© All Rights Reserved

11 vues

© All Rights Reserved

- BeerVectorISM_C14P001P116
- A historical review on nonholomic mechanics.pdf
- [C._Grosche_F._Steiner]_Handbook_of_Feynman_Path_I(b-ok.xyz).pdf
- braquistocrona_cuantica
- osnovna hidraulika
- Classical Mechanics Lecture Notes David Tong DAMPT Cambridge Univ
- 02_Simulating Techniques - AtomisticScale
- Part CM_ Classical Mechanics
- MCQ Ch# 1
- Skema SBP 2010 Kertas 2
- Joel a Shapiro
- Extended Lab 2D Momentum
- 1210.6261v1.pdf
- ITE 188
- CP S HW Ch 6 Detailed
- 1 Momentum
- hamilton
- Lecture 4
- CMFT
- senior science scitech cross curricular proposal

Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 12

Hamiltonian systems

Ja m es Meiss (2 0 0 7 ), Sch ola r pedia ,

2 (8 ):1 9 4 3 .

a r t icle]

Prof. James Meiss, Applied Mathematics University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA

A dynamical system of 2n , first order, ordinary differential equations

= J H(z, t),

z

J = (

) ,

(1)

+ 1/2

d.o.f.).

Here H is the ''Hamiltonian'', a smooth scalar function of the extended phase space variables z and time t , the

2n 2n matrix J is the Poisson matrix and I is the n n identity matrix. The equations naturally split into

two sets of n equations for canonically conjugate variables, z = (q, p) , i.e.

= H/p,

q

= H/q .

p

(2)

Here the n coordinates q represent the configuration variables of the system (e.g. positions of the component

parts) and their canonically conjugate momenta p represent the impetus gained by movement.

Hamiltonian systems are universally used as models for virtually all of physics.

Contents

1 Formulation

2 Examples

2.1 Springs

2.2 Pendulum

2.3 N-body problem

2.4 Electromagnetic Forces

3 Geometric Structure

3.1 Conservation of Energy

3.2 Liouville's Theorem

3.3 Poincar's Invariant

3.4 Symplectic Maps

4 Integrable Systems

4.1 Action-Angle Variables

4.2 Liouville Integrability

5 KAM Theory

6 Hamiltonian Chaos

7 References

8 External Links

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hamiltonian_systems

1/12

10/22/2014

9 See Also

Formulation

In 1834 William Rowan Hamilton showed that Newton's equations F = ma for a set of particles in a

conservative force field F = V with "potential energy" V could be derived from a single function that he

called the "characteristic function",

n

H(q, p) =

i=1

|pi |

+ V (q , q , , q

1

2mi

) .

(3)

Here q is the position of the i particle whose mass is m , and p is its canonical momentum p = m q . The

equations of motion are obtained by (2), which can in turn be converted to Newton's second order form by

differentiating the equation q = p /m .

th

At first it seems that Hamilton's formulation gives only a convenient restatement of Newton's system---the

convenience perhaps most evident in that the scalar function H(q, p) encodes all of the information of the 2n

first order dynamical equations. However, a Hamiltonian formulation gives much more than just this

simplification. Indeed, if we allow more general functions H(q, p, t) and a more general relationship between

the canonical momenta and the velocities q then virtually all of the models of classical physics have a

Hamiltonian formulation, including electromagnetic forces, which are not derivable from a (scalar) potential.

Moreover, waves in inviscid fluids such as surface water waves or magnetohydrodynamic waves also have a

Hamiltonian (PDE) formulation. Quantum mechanics is formally obtained from classical mechanics by

replacing the canonical momentum in the Hamiltonian by a differential operator.

Hamiltonian structure provides strong constraints on the flow. Most simply, when H does not depend upon

time (autonomous) then its value is constant along trajectories: the energy E = H(q, p) is constant, see Energy

Conservation. Similarly if the Hamiltonian is independent of one of the configuration variables (the variable is

ignorable), then (2) implies that the corresponding canonical momentum is an invariant. This gives a simple

explanation for the relation between symmetries (for example rotational symmetry) and invariants (for

example angular momentum)---see Noether's Theorem.

One of the stronger constraints imposed by Hamiltonian structure relates to stability: it is impossible for a

trajectory to be asymptotically stable in a Hamiltonian system. Even more structure applies: for each

eigenvalue of an equilibrium there is a corresponding opposite eigenvalue . For example an equilibrium of

a one degree-of-freedom system must either be a center (two imaginary eigenvalues, i or a saddle (two real

eigenvalues, ) or have a double zero eigenvalue.

Another geometric implication is that knowledge of n invariants is enough to fully characterize a solution of the

2n equations for an n degree-of-freedom system, i.e., the Hamiltonian is integrable. This follows from

Liouville's Integrability Theorem. Moreover, if the orbits of such a system are bounded, then almost all of them

must lie on n-dimensional tori. Kolmogorov, Arnold and Moser proved that a sufficiently smooth, nearlyintegrable Hamiltonian system still has many such invariant tori (see KAM theory). This strong structural

stability of Hamiltonian dynamics was unexpected even in the middle of the 20 century when physicists

began the first computer simulations of dynamical systems (see Fermi Pasta Ulam problem).

th

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hamiltonian_systems

2/12

10/22/2014

Examples

For many mechanical systems, the Hamiltonian takes the form H(q, p) = T (q, p) + V (q) , where T (q, p) is the

kinetic energy, and V (q) is the potential energy of the system. Such systems are called natural Hamiltonian

systems. The simplest case is when the kinetic energy is of the form in (3) for a set of particles with kinetic

momenta p R and masses m . More generally, when the extent of the bodies is taken into account the

kinetic energy can depend upon the configuration of the system, but it is typically a quadratic function of the

3

1

2

M (q)

p ,

where the n

Springs

A harmonic spring has potential energy of the form

where k is

the spring's force coefficient (the force per unit length of extension) or

the spring constant, and x is the length of the spring relative to its

unstressed, natural length. Thus a point particle of mass m connected

to a harmonic spring with natural length L that is attached to a fixed

support at the origin and allowed to move in one dimension has a

Hamiltonian of the form H(q, p) =

p +

(q L) and thus its

1

2m

= p/m ,

q

= k(q L) .

p

If the spring is hanging vertically in a constant gravitational field, then the new equations are obtained by

simply adding the gravitational potential energy mgq to H .

A set of point masses that are coupled by springs has potential energy given by the sum of the potential energies

of each spring in the system. For example suppose that there are two masses connected to three springs as

shown in (Figure 1). The Hamiltonian is

1

H(q, p) =

p

m1

1

+

p

m2

k1

2

1

k2

2

(q 2 q 1 )

k3

2

(L q 2 )

One advantage of the Hamiltonian formulation of mechanics is that the equations for arbitrarily complicated

arrays of springs and masses can be obtained by simply finding the expression for the total energy of the system

(However, it is often easier to do this using the Lagrangian formulation of mechanics which does not require

knowing the form of the canonical momenta in advance).

Pendulum

The ideal, planar pendulum is a particle of mass m in a constant gravitational field, that is attached to a rigid,

massless rod of length L , as shown in (Figure 2). The canonical momentum of this system is the angular

momentum p = mL and the potential energy is the gravitational energy

from the vertical. The Hamiltonian is

2

mgL cos ,

H(, p) =

2mL

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hamiltonian_systems

mgL cos .

(4)

3/12

10/22/2014

p

mL

= mgL sin .

p

While these equations are simple, their explicit solution requires elliptic functions. However, the trajectories of

the pendulum are easy to visualize since the energy is conserved, see (Figure 3). When

the energy is below mgL the angle cannot exceed and the pendulum oscillates. Since

the energy is conserved, the orbit must be periodic. For energies larger than mgL , the

pendulum rotates, and the angle either monotonically grows with time (if the angular

momentum is positive) or decreases (negative p). The critical level set is the separatrix;

the two orbits on this level set asymptotically approach the equilibrium (, 0) as

t .

N-body problem

A set of point masses interacting by Newton's gravitational force is also a Hamiltonian

system of the natural form (3) with potential energy

Figure 2:

Planar

Pendulum

Gmi mj

V (q 1 , q n ) =

i<j

where q

||q i q j ||

th

body. In

has additional conserved quantities. Since H is a

function only of the difference between particle

positions, the total momentum

n

P = pi

(5)

i=1

between the bodies, the total angular momentum is

also conserved

n

L = q

i=1

For the case of two bodies, the Hamiltonian has six degrees of freedom (the three components of the position

and momentum for each body), however, the conservation of total momentum means that if we choose

coordinates moving with the center of mass

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hamiltonian_systems

Q =

4/12

i

10/22/2014

n

mi q

i

Q =

M

where M

= mi

i=1

is the total mass, then the Hamiltonian is independent of Q , so that its conjugate

momentum (5) is constant. Thus the system is reduced to three degrees of freedom, depending only upon the

inter-particle vector q = q q , and its conjugate momentum, p = q , where =

is the reduced

m1 m2

P

H(q, Q, p, P ) =

2M

Gm1 m2

(6)

||q||

= M P , the first

term is itself individually conserved, so l = q p is also constant, a fact that can also be seen from (6) directly.

Electromagnetic Forces

A nonrelativistic charged particle in an electromagnetic field has the equations of motion

= eE(q, t) +

mq

B(q, t)

q

where E is the electric field, and B is the magnetic field and we use Gaussian (cgs) units. This system is

Hamiltonian, with

1

e

(p

H(q, p, t) =

2m

A)

+ e,

(7)

where the scalar and vector potentials and A are defined through

A

E = +

B = A.

The momentum occurring in (7) is not the kinetic momentum mq , but rather a canonical momentum defined

by p = mq + A . For systems that also have a Lagrangian formulation, the canonical momentum is defined

e

c

by

)

L(q, q

p =

Note that the first term in the Hamiltonian (7) is simply the kinetic energy as usual, and the last term is the

electrical potential energy.

Geometric Structure

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hamiltonian_systems

5/12

10/22/2014

Much of the elegance of the Hamiltonian formulation stems from its geometric structure. Hamiltonian phase

space is an even dimensional space with a natural splitting into two sets of coordinates, the configuration

variables q and the momenta p . For most physical systems the momenta are similar to velocities, which are

tangent vectors to trajectories, but the difference--emphasized in the electromagnetic example--is that they are

cotangent vectors, as we will explain further below. In this case the Hamiltonian phase space is the cotangent

bundle of the configuration space.

More abstractly, the phase space of a Hamiltonian system is an even dimensional manifold M that is endowed

with a nondegenerate two-form, . This two-form allows us to define a pairing between vectors and covectors.

Given a Hamiltonian function H

: M R ,

i X (X, ) = dH.

(8)

This is just a coordinate-free version of (1). Indeed, a famous theorem of Darboux implies that near each point

in M there exists a set of canonical variables z = (q, p) , such that

= dq dp ,

Jw ,

J

X = H,

Conservation of Energy

If a Hamiltonian does not depend explicitly on time, then its value, the energy, is constant. Indeed

differentiating along a trajectory gives

dH

dq

=

dt

dp

dt

+

q

dt

= 0,

While Hamiltonian systems are often referred to as conservative systems, these two types of dynamical

systems should not be confounded. In the autonomous case, a Hamiltonian system conserves energy, however,

it is easy to construct nonHamiltonian systems that also conserve an energy-like quantity. Moreover, in the

nonautonomous case, the Hamiltonian depends explicitly on time H(q, p, t) and there is no conserved energy.

Liouville's Theorem

One direct consequence of the form (2) is that the divergence of a Hamiltonian vector field is zero

H

X = J H = J ij

i,j

D H

= 0.

z i z j

of any bundle of trajectories is preserved. That is, suppose A is a set of initial conditions with volume

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hamiltonian_systems

V (A) =

dz.

6/12

10/22/2014

V (A) =

dz.

A

If z evolves to

(z) ,

dz =

(A)

(t (z) y)dy,

A

This is known as Liouville's theorem. It is valid for any divergence free vector field, X = 0 .

Note that Hamiltonian flow is volume preserving even when it is nonautonomous.

Poincar's Invariant

In addition to preserving volume, Hamiltonian systems also preserve a loop action, or Poincar invariant.

Given any loop L in the extended phase space (q, p, t) , let

A(L) =

(9)

A( (L)) = A(L).

t

Even more generally, suppose T is the two dimensional tube obtained from the flow of L

T = {t (L) : t R}

This fact is used, for example, in the construction of a Poincar section for Hamiltonian systems.

Symplectic Maps

A map f

: M M

= ,

Df

where Df is the 2n

2n

J Df = J

(10)

Jacobian matrix

q

Df (q, p) =

f p

p

f p

p

The preservation of the loop action (9) implies that the time-T map of any Hamiltonian flow is symplectic. This

follows from Stokes's theorem and the fact that for a loop at a fixed value of time, the loop action reduces to

pdq .

Note that this holds even if the Hamiltonian depends explicitly on time H(q, p, t) .

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hamiltonian_systems

7/12

10/22/2014

Another way in which symplectic maps arise is for Poincar sections of autonomous Hamiltonian flows on an

energy surface. For example if the surface Q

= {(q, p) : q n = 0, q

> 0, H(q, p) = E}

n

n1

i=1

d q i d pi .

visualization of the motion of a two-degree-of-freedom system, since the resulting map is two-dimensional.

The set of linear mappings that obey (10) is called the symplectic group; it is a Lie group. Any quadratic

Hamiltonian

1

H(z) =

Kz ,

where K is a (constant) symmetric matrix, has a linear flow that is generated by the exponential (t) = e

tJ K

Each of the matrices in the curve (t) is symplectic. Indeed, the collection {J K

: K

= K}

Integrable Systems

A dynamical system is integrable when it can be solved in some way. One (rather restrictive) way in which this

can happen is if the flow of the vector field can be constructed analytically. However, since this can almost

never be done (in terms of elementary functions), this is not an especially useful class of systems.

However, there is a class of Hamiltonian systems, action-angle systems, whose solutions can be obtained

analytically, and there is a well-accepted definition of integrability for Hamiltonian dynamics due to Liouville in

which each integrable Hamiltonian is (locally) equivalent to these action-angle systems.

Action-Angle Variables

A Hamiltonian system is written in action-angle form if there is a set of canonical variables (, I ) where

and I R and such that H depends only upon the actions

H(I ) .

= H(I ) = (I ) ,

I = 0

(11)

((t), I (t)) = ( o + (I o )t, I o )

= Io

1

H(q, p) =

(p

+ q

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hamiltonian_systems

(q, p) = (

sin ,

cos ) .

8/12

10/22/2014

canonical since dq

dp = d dI

sin , 2I cos ) .

= 1 .

oscillator, with a natural Hamiltonian of the form (3) with a potential energy V (q) with a unique minimum at

q = 0 has a Hamiltonian that depends in a nonlinear way upon the action, but which nevertheless can be

reduced to action-angle form.

Hamiltonian systems with two or more degrees of freedom cannot always be reduced to action-angle form,

giving rise to chaotic motion.

Liouville Integrability

Liouville and Arnold showed that the motion in a larger class of Hamiltonian systems is as simple as that of (11).

Suppose that an n degree-of-freedom Hamiltonian system (2) has a set of n invariants F that are almost

i

everywhere independent (their gradients span an n-dimensional space except on sets of zero measure) and that

are in involution, that is, their Poisson brackets vanish:

{F i , F j } (F i , F j ) = 0 .

= {F i (q, p) = ci : i = 1, n}

Moreover, there is a neighborhood of L in which there exist action-angle coordinates such that the equations

c

For example, every one degree-of-freedom, autonomous Hamiltonian system is Liouville integrable. However,

the action-angle coordinates may not be globally defined. In the case of the pendulum (4), there are actionvariables away from the separatrix.

Generically the dynamics on an invariant torus are quasiperiodic.

