Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Medicine
http://ajs.sagepub.com/
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine
Additional services and information for The American Journal of Sports Medicine can be found at:
Email Alerts: http://ajs.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
Subscriptions: http://ajs.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) arthroscopic reconstruction, the tendon autograft used to replace the injured
ligament undergoes a biological healing process consisting
of 4 successive phases: initial necrosis, revascularization,
cellular repopulation, and remodeling.4,7,11,18,19,50 Revascularization contributes significantly to this process by
providing the nutrient elements to sustain graft viability
and by facilitating the subsequent remodeling phases to
be conducted.4,18,41,50 The uneventful transition of these
histomorphological alterations will eventually lead to graft
ligamentization.4,19,30,31,41,46 As a neoligament, the tendon
z
Address correspondence to Anastasios D. Georgoulis, MD, Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Center, PO Box 1042, Ioannina 45110, Greece
(e-mail: georgoulis@osmci.gr).
*Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina,
Greece.
y
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
Center, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest in the
authorship and publication of this contribution.
1478
Downloaded from ajs.sagepub.com at TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY on October 28, 2014
autograft will achieve its incorporation to the new environment and therefore its functional adaptation to its new
role.4,9,18,31,56 The earlier this process is completed, the
sooner the ACL substitute graft will meet its new loading
demands, allowing the patient to resume earlier his or
her sport activities.4,19,25
In this healing process, the microenvironment surrounding the graft plays an important role because it provides the necessary elements for its healing.4,46
According to the composition of this environment, 3
distinct sites can be discerned along the graft course:
(1) the intra-articular site, (2) the site of the graft that
is located inside the osseous tunnels, and (3) the site of
the graft that is adjacent to the fixation material inside
the osseous tunnels. The first graft site interacts circumferentially with the surrounding synovial environment.
The site that is entirely enclosed in the osseous tunnels
interacts extensively with the cancellous bone, while the
graft site that is located between the fixation material
and the osseous tunnel wall interacts partially with
both of them. Given the prominent differences in the composition of these surrounding spaces, questions can be
raised concerning whether each of the aforementioned
graft sites could be differently affected in terms of
revascularization due to different nutrient elements
supply.
Several histological studies have been conducted in
dissimilar in vivo models documenting the revascularization process of the graft with variable results. On the
scope of imaging, MRI with the use of gadoliniumdiethylenetriamine pentacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) contrast
agent has been used as a valuable tool to provide noninvasively important information regarding the vascular status of the graft tissue. It is well established that
enhancement of a tissue after contrast agent administration results in increase of its signal intensity.8,27,36,37,51,52
Weiler et al,52 by means of contrast-enhanced MRI in
a sheep model, demonstrated that the signal intensity
changes observed in the graft tissue reflect its vascularity
and biomechanical properties. Additionally, evaluation of
quantitative imaging parameters, such as signal-to-noise
quotient (SNQ), was correlated with the degree of vascularity as it was histologically confirmed. However, in
this animal-based study, only the intra-articular part of
the graft was examined.
To our knowledge, no previous studies have been conducted on human patients to compare noninvasively the
degree of vascularity in the aforementioned distinct graft
sites that can be discerned along its course in relation to
the surrounding microenvironment. Therefore, the aim of
the present study was to quantitatively evaluate, by means
of contrast-enhanced MRI, the signal intensity changes of
the graft over time that correspond to its revascularization.
We hypothesized that the differences in the surrounding
microenvironment will be reflected in the vascularization
process.
References 4, 7, 11, 18, 19, 30, 31, 41, 46, 50, 56.
1479
1480 Ntoulia et al
Figure 1. Tibial (A) and femoral (B) tunnel placement in a left knee.The tibial tunnel was drilled in the center of the ACL footprint.
The femoral tunnel was drilled at the 10-oclock position of the left knee (or the 2-oclock position corresponding to the right knee)
according to the classification system of the scientific committee of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery
and Arthroscopy.
about the 10-oclock position (for a right knee) or at the 2oclock position (for a left knee).
