Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Carl.herb@bluewin.ch
Invetigations
Fundus imaging is necessary to be able to monitor the evolution of the lesion. If possible
dual fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography should be performed, showing the
extent of retinal vasculitis, the importance of associated papillitis and the extent of choroiditis.
[9} Optical coherence tomography (OCT) gives details of the retinitis and information on the
macula indicating the presence or not of cystoid macular oedema (CMO). Visual field testing
is indicating the effect of the retinitis focus on the nerve fibre layer in the area involved
showing a sectorial scotoma. Visual field testing is also important to monitor evolution of the
disease and response to treatment.
In immunocompromised patients the extension of the retinitis can be very large, there can be
more than one focus and there can be bilateral involvement.
Differential diagnosis
Any granulomatous posterior uveitis has to be considered, including infectious etiologies such
as acute retinal necrosis (necrotic herpetic retinopathies), cytomegalovirus retinitis (in
immunocompromised patientrs), syphilitic chorioretinitis and tuberculous chorioretinitis. Non
infectious causes such as sarcoidosis should also be considered being however less likely as
a differential diagnosis.
Treatment
Retinal foci in the vicinity of the optic disc or the macula or within the vascular arcades should
absolutely be treated. Large lesions with severe vitritis outside these areas should probably
also be treated. The aim of the treatment is to limit the tissue damaging inflammatory reaction
and for this corticosteroids should be given, usually systemically (50 to 70 mg to begin with).
In order to be able to give corticosteroids and to avoid proliferation of the parasite
References
1. Burnett AJ, Shortt SG, Isaac-Renton J, et al. Multiple cases of acquired toxoplasmosis retinitis
presenting in an outbreak. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1032-7.
2. Hegab SM, Al-Mutawa SA. Immunopathogenesis of toxoplasmosis. Clin Exp Med. 2003;3(2):84-105.
3. JBrown KM, Blader IJ. The role of DNA microarrays in Toxoplasma gondii research, the causative agent
of ocular toxoplasmosis. Ocul Biol Dis Infor. 2009 Dec 12;2(4):214-222.
4. Dodds EM, Holland GN, Stanford MR, Yu F, Siu WO, Shah KH, Ten Dam-van Loon N, Muccioli C,
Hovakimyan A, Barisani-Asenbauer T; International Ocular Toxoplasmosis Research Group. Intraocular
inflammation associated with ocular toxoplasmosis: relationships at initial examination. Am J
Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;146(6):856-65.
5. Garweg JG, Boehnke M. The antibody response in experimental ocular toxoplasmosis.Graefes. Arch
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Dec;244(12):1668-79.
6. Garweg JG, Candolfi E. Immunopathology in ocular toxoplasmosis: facts and clues. Mem Inst Oswaldo
Cruz. 2009 Mar;104(2):211-20.
7. Feron EJ, Klaren VN, Wierenga EA, Verjans GM, Kijlstra A. Characterization of Toxoplasma gondiispecific T cells recovered from vitreous fluid of patients with ocular toxoplasmosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis
Sci. 2001 Dec;42(13):3228-32.
8. Talabani H, Asseraf M, Yera H, Delair E, Ancelle T, Thulliez P, Brzin AP, Dupouy-Camet J.
Contributions of immunoblotting, real-time PCR, and the Goldmann-Witmer coefficient to diagnosis of
atypical toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jul;47(7):2131-5. Epub 2009 May 13.
9. Auer C, Bernasconi O, Herbort CP. Indocyanine green angiography features in toxoplasmic retino
choroiditis. Retina 1999; 19:22-29
10. Rothova A, Bosch-Driessen LE, van Loon NH, Treffers WF. Azithromycin for ocular toxoplasmosis. Br J
Ophthalmol 1998; 82:1306-8.