1) Mr. Kohlberg, what is the subject of your intensive research?
How reasoning about moral issues changes with age has been the subject of my research. 2) What inspired you, or influenced you in conducting a research about moral reasoning? I am greatly influenced by Piagets theory of cognitive development. With this, I sought to determine whether there are universal stages in the development of moral judgments. 3) How did you come up with the result of your research? I presented various stories with moral dilemmas to children and adults of various ages and cultural background. From this, I concluded that children are moral philosophers. 4) You described children as moral philosophers. Why did you describe them as such? I described them as moral philosophers because they are the ones who develop moral standards of their own. These standards do not necessarily come from parents, but emerge from cognitive interaction of children with their social environment. 5) According to our research, you have developed levels and stages of moral reasoning. Can you name what are these levels and stages? The first level of moral reasoning is pre-conventional morality. The second level is conventional morality. And the last is post-conventional morality. 6) Can you describe pre-conventional morality? In this first stage, morality is based on the expectations of others and the effect of ones action to his/her image in the community or ones group. An action is good if it
conforms to the expectations of others, otherwise it is not. An action is also good if it
will enhance ones good reputation or ones good image on others. 7) How can you describe the behavior of a child on this first stage? Here, the child considers right and wrong in terms of punishment and reward. For the child, an action is bad because of the punishment for it. Disobedience is wrong because it means not going out of the house or no allowance or no gift. An action is good because there is reward for it. Studying the lesson is good because it means gift from the parents or star in the card. 8) As youve stated earlier, the second level of moral reasoning is conventional morality. Can you explain what is this all about? In the second stage, morality is based on authority and ones duty. An action is good because one has to do his/her duty and one does not want censure of authority. 9) How can you describe the behavior of a child on this second stage? Here, the child behaves as a good boy or a good girl, and behaves according to authority. Because the child wants to be a good girl/boy, he/she conforms to avoid disapproval of others. The child also upholds laws and social rules to avoid censure of authorities and feelings of guilt about not doing ones duty. 10) The third level of moral reasoning is post-conventional morality. What is this all about? Very few reach this level. In the third stage, actions are guided by social-contact orientation and ethical principle orientation. In social-contact orientation, actions are guided by principles commonly agreed on as essential to the public welfare; principles upheld to retain respect of peers and thus, self-respect. In ethical principle orientation, actions are guided by self-chosen ethical principles such as justice, dignity, and equality; principles upheld to avoid self-condemnation.