Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Date
Contents
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1
900 Existing Pavement-Types ...................................................................................................................... 2
910 Rehabilitation with HMA Overlay (>2 inches) .................................................................................. 3
920 Rehabilitation with PCC Overlay ......................................................................................................... 5
930 Rehabilitation with FDR/SFDR/CIR ...............................................................................................10
940 Rehabilitation with Rubblization/Crack & Seat ...............................................................................13
950 New/Reconstruction ............................................................................................................................15
960 Noneconomic Factors ..........................................................................................................................16
Introduction
Process
STEP 1.
Find the existing pavement-type and the possible rehabilitation alternates in Table
900.1.
STEP 2.
Use the tables in Sections 910-950 to determine which alternates are applicable.
Additionally, consult Table 960.1 for noneconomic factors
Possible
Rehabilitation*
Description
HMAonAggregate HMApavement,includinganyHMAoverlays,
Base
placedonseveralinchesofaggregatebase.
HMAoverlay(>2inches)
PCCoverlay
FDR/SFDR/CIR
New/Reconstruction
FullDepthHMAon HMApavement,includinganyHMAoverlays,
Subgrade
placedonsubgrade.
HMAoverlay(>2inches)
PCCoverlay
FDR/SFDR/CIR
New
HMApavementplacedonpreviously
constructedPCCPavement.
HMAoverlay(>2inches)
PCCoverlay
CIR
Rubblization
CrackandSeat
New/Reconstruction
PCCpavementplacedoneitheraggregate
baseorsubgrade.
HMAoverlay(>2inches)
PCCoverlay
Rubblization
CrackandSeat
New/Reconstruction
PCCpavementplacedonpreviously
constructedHMAPavement.
HMAoverlay(>2inches)
PCCoverlay
FDR/SFDR
New/Reconstruction
PCCpavementplacedonpreviously
constructedPCCPavement.
HMAoverlay(>2inches)
PCCoverlay
Rubblization
CrackandSeat
New/Reconstruction
HMAonPCC
PCConAggregate
BaseorSubgrade
PCConHMA
PCConPCC
* This list includes typical, available rehabilitation alternates. It is not intended to exclude any
alternates that may be available for a project.
2
Section460.
Description
Paving>2ofHMAonanexistingHMApavementssurface.Itisintendedto
improveride,reducesurfacedistress,mayimprovepavementstructure,and
preservetheexistingpavement.ExistingHMAmaybemilledpriortotheHMA
overlaytoremovesurfacedistressesandtoreducetheroadsprofile.
DesignLife
Typically,MnDOTprojectsuseadesignlifeof1319yearsdependingon
existingpavementcondition,traffic,andHMAoverlaythickness.
GoodCandidate
Structurallysoundpavementthatneedsonlyminorimprovements.
Projectsinwhichalimiteddesignlifeisacceptable.
PoorCandidate
Pavementsthatexhibitstructuralproblemssuchas:
o Deformingorruttingsubsurfacelayers.
o Largeamountsofbottomupfatiguecracking.
o Subgradefailuresand/orseasonalheavingissues.
Pavementswithalargeamountofsurfacedistress(rutting,cracking,and
poorride)thatwillnotbesufficientlyimprovedbyanHMAoverlay.
Projectsinwhichalongdesignlifeisdesired..
Pros
Cons
Limitedabilitytoimprovestructureandfunction.
Mayraiseroadprofile.
Limiteddesignlife.
Mayaddstructure.
Improvesrideandreducessurfacedistresses.
Relativelyinexpensive.
Shortconstructionperiod.
Reducesshorttermmaintenance.
Section460.
Description
Paving>2ofHMAonanexistingPCCpavementssurface.Itisintendedto
improveride,reducesurfacedistress,mayimprovepavementstructure,and
preservetheexistingpavement.AnyexistingHMAmaybemilledpriortothe
HMAoverlaytoremovesurfacedistressesandtoreducetheroadsprofile.
DesignLife
Typically,MnDOTprojectsuseadesignlifeof1317yearsdependingon
existingpavementcondition,traffic,andHMAoverlaythickness.
GoodCandidate
Structurallysoundpavementthatneedsonlyminorimprovements.
Projectsinwhichalimiteddesignlifeisacceptable.
PoorCandidate
Pros
Mayaddstructure.
Improvesrideandreducessurfacedistresses.
Relativelyinexpensive.
Shortconstructionperiod.
Reduceshorttermmaintenance.
Cons
Limitedabilitytoimprovestructureandfunction.
Limiteddesignlife.
JointsandcracksintheexistingPCCwillreflectthroughtheHMAoverlay.
MayinducePCCblowups.
