Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000
Cost-effectiveness of various
treatment modalities for adult
chronic periodontitis
P E R E. G J E R M O & J O S T E I N G R Y T T E N
The aim of this review was to assess the cost-effectiveness of various modalities for chronic periodontitis in adults. We searched the literature for studies
where time consumption and monetary costs (where
available) were used as expressions of the resources
required to perform the following types of services:
providing information on the disease and oral
hygiene instruction for patients; removal of subgingival calculus; access surgery; and maintenance and
prevention of recurrence of the disease. The following
outcome variables were chosen: retention of teeth, or
a surrogate variable such as change in bone level
measured on X-rays taken at the start and at the end
of a 1-year (or longer) period. The literature search
did not reveal any studies where these outcome
variables could be linked to information on resources
used in treatment. Therefore, we reviewed relevant
studies where different treatment techniques were
used but where the outcome variables were different.
This review revealed that in most cases it was difficult
to assess whether one type of treatment (or intervention) is more effective than another. We conclude
that better data are needed, in particular on outcomes, so that valid comparisons can be made between different types of treatment, for different types
of studies.
Periodontal disease is an inflammatory disease
induced by bacterial plaque adhering to the tooth
surface in contact with the gingiva. A lesion that is
contained in the gingival margin is termed gingivitis.
Gingivitis may be regarded as the result of an
immunologic reaction and as an attempt by the
organism to prevent the development of the tissuedestructive component of periodontal disease called
periodontitis. Gingivitis will always precede periodontitis, but its development into periodontitis
is rare (50). The development of gingivitis into
269
270
Methods
In order to approach the problem of cost-effectiveness of treatment modalities, we decided to use, as
outcome variable, either tooth loss or retention, or as
surrogate variables, bone level measured on radiographs (27) in randomized clinical trials. Variables
indicating mostly variations in the degree of inflammation (bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth,
clinical attachment level) were not accepted. Thus,
we applied level 5, according to Lundgren et al. (42),
as our end point, which is a rather coarse measure
but which is tangible to people. In order to assess,
with a certain degree of confidence, that the treatment had resulted in arrest of the progression of the
disease, we required an observation time of at least
1 year.
The terms cost-effectiveness, costbenefit and
costutility have recently been discussed by Bragger
(10) and we chose to use his definitions. This implies
that cost-effectiveness studies could include studies
where more than one treatment modality reached the
same end-point and the costs were compared, or
where different results were obtained at the same
cost using different treatment modalities. Possible
benefits (firm teeth, chewing capacity, avoiding
prosthetic replacements) and adverse effects of a
treatment type (sensitivity, antibiotic resistance,
negative cosmetics) were disregarded.
A literature search was performed using the terms
periodontal therapy and cost-effectiveness, cost,
time consumption, time factor and time, and
periodontal treatment modalities and cost-effectiveness, cost, time consumption, time factor and
time, in Medline (PubMed) and the Cochrane
Library. In addition, a hand search was performed in
relevant journals after 2003 with special attention
given to reference lists in review articles on related
subjects.
Results
No randomized clinical trials were found that satisfied the requirements for an outcome variable that
was tangible for patients (tooth loss, tooth retention,
radiographic assessments of bone level) and of
sufficient duration to disclose further progression of
the disease after treatment (1 year). Thus, a systematic review was not possible. However, some
studies that tried to address the cost-effectiveness
aspects of periodontal treatment modalities were
271
Subgingival debridement
Subgingival debridement is the cornerstone of all
periodontal treatment (33), and many studies confirm its effectiveness in controlling mild to moderate
periodontitis (pockets 5 mm) (41, 62), (24, 20, 35,
51). For this purpose, various techniques and
instruments, both manual and machine driven, have
been developed and their effect compared (14, 19, 60,
65). The majority of studies show only marginal differences in outcome and time consumption for performing the various procedures (59, 67). One recent
review indicates that ultrasonic instrumentation of
single-rooted teeth may yield a time gain as compared with manual debridement (65). However, because the equipment necessary for ultrasonic, laser
or other machine-driven instruments infers extra
costs, scaling and root planing with manual scalers
may be regarded as the most cost-effective treatment
modality for mild and moderate disease. In severe
cases of periodontitis, adjunctive antibacterial treatment (systemically or locally applied) seems to
provide a small additional benefit (23, 45, 48, 64).