The placement of the graft in the femoral tunnel was
performed with the cortical side of the bone plug close to
the over-the-top position. In the tibia, we twisted the graft
90, so as to recreate the anatomic spiral of ACL fibers.20,34
Fixation of the graft was performed in all patients with the
same bioabsorbable interference screws, consisting of polylactic acid (PLA) and hydroxylapatite (HA) (BioRCI-HA,
Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, Massachusetts),
on both femur and tibia (size, 7 3 20 mm and 9 3 20 mm,
respectively). Interference screws were inserted at the cancellous side of the bone plugs. After the fixation to the
femur, maximal tension was performed manually by pulling
the graft from its tibial edge and pushing the tibia posteriorly. Holding the knee in 30 of flexion23 and holding the
graft tensioned as we described, we proceeded to the fixation
on the tibia with the second interference screw (Figure 1).
Finally, the graft was inspected both in full flexion and
full extension so as to exclude graft impingement at the
intercondylar roof, the lateral condyle, and the posterior
cruciate ligament. A notchplasty was not performed in any
of our cases.
Clinical Evaluation
All ACL-reconstructed patients followed the same carefully
controlled rehabilitation protocol. They were allowed to
return to sports-related activities at 6 months after surgery, provided that they had regained full functional
strength and stability. Strength at that time was determined with the BIODEX (System-3, Biodex Corp, Shirley,
New York) isokinetic dynamometer, revealing acceptable
symmetry in quadriceps and hamstring strength.45 Clinical examination was performed by the same experienced
orthopaedic surgeon at the same day that the MRI examination was performed and included several clinical tests
for objective and subjective evaluation of knee joint stability. Specifically, the subjective examination included the
Lachman, anterior drawer, and pivot-shift tests, as well
as International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC),
Tegner, and Lysholm activity scores. In addition, anterior
tibial translation was evaluated using the KT-1000 knee
arthrometer (MEDmetric Corp, San Diego, California).49
The measurements were performed with the application
at the tibia of 134-N posterior-anterior external force, as
well as maximum manual posterior-anterior external force
until heel clearance.
MRI Evaluation
Each patient underwent static MRI of the knee joint at 3
time intervals: third postoperative day and 6 and 12
months after surgery. The examination at the third postoperative day was performed after the removal of the drainage tubes. Clinical examination and routine laboratory
profile of the patients, including total white blood cell
(WBC) count, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), were performed, and results were normal
with no evidence of surgery-related infection. All the
1481
TABLE 1
MR Imaging Protocol Series of Different Sequences Performed in Orthogonal Planes to Obtain an Overview of
All Knee Joint Structures and to Evaluate Graft Integritya
Parameters Sequence
PDW/TSE/SPIR
PDW/TSE
STIR/long TE
PDW/TSE
T2W/TSE/SPIR
T1W/TSE
3D/FFE/SPIR
Plane
TR (ms)
TE
FA
NSA
Thickness/Gap (mm)
FOV/RFOV
Axial
Coronal
Coronal
Sagittal
Sagittal
Oblique axial
Oblique sagittal
3455
3092
1798
2711
2600
500
32
15
16
55
16
70
17
5.1
90
90
90
90
90
90
25
2
2
3
2
2
3
2
4.00/0.4
3.3/0.33
3.3/0.33
3.3/0.33
3.3/0.33
3.0/0.3
2.0
180/80
180/90
180/90
180/90
180/90
180/90
180/80
PDW, proton density weighted; TSE, turbo spin echo; SPIR, spectral presaturation by inversion recovery; STIR, short tau inversion
recovery; TE, echo time; T2W, T2 weighted; T1W, T1 weighted; 3D/FFE, 3-dimensional fast field echo; TR, repetition time; FA, flip angle;
NSA, number of sample averages; FOV, field of view; RFOV, rectangular field of view.
examinations were performed with a 1.5-T imager (Gyroscan ACS NT, Philips, Medical System Best, Best, the Netherlands) and a circular receiver-transmission extremity coil.
