Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Personality
J. Neville
http://journals.cambridge.org
145
IP address: 132.234.242.15
http://journals.cambridge.org
IP address: 132.234.242.15
Eysenck stated that he' prefers to keep moving and doing things' Pop Music, Preference and
and that he' craves excitement'. The introvert on the other hand
Personality
is ' quiet... does not like excitement, takes matters of everyday
*' e v i e
life with proper seriousness... seldom behaves in an aggressive
manner
'
It has been argued that music is capable of expressing such
concepts; Swanwick has demonstrated that music, on a general
level, is able to communicate such characteristics by means of
gestures that appear to have their biological equivalents in
human behaviour (Swanwick, 1974). The terms 'serious' and
'peaceful' are often applied to musical items, and there do seem
to be recognisable musical gestures that lend themselves to such
descriptions. Among these would be a slow tempo with a steady
but often unobtrusive rhythm, a general lack of melodic and
harmonic tension (phrases tend to contain a minimum of awkward
intervals) and a somewhat restricted dynamic range. Extremes
of volume are rare, the emphasis being on quiet sounds.
Turning to the extrovert, my addition of the word ' driving'
to the adjective ' exciting' was the result of scrutiny of the main
characteristics of extrovert behaviour postulated by Eysenck,
especially 'he prefers to keep moving'. 'Exciting' music would
involve criteria such as a rapid tempo and a predominance of loud
sounds. 'Driving' music maintains a forward thrust, sometimes
obtained by rhythmic predictability but often by rhythmic
variety - the pulse may vary but the feeling of momentum is
maintained.
To obtain musical examples that seemed to satisfy these
criteria proved very difficult. I decided to use one-minute
extracts, because intense concentration on a single item for a
longer period seems very hard for most fourteen-year-olds. In
fact, finding extracts that consistently exhibited the stipulated
criteria for even this length of time was a problem. I did not wish
to use vocal items, since words, when understood, can prejudice
a reaction to the music. When not understood they can prove
a distraction. In the end, selecting from instrumental music only,
I decided that if one set of criteria could be identified as the
dominant feature of an extract I would be able to find suitable
musical examples to correspond to the poles of extroversion and
introversion. From now on these poles will be referred to as the
dimensions, while the individual extracts will be termed the
tunes.
I chose four tunes from thefieldof pop and four from the field
of classical music. It could be argued that to choose four classical
tunes might encourage a negative response from the fourteenyear-old subjects. However, I was interested to ascertain whether
this would be the case in audition (actual listening as opposed
to verbal response). Also analysis would clarify whether there
might be a hierarchy of factors affecting preference with the
pop/classical dichotomy at or near the top. Pop and classical will
from now on be referred to as the kinds of music.
At least two tunes had to be used to represent each dimension.
147
http://journals.cambridge.org
IP address: 132.234.242.15
Vaughan
Williams,
Smetana,
Camel,
Santana,
Brahms,
Bruckner,
Camel,
Pink Floyd,
Tune
Kind
Dimension
1st movement
Symphony no. 6
'Sarka'
'Lunar Sea'
'Soul Sacrifice'
2nd movement
Piano Concerto
no. 1
2nd movement
Symphony no. 4
'Chord Change'
'A Pillow of
Winds'
Classical
Extrovert
Classical
Classical
Extrovert
Extrovert
Extrovert
Introvert
Classical
Introvert
Pop
Pop
Introvert
Introvert
Pop
Pop
Naturally one would not claim that the whole of the Brahms
concerto would fit one dimension. However, the extracts chosen
(in this case the very start of the slow movement) scored
positively during pilot tests designed tofindmusical extracts that
appeared to match the dimensions. This also explains the
presence of two tunes by Camel. These were totally dissimilar
in style and presentation, and so I felt justified in using both,
as they too scored positively in the pilot tests. It must be stressed
that at no time was any information given to any of the subjects
about any of the tunes.
The listening test was administered to the subjects en masse
but preserving each individual's anonymity. In order to determine
their preference rating they were asked to respond to each tune
separately in terms of liking and disliking. A simple five-point
scale was used, where one point rated low preference and five
points high preference.
The subjects were drawn from two schools, chosen to provide
contrasting social backgrounds (although it must be stressed that
class as a factor was never taken into consideration in the
experiment). I was however interested to ascertain whether there
was any significant effect on preference regarding the school
attended, which we were, of course, able to measure.
148
http://journals.cambridge.org
IP address: 132.234.242.15
Table 1
Tune
Extroversion
correlation
coefficient
01937
A (Pink Floyd)
B (Bruckner)
-00097
C (Camel - ' Lunar Sea')
0-606
-00548
D (Smetana)
00537
E (Vaughan Williams)
00757
F (Brahms)
G (Camel - 'Chord Change') 01439
00743
H (Santana)
Significance
level
0031 P < 005
0-463 (n.s.)
0-282 (n.s.)
0-301 (n.s.)
0-305 (n.s.)
0-235 (n.s.)
0084 (n.s.)
0-240 (n.s.)
http://journals.cambridge.org
BME 2
IP address: 132.234.242.15
for one kind of music over another (in this case pop or classical).
Similarly I wished to ascertain whether the sex of the subjects
had a significant effect on preference, or whether there were
significant differences regarding the two schools.
Table 2 reveals the only significant interactions.
Table 2
Dimension, tune, school and sex
Kind, dimension and tune
Kind and school
P < 0044
P < 0019
P < 0003
Pop
A
0001
0001
0001
0015
0001
0001
0016
0072
0-235
0-367
0001
0001
0170
0-340
0016
0042
0177
0073
0-347
0001
0001
0174
0-212
0-226
0011
0001
0015
0001
IP address: 132.234.242.15
between these tunes than they were between the less familiar
norms of classical music. This suggests that familiarity might be
a very important factor in determining preference. I was not
testing this factor, but it would be interesting to include it in a
future experiment.
Table 4
Tune
Kind
Mean
score
S.D.
2-9
2-8
26
2-2
1-8
1-8
1-7
1-6
1 113
1179
1058
1026
0-943
0-888
0-948
0-719
IP address: 132.234.242.15
including the kind of tune and the sex and school of the subjects.
The fact that the pop items were generally preferred to the
classical items should not lead us to assume that this factor (kind)
is the most important influence on preference. Once again the
complex interactions between this and the other factors show
that it would be incorrect to suggest the establishment of a
hierarchy in terms of influences. This is also due to the fact that
the subjects appeared to perceive each tune as a separate entity
to be considered on its own merits, regardless of any possible
link with dimension or kind.
This would seem to be the most positive result of my study:
the discovery that the autonomy of each musical item was
recognised by the young people. This suggests that they are able
to listen to music (albeit possibly only in small extracts) and base
their judgements on purely musical criteria, regardless of what
they might be 'expected' to think. This is very encouraging,
since it shows a respect for the sounds themselves, rather than
for any associations they might possess.
Regarding my initial hypothesis, it would seem obvious that
although personality types (as denned in Eysenckian terms) do
not appear to have a significant effect on musical preference of
adolescents, there are other areas of enquiry that could profitably
be undertaken. We might try to gauge the effects of factors such
as age, and especially familiarity with tunes on preference. It
would seem to be important to fill these gaps in our knowledge,
since music teachers would then be in a better position when it
comes to making choices about the music they wish to present
to their pupils in the classroom.
References
H. (1965) Fact and Fiction in Psychology. Harmondsworth:
Penguin.
NEVILLE, J. (1979) 'A study of musical preference among third-year
secondary school pupils with special reference to personality'.
Unpublished M.A. dissertation, University of London Institute
of Education.
SCHOEN, M. (ed.) (1927) The Effects of Music. London: Kegan Paul.
SWANWICK, K. (1974) 'Music and the education of the emotions',
British Journal of Aesthetics, 14, 2.
EYSENCK,
152
http://journals.cambridge.org
IP address: 132.234.242.15