However, while the adjunctive use of systemically
applied antibiotics may be relatively cheap, the costs
for single tooth treatment with local drug-delivery
systems are not negligible (10). Full-mouth debridement (52), used in combination with systemic antibiotics, has shown a small, but clinically insignificant,
advantage over the conventional approach (37, 38).
For severe periodontitis (periodontal pockets
6 mm), closed nonsurgical treatment may be
insufficient to arrest the disease, although this is
generally recommended as the first treatment approach. The result of the nonsurgical approach must
then be evaluated and surgery performed if satisfactory results are not obtained (33). From a costeffectiveness perspective this approach will add
to the costs when surgery is necessary, compared to
the costs if surgery had been performed immediately
(6, 7).
Access surgery
In the treatment of chronic periodontitis, periodontal
surgery is performed to obtain access to affected root
surfaces for the removal of calculus and biofilm (68).
This may be obtained by gingivectomy or various flap
procedures. The type of procedure chosen does not
influence the outcome when this is assessed as no
further progression of the disease, provided that
optimal plaque control is maintained by the patient
(55). However, lack of plaque control after perio-
272
dontal surgery always results in failure (49), regardless of the surgical technique employed. This would
tend to favor gingivectomy as a result of the simplicity of the method that probably renders it
the more cost-effective option. However, other aspects, such as unwanted side effects (sensitivity,
cosmetics), may be influenced by the technique used
and should be evaluated when the choice is made.
There are indications that prescaling before surgery
may require more time than debridement after surgery (7). This would make it cost-effective to perform
surgery without prescaling if it is obvious that surgery
will be needed. It has been suggested that performing
scaling during or after surgery requires less time than
a systematic subgingival debridement (6, 7). The
difficulty is that there are no absolute criteria to
determine when surgery would be indicated.
Adjunctive systemic antibiotics have been shown
to offer some advantage to the treatment outcome in
severe periodontitis cases and in refractory periodontitis (45, 64), but a recent report questions the
usefulness in combination with surgical approaches
(23). However, the increased cost of a single course of
antibiotics does not influence the total cost of treatment in a way that would be decisive for the costeffectiveness of the treatment.
Concluding remarks
As inflammation is variably associated with destructive disease and difficult for patients to assess, future
studies on the cost-effectiveness of periodontal
treatment modalities would benefit from focusing on
end point variables, such as tooth loss or tooth
retention, that are tangible for our patients. Because
of the slow progression of chronic periodontitis, even
in populations that do not receive treatment (39, 40),
the study period should preferably extend to several
years. The study period may be reduced if bone loss,
assessed on radiographs, is employed as a surrogate
outcome variable (27). Cost-effectiveness studies in
many other fields in medicine have the advantage of
having well-defined and distinct end points. For
example, with respect to the treatment of cancer, the
chosen end point is usually the 5-year survival rate. It
is easier to compare the costs of different types of
treatment when the expected outcome is well defined
and agreed upon, compared to when it is not.
Therefore, one challenge for periodontics is to develop outcome criteria that can be generally accepted
and to which costs can be related.
The narrative review of articles that were not accepted for our systematic review indicates that the
main cost gains in periodontal therapy would be
achieved by avoiding unnecessary surgery and by
applying intervals of 1 year or more in the life-long
maintenance phase. Variation in other modalities
would probably display only minor differences in
cost.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
References
1. Antczak-Bouckoms AA, Weinstein MC. Cost-effectiveness
analysis of periodontal disease control. J Dent Res 1987: 66:
16301635.
2. Axelsson P, Lindhe J. Effect of controlled oral hygiene
procedures on caries and periodontal disease in adults.
Results after 6 years. J Clin Periodontol 1981: 8: 239
248.
