Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1 USER
MANUAL
Table of Contents
Pore Pressure Prediction .............................................................................................. 3
Module Summary .................................................................................................................................... 4
Well Settings ......................................................................................................................................... 14
Overburden Pressure (OBP)................................................................................................................. 18
Normal Compaction Trend Lines (NCTL).............................................................................................. 21
Pore Pressure ....................................................................................................................................... 27
Calibration Points .................................................................................................................................. 35
Centroid Method Pore Pressure in a Hydraulically-Connected Formation .......................................40
3D Model Building ................................................................................................................................. 43
View and Export Options....................................................................................................................... 57
Workflow Hints and FAQs ..................................................................................................................... 68
Page 3
Module Summary
Introduction
DUG Insight's Pore Pressure Prediction (PPP) module is a powerful tool for interactive geopressure analysis,
calibration, and prediction at wells and in 3D.
More than 25% of drilling non-productive time (NPT) is due to overpressure. In addition to decreasing the
NPT, correct prediction of the pressure regime enables faster drilling, less formation invasion, and therefore
improved reservoir integrity.
Features include:
The Pore Pressure Prediction module is a seamless addition to DUG Insight 3, with an intuitive, interactive
interface for rapid analysis.
1D well calibration
1D well calibration allows the user to determine a local observed shale compaction trend line (OSCTL) and
establish a regional normal compaction trend line (NCTL) which best fits all well sonic and/or resistivity logs.
Overburden pressure (OBP) and thus pore pressure prediction (PPP) by either Eaton's or Miller's methods is
developed to best match measured or interpreted borehole pressures.
This module can be used for real time drilling and completion analyses, or as calibration points for 3D model
building.
The calculated curves are also available to view in Insight's other 2D and 3D views.
Page 4
Page 5
3D model building
3D model building generates a volume of pore pressure gradient (PPG) from seismic velocity (or resistivity)
volumes.
This may use the parameters optimised from the 1D well calibration mode, or from other empirical sources.
Pore pressure and fracture gradient volumes can then be used for future well planning, to optimise mud
weights, and predict hazards.
Figure 2 shows an example of a 3D pore pressure calibration from seismic velocity.
Page 6
(b) Symbols
Page 7
(c) Units
Notes:
"PPP" may be used to describe the method or the result. e.g. the PPP module or the PPP at WellX
Pore Pressure Gradient (PPG) is Pore Pressure (PP) divided by TVDSS
In the various formula builders, Insight provides built-in variables tvdss_m, tvdbml_m, tvdss_ft,
tvdbml_ft for depths measured from the surface or from the mud line, in metres or feet.
Fundamental theory
Conventional pore pressure analysis is based on Terzaghis (and Biot's) effective stress principle which states
that total vertical stress (v) (or overburden stress) is equal to the sum of the effective vertical stress (e) and
the formation pore pressure (PP) as follows:
v = e +
PP
where
v = Total vertical stress
e = Effective stress
PP = Formation pore pressure
(this assumes the Biot effective stress coefficient is 1 which is the usual assumption)
The basic steps in performing a conventional 1D pore pressure analysis are:
Page 8
1.
2.
3.
4.
The pore pressure prediction module is utilised to estimate the effective stress (e), using either Eaton's or
Miller's methods, described next.
Eaton's equation
Eaton's method equations for PPP are described in Figure 3, and can be made from either velocity (slowness)
or resistivity measurements, in the well or from data volumes:
Velocity uses the observed shale compaction trend (OSCTL) at a well location, or seismic interval
velocity from a volume.
Resistivity uses the shale deep resistivity at well, or a resistivity volume.
Crucial to Eaton's method is defining the Normal Compaction Trend Line (NCTL), which is the background
trend of velocity (as slowness) or resistivity, described in Section 4: Normal Compaction Trend Lines.
Calibration of the Eaton parameters in the PPP module are described in Section 5.2: Eaton's method.
Page 9
Miller's equation
Miller's equation for PPP is described in Figure 4. Pore pressure gradient depends on the measured velocity,
and whether depth is above or below the unloading depth. Below (deeper than) a given depth, unloading does
not occur (and is the formula used in the PPP module). The physical relationships built into the Miller's (no
unloading) equation are: at zero effective stress, the velocity is simply the fluid velocity, and as the effective
stress approaches infinity, the velocity approaches the matrix velocity.
Calibration of Miller's method parameters in the PPP module are described in Section 5.3: Miller's method.
Page 10
Fracture gradient
The fracture pressure is that at which the formation has tensile failure. Thus, the predicted fracture gradient
shows the maximum possible mud weight without inducing mud loss into the formation.
The Matthews-Kelly formulation is implemented, defined in Figure 5. You must provide an effective stress ratio
(K0), which can be calibrated from leak-off tests (LOTs), described in Section 6.2.1: Leak Off Test (LOT) and
fracture gradient example.
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Well Settings
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Parameter settings
Density options
The parameters to set and apply for all wells are:
Note: The water depth must be correct in the well configuration. To view or change the well configuration,
open the Well tab in the Control Panel, and double-click the desired well (see Figure 8).
Extrapolation options
Shallow zone defines the zone from the sea floor to the (allocated) log depth.
Extrapolate up from defines the first log depth from which to begin the density extrapolation up to
the sea floor. Zero (0) will use the first logged sample.
Override Power if checked, will be applied for the current well only.
Deep zone defines the zone from the last log depth to the base of Display Window.
Extrapolate down either from a user-defined depth, from the last log sample, or do not
extrapolate.
Method either power-law or polynomial GGG relationship.
Page 18
Volume options
To calculate PPP volumes, an OBP volume is also required. Section 8: 3D Model Building shows how to
create a density volume, which is used to calculate the OBP volume.
QC measures
Page 19
Well comparisons
In the Tracks section of the View tab, enable OBPG Compare, allowing you to verify that all wells have
similar trends. Figure 11 shows how simply adjusting the Extrapolate up from value can minimise well-towell variability.
Note: The Extrapolated Well Curve option will exist only when Use density from well log is selected.
Section 8: 3D Model Building, Figure 29 shows the same comparisons made with Use density from volume.
Page 20
Page 21
Parameter settings
Upon opening a new well, the NCTL options are blank with red outlines (Figure 12).
There are four options to define the NCTL trends:
Constant
Defined by a single, depth-invariant value of sonic slowness; the simplest option.
Page 22
Log
NCTL defined from a log curve.
Picked
Manually picking a curve on the DT or Resistivity tracks:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Formula
These are depth-dependent functions of tvdss_m, tvdbml_m, tvdss_ft, tvdbml_ft, where the suffix _ss
indicates sub-sea, and _bml is below mud-line (or burial depth).
The default NCTL formulae are of the form:
For P-slowness (DT)
NCTL = DT + (DTm - DT) * e^c*tvdbml_m
Page 23
that is
NCTL = tvdss_m / 5000
You can provide any formula using these variables; the above are only examples.
QC measures
Page 24
Well-to-well comparisons
For 1D well calibration and local analyses, the NCTL may be designed to fit a particular well
location. However, it is expected that the NCTL over a study area should be relatively consistent from well to
well. For regional analyses and 3D model building (see Section 8: 3D Model Building), the NCTL must be a
robust function.
In the Tracks section of the View tab, select the NCTL Compare track to view the variation among the NCTL
curves of all enabled wells and verify the spatial consistency.
Page 25
Pressure comparisons
The NCTL may be iteratively adjusted such that pore pressure predictions match measured or interpreted
pressures. Thus, the NCTL may be revisited and updated once pore pressure predictions are made from the
logs (see Section 5.2: Eaton's method) or volumes (see Section 8.3: 3D volume generation).
Page 26
Pore Pressure
Introduction
The complete set of default parameters for well pressure predictions, visualisation, and exporting are
controlled from this tab: Eaton and Miller parameters, velocity model, and LAS exports.
Eaton's method
Eaton's method predicts pore pressure from either velocity or resistivity, using equations shown in Figure 3
(Section 1.3.2: Eaton's equation). These both require a normal compaction trend line (NCTL) and overburden
pressure (OBP), which may be well-local or regional models.
Page 27
Page 28
4. Viewing results
Once again, the Eaton pore pressure curves from the OSCTL (DT and/or RES) can be
enabled in the View tab (Figure 16).
Note: The default smoothing and Eaton parameters may be overridden for a particular well in
the Well Settings tab. You will need to settle on a common value for these (and an NCTL
function) when you create a 3D pore pressure model, discussed in Section 8: 3D Model
Building.
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
We then randomly sample (using Monte Carlo simulation) from the distributions to create realisations of PPG
at each depth level. The P10 and P90 curves are then calculated from this resulting distribution (which may or
may not be a normal distribution).
Under the Pore Pressure tab, Eaton Uncertainty Simulation section, relative uncertainties can be set for all
Eaton parameters (equations shown in Figure 3).
The specified Number of random simulations are then made at the given Sample Interval.
Figure 18 shows the PPP uncertainty envelopes from both a log sonic and seismic velocity model analysis.
Figure 18(a) shows the PPP envelope from the default uncertainty parameters. The envelope on the velocity
model from traces extracted in a radius around the well location is shown in Figure 18(b), which is used to set
the higher % error on the simulation value. The PPP uncertainty is least sensitive to the Eaton exponent.
Page 32
Miller's method
Miller's method does not require NCTL. It is purely dependent on the observed sonic velocity (smoothed
OSCTL) and overburden pressure (OBP). The no unloading equation of Section 1.3.3: Miller's equation is
implemented.
Figure 19 shows Miller's pore pressure prediction at a well location, from the smoothed sonic log (OSCTL,
observed shale compaction trend line). Parameters are optimised to fit the previously estimated Eaton's
method (Figure 16). Both the Eaton uncertainty bounds (Section 5.2.3: Pore pressure uncertainty simulations)
and calibration points (to be outlined in Section 6: Calibration Points) have been added, to support the
parameter choices.
Note: As per Eaton's method from log (DT), the Miller's method PPP is also dependent on the shale cutoff
and OSCTL smoothing parameters.
QC measures
Calibration points
Section 6: Calibration Points shows how to load calibration points to verify the predicted pressures.
In general, the predicted pressures should be:
More than the hydrostatic gradient (defined by the weight of a water column) in the shale portions
Page 33
Page 34
Calibration Points
Introduction
The pore pressure track can be annotated with relevant borehole data, such as MDT (modular dynamic test),
LOT (leak off tests), mud weights, flow tests, and casing points.
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Note: Only psi or ppg units are accepted for import. With Mud Weight in SG or Pressures in kPa, these can
be converted to psi using one of the equations from Section 10.2 Unit conversions.
Page 38
You can create any number of groups. Figure 22 shows a pore pressure prediction track with RFT, MW, and
casing points annotated.
Note: For existing groups, the units are set upon the group creation. If points are added to that group, values
will be converted to the group units on-the-fly. For example, mud weights imported as psi (see spreadsheet
in Figure 21(a)) are automatically converted to the group units ppg.
Although calibration pressure gradients may not be imported in units of specific gravity (SG), they may be
viewed as SG using the view menu, Units option.
Page 39
Page 40
QC measures
Page 41
Calibration points
The predicted pore pressure should correlate with borehole measured pressures, such as MDT or RFT
measurements (see Section 6. Calibration Points). The height of a hydrocarbon column may then be
interpreted and its effects on pore pressure predicted. Figure 23(b) shows how the fluid heights and densities
can be edited in order to estimate the maximum pore pressure expected up-dip in a reservoir layer.
Page 42
3D Model Building
Page 43
Introduction
The second mode of the PPP module is 3D model building. This will use the calibration parameters (i.e.
overburden pressures, NCTL models, and Eaton exponents) plus a 3D velocity model.
The 3D model building processes are found in the main Control Panel Process tab. As with other processes,
these create new output volumes for use throughout Insight, including within the PPP view.
However, before building a 3D model of PPP from the velocity model, it should be verified at the wells. The
same 1D well calibration workflow from Section 4: Normal Compaction Trend Lines (NCTL) and Section 5:
Pore Pressure apply, but instead will use a global NCTL volume (for Eaton's method) and OBP volume, with
the aim of creating a 3D model that will tie the wells.
Page 44
Page 45
To apply this density volume for OBP calculation at the well location: under the PPP module, OBP tab, select
the Density Volume (in TVD) and set Specific density settings for well to Use density from volume
(Figure 26).
Figure 26 also shows the well-to-well density volume comparisons, as calculated from the velocity model
(similar to Figure 6, which compared density extrapolated from well logs).
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
3D volume generation
Once all global NCTL and Eaton parameters are established for the PPP from velocity model, two processes
are then used to generate a 3D pore pressure volume.
Density volume
This is already generated for the well verification (Figure 25 in Section 8.2.2: Density volume and Overburden
Pressure (OBP)).
Page 52
Note: For the volume to match the well calibration, ensure there is no Eaton Velocity Exponent Override
active when verifying the PPP at wells from the velocity model.
Page 53
QC measures
Viewing and well matches
The pressure predictions from velocity should match those from the OSCTL (which should in turn match the
well calibration points).
This will justify the robustness of the predictions away from the well.
Figure 32 shows the results of the Eaton Pressure Volume process, and procedure to select the Well curve,
in this case the DT_Eaton result.
Figure 33 shows the same results with the logs from VEL_Eaton overlain, and setting these logs to the
global Pore Pressure Gradient well curve class.
Page 54
Figure 34 shows how to apply a Volume Smoothing process to the velocity volume. This process is then
used on-the-fly for the 3D model building and 1D log generation.
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Introduction
The 1D well calibration (Pore Pressure Prediction view) offers detailed controls on the track and curve views.
Most of these can be set from either the View tab, or by right clicking one of the display tracks, and choosing
Configure Track.
All generated curves can be exported to LAS file format.
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
switch on and off the curves for each track by toggling the yellow/green buttons
set interpolation method (for logged well curves)
set line display mode: Wiggle, Fill, or Density
set colourbar (for Fill or Density curves) by choosing a Class
set line colour, transparency, and width.
Page 61
Navigation extents
The view extents on on any track can be set either with the mouse or by typing specific values.
Interactive view setting
Right-click, hold, and drag select the vertical view range.
Right-click, Zoom to fit extends the min/max depths to the previously set Display
Window (global or well local)
Mouse wheel up zooms in, down zooms out
Page 62
Left-click, hold, and drag moves the entire track up or down (if not already zoomed to
maximum extents)
Manual view setting
The overall Display limits are set via global or well Display Window in the tabs on the left.
To set specific values, right-click on a track and select Configure track; or see the Tracks
section in the View tab.
Page 63
Page 64
Curve export
All generated curves can be exported as LAS format, from the Pore Pressure tab, under Export LAS.
Page 65
Export options
It will export the defined Window of Interest. This is primarily defined in the View tab, Default Window Of
Interest section, with two exceptions:
if there is an Override Window of Interest set and activated for any well under the Well Settings
tab, or
if Use Display Window is set under the View tab.
Either All Wells or Current Well may be exported, at the desired Sample Interval (m). LAS files are exported
to the chosen folder, with suffix _PorePressure.las. Figure 40 illustrates the flow to batch-export all LAS files
of all wells (one file per well) with all generated curves.
Note: The Calculation Sample Interval (m) is purely for the on-screen curve display resolution.
Page 66
Exported curves
All computed curves are exported even if curve or track is not enabled for display. For example, the fracture
gradient curve, even though not switched on, will be exported. Only when a curve becomes invalid will it not
be exported.
(See Section 10.1: Troubleshooting for typical reasons why a curve may become invalid. For example, PPP
using OBP from an invalid density volume; or OSCTL curve where shale indicator has not been picked.)
An example of the LAS format is shown in Figure 41.
Note: LAS files are exported in TVDSS. Pore pressure units are all PSI, pore pressure gradient in Pounds
Per Gallon (PPG).
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Unit conversions
The View tab allows the pressure gradient track to be in units of pounds per gallon (ppg) or specific gravity
(SG). For reference, the conversion factor is:
SG = ppg / 8.3
Page 70
van Ruth, P., Hillis, R. and Tingate, P., 2004, The origin of overpressure in the Carnarvon Basin WA implications for pore pressure prediction, Petroleum Geoscience, 10, 247-257.
Yardley, G.S. and Swarbrick, R.E., 2001, Lateral Transfer: A source of additional overpressure: Marine and
Petroleum Geology.
Zhang, J., 2011, Pore pressure prediction from well logs: Methods, modifications and new approaches, EarthScience Reviews, 108, 50-63.
Page 71