Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
credit
unions
currently
hold
well
over
$1
trillion
of
assets.
Contracts
sold
are
the
best
indicator
of
future
profits
as
profits
can
be
easily
estimated
at
time
of
sale.
Long-term
contracts
provide
years
of
future
earnings.
Currently
financials
show
a
small
loss
due
to
amortization
of
the
purchase
price.
Trinity
Trinity
provides
warranty
and
dispatch
services
on
HVAC,
refridgeration,
generators
and
commercial
equipment
that
competitors
ignore
(like
large
commercial
chillers).
Keeping
larger
than
needed
sales
staff
in
order
to
focus
on
long-term
growth.
Management
expects
strong
double-digit
margins
in
the
long
run.
Management
expects
Trinity
to
generate
$7
milion
in
revenue
in
2014
and
be
cash-flow
positive
in
2015.
As
noted
in
the
letter
to
shareholders
dated
April
29th
2015,
management
will
be
spending
some
time
in
2015
performing
a
strategic
review
on
the
warranty
companies.
I
expect
further
clarification
on
future
plans
and
profitability
in
the
coming
year.
Mendota
Mendota
is
the
main
division
of
the
companies
non-standard
automotive
insurance
business.
Since
the
new
management
took
over,
Mendota
moved
from
focusing
on
premium
growth
and
how
fast
it
could
add
states
to
focusing
solely
on
writing
profitable
premiums
regardless
of
size.
This
new
strategy
appears
to
be
paying
off
as
KFSs
insurance
underwriting
has
gone
from
a
large
loss
to
slightly
positive
(combined
ratio
of
99.2%
in
2014).
This
essentially
allows
the
company
to
be
paid
for
investing
the
float
provided
by
its
insurance
customers.
Also
of
note,
the
reserves
on
the
liability
side
of
the
ledger
for
Mendota
are
to
the
highest
level
within
the
range
of
estimates
provided
by
the
outside
actuarial
firm.
They
seem
to
be
very
conservative
in
their
assumptions.
Passive
Investments
KFSs
passive
investment
portfolio
contains
a
mix
of
fixed-
income
securities,
which
supports
the
insurance
reserves,
bridge
loans,
publicly
traded
equity,
and
real
estate.
Their
goal
is
to
find
investments
that
contain
asymmetric
risk/reward
potential.
Major
shareholders
No
matter
how
much
an
outside
investor
researches
a
company
they
will
never
have
the
same
level
of
knowledge
of
the
operations
as
an
insider.
Keeping
that
in
mind,
it
becomes
very
important
for
the
outside
investor
to
become
comfortable
with
the
management
team
and
major
shareholders
(those
a
large
enough
position
in
the
firm
to
influence).
KFSs
largest
shareholder
is
actually
the
reason
I
stumbled
upon
this
stock.
While
listening
to
a
podcast
on
community
banks
the
guest
mentioned
a
great
way
to
find
investments
is
to
find
small
community
banks
that
have
an
experienced
activist
as
a
main
shareholder.
Joseph
Stilwell
was
one
of
the
names
he
brought
up
as
a
smart
activist
investor.
This
led
me
to
look
thru
Stilwell
Value
Funds
13F
and
its
top
holding
being
KFS
(11.6%
of
fund,
approx.
20%
of
company).
Id
like
to
say
I
was
bright
enough
to
recognize
the
value
in
KFS
immediately
and
bought
up
a
large
stake
to
ride
the
coattails
of
Mr.
Stilwell
as
soon
as
I
saw
it,
however
this
would
be
false.
I
looked
at
KFS,
as
I
imagine
a
lot
of
other
investors
do,
and
saw
an
insurance
company
with
a
poor
underwriting
history
selling
for
a
few
times
book.
This
was
about
all
the
time
I
spent
on
it
as
I
moved
to
the
next
company
on
the
list.
Luckily,
after
looking
into
Stilwells
success
as
an
activist
investor,
I
decided
to
take
an
evening
and
give
KFS
a
deeper
look
(for
insight
on
Stilwells
success
as
an
activist,
I
suggest
reviewing
some
of
his
13-D
filings).
Given
Stilwells
large
stake
in
Kingsway
he
has
a
lot
of
control
over
the
strategy
of
the
firm.
However,
more
on
the
day-to-day
operations
and
investments
of
the
firm
fall
to
the
CEO
(or
as
he
calls
himself
the
Chief
Capital
Allocator
CCA)
Larry
G.
Swets,
Jr.
He
owns
over
8%
of
the
company
and
the
shares
are
restricted
and
subject
to
a
10-year
cliff
vesting.
These
guys
truly
focus
on
long-
term
value
creation.
Valuation
Since
Kingsway
has
numerous
parts
to
value,
I
will
be
taking
it
in
a
few
steps:
1. Insurance
Operations
2. Insurance
Services
Operations
3. NOLs
Insurance
In
the
past
I
always
struggled
with
the
method
to
value
an
insurance
company.
Some
value
them
at
book
if
its
underwriting
is
breakeven.
Some
add
the
value
of
the
float
to
this
metric.
Columbia
University
offers
an
eBook
on
the
insurance
industry
that
provides
insight
into
valuation.
However
the
best,
most
rational,
method
Ive
come
across
was
laid
out
by
the
fantastic
blog
The
Brooklyn
Investor
at
brooklyninvestor.blogspot.com.
He
outlined
his
method
while
walking
thru
the
valuation
of
Berkshire
Hathaway.
My
method
will
walk
through
some
of
this,
but
I
suggest
searching
Brooklyn
Investors
website
for
a
more
comprehensive
look
if
you
so
should
desire.
Basically
an
insurance
company
is
just
an
underwriting
operation
and
a
basket
of
investments.
A
successful
underwriting
operation
can
add
to
the
returns
of
the
basket,
and
unsuccessful
underwriting
operation
needs
to
be
supported
by
the
investment
returns.
In
the
past
the
underwriting
operations
at
Kingsbury
have
been
horrid,
to
put
it
mildly.
When
the
current
management
took
over,
Kingsbury
was
solidly
in
the
red.
Since
then,
management
has
worked
hard
and
in
2014
the
combined
ratio
of
Mendota
was
99.2%,
meaning
theyve
basically
back
to
even.
Their
goal
is
to
get
to
a
combined
ration
of
98%,
this
would
mean
theyre
being
paid
to
take
the
insurance
customers
money
to
buy
investments.
Im
going
to
give
no
credit
to
this
underwriting
profit
and
consider
the
underwriting
operations
break
even.
Now
it
just
comes
down
to
what
should
I
pay
for
the
basket
of
investments?
Its
a
pile
of
money
that
they
allocated
to
different
assets.
If
I
gave
a
pile
of
money
to
someone
Id
at
least
require
a
10%
return.
So
if
KFS
is
getting
10%
return
on
their
investment
portfolio,
Id
be
willing
to
pay
100%
of
the
value
of
that
portfolio.
Its
important
to
remember
that
you
also
have
to
subtract
any
cost
of
debt
they
use
too
fund
these
investments.
Currently
the
majority
of
Kingsways
portfolio
is
sitting
in
cash
waiting
to
be
invested.
They
have
allocated
the
second
largest
perentage
to
bonds,
which
covers
the
requirements
for
their
insurance
liabilities.
The
rest
is
invested
in,
as
they
call
it,
their
alternative
investments.
This
covers
common
shares,
real
estate
and
other
business
investments.
Based
on
the
prorated
expected
return
of
each
of
these
categories,
and
the
assumption
that
they
put
half
their
current
cash
hoard
to
work,
I
expect
KFSs
investment
portfolio
to
return
around
6%
in
a
normalized
environment.
If
they
can
put
more
of
their
cash
to
work,
this
6%
assumption
will
prove
to
be
very
conservative.
Below
is
my
valuation
for
the
insurance
division
after
finding
my
expected
normalized
return
for
their
basket
of
investments.
Investments
Proj.
%
Return
Return
Debt
at
Par
Cost
of
Debt
Debt
Cost
Underwriting
P/L
Return
After
Debt
Cost
Required
Return
(10%)
%
of
Required
Value
of
Investments
$186,000
6.0%
$11,093
$90,000
5.0%
$4,500
$0
$6,593
$18,600.00
35.4%
$65,930
With
my
assumption
of
a
6%
return
for
KFSs
investments
its
investment
divisions
worth
is
almost
$66
million,
or
35%
of
the
portfolio
Of
note,
if
Kingsway
can
put
all
its
excess
capital
to
work
my
estimated
return
for
their
investments
jumps
to
8%
and
the
value
of
the
insurance
division
jumps
to
over
$100
million.
For
my
valuation
Im
going
to
use
the
more
conservative
6%
return
and
value
of
$66
million.
Insurance
Services
The
insurance
services
division
is
a
bit
murky
to
get
a
solid
valuation
for.
As
of
1Q
2015
they
had
revenue
of
$5.5
million
and
basically
breakeven.
The
services
division
used
to
contain
another
company
named
ARS
that
was
recently
sold
for
$47
million.
Backing
out
the
recent
quarters
numbers
for
IWS
and
Trinity
annualized
from
2014
numbers
means
ARS
had
roughly
$30
million
in
revenue
and
$4.9
million
in
operating
profit.
Meaning
it
sold
for
approx.
1.5x
revenue,
10x
operating
income,
and
14x
net
income.
Annualizing
1Q
2015
numbers
would
give
me
$22
million
in
revenue
times
1.5
means
the
services
division
is
worth
$33
million.
However
this
is
a
major
assumption
given
its
still
not
profitable.
Management
has
set
up
both
services
companies
for
future
growth,
which
should
leverage
the
operating
costs
and
produce
profits.
Meaning
future
revenues
will
be
higher,
if
management
produces
as
promised.
In
valuing
the
services
division
Im
going
to
take
Warren
Buffetts
approach
of
being
approximately
right
rather
than
exactly
wrong.
The
value
could
range
from
$15
million
to
$40
million.
Im
going
to
value
it
at
1x
revenue
for
a
valuation
of
$22
million.
NOLs
Because
of
the
dire
situation
KFS
was
in
when
the
current
management
took
over,
it
posses
a
significant
tax
asset
in
the
form
a
net
operating
losses.
A
lot
of
unprofitable
companies
have
these
assets,
but
the
ones
Im
interested
in
are
ones
on
the
balance
sheet
of
a
company
that
has
transitioned
management
or
has
moved
to
a
new
profitable
line
of
business
via
acquisition
or
other
method.
Kingsway
falls
into
both
categories,
and
KFS
has
significant
tax
assets
currently
at
$286.6
million
or
$14.54
per
share.
If
all
the
tax
assets
could
be
used
today
for
their
full
amount,
valuation
would
be
simple,
$14.54
per
share.
However,
these
tax
assets
expire
at
some
point,
and
as
of
now
Kingsway
doesnt
posses
enough
operating
income
to
use
much
of
this
asset.
In
regards
to
the
expiration,
KFS
has
significant
time
with
the
majority
expiring
in
2029.
Currently
on
the
open
market
tax
credits
are
selling
for
about
90
cents
on
the
dollar.
Using
this
method
would
mean
KFSs
tax
assets
are
worth
about
$250
million.
However,
because
of
restrictions
Kingsway
cant
just
sell
these
and
reap
that
profit.
Kingsway
will
have
to
earn
a
profit,
either
through
current
operations,
or
more
likely,
an
acquisition
to
realize
a
benefit
from
these
assets.
Because
of
the
time
value
of
money,
I
ran
a
simple
discount
cash-flow
model
assuming
they
would
use
the
$280
million
in
assets
evenly
over
the
remaining
time
before
expiration
in
2029,
discounting
these
back
at
7%.
You
can
play
around
with
the
7%
number,
but
I
feel
its
close
to
appropriate
given
the
current
bond
rates,
rates
of
inflation,
and
the
fact
Ill
be
applying
my
margin
of
safety
discount
to
the
final
valuation
of
KFS.
Running
this
discount
model
gives
me
a
valuation
for
the
deferred
tax
assets
of
$175
million.
One
way
to
look
at
the
current
markets
valuation
of
KFS
is
to
say
were
buying
$286
million
in
NOLs
for
40
cents
on
the
dollar
in
addition
to
an
insurance
underwriter,
basket
of
investments,
and
two
growing
insurance
services
firms
thrown
in
for
free.
If
you
believe
management
will
produce
as
promised
this
is
a
fantastic
deal.
Final
Valuation
Adding
up
the
individual
divisions
valuations
above
gives
us:
Value
of
Insurance
Under
$65,930
Value
of
Insurance
Service
$22,000
Value
of
NOLs
$175,000
Value
of
KFS
$262,930
Per
Share
$12.40
At
a
current
market
price
of
$5.35
KFS
is
selling
for
45%
of
my
valuation
of
$12.40.
Offering
a
significant
margin
of
safety
should
any
of
my
assumptions
prove
to
be
too
aggressive,
or
if
management
underperforms.
What
to
Watch
Below
are
a
few
of
the
things
Ill
be
looking
out
for
over
the
coming
quarters/years
to
make
sure
management
is
on
track.
Dilution
of
Shareholders
o They
have
recently
issued
some
preferred
shares
to
Stilwell
and
are
authorized
to
issue
more.
As
of
now
I
view
this
as
a
way
to
fund
the
company
without
jeopardizing
the
NOLs.
However
this
will
be
something
I
monitor
closely
moving
forward
to
make
sure
they
dont
pillage
the
pockets
of
the
minority
common
shareholders
for
the
insiders
gain.
Underwriting
Quality
o Current
management
has
transitioned
the
insurance
division
from
a
growth
at
any
cost
perspective
to
a
profitable
underwriting
perspective.
This
has
taken
the
underwriting
from
a
large
loss
to
breakeven,
proof
of
their
vision
playing
out.
However,
should
this
positive
momentum
proves
to
be
fleeting
the
valuation
of
the
insurance
division,
and
the
trust
in
management,
would
be
cut
dramatically.
Investment
Returns
o Should
the
returns
from
the
basket
of
investments
fall
short
of
projections,
Ill
need
to
reassess
(lower)
the
valuation
I
put
on
KFSs
holdings.
Insider
Buys/Sells
o Should
Stilwell
or
the
CEO
Swets
start
liquidating
their
position,
I
will
need
to
assess
why
they
are
making
such
a
move.
Use
of
NOLs
o Are
they
buying
cash-flow
rich
businesses
at
decent
prices
to
take
advantage
of
their
tax
asset?
Direction
of
Insurance
Service
Companies
o As
the
insurance
services
companies
are
current
breakeven,
management
has
indicated
that
2015
will
be
a
year
of
review
for
them.
If
they
dont
continue
to
move
in
a
positive
direction
I
will
need
to
review
the
valuation
I
assigned
to
them.