.
M/s Karnataka Telecables Ltd , Mysore renamed as M/s RPG Telecom Ltd again renamed as M/s
RPG Cables Ltd once again renamed as M/s KEC International , Mysore used to manufacture
PIJF & OFC telecables and supplied it to department of telecommunications , government of
india , Indian Railways and GAIL , PGCIL of Ministry of Petroleum . DOT used to pay hundreds
of crores of rupees from public exchequer to buy these cables . There is also one more company
by name M/s Concepta Cables Ltd , Mysore belonging to the same industrial group supplying
PIJF & OFC telecables to DOT. As a public , as a citizen of india and as a tax payer I want to
know whether those crores of rupees from public exchequer are well spent.
1.
How many times the above said companies were blacklisted by DOT , Supreme Court of
India and other quasi judicial bodies , casewise ?
2.

What action taken by DOT & judicial bodies against the above companies , casewise ?

3.
How many cable kms of cable supplied by above companies , were rejected by DOT from
the field yearwise , since 1986 ?

4.
Did the above companies replace all the cables rejected by DOT & make good all the
losses , yearwise ?
5.

If not , why ?

6.

What action taken by DOT , casewise ?

7.
How many cable kms of cables supplied by above companies were accepted on deviation
by DOT yearwise ? on what basis ?
8.

Has the DOT authorised usage of recycled materials in the manufacture of cables ?

9.

If yes , on what basis ?

10. Did DOT authorize outsourcing of cable manufacturing process by above companies to
third parties , casewise ?
11. How many cable kms of telecom cables supplied by above companies have failed during
usage within the warranty period , yearwise ?
12. Did the above companies honour warranty contract in all such cases ?
13. If not why , casewise ?
14. What action by DOT , casewise ?
15. Who maintains records of DOT / BSNL tenders given out to Suppliers specifically with
respect to tenders given to M/s Karnataka Telecables Ltd , M/s RPG Telecom Ltd , M/s RPG Cables
Ltd , M/s Concepta Cables Ltd & M/s KEC International Ltd ?
16. How may rejections / adverse reports , deviations found in the supplies made by above
companies by DOT / BSNL Quality Circle ?
17. What action taken against BSNL / DOT officials who are trying to cover-up the scam inspite of
my repeated appeals & RTI requests ?
YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995-2015 .
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :

CPIO , BSNL HQ , New Delhi.

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733463 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.


PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

To ,

RTI Appellate Authority ,

O/O Chief Justice of India ,

Supreme Court of India ,

New Delhi.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF
KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,


EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,

HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low
calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among
themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air &
water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the
independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been
proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples representatives , police , public servants
& Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchills men
Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied citing
unavailability. If at all information is not truly available , why didnt the CPIO TRANSFER rti
application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law , Justice , Respective High Courts ,
etc.
Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each employee including
judges. If not on what basis they give promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person
who posess SR can give infor mation about guilty judges. Why CPIO not asking that person to
share infor mation ?
If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind bars. Police
spend thousands of rupees for investigation to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend
hours to hear that case & prepare judgements running into tens of pages sometimes even over &
above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police & judge themselves committ grave
crimes detrimental to national security , integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only coverup , WHY ? Are Judges & Police above Law ?
The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby , CPIO is also
committing a crime. With respect to previous RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First Appellate
Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by covering up judges & their crimes.
Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day , we lower middle class
people toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to
them / shame to JUDGEs that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from our
money , from taxes paid by us still not do their constitutional duties properly.
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED IN THE
BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to the honest few public servants in
public service including judiciary. However, the corrupt in public service dont deserve respect as
individuals as they are parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the chairs they occupy
but not the corrupt individuals.
All the following articles / issues , whole articles published in the weblinks mentioned below
forms part of this appeal. The term JUDGEmentioned throught includes all public servants
discharging judicial functions right from taluk magistrates , quasi-judicial officers to Chief Justice
of India.

Indian Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages & is for sale. It is a SHAME. The
persons who raise their voice seeking justice are silenced in many ways. The criminal nexus has
already attempted to silence me in many ways . If anything untoward happens to me or to my
family members , my dependents , Honourable Chief Justice of India together with jurisdictional
police officer will be responsible for it.

Hereby, we do once again offer our conditional services to the honourable supreme court of
India & other government authorities, in apprehending criminals including corrupt judges &
police. Herewith , we once again appeal to the honourable supreme court of India , to consider
this as a PIL Appeal in public interest.

The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for others to
emulate & follow. if a student makes a mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher.
if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same mistake. if a thief
steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if a police himself commits crime ,
many thieves go scot- free under his patronage. even if a police , public servant commits a
crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the aggrieved. just think , if a
judge himself that too of apex court of the land itself commits crime - violations of RTI Act ,
constitutional rights & human rights of public and obstructs the public from performing their
constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ? it gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty ,
those in power , criminals in public service to committ more crimes. that is exactly what is
happenning in india. the educated public must raise to the occassion & peacefully ,
democratically must oppose this criminalisation of judiciary , public service. then alone , we can
build a RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.

Kindly go through the following articles & provide justice by giving complete truthful information
to us , by publicly answering the following questionnaire in an unambiguous manner.

The constitution of India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to each citizens of India.
It is the duty of every citizen to protect & uphold the dignity , honour of our democratic
institutions , to
protect our national integrity , to respect & protect the rights of our fellow citizens. No
constitutional authority has the right to obstruct the discharge of these duties by citizens of
India. No legal privileges of constitutional functionaries is superior over the FUNDAMENTAL
DUTIES OF CITIZEN'S OF INDIA.

We need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India has guaranteed those rights as
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of India & by birth itself everyone of us has secured HUMAN

RIGHTS as individuals. To express ourselves , we need information , data feed back , to ascertain
whether we are getting equal opportunity , whether we are getting equitable justice , etc , we
need information . so ,
basically Right To Information is an inalienable part of our fundamental rights & human rights.
What RTI Act has done is fixed time limit , responsibilities of public servants up to certain
extent. However the citizen's fundamental right & human right to seek information extends far
beyond the scope of RTI Act.

Hereby , we seek complete truthful information from supreme court of India , with respect to my
RTI application appeal. HEREBY , WE ARE ONLY SEEKING ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS
IN PUBLIC INTEREST & JUSTICE. Hereby , we request you to register this appeal as a PIL petition
& to ascertain the stand of apex court on various matters raised in my RTI Application , in public
interest & equitable justice.

We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament & state legislative
assemblies. our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE
ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie
answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS
ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES
WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL
RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC
INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND
CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD &
CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN
LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC.
READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind ,

Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,

SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,

Hereby , we do request PIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , PIO , O/O H.E.Honorable
President of India , PIO O/O Honorable Speaker of Lok Sabha , PIO O/O Dy Chairman of Rajya
Sabha , PIOs of Karnataka Raj Bhawan , Karnataka CMO , Union Home Ministry GOI and DG & IG
of Police of Government of Karnataka to answer the following questions in public interest , for
safeguarding national security , National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals ,
criminals within the judiciary & police.

Main A :
1.
What action you have taken against judges involved in atrocities against women ,
casewise ? if not, why ?
2.
What action you have taken against judges involved in land scams , casewise ? if not ,
why ?
3.
I have shown with actual cases how manipulation / fixing takes place , from complaint
filing to judicial pronouncement stage. Are the judges & police , above law ?
4.
I have numerous PILs , RTI appeals before supreme court of india. But they were not
registered , not honoured , why ?
5.
To my legal notice / show cause notice / damage payment notice to supreme court of india
& chief justice of india , till date I have not received the reply , why ?
6.

Is it not the duty of supreme court of india to protect the life & liberty of all Indian citizens ?

7.
Is it not the failure of supreme court of india, when it failed to protect the life of a
complainant ?
8.
By negligence of their duties , are not supreme court judges aiding & abetting criminals ,
anti nationals & terrorists ?
9.
While crores of Indians are barely surviving on a single piece meal a day , people dying
due to starvation , supreme court judges are getting salary & perks amounting to lakhs of

rupees from the same suffering public / public exchequer. Are not those duty shirking judges
ashamed ?
10. What action you have taken against judges involved in hushing up late prime minister rajiv
Gandhi assassination case ?
11. Why the supreme court of india didnt allow me to appear before it in the said case of late
PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case ?
12. Why the supreme court of india didnt protect my life , my job oppurtunities , my newspaper
from the wrath of criminal nexus ?
13. When even cable TV journalists , web journalists are getting PRESS / MEDIA accreditation ,
my web news papers , myself are not getting PRESS accreditation since 9 years , why ?
14. Are the supreme court judges hand in gloves with the criminal nexus ?
Main B :
You have not taken appropriate action to my previous RTI requests , Numerous appeals for justice
& police complaints. You have not replied to show-cause notice also. Your inaction has helped the
criminals in manipulating & destroying evidences.
Your inaction / delay in performing your duties not only amounts to denial of information , but
amounts to violation of our fundamental & human rights , cover-up of crimes , aiding & abetting
criminals . The criminal nexus tried to silence me in many ways. Is not these acts of yours a
crime in itself ?
If your acts of crime cover-ups , information / evidence cover-ups , aiding & abetting criminals ,
silencing a crusader is just & legal. The same type of acts of crimes performed by other citizens
will also be legal ?
Main C :
At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to all constitutional institutions & to the
honest few in public service. Contempt of constitutional institutions , citizens of India is being
made by the corrupt persons in constitutional positions themselves. This is an appeal to the
honest few in public service , constitutional positions , to bring their corrupt colleagues to book.
1.
does the action of MPs , MLAs taking money / receiving favors from vested interests
, to formulate policy decisions , to raise questions in parliament / legislative bodies or to abstain
from voting legal ?
2.

why transparent , fair investigation is not done in such cases ?

3.
just remember , the vulgar acts of Mr.Bora Babu Singh in state legislature & how
some MLAs vulgarly behaved with Ms.Jayalalita in state legislature , years ago. Are these type
of vulgar actions by MPs & MLAs legal ? does not these constitute contempt of the house by MPs
& MLAs themselves ?
4.
all the peoples representatives from panchayath member to president of India
must read ABCD Of Democracy provide along with.since independence of India till date , MPs &
MLAs are forcing projects on people against the wishes of people , formulating policies against

the wishes of people. Are not such projects , government policies & Laws , undemocratic & illegal
?
5.
is the election commission of India verifying the authenticity of affidavits submitted
by electoral candidates ?
6.
how many candidates have been caught so far for giving false affidavits ? are all
the violators prosecuted?
7.
are the MPs , MLAs submitting their wealth details on affidavits yearly to vigilance
authorities ? defaulters , violators how many ?
8.

what legal action taken against violators , defaulters , for giving false affidavits ?

9.

who is checking the authenticity of those affidavits submitted by MPs , MLAs ?

10.
the agricultural incomes of some MPs , MLAs , their kih & kin raises even during the
time of severe drought , floods , fall in prices of agricultural products , their companies register
increase in turnover / profits even during recession , the trusts / NGOs set up by them receive
huge donations. Are all these income legal ?
Main D :
1.
we do once again offer our conditional services to the government of india , all
state governments & supreme court of india , in apprehending tax evaders , land grabbers ,
corrupt police , corrupt judges , corrupt public servants , labor law violators , etc. whom the the
government officials , vigilance authorities have failed to apprehend. Why the authorities , courts
, supreme court of India , are not ready to utilize our service ? are they afraid of being caught ?
2.
the public servants , courts theselves are delaying giving information / records to us
in many cases. So in the issues / cases raised by us , the clause of time bar doe not apply. Are
these delaying tactics of public servants , courts legal ?
3.
why no proper , timely action was not taken based on numerous police complaints
made by us ?
4.
why DG & IGP , Government of Karnataka , has not made any efforts to seek legal
sanction for prosecution of VVIPs ( mentioned in our complaint ) , from union & state home
ministries ?
5.
the criminal nexus is trying to silence me in many ways , but the supreme court of
India & national human rights commission has failed to undo the injustices , why ? is it because
it is not a high profile case ? is it because it is not hi-fi , does not get image ratings , TRPs ?
6.
the public servants are aiding underworld , naxalites & terrorists , by their delaying
tactics & denial of information , records. What action has been taken against such anti-national
elements in public service ?
7.
how many complaints are made by Nagaraj .M.R. , Human Rights Activist , Mysore
(editor of SOS e-clarion of dalit & SOS e-voice for justice) to Karnataka police , to national human
rights commission to supreme court of India till date ? what action taken with respect to each
complaint ?

8.
the delay in taking action by public servants with respect to following cases has
resulted in more crimes , destruction / manipulation of evidences , records and more injustices
to commonman. Why the authorities did not take timely action against criminals in following
cases ?
SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-
DEALS IN COURTS & POLICE STATIONS READ :
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html ,
ACCUSED Chief Justice of India
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of
,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of
CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF
INDIA http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF DG&IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,

http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/
, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/
, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218
MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
are you ready to catch tax thieves ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
reliance industry where is accountability ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
crimes at infosys campus
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214
crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/ ,
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
crimes of land mafia in India
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/ ,
http://landscam.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
currency thefts in RBI Press
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80
killer colas & killer medicines of India
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/ ,
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201
HONOR OF INDIAN PALIAMENT FOR SALE
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honor-of-indian-parliament-for-sale
Persecuted IROM SHARMILA of Puttaparthi AP pushpa kolasani on hunger strike in anantapur
district jail Andhra Pradesh
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/persecuted-irom-sharmila-of-puttaparthi-ap
9.
how many judges are caught by authorities for doing improper , immoral & illegal
acts , since independence till date ? what action taken in each case ?
10.
what action taken against copy cat judges caught red handed while copying in public
examination in Andhra Pradesh ?

11.
have you reviewed all the previous judicial decisions taken by such judges of
doubtful integrity & honesty ?
12.
is it not the duty of government & supreme court of India , to protect the
fundamental rights & human rights of all Indian citizens ?
13.
why the government & supreme court of India has failed to protect the fundamental
rights & human rights of me & those mentioned in my complaint ?
14.
wealth ?

how many former CJIs , supreme court & high court judges have disproportionate

15.
Your denial of information to my previous RTI requests amounts to suppression of
evidence , hiding crimes , what action against erring public servants ?
16.
why my previous RTI requests or part there of was not transferred to appropriate
authorities and information given to me in a consolidated form ?

Main E :
Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in lock-up / fake
encounters ?
Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3rd degree torture on prisoners ?
Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with criminals & backstabs our
motherland , its national security ?
Q4. Dont the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public welfare , law
& order ?
Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants , industrialists , etc in
the media . Then why not police taking any action with respect to them ?
Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional functionaries ,
public servants in the media. Instead of wasting money , killing time by prolonging formation of
parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why not subject those accussed public
servants to narco analysis , lie deector test , etc to ascertain truth & provide timely justice ?
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences , witnesses to take action
against the rich & mighty crooks. Where as if a rich person just gives a complaint against a poor
chap , he is arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences , witnesses. Why this double
standard ?
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or as per RTI ACT , the
public servants dont give full , truthfull information. Still , police / courts dont take action
against those public servants hiding crimes. Why ?
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an amicus curie before jain commission of enquiry or
supreme court of india probing late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?

Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper , by snatching away my
job oppurtunities in government service, by physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false
fix-ups in cases & by attempts to murder me. But no action against culprits , why ?
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police & intelligence personnel about this
case , but the culprits were not enquired even once , why ?
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not police
responsible for it ?
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of witnesses & all parties
involved , both during case & afterwards ?
Q14. How do you monitor & check corrupt police personnel & increase in their familys wealth
year after year ?
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon to IAS officer ,
police verification is mandatory. While appointing to sensitive defense establishments , research
institutes in addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies cross-check candidates
background. However is there no background checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs ,
, who are privy to national secrets ? why ?
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during presidential allegations that
close relative of one of the front running candidates have swindled public money by their bank ,
misused public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ?
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india , more than half
the population are poor , people are starving to death. Inspite these background , GOI funded &
aided terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of Bangladesh , GOI has
funded & aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these
terrorist outfits have murdered thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI
just & legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ? has GOI paid any
compensation to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ?
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups , GOI has funded & aided
couter terrorist groups , is it right & legal ?
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed , trained & funded salwa
judum to counter naxalites. Salwa judum cadres are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites. Is
this action of government just & legal ?
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where there are no
problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being slapped against innocents , even children. In
M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous charges
of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc. where as the prominent
political, film , sports personalities who have links with underworld , anti national elements &
attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf countries , else where. But these
hi-fi people are not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?

Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld & fully knowing well the criminal
objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous arms & ammunition in his home , which were intended
for terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he is charged
with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally applied to farmers who use illegal home
made guns to scare away animals , birds in their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of
mr.dutt by police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically mighty & rich ?
Q23. Law is one & same for all , the public servants, police interpretes , enforces it differentially
between rich & poor ? why this differentiation ?
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to international criminal syndicate
selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this
number is also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at consumer disputes
redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company stated that all its products come with IMEI
number only & stated that the product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO
COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not theirs as it doesnt have IMEI numbers. Further nokia stated
they dont have any business relationship with either tata indicom or its dealer. However the
tata indicom dealer stated that indeed his products are genuine , first hand products , but
doesnt have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer in collusion with tata company is selling
illegal nokia mobile hand sets & cheating the public. These mobiles are evading taxes , as well as
these are without IMEI numbers best buy for criminal elements who want to evade police
tracking. What police are doing
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to close a case ie to file B
report , when after certain time limit no leads are found in investigation ?
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully fail to investigate case
properly , so that either the case can be closed with B report or the prosecution fails to prove
the case in court ?
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a lower court , when
the prosecution fails ?
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order acquitting
mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious big time rich
criminals get spacious barracks with tv, news paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while
small time criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70 inmates without any
basic requirements ?
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG & IG of police , government of
Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint was released at press meet at patrakartara
bhavan Mysore on same day, even copies were given to police & intelligence personnel ?
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to certain constitutional
functionaries , so that they are not burdened with frivolous court cases & can concentrate on
their constitutional duties. But these privileges doesnt cover the individual actions of those
public servants like rape , murder , dowry harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but
still law enforcement / police department is bound to send request to home ministry seeking

permission & home ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed ample time to
destroy evidences. Is it right & legal ?
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what does it cover ?
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution of tainted
constitutional functionaries ?
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other peoples
representatives are facing criminal charges ?
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal charges , yearwise
since 1987 ? how many of them were eventually convicted ?
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have have contacts with
underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld dons in gulf
countries , else where ?
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other peoples representatives are wanted by police in various cases .
but shown in the police records as absconding but in reality are attending the proceedings of the
house as usual ?
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any public office
before naturalization ?
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a spouse of foreign
origin ?
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin & while they are on
foreign tour , from national security perspective ?
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister mr.subramanya swamy
alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhis family received money from foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that culprit party
comes to power all the cases involving its partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse
prosecution fails to prove its case & prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay riot case
involving shiv sainiks & others , when shiv sena BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the
cases against its partymen were withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just &
legal ?
Q48.what damages has been done to indias national security due to mole in the PMO, as alleged
by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?
Q49. What action by the government ?

Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign countries ?
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures , fix-ups , , who
suffer in jail for years & acquitted by courts upon finding them as not guilty ?
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges against guilty police officers
who are responsible for lock-up deaths , fake encounters & 3rd degree torture ?
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF personnel who were
responsible for gross human rights violations , 3rddegree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in
forest brigand veerappans territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission findings ? if not
why ?
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my fundamental duty hereby do offer my conditional services to
GOI & GOK to apprehend corrupt public servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ?
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes , mass fury , riots , etc.
they suffer more & even their family members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the
government provide insurance coverage to police & their family members on the lines of defense
forces ?
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable & his family ?
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police who daily work
beyond 8 hours of duty ?
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public interaction , human
rights ?
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of ministers ?
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ?
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING , LIVING SPACE
TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis , lie-detector test , etc
under the control of police department ?
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings & subtly insisting the
poor to tow the line of rich or else face the consequences , is it right & legal ? this happens
mostly in real estate matters.
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan during his various
kidnappings ?

Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during narco analysis
about public servants involvement ?
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media about misuse of
office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till date
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases accessible to public ? if
not why ?
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it just ended with their
resignation from services or his superior judge not allotting him any judicial work ?
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong doings ?
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted , guilty judges to
review , to undo past unjust judgements ?
Q78. how ? if not why ?
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges including the wealth in
the name of judges family members ?
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn affidavits to the
higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court , what action is
initiated against lower court judge for making unjust judgement & meating out injustice ?
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are made , why the
accussed judges are not subjected to tests like poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping , etc ,
in the interest of justice & truth ?
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible to be the members of
Karnataka state government judicial department house building co-operative society. Then
how come , many judges including supreme court judges are admitted as members of this
society & allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said
society at said societys judicial layout , yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members
like peons , clerks in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not the whole thing
grossly illegal ?
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central government or state
government or government agency is one of the parties. How many judges or their family
members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol
pumps , etc by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ?

Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3rd degree torture by police ,
is not the judge of the respective court which is handling that tortured persons case responsible
for it ?
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges & the police officers for
committing 3rd degree torture , on charges of attempt to murder & murder ? if not why ?
Q89. registrar , Mysore district & sessions court , has called for the candidatures to various
vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated
19/11/2003. Please furnish me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my merit
ranking for the post of peon.
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in
that court from the public vide notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish
me merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.
Q91. when a person doesnt get adequate food , medical care while under police custody or
judicial custody , is not the respective judge dealing that persons case responsible for it ? what
action ?
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food & medical care to prisoners ?
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody , for periods far
exceeding the legally stipulated sentence periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one
year , the judge finds him guilty of offence & gives him 3 months sentence. What about the
excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible for the illegal , excess punishment
of the convict ? what action against the judge in such cases ?
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years & finally the judge finds them as innocents &
acquits them of the charges. What about the prison sentence , the innocent has already served ?
is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ? remedy ? what
action against the judge ?
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions & the actions arising out of
misuse of office ?
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges & their personal
actions as individuals ?
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges , constitutional
functionaries supreme ?
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the judges ?
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as governors of states ,
members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes scheduled caste , scheduled tribe ,
other backward classes , minorities & women are their in supreme court , state high courts &
subordinate courts ? kindly provide specific figures .

Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce the accountability of judges
& to check corruption in judiciary ?
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of judiciary ?
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the official meetings ,
parties , at the tax payers expense ?
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in their hotel bill &
claimed traveling allowance ?
Q106. what action has been taken against selectors ie Karnataka high court judges & newly
selected women judges involved in roost resort scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ?
Q107. when common people / tax payers & even government employees are not getting proper
health care from government at government hospitals. Is it right & just to provide premium
health care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals in India , abroad , all
at tax payers expense ?
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their health , mental
faculties & mental balance in the midst of all work pressures , emotional tensions ?
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking public interest
litigations ?
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing amicus curie in a case ?
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an amicus curie in late P.M
Rajiv Gandhis assassination case , was not considered by the court ?
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ?
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with supporting evidences .
why not the judiciary take suo-motto action in all such cases ?
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal opinion , before providing
legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy persons rights violation ?
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court , both during
hearing of the case & afterwards ?
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police custody / judicial
custody / prison sentence right ? what action ?
Q118. when the corrupt police officer & government prosecution advocate together cover-up
evidences , conducts improper investigation intentionally to fail the case to cover-up rich crooks
, high & mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ?

Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government advoctes , tax
officials , officials of licensing authorities , to ensure proper & fair prosecution of cases against
rich & mighty ?
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist NAGARAJ.M.R. to the
honourable supreme court of India ?
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial positions like district / taluk
magistrates , tax officers , revenue officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the judiciary
monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights watch , do offer
my free services to honourable supreme court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges , are you
the honourable court ready to utilize it ?
Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme court of India ,
through government of indias on-line grievance system ( DPG & DARPG ) :
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 , DPG/M/2006/80021 ,
DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 , DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 ,
DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 ,
DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 , DPG/M/2006/80162 ,
DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 , DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 , DARPG/E/2007/00044 ,
DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 , DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 ,
DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 , DPG/M/2007/80055 ,
DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of which are available
at following web pages
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw
what are the status of those appeals ?
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing crimes rape , attempt to
murder , swindling government money , untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag ,
sale of judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty for books , prime real
estate purchase at discounted rate , taking round about long foreign tours along with family in
the name of official work , etc. by this way , judges themselves are making contempt of court ,
constitution of India & citizens of India. How you are protecting the honour of the judiciary ,
constitution of India & citizens of India ? please answer.

Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to policemens family as being
given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen & their families , like preferential site allotment , lpg
agency , ration depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank loans , etc ?
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on par with defense
forces.
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular term , abusing
them with vulgar words wrong ?
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing public with vulgar
words wrong ?
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison in-mates ?
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an innocent person of
criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be
innocent ?
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police personnel & pay it
as compensation to victims of police failures & atrocities ?
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign origin naturalized by
marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option , to occupy any constitutional office ?
Q133. during british rule in india & various other british colonies , criminal cases were foisted
against our freedom fighters in India & other british colonies. After indias independence what
happened to those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it continue with
the prosecution ?
Q134. in how many cases GOI & other state government continued with the prosecution AGAINST
OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or its colonies , to face prosecution after
India gained independence ? HAS GOI RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ?
if yes , why , whom ?
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me as per my RTI
request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 ,
why ?
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me information as per my rti request ,
he transferred my application to others , in turn they transferred the application to some others.
Finally , complete truthful information was not given , why ? as the union home secretary has got
copies of all those replies in response to transferred RTI application , will he send me a
consolidated reply to my present RTI request ?
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have seen how defense
advocate mr. R.S.ANAND & prosecution advocate mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the
case in favour of rich criminal , totally manipulating prosecution witnesses , evidences &

prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you are ensuring the delivery
of justice , there being numerous such advocates in practice ?
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields enormous clout more than the
Prime Minister himself over the government of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she legally
permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of the cabinet , to hold the cabinet
meeting of union ministers ?
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime minister of India or
president of India , etc ?
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the constitution (Article
21) ?
Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators & parliamentarians by the constitution of
India?
a) Inside the House b) Outside the House
Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like
a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India
c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC
e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.
Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned constitutional
functionaries ?
a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.
b) Cover both their official & personal actions.
Q146. Are the privileges defined & codified ?
Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?
Q148. Are the liberty & fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the constitution, above
the privileges of the constitutional functionaries or equal or below ?
Q149. Can the Indian legislatures & parliament be equated to the House of commons in England
which is considered to be a superior court and court of records ?
Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the Judiciary, be
equated to the functioning of the House of commons and House of Lords in England ?
Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or court and
causing contempt of the house or court by raising the issues of accountability of constitutional
functionaries ?
Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to nullify the Judicial
orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples representatives & executive ? does not it amount
to infringement of Judicial powers & contempt of the court by the House.

Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than constitutional duties of a
constitutional functionary or equal in importance to it ?
Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in the name of
constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of officials secret act & go unaccountable for his
actions and go unpunished by his legal immunity privileges
Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court & Supreme court Judges and other
constitutional functionaries not willing to codify their privileges for the reason that if codified
their privileges would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to legal scrutiny. ?
Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the legislature and
Parliament out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks & lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles.
Hence whether a vote of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian
is above or more valid in a democracy ?
Q157. Judges & Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by voters / tax payers. Out
of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks & lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether
the vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a seat of judge /
constitutional functionary is above (more
valid) in a democracy ?
Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up that vacuum till such
time that the legislature or parliament acts provide a solution by performing its role by enacting
proper legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?
Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his own cause, is it
not worse for the members of the legislature and parliament to be judges in their own cause ?
Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to a citizen,
protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?
Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action with respect to numerous
cases of injustices reported in Media ?
Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as the Public Interest
Litigation ? In some cases, the Public or the person representing them is unable to afford the
high cost of the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.
Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. & giving free legal aid ?
Q164. Communication free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy. Why the
constitutional functionaries are not honouring the Right to Information of Citizens ?
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka , justice.
P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all internal departmental enquiries against
approximately 200 judges , is it just & legal ? give me the names of accused judges & description
of charges against them ?
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?

Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ? refer.
F1/RTI/A91/2007.
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of Karnataka high court honble
Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court of India) just on assuming offices within hours
scrapped disciplinary inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short time no
human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he arrived at this vital decision in
such short time? Who are those 200+ judges facing enquiry ?
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a district judge without
conducting hearings properly , entering fictious dates of hearings (which happens to be
government holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired into the
previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any wrongdoings?
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under the influence of alchohol ,
as it limits the functioning of his senses & brain. That is why the acts & sayings of drunkards ,
committed / said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However most of the police
officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only they apprehend many suspects &
produce those suspects at the residences of magistrates before magistrate during wee hours /
night. Some of of the judges are also drunk during that time. Does the senses of drunken police
& judges work properly to do their respective duties in identifying criminals , apprehending them
& to issue judicial orders. Are these actions of police & judges in drunken state legal ?
Q 172 . What action has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the guilty police officials
who changed the charge sheet against union carbide officials ?
Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials , district magistrate , state
ministers & central ministers who fully aided the criminals Union Carbide official Mr. Anderson
to escape law , to jump bail & flee the country without courts permission ?
Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with respect to their contempt
of court & for aiding a criminal to escape ?
Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India , who changed the legal
clause under which the guilty should be tried ? what action has been taken against the CJI who
became an official of the trust belonging to the criminal ?
Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant who decided to withdraw
cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal gas tragedy ?
Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department & pollution control
board officials who have failed in their duties , inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ?
Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who decided the quantum of
compensation money to favour the criminal although they dont have right to do so ?
Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the trial court , Chief Justice of
India , state police officials , public prosecutors & Central Bureau of Investigation officials who
kept quite all along and didnt press for the extradition of the criminal Mr.Anderson , for
producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the trial court ?

Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government officials & peoples
representatives who became part of Operation Crime Hush Up & aided criminals responsible for
ghastly murders of thousands & maiming of lakhs of hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak Tragedy?
Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers , corrupt labour / pollution
control board officials HUMAN BEINGS ?
Q 182
years ?

Why police are not registering my complaint against CJI & other VVIPS ,Even after

Q 183 dont the police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal jurisdiction to register
the case against these VVIPs ? or just because the criminals happens to be VVIPs ,they are
not booked by police? If the said police dont have legal jurisdiction to book these VVIPs , they
should have transferred the complaint to those authorities who have jurisdiction & authority
to book & prosecute these VVIPs , but not done so , why ?
Q 184 are not all these actions , of VVIPs & police amounting to cover up of crimes &
criminals ? are not these cover ups itself is a crime ?
Q 185. Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL by courts of justice .
however my appeals for justice concerning public welfare , national security sent through post
, e-mail to supreme court of india are not admitted as Public interest litigation , why ? does not
these acts of Supreme court amount to aiding criminals , anti nationals?
Q 186 Are not the honourable chief justice of india together with the jurisdictional police &
Revenue district magistrate responsible to protect the fundamental & human rights of
people ? why the CJI , Mysore DC & Jurisdictional Police have failed to protect the fundamental &
human rights of people including mine ? For all the previous injustices I have suffered at the
hands of the criminal nexus Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district magistrate & jurisdictional
police are together responsible , if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members
or to my dependents the quartet Honourable Chief Justice of India , Honourable District
Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable Police Commissioner of Mysore city & Circle Inspector of police ,
vijayanagar police station , mysore will be responsible .
These corrupt parasites will feel , understand the pain only when they also suffer in the same
manner. Let us pray to almighty In whose Court of justice MATCH FIXING is not there & every
body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing less
nothing more.
YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995-2015 .
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE FULL INFORMATION:

CPIO , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733465 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

To ,

RTI Appellate Authority ,


O/O Honourable Governor ,
Reserve Bank of India ,
Central Office Building , Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg ,
Mumbai 400 001

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF
KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,


EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,

HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,


HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low
calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among
themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air &
water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the
independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been
proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples representatives , police , RBI Officials ,
public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned public servants fall among the
category of churchills men Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters. RBI Officials are denying me
information under one pretext or the other and covering-up SCAM worth crores of rupees.

We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO
HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING
QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH
I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL
STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE
VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS
FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO
THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING
TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS.

HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE


FOLLOWING QUESTIONS - WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME.
WITH RESPECT TO CASE NO old CC34 / 1989 & NEW NO SC436/1991 AT 21
ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS COURT BANGALORE
CHARGE SHEETED OFFICER MR.G.HARIRAM RBI BANGALORE
CHARGE SHEET NO staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 01.01.1985
Amended charge sheet staff no.3798/156-84/85 dt 08.04.1985

1. Why didn't you notice the alleged crimes of 1977 , 78 & 79 till the
mid of 1979 ?
2. This crime came to light only due to anonymous phone calls of good
Samaritans to authorities , but not due to your inspection . is your
inspection division working properly ?

3. why there is no security check up of officers during entry & exit


out of premises ?
4. why there is no individual weighment , individual statement of
value of bags of reissuable notes & bags of note meant for destruction
, after sorting is done, why they are not tallied with total weight ,
value of notes issued for sorting ?
5. Immediately after noticing the crime, why did not you transfer all
the employees of those sections ?
6. why did not you take steps to preserve3 & protect respective
documents relating to such high profile crime ?
7. why didn't you immediately issue charge sheet to all the accussed &
waited till 1983 ?
8. Why RBI has left out , so many officers ( who worked in the same
sections for more period than accused officers ) from domestic
enquiry ?
9. why CBI also failed to put those people in the charge sheet before
the court ?
10. is it because they were in favorable terms with the vested
interests ?
11. did the CBI dance to the tune of vested interests in RBI while
preparing charge sheet & during investigation , instead of
independent investigation ?
12. those left out probables from the charge sheet might have caused
the destruction of evidences / records. During the course of domestic
enquiry / court proceedings , it has been recorded that some records
have been destroyed. Are not CBI & RBI responsible for destruction of
evidences , aiding true criminals get away ?
13. in normal times , what is the period specified in RBI regulations
for preserving old documents / records ?

14. after noticing such a high profile crime the RBI must have taken
utmost care to preserve such old records for indefinite time , for
producing before courts of law as & when demanded. But it didn't ,
why ?
15. does not this point to connivance of higher authorities of RBI ,
with the criminals ?
16. RBI authorities have conducted domestic mass enquiries , instead
of individual enquiries , is it not detrimental to the rights of
defense ?
17. RBI authorities have stated that court proceedings & domestic
enquiry are independent of each other & are not binding on one
another. However RBI authorities straight away took on record of
domestic enquiry the court statements , evidences , but didn't honour
the order of same court of law ? why this double standard by RBI ?
18. The alleged crime was committed in 1977-79, but charge sheet was
framed in mid 1985 , why this long delay ?
19. didn't this facilitate the masterminds of crime to destroy ,
manipulate evidences ?
20. as stated before court , indeed some records , 22nd currency note
packet were missing , who is responsible for it ?
21. has the CBI conducted enquiry , polygraph test of RBI higher
officers - S.N.RAZDAN , W.S.SARAF , J.P.AWASTHI , J.MITRA & others ,
if not why ?
22. is it not due to inefficiency , negligence of duty by such high
ranking managers , that such a crime occurred in RBI Bangalore ?
23. what disciplinary action RBI has taken against the inefficient ,
negligent higher officials ?
24. whatever internal rules an organization makes must be within the
line of law. If such internal laws of the organization are violative

of law , fundamental rights of employees , such internal rules become


illegal. Are not the way of RBI disciplinary proceedings illegal ?
25. as per RBI pension regulations 1990 , RBI has the right to deduct
any loss caused to the bank , from the pension of RBI employee if the
misconduct of employee is proved in judicial proceedings . even though
mr.G.Hariram came out clean from the court , why RBI has denied his
pension ?
26. judicial courts of law are appellate authorities over & above ,
domestic enquiry committees & judicial orders supersedes the domestic
enquiry proceedings. Still RBI showed contempt of court & didn't
reinstate mr..G.Hariram into service , why ?
27. even if an employee's misconduct causing loss to the bank is
proved , before denying him pension (towards making up loss to the
bank) , previous sanction of the central board of RBI must be taken.
But in mr.G.Hariram's case , pension was denied in full without taking
previous sanction of the central board of RBI , is it not illegal ?
28. RBI alleged that mr..G.Hariram caused loss to the tune of Rs.14000
to the bank & recovered it from his provident fund dues. There was
nothing left over to recover , still RBI completely denied pension to
mr.G.Hariram , why ?
29. ideally, domestic enquiry findings / disciplinary actions should
be completed first , then the employee can appeal to appropriate court
of law. In mr.G.Hariram's case , CBI & RBI failed to prove the charges
in court of law , as a result court discharged him from the charges.
To cover-up it's failures RBI management dragged domestic enquiry much
beyond court orders date & gave findings indicting mr..G.Hariram. does
the enquiry officer of domestic enquiry think that he is over & above
the court of law ? is it not illegal & contempt of court ?
30. ideally , RBI authorities should have appealed to higher court

against lower court order discharging mr.G.Hariram from charges. But


it was not done , why ?
31. did the RBI pay interim relief to mr.G.Hariram , during suspension
period ?
32. the undue delay in filing charge sheet , consequent destruction of
key evidences , dishonour / contempt of court orders , undue haste in
giving findings , dismissal , denial of of pension without central
board's sanction , all point towards criminals within RBI higher
management. What disciplinary action has been taken against
J.P.AWASTHI, S.N.RAZDAN,J.MITRA, W.SARAF & others ? if not why ?
33. why charge sheet was amended? Is it legal ?
34. did the charge sheet was amended to falsely implicate
mr..G.Hariram , by including cancelled note vault in the charge
sheet ?
35. does not this itself show that it is not statement of actual
happenings / facts , but a cunning ploy to mislead investigation
towards fixed innocents from actual criminals ?
36. is it true that that only 5% of sample inspection is done out of
bundled verified defective note packets ?
37. is not the conduct of joint / mass enquiries of all charge sheeted
officers illegal ?
38. how come such an important evidence 22nd note packet went
missing ?
39. is it because it may point towards real criminals ?
40. as per the statement of management witness / inspection head /
expert mr.vijendra rao , the notes of earlier dates have been removed
from packets made into new bundles , right ?
41. as per his statement , entire certificates , seals of some asst
treasurers are there , who didn't work at all on that day is not it ?

