3450 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No.
13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Notices
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45-
day comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
Dated: January 8, 2008.
Maribeth Gustafson,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E8–631 Filed 1–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
ARCTIC RESEARCH COMMISSION
85th Meeting; Notice
January 7, 2008.
Notice is hereby given that the U.S.
Arctic Research Commission will hold
its 85th meeting in Boulder, CO on
February 6–8, 2008. The Business
Session, open to the public, will
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
convene at 8:30 a.m. Wednesday,
February 6, 2008 in Boulder, CO. An
Executive Session will follow
adjournment of the Business Session.
The Agenda items include:
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:37 Jan 17, 2008 Jkt 214001
(1) Call to order and approval of the
Agenda.
(2) Approval of the Minutes of the
84th Meeting.
(3) Reports from Congressional
Liaisons.
(4) Agency Reports.
The focus of the meeting will be
reports and updates on programs and
research projects affecting the Arctic.
Any person planning to attend this
meeting who requires special
accessibility features and/or auxiliary
aids, such as sign language interpreters,
must inform the Commission in advance
of those needs.
Contact Person for More Information:
John Farrell, Executive Director, U.S.
Arctic Research Commission, 703–525–
0111 or TDD 703–306–0090.
John Farrell,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 08–155 Filed 1–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
SEVERELY DISABLED
Procurement List; Proposed Addition
and Deletions
ACTION: Proposed Addition to and
Deletions from the Procurement List.
SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing
to add to the Procurement List a product
to be furnished by nonprofit agencies
employing persons who are blind or
have other severe disabilities, and to
delete products previously furnished by
such agencies.
Comments Must Be Received On Or
Before: February 17, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase
From People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800,
1421 Jefferson Davis Highway,
Arlington, Virginia, 22202–3259.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT
COMMENTS CONTACT: Kimberly M. Zeich,
Telephone: (703) 603–7740, Fax: (703)
603–0655, or e-mail
CMTEFedReg@jwod.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is published pursuant to 41 U.S.C
47(a) (2) and 41 CFR 51–2.3. Its purpose
is to provide interested persons an
opportunity to submit comments on the
proposed actions.
Addition
If the Committee approves the
proposed addition, the entities of the
Federal Government identified in this
notice will be required to procure the
product listed below from nonprofit
PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
agencies employing persons who are
blind or have other severe disabilities.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
I certify that the following action will
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The major factors considered for this
certification were:
1. If approved, the action will not
result in any additional reporting,
recordkeeping or other compliance
requirements for small entities other
than the small organizations that will
furnish the product to the Government.
2. If approved, the action will result
in authorizing small entities to furnish
the product to the Government.
3. There are no known regulatory
alternatives which would accomplish
the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-
O’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48c) in
connection with the product proposed
for addition to the Procurement List.
Comments on this certification are
invited. Commenters should identify the
statement(s) underlying the certification
on which they are providing additional
information.
End of Certification
The following product is proposed for
addition to Procurement List for
production by the nonprofit agencies
listed:
Product
Paper, Copying, Xerographic—Convenience
Pack
NSN: 7530–00–NIB–0814—Reamless.
NSN: 7530–00–NIB–0826—Ream Wrapped.
NPA: Association for Vision Rehabilitation
and Employment, Inc., Binghamton, NY.
Coverage: A-List for the total Government
requirement as specified by the General
Services Administration.
Contracting Activity: General Services
Administration, Office Supplies & Paper
Products Acquisition Ctr, New York, NY.
Deletions
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
I certify that the following action will
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The major factors considered for this
certification were:
1. If approved, the action should not
result in additional reporting,
recordkeeping or other compliance
requirements for small entities.
2. If approved, the action may result
in authorizing small entities to furnish
the product to the Government.
3. There are no known regulatory
alternatives which would accomplish
the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-
O’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48c) in
connection with the product proposed
for deletion from the Procurement List.
E:\FR\FM\18JAN1.SGM 18JAN1