Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
I.
INTRODUCTION
This full text paper was peer reviewed at the direction of IEEE Communications Society subject matter experts for publication in the WCNC 2010 proceedings.
SINRm (n) =
Ptx PLm
L
tx
l =1
x nl + N 0
PLml
(1)
SINRl (n) =
Ptx PLl
L
tx
(2)
k =1,k l
Cuser =
log 2 (1 + SINRn ) z n ,
(3)
n =1
This full text paper was peer reviewed at the direction of IEEE Communications Society subject matter experts for publication in the WCNC 2010 proceedings.
(5)
(6)
This full text paper was peer reviewed at the direction of IEEE Communications Society subject matter experts for publication in the WCNC 2010 proceedings.
TABLE II.
Frequency
Allocation Scheme
User Throughput(Mbps)
Average user throughput
Co-channel FA
1.31
0.076
OFA
1.15
0.063
AFFR
1.42
0.101
(7)
n=1,... N
1
0.9
0.8
Co-channel FA
OFA
AFFR
0.7
SINRm (n ) >
SINR3TH
(8)
CDF
0.6
*
0.5
0.4
SIMULATION RESULTS
SIMULATION PARAMETERS
Parameter
Carrier frequency
Value
2000 MHz
14 dBi
0 dBi
UE noise figure
9 dB
20 dBm
46 dBm
0.8
TH
PL
30dB
2dB/2dB/0dB
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Femtocell User SINR(dB)
30
40
the SINR CDF for the downlink of three schemes with 200
femtocells per macrocell. It is shown that the SINR
improvement of FUEs as a result of OFA scheme is only
marginal, that is because OFA can not handle the interference
caused by other femtocell BSs. However, when AFFR scheme
is used, interference from neighboring femtocell BSs can be
limited, so AFFR scheme has the best FUE SINR, especially
for the cell-edge users.
Table II shows the average macro user throughput of three
schemes when there are 200 femtocells per macrocell. The
average throughput of the MUEs using OFA scheme is the
smallest, and the proposed AFFR scheme shows the best
performance. The average MUE throughput of AFFR scheme
is 1.42Mbps, and shows improved performance by 8.4% than
the 1.31Mbps of co-channel FA scheme. The average
throughput performance of OFA is worst, which is 1.15Mbps.
That is due to the reduced spectrum utility.
Fig. 5 shows the simulation results of the throughput for
FUEs with 200 femtocells per cell. From Fig. 5, we can see
that the throughput of FUEs using OFA scheme is significantly
lower than that using co-channel FA and AFFR. That is
because when OFA is used, the available bandwidth of each
femtocell is only 20% of the total bandwidth. It is also shown
that data rate coverage of AFFR is better than that of OFA and
co-channel FA.
B. Throughput of Different Femtocell Deployment Density
Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 show the average cell throughput of
femtocells and macrocells vs. different femtocell deployment
density. The result of Fig. 6 shows that when femtocell density
is very low, such as 50 or 100 femtocells per one macrocell, the
This full text paper was peer reviewed at the direction of IEEE Communications Society subject matter experts for publication in the WCNC 2010 proceedings.
Co-channel FA
OFA
AFFR
0.9
0.8
0.7
CDF
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0 2
10
15
14
13
Co-channel FA
OFA
AFFR
12
11
10
50
3
10
10
Femtocell User Throughput(Kbps)
10
75
100
125
150
175
Number of Femtocells per Macrocell
200
Femtocell BS Throughput(Mbps)
30
Co-channel FA
OFA
AFFR
25
20
REFERENCES
15
[1]
[2]
10
5
0
50
75
100
125
150
175
Number of Femtocells per Macrocell
200
CONCLUSION