42. does not it show that some body else was misusing the seals ,
putting some innocents seals over the notes ?
43. does it not show that , crime has taken place at verification
section ?
44. does it not show involvement of some asst treasurers ?
45. why asst treasurers have not been charge sheeted ?
46. why inspection of RBI Bangalore office was not done between 1975 &
1979 ?
47. is it not true that you failed to produce all records showing
internal inspection / audits , during domestic enquiry & court
proceedings ?
48. your expert mr.vijendra rao has stated that some seal marks are
smudged , he has stated some seal marks appears to be so & so. He has
clearly nowhere stated that this seal mark is exactly this , so he
himself is not 100% sure ?
49. your expert nowhere said that 100% sure this seal mark is this ,
on that day this seal was issued to mr.G.Hariram , isn't it ?
50. your expert says during 1975 , he didn't notice3 any fraud.
However approver says fraud was there before mid 1977 also. Why no
action has been taken ?
51. why you didn't produce all records of all persons , who have
specifically worked in alleged sections , the registers of those
departments with daily activity report containing seal nos , packet
nos , bag nos , etc ?
52. are not their chances of some criminals putting the seal marks of
innocent officers over the notes , bundles , bags , etc ?
53. your expert is not 100% sure of seal mark , your records are not
there to prove the presence of charge sheeted officers in the alleged
sections , neither your expert nor your records are 100% sure on what

date , at what stage , by whom crime was committed , isn't it ?


54. is not the charge sheet amounting to higher ups picking up
officers they dislike & falsely implicating them ?
55. is it not cunning ploy of higher ups to divert attention from
original criminals ?
56. why no action was taken against currency officer of 1977-79
mr.J.Mitra ? why his pension , super annuation benefits were not
withheld ?
57. what is your justification , supporting evidence , records for
picking up only three officers including mr.G.Hariram for legal
prosecution and leaving the majority of probables ?
58. why you have dropped charges against five asst treasurers ? why
you didn't even conduct domestic enquiry against them , let alone
legal prosecution ?
59. Is it RBI's & CBI's way of fair play & justice ?
60. as inly 5% sampling of verified note bundles are done , there are
more possibilities of rebundled packets getting unnoticed in relaxed
95% lot , isn't it ?
61. you have left out so many officers who worked in those sections,
some of whom even became management witnesses , instead of being
charge sheeted by the management, is it fair play & legal ?
62. who are the bank employees , from whom you have recovered the alleged bank loss of
Rs.220000 ?
63. were all of them charge sheeted , enquired , legally prosecuted ,
dismissed & their pension , gratuity withheld ?
64. you don't have any internal statuotary records to prove that
mr.G.Hariram worked in those departments , except a currency officer's
office note dated just on the eve of charge sheet years after the
alleged crime ? does it not prove that this note has been concocted
just to fix mr.G.Hariram ?

65. where as you have records of other officials attendance in those


departments , but not charge sheeted them why ?
66. three officers of staff grade A daily work in three sections out of 40 officers , why you have
picked up only mr.G.Hariram , out of 1095 working days , he has worked for only 223 days in
those
sections , still those officers who worked for more days in those
sections are not charge sheeted why ? the approver , the management
expert witness , shift registers , V2 registers , Destruction
certificates , Form CD 55 , etc , nobody , no records were able to say
on what date , at what stage , by whom crime took place , also they
were unable to say on what date at what stage crime was committed by
mr.G.Hariram ? is it not futile imagination , cunning ploy of RBI
higher authorities to fix innocent Mr.G.Hariram ?
67. the management expert witnesses said , the most probable place of
crime is punching / Cancelled Note Vault , incinerator , where asst
treasurers were joint custodians . they were not enquired & let off
why ?
68.

the charge sheet alleges extraction / substitution of

defaced note packets. Where as the management expert witness say


substitution of defaced notes only ? is not there difference between
loss of one number of note & 100 number of notes ?
69.

as per the normal course of duty , staff officers does not

count notes in each bundles , but they just count the number of
bundles only. Is not there chances of inserted note bundles or bundles
containing less number of notes going unnoticed ? is it not the
failure of statuotary system of work practices ?
70.

does not all these prove higher authorities of RBI & CBI

were hell bent to fix mr.G.Hariram & to shield the original


criminals ?
Questions with respect to other cases :

71.

how do you monitor the work of bank officials nominated as

directors of companies which have availed bank loans ?


72.

how do you monitor the work of companies , in which banks

have invested ?
73.

how do you monitor the rapid wealth growth of certain bank

officials , who work in shares investment / equity funds section ,


etc ?
74.

inspite of project reports by bank officials , over

assessment of collateral securites / value of debtor companies by bank


officials , the loans become NPAs & full value cann't be realized in
the market by selling off the assets of debtor companies also. In such
cases , what action is taken against erring bank officials who collude
with criminal industrialists for availing higher amount of loan than
permissible ?
75.

give bankwise specific figures of NPAs.

76.

give names of industrial groups / promoters whose

companies have become NPAs , so that public can be aware of them ,


before investing in new companies promoted by them.
77.

is not collection of loan from debtors of bank through

rowdies / recovery agents , illegal ?


78.

why not criminal complaints filed against bank mangers for

aiding , abetting rowdism , murdering people ?


79.

if your method of employing rowdies to collect loans of Rs.

10000 from commoners is right , what would you do to a promoter of a


debtor company to recover loans of crores of rupees , supari killing ?
but debtors of crores of rupees is let off coolly by banks , why ?
80.

what is the exact amount of loss caused to the exchequer

by karim lala telgi who printed fake stamp papers ?


81.

what action has been taken against those involved ?

82.

have you taken action against all those mentioned by telgi

during narco analysis test , if not why ? is it because they are


powerful & bigwigs ?
83.

how you are controlling the illegal finance activities ,

money lending by individuals , pawn brokers & chit fund companies ?


84.

how you are monitoring the receipt of public donations ,

foreign donations by many NGOs ?


85.

how many erring NGOs , chit fund companies , pawn

brokers , individuals you have booked for illegal finance activities ?


Questions relating to RBI CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE
86. who were responsible for selling the good printing machine at
security press nasik to scamster karim lala telgi as scrap ?
87. who recruited the candidates below merit rankings in R.B.I for
what criminal roles ?
88. how many irregularities have taken place in R.B.I till date ?
89. who is responsible for installing, operating & supervising the
security set-up in R.B.I ?
90. how the raw materials ie number of paper sheets, ink, etc are
accounted for in inward stores & while issuing for printing ?
91. how wastages, scrap of ink , papers , etc in the printing process
are accounted for?
92. How the finished goods ie currency notes are accounted for ?
93. Who keeps physical figures & possession of goods, inventory of
all the above?
94. How the scrap paper is disposed off ?
95. From security angle who keeps track from start till dispatch ?
96.

Give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the

post of stores assistant in BRBNMPL in the year 1995-96 ?


97.

give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the

post of process assistant at BRBNMPL in the year 1996 ?


98.

give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the

post of process assistants & maintenance assistants at BRBNMPL in the


year 1996-1998 ?
99.

is not RBI & BRBNMPL authorities created by statuotary

laws , fully funded by public money ie from government exchequer ?


100. still why BRBNMPL & RBI refused to answer my previous
information request as per RTI Act ? are you afraid that skeletons
will come out of cubboard ?
101. what action initiated against the SBI branch Bangalore & SBI
Overseas branch for loss of cheque / draft amounting to crores of
rupees ? if not why ?
102. give me specific figures bank wise with respect to loss caused
to the bank by loss of cheques or demand drafts , etc ?
103. how RBI is containing crimes of loss of cheques / DDs causing huge losses to the banks to
the tune of crores of rupees ?
104. what action taken against the RBI officials who are covering up crimes inspite of my
repeated appeals & RTI requests ?

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995 - 2015 .

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :


CPIO , C/o PCGM and Secretary , Secretarys Department , Reserve Bank of India , 16 th floor,
Central Office Building , Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg , Mumbai 400 001

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733466 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

To,

Shri. Dr.Sindhe Bhimsen Rao . H ,

RTI APPELLATE AUTHORITY & CPIO ,

Additional Secretary to Chief Minister ,

Room No 236 , 2nd Floor ,

Vidhana Soudha , Bangalore 560001.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF
KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.


ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.

Please go through the some of actual criminal cases of land grabbings enclosed herewith.
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low
calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among
themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air &
water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the
independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been
proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples representatives , police , public servants
& Judges. Some of the below mentioned officials fall among the category of churchills men
Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters. To my previous RTI requests & appeals they tried covering up
crores worth SCAM by transferring application from one to the other at the end by denying
information to me, Does not the Revenue department possess information ?
We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO
HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING
QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH
I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL
STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE
VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS
FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO
THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING
TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL
CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN
JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,

Main A :
1.
The land encroachments & illegal buildings and its continued existence since years is
not possible without tacit , covert support of jurisdictional revenue officials. What
disciplinary action has been taken against concerned officials with respect to each case of land
encroachment & illegal buildings , case wise ?
2.
3.

