Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
See
Amelie Rorty
The Journal of Aesthetic Education, Volume 48, Number 1, Spring
2014, pp. 1-9 (Article)
Published by University of Illinois Press
2Rorty
look at a painting from different perspectives: near/far, left/right, eye level/
higher. You should focus on different aspects: color, composition, light.
See the painting as a schema for a set of superimposed compositions.
Consider a painting as designating layers of planes: a plane defined by color
(or, sometimes, each color defining a plane); a plane defined by light and
shadow; a plane defined by lines; by salient content; a plane defined by the
position of the painting in relation to the viewer; a plane defined by focus and
gestalt. Consider the effect of superimposing these planes on one another.
Because interpretations of paintings are inevitably affected by later cultural productions (artworks, architecture, advertisements, photography,
etc.), interpretations of works from earlier periods cannot fully capture the
way they were seen by their contemporaries. But that does not mean that
any and every subjective interpretive response is appropriate. Responsible
interpretations must be substantiated by some feature of the painting itself.
Interpretive free association is fun, but it is autobiography.
Trust the immediate delight of paintings that are sensuously pleasing.
Then go beyond their surface to their abstract formal qualities and composition. Are the sensory surface and the underlying structural characteristics of the painting consonant with one another? If you think a painting is
beautiful, ask yourself what makes it beautiful. Is it merely pretty? What is
the difference? Does the painter want to bypass questions of beauty? Pay
attention to paintings that you do not initially like, paintings that do not
immediately please you or tell a story or convey a message. What are they
trying to get you to notice or to see?
Just sit and look at the painting before asking any questions about its
structure, construction, meaning, or success. Simply take it in, as unselfconsciously as you can. Bear in mind that slides transform paintingssize, distance, brightness, placementall affect the way paintings are seen. Nothing
replaces seeing the painting itself.
Then ... Engage in a dialogue with the painting. Do not initially find out
about the identity of the painter. Ask searching questions about what the
painting conveys and how it is constructed, what is shown and how it is
shown. (Not all of these questions are relevant to all paintings.)
Below are some questions.
4Rorty
in/by the painting? What is the meaning or significance of the objects represented (for example, apples, an hourglass, maps, skulls, crosses, coins). Does
the painting place these referents in a new context? How does the painterly
work revise or extend their traditional significance? For example, some Flemish still lifes; Bellini, St. Francis in the Desert; Durer, St. Jerome in His Study; a
Cassatt mother and child.
What knowledge does a contemporary Western observer bring to the
painting, and how does the painting make use of that knowledge (for example, what mirrors and reflections do, how objects cast shadows, how objects exclude one another in space)? For example, Titian and Manet mirrors.
How does the painting amplify, modify, or disagree with an earlier
work? For example, Picassos improvisations on Velazquez, Manets improvisations on Goya and on Giorgione, Francis Bacons on Velazquez.
Who is the implied audience or patron of the painting? To whom is it addressed? How is the (implied) social status and role of the painter conveyed?
Of the observer? Of the subjects? For example, Van der Weyden, St. Luke
Drawing the Virgin; Velasquez, Las Meninas; van Dyke and Sargent portraits.
Where does the painter place you, as the implied observer, in relation to
the picture plane? Is the painting in your face, or does the painter place
you at a distance? Does the painting have an implied internal observer? For
example, Kaspar, Friedrich, Manet, Vermeer.
Does the painter want to make you think you are seeing a natural
scene, as if you were looking through a window and (in some sense) sharing
its space? If so, how is that achieved? Consider: we ordinarily take ourselves
to be seeing a plenum of continuous space. How do naturalistic painters
succeed in making you think you are seeing such a continuous spatial plenum ... even though reconstructive analysis shows the natural perspectival continuous space is violated (Poussin, Vermeer)? If that is not what
interests the painter, what alternative space/world is represented? For example, Pollock, Franz Klein, Rothko, Dali.
How are you invited to enter the space of the painting, at what angle,
with what obstacles or resistance? For example, Bonnard, Vuillard.
Does the painter want you to see the painting as a flat surface? As a window into the space depicted in the painting? What is the relation between
the surface space of the painting and the internal spaces of the panting?
For example, Braque and Picasso Cubist paintings.
6Rorty
Does the painter try to convey the temperature, the weight of atmosphere,
the dryness or humidity of the air? How is this done? How does this affect
the interpretation? For example, Pissarro, Turner, Constable, J. van Ruisdael.
How do lines and shapes echo one another (for example, the curve of
eyebrows might echo the shape of a hat and slope of the shoulders or the
curve of a pot). For example, Hals, Van Gogh.
How are the textures of objects (satin, velvet, lace, stucco, brick, tree
trunks) represented? How do they affect the weight of masses? The composition of the painting? Its interpretation? For example, Titian, Sargent.
How does the painter use color and brightness? How do they affect the
sequence of your observation? How do they affect the composition (and vice
versa)? The interpretation of the painting? How do these factors affect reactions to nonrepresentational painting: For example, Rothko, Albers, Stella,
Morris Louis.
What does not seem to make sense regarding space, composition, content? On the assumption that this displacement is deliberate, what is its
function in the painting? For example, Manet, Cezanne, el Greco.
Look for revisionspentimentiplaces where the painter changed the
painting. Why was the change made and what difference does it make? For
example, Rembrandts.
4. Representation
There are many different kinds of representations and many different types of
contrasts to representations (NB: A painting can represent a mood, a thought).
Whatif anythingdoes the painting re-present? What is the implied contrast? Can you see the painting as both abstract and as representational? As
both expressive and figurative? For example, Morandi, Klee, Mondrian.
Is the work deliberately anachronistic (for example, Renaissance uses of
Roman sculpture/architecture): does it embed fashions, architecture, motifs
of previous eras? How does this affect its interpretation? For example, David, some Picassos, de Chirico.
Is the work grotesque, surrealistic, playful? Exaggeratedly nave or picturesque? How do such choices affect conceptions of realistic representation? For example, Bosch, Breughel, Piero di Cosimo, Magritte, Ensor, Klee,
Dali, Grandma Moses, Soutine, Chagall.
Does the work embed exotic, orientalized motifs and subjects? With
what effect? For example, Redon, Henri Rousseau, Delacroix, Sargent, Klimt.
What role does architecturemonk cells, grand faades, ruins, windows,
domestic spaces, alcoves, city viewsplay in the painting? To what is it contrasted? For example, Sassetta, Lorenzetti, Piranesi, de Hoch, Giorgione, Veronese and baroque ceilings, Utrillo, de Chirico.
8Rorty
What season of the year is represented? Time of day? Weather? Wind?
How are they conveyed, and how do they influence the mood and interpretation of the painting? For example, Corot, Pissarro, Constable, Monet.
What does the painting suggest/imply about the constituent units of the
world? Is it composed of ordinary objects like tables, people, trees? Geometrical objects like squares and circles? Units of light and color? Symbols
indicating ideas or paradigmatic figureshourglasses, crosses, a rooster,
skulls indicating mortality, mirrors indicating vanity, paradigmatic figures
indicating Christ, Peter, Mary, or the Evangelists? How does identifying the
paintings implied ontology affect your experience of it? How are these ontological primitives related to the implied constituent units of the painting, for example, its lines, colors, brush strokes?
To what senses does the painting appeal? What senses are implicitly represented (for example, a musical instrument indicating sound, people eating indicating taste, lush textures indicating touch)? For example, Rubens,
Titian, Dutch still lifes.
What is the mood or emotional tone of the painting (nostalgia? resignation? elation? hope? grief?)? (Note that the mood of the painting as a whole
might be different from the mood implicitly ascribed to one of the subjects.
It might also be different from that entertained by the implied observer.)
How is this conveyed (colors? shading?) For example, Kllwitz, Breughel,
Gauguin, Mnch, Kiefer.
Aftermath
How does seeing and discussing a painting with someone differ from seeing
it and reading an analysis or critique of it? What explains the difference?
Look at a landscape, a room, a bowl of fruit, a person. Try to envision
the scene as it might have been painted by some of the painters you have
studied. Be specificconsider composition, shapes, light, colors, angles and
perspective. How would you paint or photograph it?
What does going to a museum represent to you? What role does it play
in your life and your images of yourself? How does it differ from going to a
movie or a concert? From reading a book?
Having addressed some of these questions, stop questioning and just
sit and look at the painting again. How does it affect you, what have you
learned, what does it make you realize or question? What does it enable you
to see? Then, after a time, consider whether how you see itits effect on
youhas been changed by your dialogue with it.