Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
105
Introduction
106
ways in handling its supply chain activities, thus increasing performance of oil palm
production and reducing costs related to production and manufacturing of palm oil
products along its supply chain activities.
With the availability of appropriate and affordable technologies, the question is
whether the MPOI is able to manage its supply chain activities effectively using KMS
and IT. The use of advanced databases, computer software and communication systems
is important for developing a cost-effective supply chain. The purpose of this study is to
explore to what extent the Malaysian oil palm plantations supply chain have used KMS
and IT to manage their supply chain activities, particularly those related to sourcing of
raw material, production and support activities. The study also aims to determine whether
the use of KMS and IT in supply chain activities has contributed to improving
performance. Following this introduction, we will discuss in separate sections the
concept of SCM followed by a short reviewed of KM, research methodology and
discussion of the results. In the last section, we will conclude this paper with possible
recommendations.
A more recent SCM definition was by Handfield and Bozarth (2006). They defined SCM
as the active management of supply chain activities and relationships to maximize
customer value and achieve a sustainable competitive advantage. Nowadays, SCM has
received greater attention from companies and has become a successful strategy to link
effectively all trading partners and to ensure cost-effective and timely movement of
materials from suppliers to producers and finally to customers (Premkumar, 2000).
According to Dreyer (2000) and Kumaraswamy et al. (2000), many companies are
implementing SCM to remain competitive because they are able to reduce time to market,
improve product quality, slash production costs and lead times. They constantly adjust
their supply chains to increase efficiency, control costs and improve customer
satisfaction. Sunil and Peter (2001) agreed and said this would enable firms to achieve
maximum profit.
As customers are the major consideration in implementing SCM, creating value based
on customers needs has become an important source of competitive advantage, creating
a shift from push to pull strategies for bringing products to the customers.
107
108
products and services configuration, fulfilment of business processes and feedback from
customers consumption of products and services.
109
opportunities to create and retain greater value from supply chains based on core business
competencies (Tiwana, 1999). According to Hult et al. (2004), capitalising on knowledge
can create superior performance in supply chains but only if the relative emphasis on
various knowledge elements such as tacitness, accessibility and responsiveness matches
strategy. KMS can be used in decision making that will lead to improved SCM
competence. Wadhwa and Saxena (2005) believed that KM has great potential to offer
opportunities to create and retain greater value within the supply chain players. This,
however, required that the implementation of KMS in the supply chain be enriched by the
judicious use of IT which will result in improved flow of information.
Lau and Lee (2000) explained that almost all companies would need to have a better
information flow for easier and quicker access to required information across
organisational and geographical boundaries. Rapid flow of information on products
particularly on the status of orders and deliveries are important for a smooth transaction
between customers and companies. Hill (1999) showed that customers prefer to do
business with companies who can provide quicker order turnaround, more frequent
shipment, special packaging, labelling, pallet builds and other value-added services.
Therefore, companies must quickly implement KMS which focus on technologies and
systems that support all activities and the flow of information along the supply chain.
Good KMS help companies to maintain their competitiveness by building strong relations
with employees, customers and upstream and downstream suppliers and partners
(Thomas et al., 2004). Wu (2001) described that the principles of applying KM in the
supply chain are for coordination, information and knowledge sharing among the supply
chain players. Besides, these principles allow companies to develop good strategies,
methods, policies, cooperation mechanism and technologies on KM in SCM (Dwivedi
and Butcher, 2008).
Most supply chain systems such as vendor managed inventory (VMI), collaborative
planning, forecasting and replenishment (CPFR), enterprise resource planning (ERP) and
e-procurement can easily implement timely and effective knowledge sharing among the
supply chain players. KMS can also provide tools to manage vast amount of data that
exists across the supply chain, conduct sophisticated analysis on these data and develop a
better understanding of supply chain performance and opportunities. In a complex supply
chain networks, it is important that organisations understand how knowledge is created
and shared around their core business processes and thus it will improve their
performance significantly (McLaughlin, 2009). Flexibility in the KMS is also important.
Fantazy et al. (2009) found that strategic decision making and information systems
flexibility had positive impact on supply chain performance.
Theoretical framework
110
Referring to previous studies (Borade and Bansod, 2008; Michael et al., 2002; SimchiLevi et al., 2003), this variable includes items such as the effects of providing IT
infrastructure capabilities (see Table 3 for details). The other independent variables which
are deemed to be relevant in this study include number of field and administrative
workers, and qualification of the managers.
Figure 1
Methodology
111
managers for their feedback. The sampling frame for the study was obtained from the list
of plantations compiled in the MPOB directory. Only those with internet connections
were included as the sampling frame. This gave a total number of 550 oil palm
plantations, which was about 40.0% of the total population. A large number of oil palm
plantations were in the rural areas; IT facilities and infrastructure in these areas were
limited.
The study used a stratified random sampling, where the population was divided two
strata, Peninsular Malaysia (West and East Coast) and East Malaysia (Sabah and
Sarawak). The sample from Peninsular Malaysia and East Malaysia was taken at the ratio
of 70:30. Questionnaires were mailed to the respondents who were the managers of the
selected oil palm plantations. Follow-up calls were made a month after the questionnaires
were sent out. Out of 196 questionnaires sent out, 80 responses were returned and usable
for further analysis giving a 41.0% response rate.
f A, SF , SA , Q, LEC , LWC
(1)
Y2
f A, SF , SA , Q, LEC , LWC
(2)
where
Y1 = performance improvement due to sourcing of raw materials activities (mean score)
Y2 = performance improvement due to production activities (mean score)
A = KMS application for primary activities (mean score)
SF = field workers (number)
SA = administrative workers (number)
Q = qualification of the respondents (1 = high school, 2 = diplomas and below,
3 = degrees)
112
Figure 2 shows that about 49.0% of the oil palm plantations in the study were from East
Coast region which consists of Kelantan (6.25%), Terengganu (6.25%) and Pahang
(36.25%). West coast region covered about 26.0% of the respondents which include
Johor (12.5%), Negeri Sembilan (8.75%), Selangor (1.25%) and Perak (3.75%). The
other 25.0% of the oil palm plantations were located in East Malaysia, where Sabah and
Sawarak, accounted for 21.25% and 3.75%, respectively.