TheHMAoverlaymayspallatsevereexistingPCCjointsorcracks.
Probablereflectivecrackingoverjointsandcracksintheconcrete.
Raisesinthepavementprofile.
Pavementswithrockingormovingpanels.
Pavementsonsubgradeswithseasonalheavingissues.
Pavementswithlargeamountsofcrackedorshatteredpanels.
Projectsinwhichalimiteddesignlifeisunacceptable.
PCC overlays may be used to rehabilitate existing HMA and existing PCC pavements. PCC
overlays of HMA pavements, or whitetopping, may be designed using two different
procedures. One procedure, using the BCOA-ME, requires a durable bond between the PCC
overlay and the existing HMA. The other whitetopping design procedure, using
MnPAVE-Rigid, doesnt consider a bond and may be used on more deteriorated HMA
pavement than the bonded design. PCC overlays of existing PCC pavement, or UBOL, use an
interlayer to prevent the bonding of the PCC overlay to the existing PCC pavement.
Section510.
Description
ThistypeofdesigncountsonthebondbetweenthePCCoverlayandthe
existingHMAtoensurethattheybehaveasasinglemonolithicpavement
layer.BCOAthicknessestypicallyrangefrom4.0to6.0.Thesurfaceofthe
existingHMAmaybemilledtoremovesurfacedistressesandtoreduceor
eliminateincreasesintheprofileoftheoverlaidpavement.AnyexistingPCC
overlaymayberemoved,theexistingHMAprepared,andreplacedwithanew
PCCoverlay.
DesignLife
20years
GoodCandidate
TheexistingHMApavementhasstablesupportconditionswithonly
localizedweakareasthatmayberepairedpriortoplacingthePCCoverlay.
TheprimarydistressesintheexistingHMApavementaresurfacedistresses.
ThermalcracksintheHMApavementarepredominatelynondeteriorated
thermalcracks.Deterioratedthermalcrackswillrequirerepairpriorto
placingthePCCoverlay.
ThereisasufficientexistingHMAthicknesssothatafteranyproposed
milling:
o 85%ofthecoresare4.0orthicker.
o Anyindividualcoremustbeaminimumof3.0thick.Any
areasoflessthan3.0ofHMAmaybetreatedbyremoving
theexistingHMApavementandconstructinga6.0
(minimum)PCCsection.
PoorCandidate
TheexistingHMApavementhassignificantstructuraldeteriorationand
areasofunevensupportconditions.
ExistingHMAoverlayofPCCPavement.
Theexistingpavementexhibitsdifferentialfrostmovements.
TheexistingHMAhasbeenwidened,orwillrequirewidening,withinthe
areaofthedrivinglane.
TheHMApavementthatwillremainafteranymillingexhibitsstripping
and/ordebondedlayers.
HMApavementswithpredominatelydeterioratedthermalcracksthatwill
requirerepairpriortoplacingthePCCoverlay.
ThereisaninsufficientexistingHMAthicknesssothatafteranyproposed
milling:
o Morethan15%ofthecoresarelessthan4.0thick.
o Thereareindividualcoreslessthan3.0thick.However,any
areasoflessthan3.0ofHMAmaybetreatedbyremoving
theexistingHMApavementandconstructinga6.0
(minimum)PCCsection.
Pros
Addsstructure.
Improvesrideandreducessurfacedistresses.
Relativelyinexpensive.
Cons
RequiresasufficientthicknessofsoundHMApavement.
Requiresstablesupport.
Mayrequireariseinroadprofile.
ExistingactivecracksintheHMAmayreflectthroughtothePCCoverlay.
Section510.
Description
ThisdesignmethoddoesnotrequireabondbetweenthePCCOverlayandthe
existingHMA.Theminimumthicknessis6.0.AnyexistingHMAmaybemilled
priortotheHMAoverlaytoremovesurfacedistressesandtoreducethe
roadsprofile.AnyexistingPCCoverlaymayberemoved,theexistingHMA
prepared,andreplacedwithanewPCCoverlay.
DesignLife
20or35years
GoodCandidate
Theexistingpavementhasstablesupportconditionsorwillrequireonly
localizedrepairs.
PoorCandidate
PoorlydrainingroadsthatwillnotprovidestablesupportforthePCC
overlay.
Theexistingpavementexhibitsdifferentialfrostmovements.
Pros
Addsstructure.
Improvesrideandreducessurfacedistresses.
MaybeusedonmostexistingHMApavements.
Cons
MoreexpensivethanabondedPCCoverlay.
Mayrequirearaiseinroadprofile.
ExistingactivecracksintheHMAmayreflectthroughtothePCCoverlay.
Section520.
Description
APCCoverlaythatusesabondbreakertoseparateitfromexistingPCC
pavement.Theminimumpavementthicknessis6.0inches.
DesignLife
20or35years
GoodCandidate
Theexistingpavementhasstablesupportconditionsorwillrequireonly
localizedrepairs.
Theroadwayhasroomtopermitasignificantraiseinroadprofile.
PoorCandidate
SignificantareasthatwillrequirerepairpriortoplacingthePCCoverlay.
Existingpavementhasrockingormovingpanels.
Theexistingpavementexhibitsdifferentialfrostmovements.
Roadwayswithasignificantnumberofbridgesrequiringprofileadjustments.
Pros
Improvesrideandpavementdistress.
MaybeusedonmostexistingPCCpavements.
Maybeusedonfaultedpavementsorpavementswithmaterialrelated
distresses.
Significantlystreamlinedconstructionascomparedtoreconstruction.
Cons
Requiresstablesupportconditions.
Willrequireasignificantraiseinroadprofile.
Section420.
Description
FDRinvolvesusingareclaimingmachinetocrushandblendtogetherexisting
HMApavementandaggregate.Theblendedmaterialismovedasnecessaryto
allowittobecompactedin6inchlifts.Aftercompactionandshaping,itwill
thenactasbasefornewHMApavement.
DesignLife
20years
GoodCandidate
Aroadwaywithfewornosubgradeproblems.
Thepavementhassufficientexistingaggregatebasetocoolthereclaimer
teethandtoreclaimwithexistingHMA.HMAmaybemilledoraggregate
addedtothepavementsurfacepriortoreclaimingtohelpmeetthis
proportion.
Aroadwaythathasroomtopermitasignificantraiseinroadprofile.
PoorCandidate
Aroadwaythatrequiresalargeamountofsubgraderepair.
Theroadwaydoesnothaveroomtopermitasignificantraiseinroadprofile.
Thepavementexhibitsdifferentialfrostmovements.
Pros
Typically,lessexpensivethanreconstruction.
Rehabilitatespavementsthatarestructurallyandfunctionallyunsound.
Removesallpavementdistressesandpavementmaterialproblems.
Cons
Notintendedtorepairsubgradeproblems(however,localizedareascanbe
addressedduringdesignandconstruction).
Requiressufficientthicknessexistingaggregate.
Willrequireasignificantraiseinroadprofile.
10
Section420.
Description
SFDRisFDRthathashadastabilizingagentadded.Aftertheroadwayhasbeen
reclaimed,asecondpassofthereclaimingmachineismadetoapplyandblend
inastabilizer.Thestabilizeristypicallyemulsifiedasphaltwithadditivesor
foamedasphaltcement.Thislayerwillthenbecompacted,shaped,and
allowedtocurebeforebeingpavedwithnewHMApavement.
DesignLife
20years
GoodCandidate
Aroadwaywithfewornosubgradeproblems.
AnHMApavementwithatleast3inchesofexistingaggregatebase.
PoorCandidate
Aroadwaythatrequiresalargeamountofsubgraderepair.
Apavementwithoutaggregatebase.
Thepavementexhibitsdifferentialfrostmovements.
Pros
Cons
Notintendedtorepairsubgradeproblems(however,localizedareascanbe
addressedduringdesignandconstruction).
Requiressomeexistingaggregate.
StabilizationaddstothecostascomparedtoFDR.
Rehabilitatespavementsthatarestructurallyandfunctionallyunsound.
UsesthinnerHMAascomparedtoFDR.
WillrequirelessofaraiseinroadprofilethanFDR.
RequireslessinplaceaggregatethanFDR.
Typically,lessexpensivethanreconstruction.
Removesallpavementdistressesandpavementmaterialproblems.
11
Section420.
Description
CIRinvolvesmillingaportionoftheexistingHMA,mixingthemilledmaterial
withemulsifiedasphaltandadditives,andpavingtheroadwaywiththe
milled/emulsifiedmix.TheseactivitiesareallperformedinonepassofaCIR
train.ThepavedCIRmaterialisthencompactedand,afterasuitablecuring
time,itispavedwithHMApavement.
DesignLife
20years
GoodCandidate
Aroadwaywithfewornosubgradeproblems.
WillsupporttheCIRtrain.
PoorCandidate
Aroadwaythatrequiresalargeamountofsubgraderepair.
SupportfortheheavyCIRtraincannotbeprovidedduringconstruction.
Thepavementexhibitsdifferentialfrostmovements.
Pros
CIRlayermayretardreflectivecracking.
Removessurfacedistresses.
Cons
Willnotrepairsubgradeproblems.
Retainsthedistressesandanymaterialsproblemsofmaterialthatisleft
remaining.
12
Section430.
Description
RubblizationisintendedtoreducetheexistingPCCmodulusinordertoprevent
reflectivecrackingofthenewHMApavementandallowittoactasnewbase.
RubblizationinvolvesbreakingtheexistingPCCslabintopieces(3.0inches
maximumatsurfaceand9.0inchesmaximumatthebottomofpavement),
compactingtherubblizedmaterial,andpavinganHMApavement.
DesignLife
20years
GoodCandidate
SubgradewithanaverageRValueofatleast17oratleast12inchesof
granularmaterial.
Roomtopermitaraiseinroadprofile.
PoorCandidate
Thepavementexhibitsdifferentialfrostmovements.
SubgradewithanRValueoflessthan17andlessthan12inchesofgranular
material.
Riseinroadprofilenotpermissible.
Pros
Lessexpensivethanreconstruction.
RemovessurfacedistressesandallowstheexistingPCCpavementtoactas
baseforanewHMApavement.
RubblizedPCCisstrongerthanaggregatebase.
Cons
Requiresasolidsubgradethatdoesntrequiresubgraderepairs.
Significantriseinroadprofile.
Edgedrainsmustbeinstalledpriortorubblization.
13
Section430.
Description
TheCrack&SeatprocessinvolvescrackingtheexistingPCCpavementinto3to
4footpieces,firmlyseatingthepieces,andpavingHMApavement.The
intentionistoreducethesizeofthePCCpiecestominimizemovementsat
existingcracksandjoints.Thiswillminimizethefrequencyandseverityof
reflectivecracking.Itisanespeciallyusefultechniquewhenmovingorrocking
panelshavebeenidentified.
DesignLife
Typically,MnDOTprojectsuseadesignlifeof1317yearsdependingon
existingpavementcondition,traffic,andHMAoverlaythickness.
GoodCandidate
Roadwaywithagoodsubgradethatdoesnotrequireextensiverepairs.
Roomtopermitaraiseinroadprofile.
PoorCandidate
Saturatedsubgradewhichcannotbeaddressedthroughedgedrain
installation.
Thepavementexhibitsdifferentialfrostmovements.
Riseinroadprofilenotpermissible.
Pros
Lessexpensivethanreconstruction.
RemovessurfacedistressesandallowstheexistingPCCpavementtoactas
baseforanewHMApavement.
CrackedPCCisstrongerthanaggregatebase.
Cons
Requiresasolidsubgradethatdoesntrequiresubgraderepairs.
Significantriseinroadprofile.
EdgedrainsneedtobeinstalledpriortoCrackandSeat.
14
950 New/Reconstruction
Section400(HMA)orSection500(PCC).
Description
Removalofanyexistingpavementandconstructionofnewpavementplaced
onneworexistingbaseandsubbase.
DesignLife
20or35(PCConly)years.
GoodCandidate
PoorCandidate
Projectsinwhichlessexpensiveoptionsareavailable.
Newalignment.
Structurallyandfunctionallyunsoundpavement.
Requireschangesingeometry.
Requireswidespreadsubgraderepairs.
Doesnthaveroomtopermitariseintheroadprofile.
Pros
Cons
Typically,themostexpensivealternate.
Generally,alongerconstructionperiodthanotheralternates.
Constructionoperationsaresusceptibletoelements.
Subgraderepairsmaybeperformedandsubsurfacedrainageinstalled.
Geometricproblemsmaybeaddressed.
Pavementsubsurfacemaybeconstructedwithfrostresistantmaterials.
Removespreviousdistressesandpoormaterials.
Controlsfinalroadprofile.
Longdesignlife.
Provideasoundplatformforfuturerehabilitations.
15
Other
Roadwaygeometrics(e.g.,varyinglanewidths,
presenceofverticalcurves,longitudinalgrades)
Continuityofadjacentpavementsandlanes
Characteristicsofsubgradesoils
Trafficduringconstruction
Futureneedsongeometricorcapacitychanges
Safetyconsiderations,suchasdelineatingthe
contrastbetweenpavementandshoulder
Availabilityoflocalmaterialsandexperience
Conservationofmaterialsandenergy
Localgovernmentpreferencesorlocal
politics
Stimulationofcompetitionamongpaving
materialssuppliers
Noiseissuesduetoworkzoneconstruction
ortirepavementfriction
Experimentalmaterialsordesignconcepts
Maintenanceexperienceandequipment
Industrycapabilitytoperformtherequired
work
Sustainability,suchasthroughenergy
efficiency,emissionsreduction,and
resourceconservation.
16