3. Axelsson P, Nystrom B, Lindhe J. The long-term effect of a
plaque control program on tooth mortality, caries and
periodontal disease in adults. Results after 30 years of
maintenance. J Clin Periodontol 2004: 31: 749757.
4. Badersten A, Nilveus R, Egelberg J. Effect of nonsurgical
periodontal therapy. I. Moderately advanced periodontitis.
J Clin Periodontol 1981: 8: 5772.
5. Beirne P, Worthington HV, Clarkso JE. Routine scale and
polish for periodontal health in adults. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev 2007: (4): CDOO4625.
6. Bellini HT. A System to Determine the Periodontal Therapeutic Needs of a Population time evaluation and planning
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
273
274
39. Lindhe J, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Progression of periodontal disease in adult subjects in the absence of periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 1983: 10: 433442.
nerud A
, Boysen H, Morrison E. Natural history of
40. Loe H, A
periodontal disease in man. Rapid, moderate and no loss of
attachment in Sri Lankan laborers 1446 years of age. J Clin
Periodontol 1986: 13: 431445.
41. Lvdal A, Arn O, Schei O, Waerhaug J. Combined effect of
sub-gingival scaling and controlled oral hygiene on the
incidence of gingivitis. Acta Odontol Scand 1961: 19:
537555.
42. Lundgren D, Asklow B, Thorstensson H, Harefeldt AM.
Success rates in periodontal treatment as related to choice
of evaluation criteria. Presentation of an evaluation criteria
staircase for cost-benefit use. J Clin Periodontol 2001: 28:
2330.
43. Mariotti A, Monroe PJ. Pharmacologic management of
periodontal diseases using systematically administered
agents. Dent Clin North Am 1998: 42: 245262.
44. Mayer MPA, Buischi YP, Oliveira LB, Gjermo P. Long term
effect of an oral hygiene training program on knowledge
and behaviour. Oral Health Prev Dent 2003: 1: 3743.
45. Mombelli A. Antibiotics in periodontal therapy. In: Lindhe
J, Lang NP, Karring T editors. Clinical periodontology and
implant dentistry, 5th edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
Ltd, 2008: 882897.
46. Mubarak A, Gjermo P. Assignment of dental school
patients using periodontal treatment need indices. Brief
communication. J Dent Educ 1990: 54: 213215.
47. Needleman I, Suvan J, Moles DR, Pimlott J. A systematic
review of professional mechanical plaque removal for
prevention of periodontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2005:
32(Suppl. 6): 229282.
48. Niederman R, Abdelshehid G, Goodson JM. Periodontal
therapy using local delivery of antimicrobial agents. Dent
Clin North Am 2002: 46: 665677.
49. Nyman S, Lindhe J, Rosling B. Periodontal surgery in plaque-infected dentitions. J Clin Periodontol 1977: 4:
240249.
50. Page RC, Schroeder HE. Periodontitis in man and other
animals. A comparative review. Basel: S. Karger, 1982.
51. Paulander J, Axelsson P, Lindhe J, Wennstrom J. Intra-oral
pattern of tooth and periodontal bone loss between the age
of 50 and 60 years. A longitudinal prospective study. Acta
Odontol Scand 2004: 62: 214222.
52. Quirynen M, Bollen CM, Vandekerckhove BN, Dekeyser C,
Papaionno W, Eyssen H. Full- vs. partial-mouth disinfection in the treatment of periodontal infections: short-term
clinical and microbiological observations. J Dent Res 1995:
74: 14591467.
53. Robinson PG, Deacon SA, Deery C, Heanue M, Walmsley
AD, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Shaw WC. Manual versus
powered toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev. 2005: (2): CD002281.
54. Roscher T, Rosing CK, Gjermo P, Aass AM. Effect of
instruction and motivation in the use of electric and
manual toothbrushes in periodontal patients. A comparative study. Braz Oral Res 2004: 18: 296300.
55. Rosling B, Nyman S, Lindhe J, Jern B. The healing potential
of the periodontal tissues following different techniques of
periodontal surgery in plaque-free dentitions. A 2-year
clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1976: 3: 233255.
275