KAM Theory

Andrey Kolmogorov discovered a general method for the study of perturbed, integrable Hamiltonian systems.

The method lead to theorems by Vladimir Arnold for analytic Hamiltonian systems (Arnold, 1963) and by

Jurgen Moser for smooth enough area-preserving mappings (Moser 1962), and the ideas have become known as

KAM theory.

Roughly speaking, KAM theory implies that a Hamiltonian system of the form

H(, I ) = H 0 (I ) + H 1 (, I ) ,

which is integrable at = 0 , still has a large set of invariant tori if is small enough (a set whose measure

approaches the total measure as 0 ). In order that KAM theory apply, the Hamiltonian must be sufficiently

smooth, and (for the simplest version of the theorem) the unperturbed Hamiltonian must satisfy a

nondegeneracy or twist condition, that D

H 0 (I )

is nonsingular.

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hamiltonian_systems

9/12

10/22/2014

Hamiltonian Chaos

Though many invariant tori of an

integrable system typically persist

upon a perturbation, tori that

commensurate or nearly

commensurate are typically

destroyed. Chaotic dynamics often

occurs in the neighborhood of these

destroyed tori.

An invariant torus is characterized by

its frequency vector . It is

commensurate if there exists an

integer vector m

such that

m = 0

Hamiltonian (1 2) for a = 4 , b = 6 and = 0.1 . Resonant

island chains with rotation numbers 0/1, 1/2, 2/3, 4/5 and 1/1

are shown.

system are generically destroyed by

any perturbation.

For example, consider the 1.5 degreeof-freedom system

1

H(q, p) =

(12)

that represents the motion of (for example) a charge particle in the field of two electrostatic waves. Here the

phase space can be taken to be T

constant and the orbits lie on two-dimensional tori with the frequency vector

= (p, 1)

Consequently every

torus with a rational value of p is commensurate--indeed such orbits are periodic in this case.

KAM theory implies that if p is "sufficiently" irrational, then the torus is preserved for || 1 . However

commensurate tori and nearby irrational tori are destroyed. For small the destroyed tori are replaced by

chains of islands formed from a pair of periodic orbits, one a saddle and the other elliptic (see Stability of

Hamiltonian Flows). Surrounding the elliptic orbit are a family of two-dimensional tori with a new topology (not

homotopic to p = constant , see (Figure 4). Moreover, the stable and unstable manifolds of the saddle

typically intersect transversely, giving rise to a Smale horseshoe and chaotic motion (albeit chaos that is limited

to a narrow layer about the separatrix. As grows these chaotic layers also grow, and they can envelope larger

regions of phase space, see (Figure 5).

References

Abraham, R. and J. E. Marsden (1978). Foundations of Mechanics. Reading, Benjamin.

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hamiltonian_systems

10/12

10/22/2014

Arnold, V. I. (1963). Proof of a Theorem of A.N. Kolmogorov on the Invariance of Quasiperiodic Motions

Under Small Perturbations of the Hamiltonian. Russ. Math. Surveys 18:5: 9-36.

Arnold, V. I. (1978). Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. New York, Springer.

MacKay, R. S. and J. D. Meiss, Eds.

(1987). Hamiltonian Dynamical

Systems: a reprint selection. London,

Adam-Hilgar Press.

McDuff, D. and D. Salamon (1995).

Introduction to Symplectic Topology.

Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Meyer, K. R. and G. R. Hall (1992).

Introduction to the Theory of

Hamiltonian Systems. New York,

Springer-Verlag.

Moser, J. K. (1962). On Invariant

Curves of Area-Preserving Mappings

of an Annulus. Nachr. Akad. Wiss.

Gttingen, II Math. Phys. 1: 1-20.

= 0.2 .

Lectures on Celestial Mechanics. New

York, Springer-Verlag.

Internal references

Paul M.B. Vitanyi (2007) Andrey Nikolaevich Kolmogorov. Scholarpedia, 2(2):2798.

Yuri A. Kuznetsov (2007) Conjugate maps. Scholarpedia, 2(12):5420.

James Meiss (2007) Dynamical systems. Scholarpedia, 2(2):1629.

Eugene M. Izhikevich (2007) Equilibrium. Scholarpedia, 2(10):2014.

Ferdinand Verhulst (2007) Hamiltonian normal forms. Scholarpedia, 2(8):2101.

Jeff Moehlis, Kresimir Josic, Eric T. Shea-Brown (2006) Periodic orbit. Scholarpedia, 1(7):1358.

Anatoly M. Samoilenko (2007) Quasiperiodic oscillations. Scholarpedia, 2(5):1783.

Steve Smale and Michael Shub (2007) Smale horseshoe. Scholarpedia, 2(11):3012.

Philip Holmes and Eric T. Shea-Brown (2006) Stability. Scholarpedia, 1(10):1838.

Alain Chenciner (2007) Three body problem. Scholarpedia, 2(10):2111.

External Links

James Meiss's website (http://amath.colorado.edu/faculty/jdm/)

See Also

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hamiltonian_systems

11/12

10/22/2014

Dynamical systems, Ordinary differential equations, Stability of Hamiltonian flows, Hamiltonian normal forms,

Kolmogorov-Arnold-Moser theory, Resonance, Melnikov function, Symplectic maps, Nontwist maps, Three

body problem, Quasiperiodic oscillations, Andrey Kolmogorov, Henri Poincar

Sponsored by: Eugene M. Izhikevich, Editor-in-Chief of Scholarpedia, the peer-reviewed open-access

encyclopedia

Reviewed by (http://www.scholarpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_systems&oldid=18653) :

Anonymous

Accepted on: 2007-08-19 16:06:03 GMT (http://www.scholarpedia.org/w/index.php?

title=Hamiltonian_systems&oldid=18653)

Categories:

This page w as las t m odified

on 15 January 2013, at 04:10.

This page has been acces s ed

80,209 tim es .

"Ham iltonian s ys tem s " by

Jam es Meis s is licens ed

under a Creative Com m ons

Attribution-NonCom m ercialShareAlik e 3.0 Unported

Licens e. Perm is s ions beyond

the s cope of this licens e are

des cribed in the Term s of

Us e

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hamiltonian_systems

12/12

- BeerVectorISM_C14P001P116Transféré parlemonhead2
- A historical review on nonholomic mechanics.pdfTransféré parChernet Tuge
- [C._Grosche_F._Steiner]_Handbook_of_Feynman_Path_I(b-ok.xyz).pdfTransféré pargog
- braquistocrona_cuanticaTransféré parmateosco
- osnovna hidraulikaTransféré parMiro Vucic
- Classical Mechanics Lecture Notes David Tong DAMPT Cambridge UnivTransféré paraud_phil
- 02_Simulating Techniques - AtomisticScaleTransféré parMiguel Angel
- Part CM_ Classical MechanicsTransféré parBheim Llona
- MCQ Ch# 1Transféré parranaateeq
- Skema SBP 2010 Kertas 2Transféré parCikgu Syamim
- Joel a ShapiroTransféré parAgtc Tanday
- Extended Lab 2D MomentumTransféré parShy Ronnie
- 1210.6261v1.pdfTransféré parVasquez JC
- ITE 188Transféré parAamir Al Baloshi
- CP S HW Ch 6 DetailedTransféré paranon_156453388
- 1 MomentumTransféré parcna_gold
- hamiltonTransféré parkadvar
- Lecture 4Transféré parAman Gaurav
- CMFTTransféré parL Inesh
- senior science scitech cross curricular proposalTransféré parapi-306208131
- Lecture 6Transféré parEko Sentinel Orion
- Momentum MS.pdfTransféré parAzeem iftikhar
- John A. Fernley et al- Band Origins for Water up to 22 000 cm^-1 : A Comparison of Spectroscopically Determined Potential Energy SurfacesTransféré parPassamm
- Chapter9A (1) MomentumTransféré parjenny hernandez
- Transféré parluisdaniel
- C11-36.pdfTransféré parOscar A. Luévano
- 10 FluidTransféré parMaria Kozyreva
- Ansys Sw InstructionsTransféré parMatthew May
- Class 3Transféré parMohamed Aslam
- TitleTransféré parSharma Aldo

- Bifurcation SolunTransféré parMainak Chatterjee
- Ch7 Asm SE-nptelTransféré parMainak Chatterjee
- Solar SystemTransféré parMainak Chatterjee
- Samos PapTransféré parMainak Chatterjee
- Bifurcation 3Transféré parMainak Chatterjee
- Nonlinear Control Problem Set3Transféré partetrix
- Perturbation and KAM TheoryTransféré parMainak Chatterjee
- PertTransféré parMainak Chatterjee
- CH6.9_KAMtheoryTransféré parMainak Chatterjee
- MAT 119A Final NotesTransféré parMainak Chatterjee
- Hamiltonian Chaos 2Transféré parMainak Chatterjee
- logisticmap2 solnTransféré parMainak Chatterjee
- Logistic Map 1Transféré parMainak Chatterjee
- Logistic MapTransféré parMainak Chatterjee
- Logistic Map SolnTransféré parMainak Chatterjee
- HCTransféré parMainak Chatterjee
- HamiltonianChaosLos AlamosTransféré parMainak Chatterjee
- Hamiltonian ChaosTransféré parMainak Chatterjee
- Hamiltonian ChaosTransféré parMainak Chatterjee
- Exp 2Transféré parMohamad Safi
- Bifurcation 2Transféré parMainak Chatterjee
- Bifurcation Soln1Transféré parMainak Chatterjee

- Technical Aspects in LIS with Special Focus on ProductionTransféré pardinhlap237
- Kh 3118981907Transféré parAnonymous 7VPPkWS8O
- Asfa Report by Vivek AgheraTransféré parvivekaghera
- Karma and ReincarnationTransféré parNityaNiranjan Pedro
- QUIZ 5 With AnswersTransféré parReinaLishelCariasoFrankera
- Practical Compactness and Bracing Provisions for the Design of Single Angle BeamsTransféré parbruno_alq
- Punjab University MA/MSC Part 1 date sheet 2013Transféré parShawn Parker
- Elec 2141 NotesTransféré parJohnny Jobby
- measurement unitTransféré parapi-311981237
- Readme-tcad Unix InstallationTransféré parabra77
- 01 - MSDS Exercise Guideline (Due August 15-16 Depending on Lab Section)Transféré parProttasha Khan
- Base Salary, Benchmarking and Grading Structures111111111111111.pptTransféré parsharifi
- WWgov CriticsTransféré parcurlicue
- Typologie du changement d’Andrew Van de Ven et Marshall Scott Poole.pdfTransféré parSirine Mahdi
- Windows Installer Repair a Package Using the Command LineTransféré parkararoy
- 201412081131-NABL-122-07-doc.pdfTransféré parmahesh
- Ch4. Quality Audit.[1]Transféré parshecat260471
- Changes to Std SAPTransféré pargverbrug
- Curriculum Vitae of Alok LatestTransféré parGurpreet Singh
- Ethics 1Transféré parXu Nadeem
- bio lab 20 population growth and survivorship instructions 1 1Transféré parapi-255334265
- 606Transféré parmohammadmohisin134
- Alzheimers DementiaTransféré parAnonymous bq4KY0mcWG
- TOR - an Editor of a PublicationTransféré parFIRST CHILDREN'S EMBASSY IN THE WORLD MEGJASHI MACEDONIA
- Workarounds for the Issue Where BICS Connection..Transféré parabhilash
- Wilson1e Ppt Ch01Transféré parJeffrey Alberghini
- Post-publication peer review of USGS San Antonio Report (Wilson et al., 2011)Transféré parPavement Coatings Technology Council
- SAP Business Objects Edge Series 3.1 Installation Guide for WindowsTransféré parconfigcrow
- Simulation.docxTransféré pararunasagar_2011
- Recovery and Recrystallization Kinetics in AA1050 and AA3003 Aluminium AlloysTransféré pardavid9060