Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

50410 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

169 / Friday, August 31, 2007 / Notices

Dated: August 23, 2007. including the validity of the NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Michele M. Leonhart, methodology and assumptions used;
Deputy Administrator. Agency Information Collection
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
[FR Doc. E7–17223 Filed 8–30–07; 8:45 am] Activities: Proposed Collection;
clarity of the information to be
Comment Request
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
collection of information on those who ACTION: Notice.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
are to respond, including through the
SUMMARY: The National Science
Federal Bureau of Investigation use of appropriate automated,
Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans
electronic, mechanical, or other
[OMB Number 1110–0002] to request reinstatement and clearance
technological collection techniques of of this collection. In accordance with
Agency Information Collection other forms of information technology, the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A)
Activities: Proposed Collection, e.g., permitting electronic submission of of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Comments Requested responses. Overview of this information we are providing opportunity for public
collection: comment on this action. After obtaining
ACTION: 30-day Notice of Information
(1) Type of information collection: and considering public comment, NSF
Collection Under Review: Revision of a
Revision of a currently approved will prepare the submission requesting
currently approved collection.
collection. OMB clearance of this collection for no
Supplementary Homicide Report.
(2) The title of the form/collection: longer than 3 years.
The Department of Justice, Federal Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
Supplementary Homicide Report.
Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice the proposed collection of information
Information Services Division (CJIS) (3) The agency form number, if any, is necessary for the proper performance
will be submitting the following and the applicable component of the of the functions of the Agency,
information collection request to the department sponsoring the collection: including whether the information shall
Office of Management and Budget Form 1–704; CJIS Division, Federal have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
(OMB) for review and clearance in Bureau of Investigation, Department of the Agency’s estimate of the burden of
accordance with established review Justice. the proposed collection of information;
procedures of the Paperwork Reduction (4) Affected public who will be asked (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
Act of 1995. The proposed information or required to respond, as well as a brief and clarity of the information on
collection is published to obtain abstract: Primary: City, county, state, respondents, including through the use
comments from the public and affected federal and tribal law enforcement of automated collection techniques or
agencies. This proposed information other forms of information technology;
agencies.
collection was previously published in and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the Federal Register, Volume 72, This report will gather data obtained the collection of information on
Number 122, pages 35071–35072, on from law enforcement agencies in which respondents, including through the use
June 26, 2007, allowing for a 60-day a criminal homicide, justifiable of automated collection techniques or
comment period. homicide, and/or a manslaughter by other forms of information technology.
The purpose of this notice is to allow negligence has occurred. DATES: Written comments should be
for an additional 30 days for public (5) An estimate of the total number of received by October 1, 2007 to be
comment October 1, 2007. This process respondents and the amount of time assured of consideration. Comments
is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR estimated for an average respondent to received after that date will be
1320.10. respond: There are approximately considered to the extent practicable.
Written comments and/or suggestions 17,523 law enforcement agency ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding the items contained in this regarding the information collection and
respondents; calculated estimates
notice, especially the estimated public requests for copies of the proposed
indicate 9 minutes per report.
burden and associated response time, information collection request should be
should be directed to Mr. Gregory E. (6) An estimate of the total public
addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports
Scarbro, Unit Chief, Federal Bureau of burden (in hours) associated with this
Clearance Officer, National Science
Investigation, CJIS Division, Module E– collection: There are approximately 31,
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm.
3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, 541 hours, annual burden, associated 295, Arlington, VA 22230, or by e-mail
West Virginia 26306; facsimile (304) with this information collection. to splimpto@nsf.gov.
625–3566. If additional information is required
Written comments and suggestions FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
contact: Ms. Lynn Bryant, Department Suzanne Plimpton at (703) 292–7556 or
from the public and affected agencies
Clearance Officer, Information send e-mail to splimpto@nsf.gov.
concerning the proposed collection of
Management and Security Staff, Justice Individuals who use a
information are encouraged. Comments
Management Division, United States telecommunications device for the deaf
should address one or more of the
following four points: Department of Justice, Patrick Henry (TDD) may call the Federal Information
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed Building, Suite 1600, 601 D. Street, Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
collection of information is necessary NW., Washington, DC 20530. between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time,
for the proper performance of the Dated: August 27, 2007. Monday through Friday.
functions of the agency, including SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Lynn Bryant,
whether the information will have Title of Collection: Recurring Study of
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United
practical utility; National Science Foundation-sponsored
States Department of Justice.
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the Graduate Education Impacts or Legacy
[FR Doc. E7–17275 Filed 8–30–07; 8:45 am]
agency’s estimate of the burden of the (GEIL). (Formerly called the Evaluation
proposed collection of information, BILLING CODE 4410–02–P of the Initial Impacts of the Integrative

VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:43 Aug 31, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 169 / Friday, August 31, 2007 / Notices 50411

Graduate Education Research and http://www.nsf.gov/funding/education/ Burden on the Public: 15,000 hours.
Traineeship (IGERT) Program.) jsp?org=NSF@fund_type-2. This estimate covers three graduate
OMB Control No.: 3145–0182. Through longitudinal study NSF aims education programs, their participants,
Expiration Date of Approval: July 31, to learn about the long-term impact or and comparison group respondents over
2005. legacy of its program strategies in a three year period.
graduate education. A primary goal is to Dated: August 27, 2007.
Abstract
identify and follow-up with individuals Suzanne H. Plimpton,
The National Science Foundation who participated in NSF-funded
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
(NSF) requests extension of data programs or projects, especially Foundation.
collection (e.g., interviews, surveys, students who graduated with masters or
[FR Doc. 07–4287 Filed 8–30–07; 8:45 am]
focus groups, site visits) measuring doctoral degrees. The primary means of
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
NSF’s contribution to the Nation’s data collection will be surveys. Site
graduate education enterprise and visits, focus groups and interviews are
overall science and engineering used to improve survey instruments, NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
workforce. This continuation expands clarify responses or address questions of
the data collection formerly called ‘‘The institutional impact. Typical Notice of Permit Applications Received
Evaluation of the Initial Impacts of the respondents are former NSF-funded Under the Antarctic Conservation Act
IGERT Program’’ most recently fellows, trainees or to her participants in of 1978 (Pub. L. 95–541)
approved through July 2005 (OMB NSF-funded projects or are professional
3145–0182). scientists, engineers, IHE faculty, K- AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
IGERT began data collection in the graduate educators, education ACTION: Notice of Permit Applications
late 1990s for use in program research, administrators and K-IHE policymakers. Received under the Antarctic
management and evaluation. Data NSF uses the analysis of responses to Conservation Act of 1978, Public Law
collection was concurrent with NSF- prepare and publish reports and to 95–541.
funding in order to document IGERT’s respond to requests from Committees of
initial impact within individual Visitors, Congress and the Office of SUMMARY: The National Science
departments or institutions (often called Management and Budget, particularly as Foundation (NSF) is required to publish
projects), and on student, faculty and related to the Government Performance notice of permit applications received to
other participants as compared to the and Results Act (GPRA) and the conduct activities regulated under the
educational and training experiences of Program Assessment Rating Tool Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.
individuals who were external to (PART). NSF has published regulations under
IGERT. This request expands data The study’s broad questions include the Antarctic Conservation Act at Title
collection to the portfolio of NSF- but are not limited to: What do 45 Part 670 of the Code of Federal
funded graduate education programs individuals following post-participation Regulations. This is the required notice
and projects, typically on a program-by- in IGERT or other NSF-funded graduate of permit applications received.
program sub-study basis in order to education opportunities do? Do IGERT DATES: Interested parties are invited to
address long-term impact. or other NSF-funded opportunities submit written data, comments, or
For over fifty years NSF has funded provide graduates with the professional views with respect to this permit
directly and indirectly (e.g. via and/or research skills needed to work in application by October 1, 2007. This
institutions), tens of thousands of science and engineering? Are IGERT or application may be inspected by
individuals who pursue post- other NSF-sponsored graduates satisfied interested parties at the Permit Office,
undergraduate education or research that their NSF-funded graduate address below.
training. NSF’s graduate education education advanced their careers in
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
portfolio includes: science or engineering? To what extent
addressed to Permit Office, Room 755,
• The Integrative Graduate Education do IGERT or other former-NSF-
Office of Polar Programs, National
Research and Traineeship (IGERT) sponsored graduates engage in the
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
program. IGERT provides grants to science and engineering workforce
Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230.
institutions to recruit and support conduct inter- or multi-disciplinary
doctoral students in interdisciplinary science? Is there evidence of a legacy FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Science, Technology, Engineering, and from NSF-funding that changed a Nadene G. Kennedy at the above
Mathematics programs (STEM). degree-granting department beyond address or (703) 292–7405.
• The graduate Teaching Fellows in number of students supported and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
K–12 Education (GK–12) program. GK– degrees awarded? To what extent have National Science Foundation, as
12 provides grants to institutions to projects achieved or contributed to directed by the Antarctic Conservation
support STEM graduate students’ individual project goals or the NSF Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95–541), as
acquisition of skills that will prepare program goals? To what extent have amended by the Antarctic Science,
them for careers in the 21st century. NSF-funded projects or programs Tourism and Conservation Act of 1996,
• The Graduate Research Fellowship broadened participation by diverse has developed regulations for the
(GRF) program. GRF provides three individuals, particularly individuals establishment of a permit system for
years of funding to eligible individuals traditionally underemployed in science various activities in Antarctica and
for graduate study leading to research- or engineering, including but not designation of certain animals and
based masters or doctoral degrees at an limited to women, minorities, and certain geographic areas as requiring
IHE of their choice. persons-with-disabilities? special protection. The regulations
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

A longer list of NSF’s graduate Respondents: Individuals or establish such a permit system to
education opportunities and eligibility households, not-for-profit institutions, designate Antarctic Specially Protected
information is on the NSF Web site business or other for profit, and Federal, Areas.
under the link: ‘‘Specialized State, Local or Tribal Government. The applications received are as
information for Graduate Students’’ at: Number of Respondents: 30,000. follows:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:43 Aug 31, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi