Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
208 / Monday, October 29, 2007 / Notices 61191
records involved have routine uses
permitting the disclosures needed to
conduct this match.
E. Privacy Safeguards and Security
The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C.
552a(o)(1)(G)), requires that each
matching agreement specify procedures
for ensuring the administrative,
technical and physical security of the
records matched and the results of such
programs. All Federal agencies are
subject to: The Federal Information
Security Management Act of 2002
(FISMA), 44 U.S.C. 3541, et seq.; related
Office of Management and Budget
circulars and memorandum (e.g., OMB
Circular A–130 and OMB M–06–16);
National Institute of Science and
Technology (NIST) directives; and the
Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR)).
These laws, circulars, memoranda
directives and regulations include
requirements for safeguarding Federal
information systems and personally
identifiable information used in Federal
agency business processes, as well as
related reporting requirements. OPM
and SSA recognize that all laws,
circulars, memoranda, directives and
regulations relating to the subject of this
agreement and published subsequent to
the effective date of this agreement must
also be implemented if mandated.
FISMA requirements apply to all
Federal contractors and organizations or
sources that possess or use Federal
information, or that operate, use, or
have access to Federal information
systems on behalf of an agency. OPM
will be responsible for oversight and
compliance of their contractors and
agents. Both OPM and SSA reserve the
right to conduct onsite inspection to
monitor compliance with FISMA
regulations.
F. Inclusive Dates of the Match
The matching program shall become
effective upon the signing of the
agreement by both parties to the
agreement and approval of the
agreement by the Data Integrity Boards
of the respective agencies, but no sooner
than 40 days after notice of this
matching program is sent to Congress
and the Office of Management and
Budget or 30 days after publication of
this notice in the Federal Register,
whichever is later. The matching
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
program will continue for 18 months
from the effective date and may be
extended for an additional 12 months
thereafter, if certain conditions are met.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:25 Oct 26, 2007 Jkt 214001
Office of Personnel Management.
Linda M. Springer,
Director.
[FR Doc. E7–21139 Filed 10–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–38–P
PRESIDIO TRUST
Notice To Terminate the Environmental
Impact Statement Process, Public
Museum at the Presidio; and Notice of
Intent To Prepare a Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement and
Conduct Scoping, Proposed Changes
to the May 2002 Presidio Trust
Management Plan, Main Post District
AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.
ACTION: Notice to terminate an
Environmental Impact Statement
Process and notice of intent to
supplement an Environmental Impact
Statement.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended (Pub.
L. 91–190, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
in response to public comment, the
Presidio Trust (Trust) is notifying
interested parties that it will: (1)
Terminate the Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) process for the Presidio
Museum in the Main Post district of the
Presidio of San Francisco, California
(Presidio), (2) supplement the final EIS
for the May 2002 Presidio Trust
Management Plan (PTMP) to consider
proposed changes in the actions
analyzed for the Main Post district in
the original NEPA document; and (3)
engage in a scoping process to seek
public input on the supplemental EIS.
The supplemental EIS will address the
environmental impacts of various
proposals that would modify previous
Trust decisions regarding the Main Post
district. The public scoping process will
determine the range of actions,
alternatives and impacts to be
considered in the supplemental EIS.
DATES: Written comments or suggestions
to assist in identifying any significant
environmental issues and in
determining the appropriate scope of
the supplemental EIS should be
submitted on or before December 15,
2007. A public meeting will be held on
November 21, 2007 beginning at 6:30
p.m., at the Presidio Officers’ Club (50
Moraga Avenue) to accept comments on
the scope of the supplemental EIS.
ADDRESSES: Electronic comments
concerning this notice should be sent to
Mainpost@presidiotrust.gov. Written
comments may be faxed to Main Post at
415.561.5308. Written comments may
PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
also be submitted to Main Post, Attn:
Compliance Coordinator, The Presidio
Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O. Box
29052, San Francisco, CA 94129–0052.
Comments previously received
regarding the Presidio Museum EIS or
the Presidio Lodge Environmental
Assessment (EA) need not be repeated;
these comments will inform the Trust’s
preparation of the supplemental EIS.
Please be aware that all written
comments and information submitted
will be made available to the public,
including, without limitation, any
postal address, e-mail address, phone
number, or other information contained
in each submission.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Federal Register notice of August 14,
2007 (72 FR 45469), the Trust notified
interested parties it was preparing an
EIS for a proposed museum at the Main
Post, and that the agency was seeking
public input through scoping. On
September 24, 2007, the Trust held a
public meeting on the scope of the EIS
at which 24 members of the public
spoke. Before scoping ended on October
15, 2007, the Trust received 86
comment letters and electronic mails,
including one petition with over 125
signatures (on file and available for
public review in the Trust library).
Several of the interested parties urged
that the proposed museum, when
viewed with other proposed actions,
would have cumulatively significant
impacts on the environment and should
therefore be addressed in a single EIS.
The Trust is responding to this public
concern in its decision to supplement
the final PTMP EIS in which it will
assess the cumulative impacts of all
reasonably foreseeable Trust actions at
the Main Post. The Trust has elected to
take a fresh look at this broader scope
in order to better meet its NEPA
compliance responsibilities and to
engage more effectively the public in its
decision making.
The Trust will supplement the final
PTMP EIS to take into account new
circumstances or information that is
relevant to the Main Post. The
subsequent analysis will provide a
procedural framework for dealing with
upcoming decisions at the Main Post.
Proposed changes in the actions
analyzed at the Main Post in the final
PTMP EIS that will be reviewed in the
supplemental EIS include the Presidio
Museum, the Presidio Lodge (the EA for
which is also being terminated through
this notice), other potential building
construction or demolition within the
district, the El Presidio site, and parking
and circulation improvements. The
Trust intends to proceed with the
29OCN1
 61192 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 208 / Monday, October 29, 2007 / Notices

signature of the Finding of No FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:John Act and Section 2(d) of the Railroad
Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Main Pelka, NEPA Compliance Coordinator, Unemployment Insurance Act, the RRB
Parade EA as well as the International 415.561.5300. may recover overpayments of annuities,
Center to End Violence (Building 100) Dated: October 23, 2007. pensions, death benefits, unemployment
FONSI as these proposed actions are Karen A. Cook, benefits, and sickness benefits that were
consistent with the PTMP, are General Counsel.
made erroneously. An overpayment may
independently justified, do not involve be waived if the beneficiary was not at
[FR Doc. E7–21277 Filed 10–26–07; 8:45 am]
significant impacts, and would not fault in causing the overpayment and
BILLING CODE 4310–4R–P
prejudice other decisions on the Main recovery would cause financial
Post. hardship. The regulations for the
Alternatives to be considered for recovery and waiver of erroneous
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD payments are contained in 20 CFR parts
analysis in the supplemental EIS
include the planning concept set forth 255 and 340.
Proposed Collection; Comment
in the PTMP for the Main Post (PTMP Request The RRB utilizes Form DR–423,
action), an updated planning concept Financial Disclosure Statement, to
for the Main Post based on new Summary: In accordance with the obtain information about the overpaid
information arising after the PTMP requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of beneficiary’s income, debts, and
(proposed action), and minimal the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 expenses if that person indicates that
planning (no action). Potential impacts which provides opportunity for public (s)he cannot make restitution for the
to be evaluated in the supplemental EIS comment on new or revised data overpayment. The information is used
include those on parking and traffic, collections, the Railroad Retirement to determine if the overpayment should
visual resources, those to the National Board (RRB) will publish periodic be waived as wholly or partially
Historic Landmark district, and summaries of proposed data collections. uncollectible. If waiver is denied, the
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
cumulative impacts. Compliance with information is used to determine the
the proposed information collection is
Section 106 of the National Historic size and frequency of installment
necessary for the proper performance of
Preservation Act will be a component of payments. The beneficiary is made
the functions of the agency, including
the supplemental EIS utilizing the aware of the overpayment by letter and
whether the information has practical
public input, alternatives development is offered a variety of methods for
utility; (b) the accuracy of the RRB’s
and assessment processes to address estimate of the burden of the collection recovery. One response is requested of
historic preservation requirements. of the information; (c) ways to enhance each respondent. Completion is
The availability of the draft the quality, utility, and clarity of the voluntary. However, failure to provide
supplemental EIS (expected to occur in information to be collected; and (d) the requested information may result in
mid 2008) for comment will be ways to minimize the burden related to a denial of the waiver request. The RRB
announced through an EPA-published the collection of information on proposes to revise Form DR–423 to
notice in the Federal Register, through respondents, including the use of delete items requesting the railroad
postings on the Trust’s Web site at automated collection techniques or employee’s Social Security Number and
http://www.presidio.gov and regular other forms of information technology. their spouses Social Security Number.
electronic newsletter (Presidio E-news), Title and Purpose of information Non-burden impacting formatting and
as well as direct mailing to the project collection: Financial Disclosure editorial changes are also proposed.
mailing list and other appropriate Statement: OMB 3220–0127 Under The estimated annual respondent
means. Section 10 of the Railroad Retirement burden is as follows:

ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RESPONDENT BURDEN

Annual Time Burden
Form #(s) responses (Min) (Hrs)

DR–423 ........................................................................................................................................ 1,200 85 1,700

Additional Information or Comments: comments should be received within 60 comment on new or revised data
To request more information or to days of this notice. collections, the Railroad Retirement
obtain a copy of the information Charles Mierzwa,
Board will publish periodic summaries
collection justification, forms, and/or of proposed data collections.
Clearance Officer.
supporting material, please call the RRB Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
[FR Doc. E7–21201 Filed 10–26–07; 8:45 am]
Clearance Officer at (312) 751–3363 or the proposed information collection is
BILLING CODE 7905–01–P
send an e-mail request to necessary for the proper performance of
Charles.Mierzwa@RRB.GOV. the functions of the agency, including
Comments regarding the information RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD whether the information has practical
collection should be addressed to utility; (b) the accuracy of the RRB’s
Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Proposed Data Collection Available for estimate of the burden of the collection
Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Public Comment and of the information; (c) ways to enhance
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES

Illinois 60611–2092 or send an e-mail to Recommendations the quality, utility, and clarity of the
Ronald.Hodapp@RRB.GOV. Written Summary: In accordance with the information to be collected; and (d)
requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of ways to minimize the burden related to
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 the collection of information on
which provides opportunity for public respondents, including the use of

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:25 Oct 26, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM 29OCN1