Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
e-ISSN: 23210990, p-ISSN: 23210982.Volume 3, Issue 4 Ver. II (Jul - Aug. 2015), PP 31-38
www.iosrjournals.org
Introduction
Theporosityofasedimentarylayerisanimportantp a r a m e t e r
for
evaluating
the
potentialvolumeofhydrocarbonsitmaycontain.Inotherwords,oneoftheessentialattributesofany
hydrocarbonreservoirisporosity.Almostallreservoirshaveporosityinarangeof5to45%withthe majority falling
between
10
and
20%
(Selley
and
Morrill,
1983;
Egehetal.,2001).HubbertandRubey(1959),Schmidt(1973),Selly(1982),Uko(1996)appliedporosityanalysisinthe
geodynamicprocesses,whichinfluencedtheevolutionofsedimentarybasinsincludingtheNigerDelta
basinandcontinentalmarginofNigeria,andhydrocarbonpotentialsofthebasin.Whenporosityis
combinedwithpermeability,aregionshydrodynamics,hydrocarbonmigrationandaccumulationin
reservoirscouldbeevaluated.Porosityfieldcouldaswellbeusedtopredictabnormalpressureareas during oil-well
drilling
(Ukoetal.,2013,
Udo,
et
al
2015).Middleton(1984)usedthesurfaceporositytocarryoutgeohistoryanalysisofasedimentarybasin.Characterization
ofhydraulicpropertiesofrocks,suchastheporosity,isessentialfordynamicbasin
analysisbecauseporosityandpermeabilitycontroltheflowofsubsurfacefluids(Bachuand
Undersschultz,1992).Regionalstudiesinbasinanalysisarenecessaryforunderstandingbasinevolution
andthegeneration,migration,andaccumulationofhydrocarbons(Hitchonetal.,1987).Also,
dynamicanalysisdealswiththestructureandrocksinsedimentarybasins
andthedynamicprocessestakingplace,suchastheflowofformationfluidsandthetransferof
terrestrialheatfromthecrusttothesurface.BjorkunandNadeau(1998)assertedthatporosityand
permeability
distributions control fluid migration on timescales of tens of millions of years.
Chukwuekeetal.,(1992)estimatedsurface
porosityusingonlygeophysicallogs
and
obtained
valuesforsandstoneandshaleas43.38and70.09%respectivelyinthe
distilpartsoftheNigerDelta.Okiongbo(1998)workedinthenorth-easternNigerDelta
andobserved
subsurfaceporosityrangebetween10and25%,whileOfeke(1998)computed
porosity
values
usingporositylogsandobtained the subsurface porosity for central NigerDelta as 52% and14%.
Ikeagwuani(1979)obtainedporositiesof35%
and15%atdepthsof5000ftand14000ftrespectively.Theseworkers
used only porosity logs without core sample measurements to infer the porosities.
In
thiswork,wemodeledporosityequation
forthe
study areainSouth-EastNigerDelta
from
whichporositycanbeestimatedatanydepthformany applications.
Geology oftheNigerDelta
NigerDeltabasinisboundedbythegeographicalgridsoflatitudes6 o40Eandlongitudes8o30N.
ItcontainsmainlyCenozoicformationsdepositedinhighenergyconstructivedeltaicenvironmentsasdifferentiatedintocontinentalBenin,paralicAgbada,andpro-deltamarineAkatafacies (Doust and
Omatsola, 1990, Short and Stauble, 1967).
DOI: 10.9790/0990-03423138
www.iosrjournals.org
31 | Page
www.iosrjournals.org
32 | Page
II.
Materials AndMethods
Depth(ft)Low
5999
7999
10000
11999
13138
VSH
0.98905
0.88532
0.38370
0.56835
0.36149
VSH
0.00099
0.00171
0.00608
0.00096
0.00042
(1)
Where = fractional porosity
Vp = Pore Volume
Vb = Bulk Volume
Vs = Gain Volume
DOI: 10.9790/0990-03423138
www.iosrjournals.org
33 | Page
III.
Results AndDiscussion
Figure 3: Complete Porosity against Depth and VSH / Porosity against Depth for the Well
DOI: 10.9790/0990-03423138
www.iosrjournals.org
34 | Page
Figure 4: Porosity against Depth and VSH / Porosity against Depth for Well 1
Figure 5: Porosity against Depth and VSH / Porosity against Depth for Well 2
Figure 6: Porosity against Depth and VSH / Porosity against Depth for Well 3
DOI: 10.9790/0990-03423138
www.iosrjournals.org
35 | Page
Figure 7: Porosity against Depth and VSH / Porosity against Depth for Well 4
Figure 8: Porosity against Depth and VSH / Porosity against Depth for Well 5
IV.
Conclusion
Inconclusion,porosityvaluesrangesfrom0.013%to94.08%intheareaofstudy.Porositydecreaseswithdepth in
normal compacted formation for bothwells.The following porosityequations have beenmodelled for thestudy area:
Z = -3E-05z + 0.5785.This implies that, in the absence of coresample, porosity, zcan beestimated at
anydepth,Zintheareaofstudy. Reservoir thicknessisdirectly related to its porosity. Thehigher the reservoir
thickness, the higher the porosity.Porosity decreases with depth.
References
[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
DOI: 10.9790/0990-03423138
www.iosrjournals.org
36 | Page
[17].
[18].
[19].
[20].
[21].
[22].
[23].
[24].
[25].
[26].
[27].
[28].
[29].
[30].
[31].
[32].
[33].
[34].
[35].
[36].
[37].
[38].
[39].
[40].
[41].
[42].
[43].
[44].
[45].
DOI: 10.9790/0990-03423138
www.iosrjournals.org
37 | Page
[46].
[47].
[48].
[49].
[50].
[51].
[52].
[53].
[54].
[55].
[56].
[57].
[58].
[59].
[60].
[61].
[62].
[63].
[64].
[65].
[66].
[67].
[68].
[69].
[70].
[71].
DOI: 10.9790/0990-03423138
www.iosrjournals.org
38 | Page