The knee was positioned in full extension, was comfortable
to the patient, and was immobilized with foam padding. An
infusion line was placed in the patients antecubital vein
before the examination, so that the patient could remain
totally immobile during the examination. The unenhanced
examination protocol included sequences in all 3 planes to
obtain an overview of the graft and joint structures. The
implementation of a 3-dimensional spoiled gradient echo
sequence with fat suppression (3-D FFE/STIR) in an oblique
sagittal plane along the long axis of the graft, before and 1
minute after gadolinium (Gd-DTPA) contrast administration (0.1 mmol/kg body weight), was used for the analysis
of signal intensity, which was performed with the computer
software ImageJ (version 1.43, National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda, Maryland). The detailed parameters of
the MRI protocol are outlined in Table 1.
Data Analysis
Two radiologists with experience in musculoskeletal MRI
evaluated blindly all MRI examinations, with disagreements resolved by consensus. The image that showed the
full extent of the graft from its femoral tunnel exit through
the joint space up to the tibial tunnel exit was selected for
the analysis. Three sites of the graft were distinguished
according to the surrounding microenvironment, and
they were evaluated independently: (1) the intra-articular
part of the graft located centrally within the joint (intraarticular site), (2) the intraosseous part of the graft
surrounded by the osseous tibial tunnel wall (intraosseous
tibial tunnel site), and finally (3) the part of the graft
located at the interface between the osseous tibial tunnel
wall and the biodegradable interference screw (intraosseous juxta screw site) (Figure 2).
The signal intensity (SI) was calculated at the 3 aforementioned graft sites using an 8-mm2 elliptical region of interest
(ROI). The SNQ was then calculated at each of the 3 sites by
dividing the SI of the graft by the noise of the image background on the images obtained before contrast agent
RESULTS
Clinical Evaluation
All ACL-reconstructed patients were satisfied with the outcome of the surgery and resumed their preinjury level of
1482 Ntoulia et al
MRI Evaluation
Calculation of the enhancement index at the 3 graft sites
on the third postoperative day MRI examination showed
mean values of 0.95 6 0.03, 0.93 6 0.02, and 0.90 6 0.02
for the intra-articular, intraosseous tibial tunnel, and
intraosseous juxta screw sites, respectively. According to
the biomedical meaning of the enhancement index, no significant vascularization can be assumed at this time. However, 6 months after surgery, the enhancement index mean
values were 1.52 6 0.14, 1.36 6 0.16, and 1.29 6 0.15,
respectively. All these values were found to be significantly
increased above the threshold value of 1, demonstrating
1483
TABLE 2
Enhancement Index Numerical and Biomedical Definitiona
Enhancement Index EI
SNQafter
SNQbefore
SNQafter . SNQbefore, EI . 1
SNQafter SNQbefore, EI 1
Satisfactory revascularization
Insufficient revascularization
a
Enhancement index ratio provides directly interpretative
information regarding the presence, or not, of revascularization.
Uptake of the contrast medium will result in the SNQ values
obtained after its administration being greater than before, and
therefore, their resultant ratio will be greater or at least equal
to the numeric value of 1. This signifies satisfactory revascularization for the specific graft site. On the contrary, enhancement index
values lower than 1 mean insufficient revascularization. Therefore, 1 is the threshold value for demonstrating revascularization.
Figure 4. After contrast agent administration. The same sagittal section is depicted after intravenous administration of
gadolinium. Uptake of the contrast medium can be seen as
increased signal intensity within the vessels of the popliteal
region. Identical ROIs were assigned at the exact same positions of the 3 graft sites by the software program, and calculations of the SNQ values were similarly repeated.
Intraosseous Juxta Screw Site. Finally, at the third
postoperative day, the intraosseous juxta screw site
exhibited enhancement index values lower than 1 as the
other 2 sites did. Six and 12 months after surgery, increase
of the enhancement index values was noted, although nonsignificant as well (P = .07).
Moreover, comparison of the enhancement index values
between the 2 intraosseous graft sites showed that the site
that was entirely surrounded by the cancellous bone achieved
higher values than the juxta screw site during the whole
observation period. This finding was supported by the large
effect sizes, although significant differences were also not
detected. The above findings are summarized in Figure 5.
Power analysis revealed that all effect sizes of our comparisons were .0.8. This enabled us to confidently regard
as sufficient the population sample for detecting correctly
the true experimental outcome (lack or presence of differences) between graft sites at every time interval. The
intraobserver and interobserver agreement, as assessed
by the k coefficient, was excellent in every case (0.92: CI,
0.9-0.94 and 0.9: CI, 0.89-0.91, respectively).
DISCUSSION
The successful outcome of ACL reconstruction requires the
incorporation of the tendon autograft into its new environment.4,30,56 This process will take the intrinsic metamorphosis
References 4, 7, 11, 18, 19, 28, 30, 31, 41, 46, 50.
1484 Ntoulia et al
1485
revascularization, which is clearly and objectively demonstrated by contrast-enhanced MRI. This process occurs in
association with the surrounding microenvironment, with
the intra-articular site of the graft being the first fully
revascularized site even 6 months after surgery, while the
intraosseous sites were still in progress throughout the first
postoperative year. Enhancement index is an objective
imaging parameter to directly assess this phenomenon
with contrast-enhanced MRI, which can be used as a valuable noninvasive tool to evaluate the healing process of
the ACL graft.
REFERENCES
1. Abe S, Kurosaka M, Iguchi T, Yoshiya S, Hirohata K. Light and electron microscopic study of remodeling and maturation process in
autogenous graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Arthroscopy. 1993;9(4):394-405.
2. Abujudeh HH, Kosaraju VK, Kaewlai R. Acute adverse reactions to
gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadobenate dimeglumine: experience with 32,659 injections. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(2):
430-434.
3. Amiel D, Akeson WH, Renzoni S, Harwood F, Abel M. Nutrition of cruciate ligament reconstruction by diffusion: collagen synthesis studied
in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand. 1986;57(3):201-203.
4. Amiel D, Kleiner JB, Roux RD, Harwood FL, Akeson WH. The phenomenon of ligamentization: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon. J Orthop Res. 1986;4(2):
162-172.
5. Arai Y, Hara K, Takahashi T, et al. Evaluation of the vascular status of
autogenous hamstring tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament
reconstruction in humans using magnetic resonance angiography.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(4):342-347.
6. Arnoczky SP, Rubin RM, Marshall JL. Microvasculature of the cruciate ligaments and its response to injury: an experimental study in
dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(8):1221-1229.
7. Arnoczky SP, Tarvin GB, Marshall JL. Anterior cruciate ligament
replacement using patellar tendon: an evaluation of graft revascularization in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:217-224.
8. Beltran J, Chandnani V, McGhee RA Jr, Kursunoglu-Brahme S.
Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156(3):457-466.
9. Bicer EK, Lustig S, Servien E, Selmi TA, Neyret P. Current knowledge
in the anatomy of the human anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg
Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(8):1075-1084.
10. Bulut D, Albrecht N, Imohl M, et al. Hormonal status modulates circulating endothelial progenitor cells. Clin Res Cardiol. 2007;96(5):258-263.
11. Clancy WG Jr, Narechania RG, Rosenberg TD, Gmeiner JG,
Wisnefske DD, Lange TA. Anterior and posterior cruciate ligament
reconstruction in rhesus monkeys: a histological, microangiographic,
and biomechanical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:12701284.
12. Clancy WG Jr, Nelson DA, Reider B, Narechania RG. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using one-third of the patellar ligament,
augmented by extra-articular tendon transfers. J Bone Joint Surg
Am. 1982;64(3):352-359.
13. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
14. Dahlin LB, Hanff G, Myrhage R. Healing of ligaments in synovial fluid:
an experimental study in rabbits. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand
Surg. 1991;25(2):97-102.
15. Di Stefano R, Barsotti MC, Felice F, et al. Smoking and endothelial
progenitor cells: a revision of literature. Curr Pharm Des.
2010;16(23):2559-2566.
16. Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Strouse PJ, Jan SC. Frequency and
severity of acute allergic-like reactions to gadolinium-containing i.v.
1486 Ntoulia et al
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36. Muramatsu K, Hachiya Y, Izawa H. Serial evaluation of human anterior cruciate ligament grafts by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of allografts and autografts.
Arthroscopy. 2008;24(9):1038-1044.
37. Petersen W, Tillmann B. Structure and vascularization of the cruciate
ligaments of the human knee joint. Anat Embryol (Berl).
1999;200(3):325-334.
38. Rak KM, Gillogly SD, Schaefer RA, Yakes WF, Liljedahl RR. Anterior
cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. 1991;178(2):553-556.
39. Recht MP, Kramer J. MR imaging of the postoperative knee: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 2002;22(4):765-774.
40. Recht MP, Parker RD, Irizarry JM. Second time around: evaluating
the postoperative anterior cruciate ligament. Magn Reson Imaging
Clin N Am. 2000;8(2):285-297.
41. Rougraff BT, Shelbourne KD. Early histologic appearance of human
patellar tendon autografts used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7(1):9-14.
42. Ruehm SG, Nanz D, Baumann A, Schmid M, Debatin JF. 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the run-off vessels: value of
image subtraction. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13(3):402-411.
43. Runge VM, Wood ML, Kaufman D, Price AC. Gd DTPA: future applications with advanced imaging techniques. Radiographics. 1988;
8(1):161-179.
44. Saddik D, McNally EG, Richardson M. MRI of Hoffas fat pad. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33(8):433-444.
45. Schatzmann L, Brunner P, Staubli HU. Effect of cyclic preconditioning on the tensile properties of human quadriceps tendons and patellar ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6:
S56-S61.
46. Scheffler SU, Unterhauser FN, Weiler A. Graft remodeling and ligamentization after cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports
Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(9):834-842.
47. Sckell A, Leunig M, Fraitzl CR, Ganz R, Ballmer FT. The connectivetissue envelope in revascularisation of patellar tendon grafts. J Bone
Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(5):915-920.
48. Shankar SS, Steinberg HO. Obesity and endothelial dysfunction.
Semin Vasc Med. 2005;5(1):56-64.
49. Steiner ME, Brown C, Zarins B, Brownstein B, Koval PS, Stone P.
Measurement of anterior-posterior displacement of the knee: a comparison of the results with instrumented devices and with clinical
examination. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(9):1307-1315.
50. Unterhauser FN, Bail HJ, Hoher J, Haas NP, Weiler A. Endoligamentous revascularization of an anterior cruciate ligament graft. Clin
Orthop Relat Res. 2003;414:276-288.
51. Vogl TJ, Schmitt J, Lubrich J, et al. Reconstructed anterior cruciate
ligaments using patellar tendon ligament grafts: diagnostic value of
contrast-enhanced MRI in a 2-year follow-up regimen. Eur Radiol.
2001;11(8):1450-1456.
52. Weiler A, Peters G, Maurer J, Unterhauser FN, Sudkamp NP. Biomechanical properties and vascularity of an anterior cruciate ligament
graft can be predicted by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance
imaging: a two-year study in sheep. Am J Sports Med. 2001;
29(6):751-761.
53. White LM, Kramer J, Recht MP. MR imaging evaluation of the postoperative knee: ligaments, menisci, and articular cartilage. Skeletal
Radiol. 2005;34:431-452.
54. Whiteside LA, Sweeney RE Jr. Nutrient pathways of the cruciate ligaments: an experimental study using the hydrogen wash-out technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(7):1176-1180.
55. Yu WD, Liu SH, Hatch JD, Panossian V, Finerman GA. Effect of estrogen on cellular metabolism of the human anterior cruciate ligament.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;366:229-238.
56. Zaffagnini S, De Pasquale V, Marchesini Reggiani L, et al. Neoligamentization process of BTPB used for ACL graft: histological evaluation from 6 months to 10 years. Knee. 2007;14(2):87-93.
For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGEs Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav