Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
235 / Friday, December 7, 2007 / Notices 69215
The information in both components
of this ICR will be collected under
authority of section 114 of the CAA.
Section 114(a) states, in pertinent part:
For the purpose * * * (iii) carrying out
any provision of this Chapter * * * (1) the
Administrator may require any person who
owns or operates any emission source * * *
to– * * * (D) sample such emissions (in
accordance with such procedures or
methods, at such locations, at such intervals,
during such periods and in such manner as
the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep
records on control equipment parameters,
production variables or other indirect data
when direct monitoring of emissions is
impractical * * * (G) provide such other
information as the Administrator may
reasonably require * * *
The data collected will be used to
revise the population of potentially
affected boilers and process heaters, and
update existing emission test data and
fuel analysis information. These data
will be used by the Agency to develop
the revised NESHAP for boilers and
process heaters (and potentially
incinerators) under sections 112 and
129 of the CAA. Specifically, the data
will respond in part to the two research
needs, providing the Agency with
updated information on the number of
potentially affected units, available
emission test data and fuel analysis data
to address variability. For a subset of
units that may become subject to CAA
section 129, and thus be required to
conduct stack tests, the data will be
used to complete emission data gaps.
All data collected will be added to
existing emission test databases for
boilers, process heaters, and when
appropriate, incinerators; it will also be
used to further evaluate the HAP
emissions from these sources.
This collection of information is
mandatory under section 114 of the
CAA (42 U.S.C 7414). All information
submitted to EPA pursuant to this ICR
for which a claim of confidentiality is
made is safeguarded according to
Agency policies in 40 CFR part 2,
subpart B. An agency may not conduct
or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
OMB control numbers for EPA’s
regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40
CFR part 9.
The EPA would like to solicit
comments to:
(i) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:30 Dec 06, 2007 Jkt 214001
proposed collection of information,
including the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(iv) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Burden Statement: The projected cost
and hour burden for this one-time
collection of information is $19,398,000
and 125,400 hours. This burden is based
on an estimated 3,396 likely
respondents to the electronic survey
component and an estimated 350
respondents to the stack testing
component. Burden means the total
time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate,
maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency.
This includes the time needed to review
instructions; develop, acquire, install,
and utilize technology and systems for
the purposes of collecting, validating,
and verifying information, processing
and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with
any previously applicable instructions
and requirements which have
subsequently changed; train personnel
to be able to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
The ICR provides a detailed
explanation of the Agency’s estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here.
Estimated total number of potential
respondents: 3,396.
Frequency of response: One time.
Estimated total average number of
responses for each respondent: 1.1
(electronic survey component and stack
testing component combined)
Estimated total annual burden hours:
125,400.
Estimated total annual costs:
$19,398,000. This includes an estimated
burden cost of $7,685,100 for the
electronic survey component and an
estimated cost of $11,712,800 for the
stack testing component.
What is the Next Step in the Process for
This ICR?
EPA will consider the comments
received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will
then be submitted to OMB for review
and approval pursuant to 5 CFR
PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue
another Federal Register notice
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to
announce the submission of the ICR to
OMB and the opportunity to submit
additional comments to OMB. If you
have any questions about this ICR or the
approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Dated: November 30, 2007.
Frederick Thompson,
Acting Director, Sector Policies and Programs
Division.
[FR Doc. E7–23845 Filed 12–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6693–8]
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section
309 of the Clean Air Act and section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
202–564–7167. An explanation of the
ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published
in FR dated April 6, 2007 (72 FR 17156).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20070401, ERP No. D–GSA–
D80032–DC, Department of Homeland
Security Headquarters at the St.
Elizabeths West Campus, To
Consolidate Federal Office Space on a
Secure Site, Washington, DC.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about impacts
to vegetation, historic woodlands, and
the cultural landscape, soil
contamination, and surface and
groundwater. EPA also expressed
concern about transportation and
environmental justice issues. Rating
EC2.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20070408, ERP No. F–AFS–
J61107–ND, NE McKenzie Allotment
Management Plan Revisions, Proposes
to Continue Livestock Grazing on 28
Allotments, Dakota Prairie Grasslands
Land and Resource Management Plan,
Dakota Prairie Grasslands, McKenzie
Ranger District, McKenzie County,
ND.
Summary: The final EIS addressed
EPA’s concerns about impacts to water
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM 07DEN1
 69216 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2007 / Notices
quality and riparian areas. EPA does not
object to the proposed project; however,
we recommend future monitoring
include numeric criteria along with
other narrative indicators.
