Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
132 / Wednesday, July 11, 2007 / Notices
issue requests for clarification and
additional information.
For the reasons identified by the
Petitioners, and because there are no
compelling reasons to deny the request,
the Department is postponing the
preliminary determination under
section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, by 50
days to September 6, 2007. The deadline
for the final determination will continue
to be 75 days after the date of the
preliminary determination, unless
extended.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to sections 733(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
Dated: July 2, 2007.
David Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–13378 Filed 7–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
University of Minnesota, et al., Notice
of Consolidated Decision on
Applications for Duty–Free Entry of
Scientific Instruments
This is a decision consolidated pursuant
to Section 6(c) of the Educational,
Scientific, and Cultural Materials
Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).
Related records can be viewed between
8:30 A.M. and 5 P.M. in Room 2104,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC.
Comments: None received. Decisions:
Approved. We know of no instrument of
equivalent scientific value to the foreign
instruments described below, for such
purposes as each is intended to be used,
was being manufactured in the United
States at the time of its order.
Docket Number: 07–025. Applicant:
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
MN 55455. Instrument: Confocal Raman
Microscope. Manufacturer: Witec,
Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 72
FR 33204, June 15, 20007. Reasons: The
foreign instrument provides capability
for distinguishing polymorphs in
organic crystalline films, identifying
components in polymer blends at the
micron level, distinguishing
components in complex biofilms,
characterizing the surface composition
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
of coated aerosol particles, etc. Precise
mapping control through a piezo scan
table, as well as high resolution and
adaptation to different wavelengths of
the laser are essential features.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:56 Jul 10, 2007 Jkt 211001
37729
Docket Number: 07–034. Applicant:
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
47907–2054. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, The Netherlands. Intended
Use: See notice at 72 FR 33204, June 15
2007. Reasons: The foreign instrument
provides capability of high voltage
electron microscopy.
Docket Number: 07–035. Applicant: Old
Dominion University, Norfolk, VA
23529. Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan
Intended Use: See notice at 72 FR
33204. Reasons: The foreign instrument
provides capability of high voltage
electron microscopy.
The capabilities of each of the foreign
instruments describedabove are
pertinent to each applicant’s intended
purposes and we know of no other
instrument or apparatus being
manufactured in the United States
which is of equivalent scientific value to
any of the foreign instruments.
Faye Robinson,
Director,Statutory Import Programs Staff,
Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–13477 Filed 7–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–122–815]
Pure Magnesium and Alloy Magnesium
from Canada: Final Results of 2005
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 20, 2007, the
Department of Commerce published in
the Federal Register the preliminary
results of the administrative reviews of
the countervailing duty orders on pure
magnesium and alloy magnesium from
Canada for the period January 1, 2005,
through August 15, 2005. We gave
interested parties an opportunity to
comment on the preliminary results.
Our analysis of the comments
received on the preliminary results did
not lead to any changes in the net
subsidy rate. Therefore, the final results
do not differ from the preliminary
results. The final net subsidy rate for the
reviewed company is listed below in the
section entitled ‘‘Final Results of
Reviews.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 11, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew McAllister or Brandon
Farlander, AD/CVD Operations, Office
PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
1, Import Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)
482–1174 or (202) 482–0182,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 20, 2007, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published the preliminary results of the
administrative reviews of the
countervailing duty orders on pure
magnesium and alloy magnesium from
Canada for the period January 1, 2005,
through August 15, 2005. See Pure
Magnesium and Alloy Magnesium from
Canada: Preliminary Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, 72 FR 19881 (April 20, 2007)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. (‘‘NHCI’’)
submitted a case brief on May 7, 2007.
In its case brief, NHCI agreed with the
Department’s Preliminary Results with
respect to NHCI. US Magnesium LLC
(‘‘the petitioner’’) did not file a case or
rebuttal brief.
Scope of the Orders
The products covered by these orders
are shipments of pure and alloy
magnesium from Canada. Pure
magnesium contains at least 99.8
percent magnesium by weight and is
sold in various slab and ingot forms and
sizes. Magnesium alloys contain less
than 99.8 percent magnesium by weight
with magnesium being the largest
metallic element in the alloy by weight,
and are sold in various ingot and billet
forms and sizes.
The pure and alloy magnesium
subject to the orders is currently
classifiable under items 8104.11.0000
and 8104.19.0000, respectively, of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written descriptions of the merchandise
subject to the orders are dispositive.
Secondary and granular magnesium
are not included in the scope of these
orders. Our reasons for excluding
granular magnesium are summarized in
Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value: Pure and Alloy
Magnesium From Canada, 57 FR 6094
(February 20, 1992).
Period of Reviews
The period for which we are
measuring subsidies, or POR, is January
1, 2005, through August 15, 2005.
11JYN1