Mark Mishak v. Google, Inc. et al Doc.

9
Case 2:07-cv-08258-CAS-JCR Document 9 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 1 of 2

1 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

MICHAEL H. PAGE - #154913
2 710 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
3 Telephone: (415) 391-5400
Facsimile: (415) 397-7188
4
Attorneys for Defendant
5 LYCOS, INC.

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SANTA ANA DIVISION
10

11
MARK MISHAK, dba INEEDATV.COM, Case No. CV07-8258 CAS (JCRx)
12
Plaintiff, STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR
13 DEFENDANT LYCOS, INC. TO ANSWER
v. OR OTHERWISE PLEAD IN RESPONSE
14 TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
GOOGLE, INC., AMERICAN ONLINE,
15 INC., NETSCAPE, INC., MICROSOFT Judge: The Honorable Christina A. Snyder
NETWORK, INC., ASK JEEVES, INC.
16 EXCITE, INC., WEBCRAWLER, INC., Date Comp. Filed: December 20, 2007
YAHOO, INC., CONVERSA, INC., LYCOS,
17 INC., HOTBOT INC., ALTAVISTA INC.,
CRAIGSLIST INC., RESPOND INC.,
18 INFOSEEK INC., YELLOW PAGES INC.,
PLANETSEARCH INC., PRONET INC.,
19 NORTHERNLIGHT INC., LUCKYSURF
INC., COMFIND INC., LIQUIDPRICE INC.,
20 EARTHLINK INC., DOES 1-100,

21 Defendants.

22

23 WHEREAS:
24 1. Plaintiff Mark Mishak d/b/a INEEDATV.com (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on
25 December 20, 2007;
26 2. Defendant Lycos’ responsive pleading is currently due, pursuant to this Court’s
27 Order, on February 19, 2008;
28 ///
1
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT LYCOS, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
411323.01 PLEAD IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
CASE NO. CV07-8258 CAS (JCRx)
Dockets.Justia.com
 Case 2:07-cv-08258-CAS-JCR Document 9 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 2 of 2

1 3. None of the other Defendants in this action have been served with the Complaint

2 in this action;

3 4. Plaintiff is currently considering whether to dismiss or amend his complaint, and

4 requires additional time to consult with counsel; and

5 5. In the event this action is not dismissed, the parties and Court will avoid

6 duplication of effort if there is a single, unified response date for all Defendants.

7 NOW THEREFORE,

8 Defendant Lycos, Inc., through its attorneys, and Plaintiff Mark Mishak, through his

9 attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond

10 to the Complaint shall be extended a further 30 days, up to and including March 20, 2008, and

11 request that this Court enter the accompanying proposed order to that effect.

12

13 Dated: February 14, 2008 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

14

15
/s/ Michael H. Page
By: __________________________________
16 MICHAEL H. PAGE
Attorneys for Defendant
17 LYCOS, INC.
18
Dated: February 14, 2008 LAW OFFICE OF ROGER JAMES
19 AGAJANIAN
20

21
/s/ Roger James Agajanian
By: __________________________________
22 ROGER JAMES AGAJANIAN
Attorneys for Plaintiff
23 MARK MISHAK, dba INEEDATV.COM
24

25

26

27

28
2
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT LYCOS, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
411323.01 PLEAD IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
CASE NO. CV07-8258 CAS (JCRx)