If not , why ?
Is not land AKRAMA SAKRAMA SCHEME itself illegal ?

4.
Is not the move of government of Karnataka to legalise land encroachments & illegal
buildings , in itself illegal ?
5.
Till date in some cases of land encroachers are evicted & some buildings violating building
byelaws demolished , you could have spared them to enjoy the benefit of land akrama sakrama
scheme. Why you didnt spare them ?
6.

Is this scheme applicable for only chosen few ?

7.

Does this scheme also benefit rich people above BPL ?

8.

Does this scheme also benefit big land developers , land developing companies ?

9.
To my previous RTI appeals to MUDA , BDA only partial information was given , conveniently
hiding the truth. Is it not violation of RTI act ?
10. Does not hiding information about land crimes , in itself also a crime ?
11. I have shown in detail some land crimes in Karnataka. What action by government of
Karnataka , casewise ?
12. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
13. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
14. Does not hiding a land crime , embolden land grabber to commit more land crimes ?
15. What action taken against BDA , MUDA & Revenue department officials who are covering
crores worth land scams inspite of my repeated appeals & RTI Requests ?

Main B : RTI QUESTIONS Mysore DC , COMMISSIONER OF MUDA ( MYSORE URBAN


DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ) & COMMISSIONER OF MCC ( MYSORE CITY CORPORATION ) ARE
AFRAID TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the mysore
city's comprehensive city development plan ?

2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987
till date ?

3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the
authorities ?

4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to
commercial , what norms are followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?

5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do
you deprive people of civic amenities ?

6. during such alenation , is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference
between civic amenity site & commercial site ? if not why ?

7. in mysore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building
bye-laws no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what
action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?

8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?

9. how much of MUDA's / MCC's / GOVERNMENT's lands , sites , buildings & houses have been
illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?

10. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal
occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?

11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has legalized ,
regularized such illegal occupation just through MUDA's / MCC's resolution instead of of
reallotting the same through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after
giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?

12. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites ,
houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?

13. in mysore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have mushroomed ,
Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms among them are legally
authorized by MUDA , MCC , GOVERNMENT & how many not ? since 1987 till date ?

14. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing
societies & illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?

15. what action MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms & housing
societies who have violated MUDA norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?

16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities ,
parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety of people first. MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the building byelaw
violators , layout Development plan violators & legalizing those

violations. Safety of public & amenities of public are totally neglected by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT . When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents say during a fire tragedy in a
complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business
complex as the complex doesn't have a parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going that
way are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is not the
MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries & deaths ?

17. what is the criteria adopted by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands
, sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?

18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from
these out of turn allotments by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ? specific figures yearwise since
1987 ?

19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated
MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT norms ?

20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , MUDA / AUTHORITIES with the help of police
razes down those huts & evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political
bigwigs illegally occupy MUDA , MCC / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees & build big
complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , MUDA or authorities not even files police
complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine.
Why this double standard by MUDA / MCC GOVERNMENT ?

21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT
since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?

22. how much of MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ?
status report yearwise since 1987 ?

23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the MUDA ,AUTHORITIES recovered the rents
earned by illegal occupation ?

24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals tresspassers ? if not why ?

25. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient time to bidders about it's
auction schedules ?

26. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?

27. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose
mentioned in the project plan ?

28. is the MUDA / AUTHORITIES acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers & selling it at a
premium , by way making profits just like a real estate agency ?

29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for
the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated
their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the
villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare
objectives of those lands ?

30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with
mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by MUDA MCC or other land developers ?

31. has the MUDA , MCC taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are
created till date ?

32. in & around mysore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as
per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the HT lines. However there
are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities
Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out
advertisement spaces & built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer's
money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service
HT line. Are all these structures under
& surrounding HT lines legal ?

33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 castewise ,
religionwise ?

34. in & around mysore city , in how many areas developed by MUDA & private developers , the
sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?

35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by MUDA , MCC & other
developers , housing societies ?

36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate
developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings ,
into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment & creating
public health hazard ? how the MUDA / MCC is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report
yearwise since 1987 till date .

37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around mysore city ? what action by
MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .

38. around mysore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by
private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are
these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private
industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has
KIADB given consent to it ?

39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ?
is it within the KIADB's
comprehensive industrial area development plan ?

40. has the MUDA / MCC , KIADB given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before
alienation of such lands ?

41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to MUDA's / MCC's CDP & KIADB's industrial
area development plan ? violations how many ?

42. is the MUDA & KIADB revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to
suit those real estate developers & Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?

43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar's
report on land grabbings in mysore ?

44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building
kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S
THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in conformance to MUDA's CDP ? if not
why ? what action ?

45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any prequalification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only
industries can participate in the bidding process ?

46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for
alienation ?

47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's newspaper . no action
, why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were cheated off their dues & the
private firm made huge profits. is this auction & alienation legal ?

48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at
preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social welfare. however many
of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the
stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by MUDA , MCC or government
in such cases ?

49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what
action taken by MUDA , MCC & government action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?

50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by MUDA , MCC or authorities ,
on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?

51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections & given media
publicity ? if not why ?

52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some MUDA / MCC / REVENUE officials &
their family members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion
authorities ?

53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly
to others ?

54.how many such lease allotments are sold by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of
lease period , without public auction ?

55. what are the norms followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to
the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?

Main C : RTI QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( BDA ) ,


COMMISSIONER , BRIHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE ( BBMP ) & CHAIRMAN ,
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD ( KIADB) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the
Bangalore city's comprehensive city development plan ?

2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
since 1987 till date ?

3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the
authorities ?

4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to
commercial , what norms are followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?

5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do
you deprive people of civic amenities ?

6. during such alenation , is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate
difference between civic amenity site & commercial site ? if not why ?

7. in bangalore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building
bye-laws no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what
action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?

8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?

9. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , buildings & houses have
been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?

10. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such
illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?

11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has
legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
` s resolution instead of of re-allotting the same through public notification to the next senior
most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not
done so why ?

12. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of
lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?

13. in bangalore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have mushroomed ,
Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms among them are legally
authorized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & how many not ? since 1987 till date ?

14. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal
housing societies & illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?

15. what action BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms &
housing societies who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms , layout plans ,
etc ? if not why ?

16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities ,
parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety of people first. BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the building

byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators & legalizing those violations. Safety of
public & amenities of public are totally neglected by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT. When
public people die , suffer injuries / accidents say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack
of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the
complex doesn't have a parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to
come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is not the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries & deaths ?

17. what is the criteria adopted by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment
of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists ,
etc ?

18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from
these out of turn allotments by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT? specific figures yearwise
since 1987 ?

19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms ?

20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT with the help of police razes down those huts & evicts the poor by brute force.
Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
lands worth crores of rupees & build big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent ,
BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or authorities not even files police complaint against them
instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double standard
by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?

21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?

22. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal
occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?

23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
arecovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?

24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals tresspassers ? if not why ?

25. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient time to bidders
about it's auction schedules ?

26. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?

27. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same
purpose mentioned in the project plan ?

28. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers &
selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real estate agency ?

29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for
the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated
their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the
villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those
lands ?

30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with
mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other land
developers ?

31. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT taken alternate steps to create new lakes ,
ponds ? how many are created till date ?

32. in & around bangalore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as
per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the HT lines. However there
are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities
Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out advertisement spaces & built
permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer's money. This fencing obstructs the
movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures
under & surrounding HT lines legal ?

33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 castewise ,
religionwise ?

34. in & around bangalore city , in how many areas developed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT & private developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is directly let
into lake , ponds ?

35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT & other developers , housing societies ?

36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate
developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings ,
into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment & creating
public health hazard ? how the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is monitoring sewage /
waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .

37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around bangalore city ? what action
by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987
till date .

38. around bangalore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by
private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are
these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private
industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has
KIADB given consent to it ?

39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ?
is it within the KIADB's comprehensive industrial area development plan ?

40. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given wide publicity , public notice calling for
objections before alienation of such lands ?

41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT's
industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?

42. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers & Private companies ? on what legal
grounds ?

43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar's
report on land grabbings in mysore ?

44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building
kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S
THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in conformance to MUDA's CDP ? if not
why ? what action ?

45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any prequalification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only
industries can participate in the bidding process ?

46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for
alienation ?

47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's newspaper . no action
, why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were cheated off their dues & the
private firm made huge profits. is this auction & alienation legal ?

48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at
preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social welfare. however many
of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the
stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT in such cases ?

49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what
action taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT action taken report yearwise since 1987 till
date ?

50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT, on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?

51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections & given media
publicity ? if not why ?

52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
officials & their family members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion
authorities ?

53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or
wholly to others ?

54.how many such lease allotments are sold by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT before the
expiry of lease period , without public auction ?

55. what are the norms followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased
lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?

56. what is the status of house allotted to sri.chandrashekariah vide BDA allotment letter no:
310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.

57. why BDA didn't file police complaint to evict encroachers?

58. why BDA didn't inform the descendents of original allottee about the cancellation of their
allotment ?

59.what happened to the money deposited by original allottee?

60.is the action of BDA allotting the said house to an illegal encroacher just by the resolution of
BDA committee legal ?

61. in case the BDA wished to re-allot the said house , first it must have informed the original
allottee about cancellation of allotment allowing them sufficient time to reply with public notice
in news papers , then they should have allotted the said house to the senior most in the waiting
list. But BDA has just allotted the house to an illegal encroacher by the resolution of BDA
committee. Is it legal ?

62. BDA officials gave half truths to my RTI request & stated that the said file concerning this
issue cann't be found ie lost . is it legal ?

63. has the BDA filed police complaint regarding theft of file from the record room ?
HONOURABLE COMMISSIONER OF BDA PLEASE REFER THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE.

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995 - 2015 .

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :

PIO , CHIEF MINSTERS OFFICE , GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA , VIDHANA SOUDHA , BANGALORE.

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733464 for Rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

Right to Information as a Human Right and Developments in India

Presentation at Sarai by Debashish Sankhari, Commonwealth Human Rights


Initiative.

Case 1: Alice lives in the tribal district of Chaibasa in Jharkhand


her husband wandered into the forest

and was trampled by a wild elephant. As per the law she is entitled to
claim compensation from the forest

authorities when she produces a copy of the FIR and the post mortem
report. The police officer at her local

police station refuses to give her these copies.

Case 2: A familiar story of the Bhopal gas leak tragedy people were
not aware of the details of the gas that

had leaked. Once established that it was Methyl-iso-cynate - when


Union Carbide was asked for the

antidote to the gas they said that it was a protected trade secret,

hence could not be divulged.

Case 3: Enron People were not given a fair chance to make


representations expressing any reservations or

opposition to the Dhabol Power project. The representations can be


made only after salient features of the

project are provided like the cost of the electricity generated, the
basis for this calculations, total expenditure,

area affected, etc. The company did not provide these details at all
in the public notification and nobody could

make any meaningful representation that could be sent to the approving


authority (the Central Electricity

Authority).

There is one common thread that runs through the above mentioned cases
and that is a

lack of access to Information. Restrictions on the free flow of


information - especially

between government and citizen has resulted not only in eroding the
democratic principles

enshrined in the Indian Constitution but has resulted in the failure

of government policies

and development schemes for bettering the lot of the poor. Denial of
information has

perpetuated the political, social and economic exclusion of millions;


aided in the illegitimate

retention and abuse of power by select segments of society;


facilitated widespread corruption

and impeded the fight against poverty eradication. With the lack of
access to information,

people are unaware of the developments schemes and are completely


unequipped to engage

in informed participation in their own development even if given a


chance. Therefore,

decades of development have been lost through decision making


uninformed by the realities

of those without a veritable voice.

The concept of human development is directly linked to human rights. A


rights-based

approach demands participation in governance and development, which

guaranteed access

to information can provide.

Needless to say when Alice is not granted a copy of the FIR and post
mortem report, she

was being denied access to compensation that was rightfully hers. Due
to the lack of

information about the effects of the deadly gas and its antidote, the
right to life of the people

itself was denied. The people of Maharashtra had no option to realise


their voices against

Enron. They were not only being denied the right to participate in
their governance, and

they were kept in the dark all the while electricity was being
generated at a much higher than

normal rate charged by the other companies and the bill was being
footed by a public body.

Page 2

The right to information is a basic right that underpins good


governance, democracy,

poverty eradication and the practical realisation of human rights.


Good governance is not

achieved simply by having efficient government or even a democratically elected

government. The norms of freedom of information and the assurance of


widespread citizen

participation in public affairs and an active civil society are


essential for the full realisation of

democracy - a system of government responsive to the needs of its


citizens - and to develop

a culture of human rights and accountability. The recognition of right


to information is

crucial to achieving these ends hence the need for a guaranteed and
legislated right to

information.

World over legislation on access to information are knows as Freedom


of Information laws.

In India advocates for the issue insist on using the Rights language
and calling the

legislation the Right to Information Law. This distinction may


appear to some as playing

with semantics. However, there is a very important distinction that


should not be ignored. It

must be kept in mind that Rights in general imply corresponding


duties. In the context of

the right to information the citizens right to information casts a


duty on the government to

ensure that information sought is provided. On the other hand,


freedom does not convey a

strong and clear sense of duty on the government to provide


information to the public, as

the public, in this case, does not hold a right to information.

Constitutional position

While some countries recognise Right to Information explicitly in


their Constitutions

, in

others the judiciary has interpreted the Right to freedom of speech


and expression to include

the Right to Information. The Right to Information has not explicitly


been recognised in the

Indian constitution. However, the Supreme Court of India has


interpreted through various

decisions that the right to information is a part of the Right to


Freedom of Speech and

Expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. In


addition, the Supreme Court

of India has gone on to say that the Right to Know is an integral part
of the Right to Life

and unless one has the Right to Information the Right to Life cannot
be exercised

Why a specific legislation?

In addition to recognising this right as a fundamental guarantee, it


is necessary to enact an

enabling law, which will operationalise this Fundamental Right. This


essentially means that

there is a specific need to enact legislation that will put in place a


system through which

government information can be accessed.

The Developments in India

The demand for RTI laws has been growing with time. While there have been some

significant developments at the state level, the central government


has been dragging its feet

on the issue.

In 1994, the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), started a


grassroots campaign for the

right to information in Rajasthan. Emerging from a struggle for


minimum wages and land

rights, the movement drew a clear link between the denial of rights to
the persons in the

1 South Africa, Nepal, Ghana are some of the countries that guarantee
the Right to Information as a

fundamental right.

2 Reliance Petrochemicals Ltd. vs Proprietors of Indian Express, AIR 1989 SC 190

Page 3

community, the corruption in the administration and the right to


information. This

movement grew and the campaign resulted in the government of Rajasthan


enacting a law

on the Right to Information in 2000.

Prior to the Rajasthan Act, as early as 1997, Tamil Nadu and Goa
became the first states to

enact laws on Right to Information. Maharashtra and Karnataka also


enacted their respective

RTI law in 2000. The most recent entrant in this league has been the
National Capital

Territory of Delhi, which enforced the Delhi RTI Act in 2001. In 1998,
the Madhya Pradesh

government enacted a law on the Right to Information, which did not


get enforced as the

Presidential assent was denied to it. Subsequently, the government has


issued executive

orders to more than 50 government departments directing them to


provide access to

information to the people. Uttar Pradesh government has also issue


similar orders on a pilot

basis, restricting them to a few departments.

At the central level there have been several initiatives for preparing
a law on the Right to

Information. The Consumer Education and Research Centre (CERC) was involved in

preparing a Bill, as also the Press Council of India. In 1997 the


central government set up a

Working Group on Right to Information and Transparency under the


chairmanship of Shri

H.D Shourie to look into the feasibility and need for a Right to
Information legislation. The

working group submitted its report in May that year with a draft Bill
titled the Freedom of

Information Bill 1997 (1997 Bill). The 1997 Bill was modified by the
government and placed

before the cabinet which referred the same to a Group of Ministers


(GOM) the 1997 Bill

remained with the GOM from October 1997 to February 2000. In July
2000, the Freedom

of Information Bill, 2000 (Bill) was introduced in the Lok Sabha.


This Bill was referred to

the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home


Affairs (Committee)

by the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha in consultation with the Speaker of


the Lok Sabha in

September 2000 for examination and report.

The Standing Committee deliberated on the Bill after hearing the views
of the Secretary,

Ministry of Personal and Public Grievances and various individuals and


organisations

working on the issue. The Committee presented a Report, which was


placed before both

houses of parliament on July 25, 2001 (Report).

Since then the process has once again gone

behind closed door and one does not really know what has been happening.

What should the Law say?

There is a great deal of debate on the content of the law. Civil


society is agitating for a law

that will be people friendly and will ensure that much information is
put in public domain.

Unfortunately, the laws that are being enacted are a far cry from the
demands of civil society

in India. To be a strong law on the Right to Information, the


following minimum elements

must be present:

1. Duty on the Government: Iron cast duty on the government and public
bodies to give

information to any person seeking the same.

2. Inclusion of Private bodies: Apart from the government and public


bodies, there are

strong arguments for the inclusions of private bodies as well. Today


the private bodies

1 A copy of the Report can be view at out Website, www.humanrightsinitiative.org

Page 4

also influence and affect public life in a great number of ways. This
is more true now in

the context of the on going privatisation of public corporations and


the growing role of

private bodies in areas of infrastructure and public services, like


power, telecom etc. The

Bhopal Gas Tragedy is a strong example of the havoc the activities of

a private body can

play on the lives of common people. Therefore, information relevant to


public interest,

public health and environmental safety must be made accessible to the


general public

from private bodies. Goa RTI Act is the only one in India, which
brings in private

bodies under the obligations of the its RTI Act to provide information
to the public.

3. Access as general rule: Clearly stating access to information as


the rule and refusal as

the exception is an essential for removing any doubt that access to


information is an

inherent right of the people in a modern democratic society, that


cannot be denied on

mere administrative discretion. This will mean that the government duty bound to

disclose/provide information to the public as norm and refuse


information only in

defined, narrow and exceptional circumstances.

4. Minimum and narrow Exemptions: The list of information that cannot


be disclosed

to the public (generally known as exemptions) must be minimal,


specific and narrowly

defined. The usual list includes categories like defence related


information, information

which can harm the law and order situation, commercial secrets, etc.
The Constitution

of India allows only reasonable restrictions to be applied to the


fundamental freedom of

speech and expression. The courts have also read these restrictions
strictly and the same

logic has to apply to the right to information as it is an accepted


part of the freedom of

speech and expression. Therefore, the law must not contain a long list
of exceptions

couched in terms general enough to ensure that all kinds of


information can be refused

taking the help of the law itself. This has happened in the case of
the Tamil Nadu right

to Information Act which has all of 22 exceptions, and the Shourie


draft Bill, which,

along with numerous exceptions contains an all-pervasive clause that


information can be

denied, viz, If its disclosure does not subserve any public purpose.
A Right to

Information does not need to disclose any specific need. If a person


must show public

purpose every time he seeks information, it would give unlimited


discretion to public

bodies to refuse information.

Here also the debate of protection of privacy becomes relevant. The


law has to take into

account the protection of an individuals privacy. Personal


information held by the

government must be exempt from disclosure. However, if the public interest in

disclosure in the public interest greatly outweighs the preservation


of individual privacy,

then disclosure should be allowed. Goa, Karnataka and New Delhi Act contain

provisions for exemption of private information subject to larger


public interest.

5. Application process: The application (the request for information)


process has to be

clearly defined and a definite official must be identified and made


responsible for

accepting the application and to process the same and provide the
information or a

2 The new Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 in South Africa


dedicates an entire segment of the

Act to access of information from Private bodies. It clearly states


the right of a person to access to

information (in certain cases) held by private bodies and provides in


detail for a person to approach any

private body and request for information.

Page 5

reasoned refusal, as the case maybe. Generally, written applications


or requests are

required seeking information, but there may be legitimate cases where


the person seeking

the information cannot write without assistance or write at all,


especially in a country

where illiteracy is widespread. In this case, the law must stipulate


that oral requests

should be accepted and where reasonable assistance is required to help


the person write

a request, the assistance must be provided. In this respect, the


central FOI Bill puts the

burden on the government official to reduce the oral request into


writing. The law in

Goa and Delhi also take into account oral requests.

6. Time Limit for administrative response: The response time to the


application has to

be reasonable and timely. If excessive time were allowed to the


administration to reply to

the application or provide information it would nullify the


requirement of timely

information. For example, in cases of urgent information requirement


like in matters of

custody or emergency medical situations etc., information delayed is


information denied

and an information giving mechanism for the benefit of the people


losses its meaning.

This kind of situation is not satisfied in most Indian RTI laws,


wherein the most

common time limit is of 30 days from the time of receipt of the application for

information. Only, the Goa RTI law provides for a situation of urgent
requirement of

information and it states that in cases of life or liberty, the


information must be provided

within 48 hours of the application for information. We believe that


this provision must

be incorporated in any RTI law to bring it closer to being a


responsive and effective

piece of legislation.

7. Fees: Most of the time a fee has to be paid for obtaining copies of
documents or any

other medium containing the desired information from the government.


This fee has to

be reasonable and provision for waiver in suitable cases must be


provided as well. This is

especially true in a country of abject and widespread poverty. The law


must set out the

basic guideline with respect to the upper limit of the fee, as it


cannot be left to the

discretion of the officials and it must be limited to the cost of


processing and making

available the information at the most. This will provide a space for
the officials to set fee

structure which will act as a deterring factor for asking information from the

government. The Rajasthan RTI Act and the Central FOI Bill, do not contain any

guideline with respect to an upper limit for the fee to be charged.

8. Suo motu Disclosures (Duty to Inform): A law on the Right to


Information must cast

a positive duty on government and public bodies to inform the public


in case of certain

projects and activities which relate to the public. This envisages


giving information

without being asked for it (by an application or request for


information). It must be

made mandatory to give out certain kinds of information on a mandatory


basis. This

kind of information would include the organisational structure of the government

department/public body, its governing rules and manual, functions,


information on

proposed projects and schemes, and other relevant information which


needs to be given

out and updated routinely. The Karnataka RTI Act and the Delhi RTI Act
impose this

obligation on the government authorities. The Central FOI Bill also


contains similar

disclosure clauses.

9. Independent Appeal Mechanism: The information seeker must be provided an

independent remedial mechanism to redress any grievance from the response to the

Page 6

application for information. One core idea involved in the Right to


Information is to pry

open the administration and subject it to public scrutiny and make the
government

accountable to the people. This objective is completely lost where


there is a complete

lack of an appeal mechanism or it is within the establishment itself.


It is of vital

importance for the success of an RTI law for the appellate authority to be an

independent agency separate from the government, which will deal with
any appeal in an

unbiased and efficacious manner. Some Acts in India provide for an independent

appellate body like, Karnataka Act, the Goa Act, the Rajasthan Act and
the Delhi Act.

The appellate body itself varies, for example Goa and Karnataka
(appeal at the second

instance) lie to the State Administrative Tribunal, whereas in Delhi


the appeal lies to the

Public Grievances Commission. In the Tamil Nadu Act, Maharashtra Act


and the central

FOI Bill, the appeal mechanism is restricted to within the


administration itself.

10. Penalties: The provision for an independent appeal mechanism is


essential for

providing a remedial mechanism for the person seeking information. But


to deter the

official and persons responsible for providing the information from


unnecessarily

harassing, delaying or intentionally denying or providing wrong or inaccurate

information, adequate provision for penalties must be fit into the


legislation. Most of the

laws in India that have penalty clause provide for disciplinary action
against the erring

government personnel in case of delay or wrongful denial of


information. The central

FOI Bill, Tamil Nadu Act and Maharashtra Act sorely lack in this respect with no

penalty clause at all.

11. Independent Monitoring Agency: Without continued and independent


monitoring the

RTI law will become a dead-letter law. It is important that an


independent agency is

made responsible to monitor and review the functioning of the law,


provide advice to

the government on all matters related to the promotion of right to information,

undertake documentation and research with respect to information


management of the

government with a view to improve the same, devise training and orientation of

government employees on the culture of openness and transparency etc.


Goa and Delhi

Acts have constituted a body with the responsibility of monitoring and


reviewing the law

called the State Council for Right to Information. Typically this body
constitutes of

members from the government, representatives from the media, civil


society, business

section, etc.

12. Protection of Whistleblowers: The RTI law must contain protection


for public officials

who give certain exempted information where it is necessary to do so


in overwhelming

public interest or to disclose some serious corrupt practice, etc.


This gives honest and

alert officers the safety and assurance from fear of reprisal to come
out with information

in public interest or expose corruption and malpractice in government.

All the RTI laws

in India, except the Karnataka Act, provide for the protection of any
person against any

legal proceeding for anything done in good faith in pursuance of the


respective RTI law.

13. Publicity and Training: The law must contain a mandatory procedure
for publicising

its contents. Often, laws are passed without their knowledge


percolating down without

sufficient speed or impact and therefore fail to bring about the


desired change in the

systems. The Right to Information law must also contain a strong


aspect of training and

orientation of public servants at all levels, in order to bring about


an effective change in

Page 7

the culture of secrecy and unwillingness to part with information. There are no

provisions in any of the RTI laws in the country, which provide for
suitable publication

and awareness building amongst the people regarding the law.

Problems with the Indian Law on RTI

As it emerges from the discussion above, the legislation that have


been enacted by the states

as also the central Bill do not contain all the important components
of a law on the right to

information. For instance the Goa and the Tamil Nadu law do not
contain provisions on the

duty to provide information. The Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu laws have
a long list of

exceptions that keep out a lot of information from public domain. The
central FOI Bill is

also very week, and in certain aspects it does not even stand at par
with its counterpart in the

States. For example, the FOI Bill does not contain any independent
appeals mechanism nor

does it contain any penalties. It further fails to provide for an


independent monitoring

agency.

Neither the laws enacted by the various states nor the FOI Bill being
considered by the

central government are satisfactory, as these laws keep a large area


of information away from

the purview of the public. There is no uniformity or consistency


amongst the various state

laws that have been enacted. That is why there is a demand that the
central government must

make a law which applies uniformly to the whole country and sets out
clear procedure for

getting information

. It is also important for the central FOI Bill to be a strong law setting

out the minimum standards with regards to the components discussed


earlier, for example

setting out a reasonable time limit for response from administration


in cases of urgent

request for information. This will mean that the States will also have
to confirm to the

minimum standards set out in the central law and therefore, certain
definite minimum

standards will be assured to all information seekers in the country.

The process of law making itself in most cases has been


non-participatory. The laws made by

the government have been passed without much discussion or debate and
without taking

into consideration people's views on the issue. As a result of this,


the laws are not people

friendly and the common person is not aware of existence of


legislation, which is meant for

their benefit.

Conclusion

The realisation of Human Rights is dependent on a democratic society,


where the people are

empowered with information and knowledge, are able to scrutinise the


functioning of their

government and are capable of participating in a meaningful manner in


the governance of

the community. To this end, the RTI law is a tool, as it gives


entitlement and the mechanism

to obtain information from the government with which citizens can


become empowered by

acquiring a weapon to hold the government accountable, participate in


governance and

exercise their rights.

It must be kept in mind that mere enactment of a law does not mean
that government will

start implementing it in an effective manner. Civil society


organisations, NGO's and others

have a responsibility to ensure effective implementation. The same is


true for the

3 Detailed analysis of the state laws can be found on the CHRI website
www.humanrightsinitiative.org

Page 8

implementation of the RTI law as well. They have an important role to


play, for example, in

using the law for the benefit of the people, disseminating


information, analysing information,

generate debate on various issues and in carrying the voice of the


voiceless to policy makers.

Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ # LIG-2 No 761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,


OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,MYSORE 570017 KARNATAKA
INDIA cell : 91 9341820313 , 91 8970318202
Home page :
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/sosevoiceforjustice/ ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper / ,
http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice / ,
http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com / ,
http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,
http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com ,

http://paper.li/f-1368369249 ,

Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,


http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw
A Member of Amnesty International

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi