Weighted-average Pub. L. 106–36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR Producer margin the company-specific rate published for part 301). Related records can be viewed (percentage)the most recent period; (3) if the between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in exporter is not a firm covered in this Room 2104, U.S. Department of Joint Stock Company Liepajas Metalurgs .... 5.94 review, a prior review, or the less-than- Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave, fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the NW., Washington, DC. manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate Comments: None received. Decision: Assessment will be the rate established for the most Approved. We know of no instrument of The Department will determine, and recent period for the manufacturer of equivalent scientific value to the foreign U.S. Customs and Border Protection the merchandise; and (4) if neither the instruments described below, for such (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm purposes as each is intended to be used, on all appropriate entries, pursuant to covered in this or any previous review that was being manufactured in the 19 CFR 351.212(b). We calculate conducted by the Department, the cash United States at the time of its order. importer-specific duty assessment rates deposit rate will be 17.21 percent, the Docket Number: 07–056. Applicant: on the basis of the ratio of the total ‘‘All Others’’ rate established in the Illinois Institute of Technology, amount of antidumping duties LTFV investigation. These cash deposit Chicago, IL. Instrument: Micro Test calculated for the examined sales to the requirements shall remain in effect until Pendulum with Hot-Stage Extension & total quantity of the sales for that further notice. Spherical Indenters. Manufacturer: importer. Where the assessment rate is This notice also serves as a final Micro Materials Ltd., United Kingdom. above de minimis, we instruct CBP to reminder to importers of their Intended Use: See notice at 72 FR assess duties on all entries of subject responsibility under 19 CFR 52084, September 12, 2007. Reason: The merchandise by that importer. As 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate instrument must be capable of testing explained in the Preliminary Results, regarding the reimbursement of materials at temperatures in excess of the Department will apply the importer- antidumping duties prior to liquidation 700 °C or at a load capacity of 10kN. specific assessment rates calculated in of the relevant entries during this Both of these features are critical in the the previous review. The Department review period. Failure to comply with assessment of mechanical properties of intends to issue assessment instructions this requirement could result in the high strength materials at elevated to CBP 15 days after the date of Secretary’s presumption that temperatures. publication of these final results of reimbursement of antidumping duties Dated: October 3, 2007. review. occurred, and in the subsequent The Department clarified its Faye Robinson, assessment of double antidumping Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff, ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on duties. Import Administration. May 6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This This notice also is the only reminder clarification will apply to entries of [FR Doc. E7–19825 Filed 10–5–07; 8:45 am] to parties subject to administrative subject merchandise during the POR protective order (APO) of their BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P produced by companies included in responsibility concerning the return or these final results of review for which destruction of proprietary information the reviewed companies did not know DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE disclosed under APO in accordance their merchandise was destined for the with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written United States. In such instances, the International Trade Administration notification of the return/destruction of Department will instruct CBP to District Export Council Nomination APO materials or conversion to judicial liquidate unreviewed entries at the all- Opportunity protective order is hereby requested. others rate if there is no rate for the Failure to comply with the regulations AGENCY: International Trade intermediate company(ies) involved in and the terms of an APO is a Administration, Commerce. the transaction. For a full discussion of sanctionable violation. this clarification, see Antidumping and We are issuing and publishing these ACTION: Notice. Countervailing Duty Proceedings: results and notice in accordance with Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 Mission Statement: Notice and call for sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the membership for one of the Sixty District FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). Act. Export Councils nationwide. Cash Deposits October 2, 2007. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of The following cash deposit David M. Spooner, Commerce is currently seeking requirements were effective upon Assistant Secretary for Import expressions of interest from individuals publication of the final results of the Administration. in serving as a member of one of the previous administrative review (see [FR Doc. E7–19821 Filed 10–5–07; 8:45 am] Sixty District Export Councils (DECs) Notice of Final Results of Antidumping BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P nationwide. The DECs are closely Duty Administrative Review: Steel affiliated with the U.S. Export Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Latvia, Assistance Centers of the U.S. 71 FR 74900 (December 13, 2006)) for DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Commercial Service. DECs combine the all shipments of rebar from Latvia energies of more than 1,500 exporters entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, International Trade Administration and export service providers who for consumption on or after December promote U.S. exports. DEC members Illinois Institute of Technology; Notice volunteer at their own expense. 13, 2006, as provided by section of Decision on Application; for Duty- mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as DATES: Applications for nomination to a
Free Entry of Scientific Instruments DEC must be submitted by the amended (‘‘the Act’’), and will continue to be in effect: (1) The cash deposit rate This is a decision pursuant to section designated local USEAC representative listed above for LM will be 5.94 percent; 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and by November 1, 2007. (2) for previously reviewed or Cultural Materials Importation Act of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: investigated companies not listed above, 1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by Contact your local U.S. Export
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:07 Oct 05, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM 09OCN1
Olaf Peter Juda v. Dennis Michael Nerney, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Northern District of California Stephen R. Kotz, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Albuquerque, New Mexico John J. Kelly, U.S. Attorney, Albuquerque, New Mexico Michael Yamaguchi, U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, California Robert L. Holler, District Director, U.S. Customs Service, El Paso, Texas Leonard S. Walton, Acting Assistant Commissioner, U.S. Customs Service, Washington, D.C. Bonnie L. Gay, Foia Unit, Attorney-In-Charge, Washington, D.C. John and Jane Does 1-25 United States of America, Olaf Peter Juda v. United States Customs Service, Robert L. Holler, Joy M. Hughan, Daniel Luar, Rita Alfaro, Dolores Payan, Gina E. Fuentes, Internal Revenue Service, George Terpack, Carolyn Leonard, Timothy A. Towns, John Does, Jane Does, 149 F.3d 1190, 10th Cir. (1998)
United States v. Vincent Gigante, Vittorio Amuso, Venero Mangano, Benedetto Aloi, Peter Gotti, Dominic Canterino, Peter Chiodo, Joseph Zito, Dennis Delucia, Caesar Gurino, Vincent Ricciardo, Joseph Marion, John Morrissey, Thomas McGowan Victor Sololewski, Anthony B. Laino, Gerald Costabile, Andre Campanella, Michael Realmuto, Richard Pagliarulo, Michael Desantis, Michael Spinelli, Thomas Carew, Corrado Marino, Anthony Casso, 187 F.3d 261, 2d Cir. (1999)