Heilbrun, Sarh Kate ALEYNELSON & EILBRUN LLP 436 14TH STREET SUITE 716 OAKLAND CA 94612
U.S Department of Justice
Executive Oce r Imigrtion Reiew
Board of Immigrton Appels Oce of he Cerk
5107 Leesburg Pike, Ste 2000 Fal Chc Vgn 2030
DHS / ICE Office of hief Counsel -DET 333 Mt. Elliott St Rm 204 Detoit l 48207 Name:�FDate of this notie 7 /13/2015
nclosed is a copy of te Boad's eciso ad ode n e bove-rerenced case. ncloe
Panel Members: Ho, Dvid 8.
Sicerel, Doa Car Chef Clek
Use te Dock
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index/
I m m i g r a n t & R e f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e n t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a c . n e t
Cite as: F-M-A-, AXXX XXX 656 (BIA July 13, 2015)
�
o
V
2053
File 656 Deoit, re: OL PRCGS OTON Dte: O BEHL SET Saah Kate Heilb Esquie ON BEL F DS PCN Reopenng Jason Riter Assist Cief Counel
·JUL 1 S 205
This ce ws ls bere the Bod on December 19 2012 hen we issed desion dsissig the respondent's appeal om e Ition Judes decision denying her reuess r asylm
1
woldng of removal to emala (her couy of citizenship), d protecion nd the Uted Nions Convention n oe (CAT)
2
n Ap 015, the responent led moon to rp vacin iple cls o neece ssice by sever oeys
3
d seen oppoity to ply r speci le cellon of removal nder secion 3 of the a Adjustent d Cel ecan elief Ac ( P L. o. 05100 1 St 2193 296
end by
L. o 139, 11 St 44 1997) as devatve spoul applc
See
otion to eopen ion) The DHS opposes s oon In spplement ling the respondent ltes additiol clas of neecive assince by h o oes. She also ishes to ppl r asyl in h o rght ased on persection claims peng to he ch ere neither developed nor sented t her h b one of her er oeys.
4
ee
ppleent to
• "r ,.
re the iation Jdge e responds husbd led an aplction r asylum listing her their son his erivtive benecies.
See
J at 4; ecor oup Exh 3 Tbs G d H
2
On eby 18, 2014 he Ued States Co of Appeals r the S Cicit de the tons r reew ed re s o decision
See Mas v. Holr,
ocket "os 3-3/1034/35 th C 4 Moon to ab
3
In s lin, c usel ncldes hself on e oeys who ovided he respondent th neeive ssisce
See
Motion at 10-11 20, 25-2; ab D
4
It is now cla t i 19, he respondent s re by goveent solders d t n 1986 t of her d h husbds cden (respevely ged d s) ee ered b ntin
I m m i g r a n t & R e f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e n t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a c . n e t
Cite as: F-M-A-, AXXX XXX 656 (BIA July 13, 2015)
�656 /Mion to Ropen (Suppeent) l Jne 205 7; Tabs AN n addtion te rpond cams n ason fo hin a endd fe of prson n h hoeld. Suppleent at 1213. The HS has no responded o ts paricu lng In dditio e reondnt s led oon ue cosoidon of her moon to reopen w he indidu oons to rpn concuey led by hr husband , whose ce ises in sepe depoion proceedin d h son whose ca s in remova preedins. The moon o considate will be dened rpen we considered th caim advcd he eiden pre d the positon of the pie Bas on the ti of he crmtce presented, he spond' oal procedings e reopened purs to 8 CF. § 10.2(a) d rord is reandd r er considraon of her egii r ef o remova, nldng b not iitd o ef nde sion 203 of the NAC syl holding of ova an CAT proecion rean, he pes prese dtona eon and denc urden ress with th rpondn o demonstr her liili r he relief so. 8 C.F. § 408(d) d 44(). rending e xre no opion a o the mate sposiion of hs ce. On remand, the rpondnt preent her requet to colde h cs w he ase of hr husbad d son Accordnl the lowi order e ntr OER: he responden remov rocdngs rpend a nte R Th rord s remd r r procedins ot insient ih the going opinon e of a ne dcsion FO O ( .. nud) ove soldie i o e h in 99, he en he n ee en cil pamen when they ed o reve her husands herou, d 98 er on wa eaen d nl kill ciil pmn
See
Spple 13 T A-C (pd dclions) d Tab F (de cicaes lis he ce of dh of h rpondets o nor cldrn a "hocid)
I m m i g r a n t & R e f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e n t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a c . n e t
Cite as: F-M-A-, AXXX XXX 656 (BIA July 13, 2015)
Satisfaites votre curiosité
Tout ce que vous voulez lire.
À tout moment. Partout. Sur n'importe quel appareil.
Aucun engagement. Annulez à tout moment.