EIS No. 20070432, ERP No. F–FHW–
G40193–LA, I–49 South Project, from
Raceland to the Westbank Expressway
Route U.S. 90, Funding, Coast Guard
Bridge Permit, U.S. Army COE
Section 10 and 404 Permits, Jefferson,
Lafourche, and St. Charles Parishes,
LA.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20070467, ERP No. F–BLM–
G65101–NM, Special Status Species
Resource Management Plan
Amendment, Managing Public Land
and Federal Minerals in Portions of
Chaves, Eddy, Lea, and Roosevelt
Counties, NM.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20070468, ERP No. FS–SFW–
K99034–CA, Coachella Valley,
Revision to the Multiple Species
Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP),
Natural Community Conservation
Plan, Santa Rosa and San Jacinto
Mountains Trails Plan, Issuance of
Incidental Take Permit, Riverside
County, CA.
Summary: No formal letter was sent to
the preparing agency.
Dated: December 4, 2007.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E7–23807 Filed 12–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6693–7]
Environmental Impact Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–7167 or http://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements
Filed 11/26/2007 Through 11/30/2007
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 20070506, Final EIS, AFS, CA,
Phoenix Project, Proposes to Use a
Combination of Contract and Forest
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Service Crew to Treat Poor Forest
Health and High Fire Hazard
Conditions, Develop a Network
Defensible Fuel Profile Zones
(DFPZs), Sierraville Ranger District,
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:30 Dec 06, 2007 Jkt 214001
Tahoe National Forest, Sierra and
Nevada Counties, CA, Wait Period
Ends: 01/07/2008, Contact: Jeff Leach
530–994–3401 Ext 6680.
EIS No. 20070507, Final EIS, BLM, CA,
Eastern San Diego County Resource
Management Plan, Implementation, El
Centro Field Office, San Diego
County, CA, Wait Period Ends: 01/07/
2008, Contact: Erin Dreyfuss 760–
337–4436.
EIS No. 20070508, Draft EIS, AFS, 00,
Wild and Scenic River Suitability
Study for National Forest System
Lands on the Ashley, Dixie, Fishlake,
Manti-La Sal, Uinta and Wasatch-
Cache National Forests in UT and
Portion of National Forests extend
into Colorado and Wyoming, several
counties, UT, Montrose County, CO
and Uinta County, WY, Comment
Period Ends: 01/22/2008, Contact:
Catherine Kahlow 435–783–4338.
EIS No. 20070509, Final EIS, FHW, SC,
Interstate 73 Southern Project,
Construction from I–95 to the Myrtle
Beach Region, Funding, NPDES
Permit, U.S. Coast Guard Permit, U.S.
Army COE Section 404 Permit, Dillon,
Horry and Marion Counties, SC, Wait
Period Ends: 01/07/2008, Contact:
Patrick Tyndall 803–765–5460.
EIS No. 20070510, Draft EIS, FHW, NJ,
I–295/I76/Route 42 Direct Connection
Project, To Improve Traffic Safety and
Reduce Traffic Congestion, Funding
and U.S. Army COE Section 10 and
404 Permits, Borough of Bellmawr,
Borough of Mount Ephraim and
Gloucester City, Camden County, NJ,
Comment Period Ends: 02/15/2008,
Contact: Lawrence Cullari 609–637–
4200.
Amended Notices
EIS No. 20070332, Draft EIS, BLM, OR,
Western Oregon Bureau of Land
Management Districts of Salem,
Eugene, Roseburg, Coos Bay, and
Medford Districts, and the Klamath
Falls Resource Area of the Lakeview
District, Revision of the Resource
Management Plans, Implementation,
OR, Comment Period Ends: 01/11/
2008, Contact: Dick Prather 503–808–
6627 Revision of FR Notice Published
08/10/2007: Extending Comment
Period from 12/10/2007 to 01/11/
2008.
Dated: December 4, 2007.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E7–23820 Filed 12–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Public Information Collection(s)
Requirement Submitted to OMB for
Emergency Review and Approval
December 4, 2007.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted on or before January 7, 2008.
If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contacts listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, via e-mail to
nfraser@omb.eop.gov or via fax at 202–
395–5167, and to the Federal
Communications Commission via e-mail
to PRA@fcc.gov or by U.S. mail to Leslie
F. Smith, Federal Communications
Commission, Room 1–C216, 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information about the
information collection(s), contact Leslie
F. Smith via e-mail at PRA@fcc.gov or
call (202) 418–0217. For further
instructions on how to view a copy of
this information collection request
(ICR), go to this Web page: http://
www.fcc.gob/omd/pra/collections-
review.html.
07DEN1