The questionnaires were mostly completed by managers, which accounted for 92.5%
while assistant managers completed 7.5%. Most of the managers and assistant managers
had bachelor degrees (74.0%); whereas, the other 26.0% had diplomas and lesser
qualification. Slightly more than 36.0% of the oil palm plantations hired between 101 and
150 field workers. The highest percentage (56.3%) of the oil palm plantations had fewer
than 10 administrative staff and only 2.5% had more than 21 administrative staff.
Figure 2
East Malaysia,
25%
East Coast,
49%
West Coast,
26%
113
important mean score (3.10) was for the use of computerised inventory management
systems (CIMS) to manage raw material inventories. The use of CIMS in the oil palm
plantations was required to ensure better management of raw materials. The incoming
and outgoing of raw materials data that were recorded in a computerised system allow
managers to make better decisions. The managers were allowed to choose their own
suppliers to ensure a smooth progress of operations in the oil palm plantations (mean
score of 2.96). One of the main criteria required by the managers was that their suppliers
were able to supply quality raw materials. The managers agreed that the current method
of transporting raw materials from their suppliers was the most cost-effective method
(mean score of 2.91). The overall mean score for sourcing of raw materials activities was
2.76. This finding suggests that the performance of sourcing of raw materials activities
was moderate; nevertheless a few activities have been well managed by the plantations.
On the average, 52.0% of the respondents agreed that their plantations have taken the
appropriate sourcing of raw material activities to improve performance; however, still a
significant percentage (33.0%) did not believe that they have done so.
Table 1
Activities
Number of responses
SDA DA
A
SA
9
17
43 11
Mean
score
2.70
13
39
22
2.96
42
24
2.39
15
54
10
2.91
14
36
28
3.13
21
39
15
2.80
35
31
2.33
35
37
2.44
12
48
20
3.10
16
54
2.89
1
11 The current method of managing inventory used by the
company is better than the methods used by the competitors
Overall mean score
Average response percentage (n = 80)
5.0
24
53
2.70
2.76
28.0 52.0 15.0
Note: SDA: strongly disagree (score = 1); DA: disagree (score = 2); A: agree (score = 3);
SA: strongly agree (score = 4).
114
Activities
Number of responses
SDA DA
A
SA
2
15
54
9
Mean
score
2.88
52
26
3.30
34
38
2.60
56
19
3.18
12
57
2.91
27
50
2.63
11
50
17
3.02
If the company does not have own processing facilities, its will
look for the most cost-effective way at processing the products
(such as by utilising the nearest independent processing facility)
65
10
3.06
14
55
2.85
2.0
17.0
66.0
15.0
2.94
Note: SDA: strongly disagree (score = 1); DA: disagree (score = 2); A: agree (score = 3);
SA: strongly agree (score = 4).
115
Activities
1
Number of responses
SDA DA
A
SA
5
29
43
3
Mean
score
2.55
23
50
2.65
20
54
2.75
58
13
3.04
24
48
2.65
21
46
2.75
15
54
2.84
22
44
10
2.75
18
46
14
2.90
4.0
25.0
2.76
62.0 9.0
Note: SDA: strongly disagree (score = 1); DA: disagree (score = 2); A: agree (score = 3);
SA: strongly agree (score = 4).
116
Activities
Number of responses
SDA DA
A
SA
2
4 40
34
Mean
score
2.70
18
48
11
2.74
11
53
14
2.91
15
53
10
2.69
19
49
10
2.64
56
16
2.99
50
21
3.01
11
52
16
2.98
2.83
2.0 15.0
63.0 20.0
Note: SDA: strongly disagree (score = 1); DA: disagree (score = 2); A: agree (score = 3); SA:
strongly agree (score = 4).
117
Variable
Constant
Application of KMS (A)
No. of field workers (SF)
No. of administrative workers (SA)
Qualification of the respondents (Q)
Located in the east coast (LEC)
Located in the west coast (LWC)
R
R2
Adjusted R2
SE of the estimate
Note: Dependent variable: Y1.
SE
T-statistic
Coefficient (E)
18.046
9.075
1.989
13.623
2.880
4.731
0.003
0.016
0.239
0.150
0.172
0.138
0.358
1.499
0.920
0.542
1.974
0.275
1.087
2.247
0.484
0.502
Mean of dependent var.
0.252
F-statistic
0.191
Significant of F-statistics
6.96625
Significant
0.050
0.000
0.812
0.864
0.361
0.784
0.630
48.529
4.102
0.001
118
Table 6
Variable
SE
T-statistic
Significant
17.385
2.179
7.977
0.000
3.255
0.688
4.731
0.000
0.001
0.005
0.223
0.824
Constant
0.005
0.048
0.099
0.921
0.274
0.479
0.572
0.569
0.431
0.630
0.684
0.496
0.133
0.720
0.184
0.854
0.500
4.970
R2
0.250
F-statistic
4.050
0.188
Significant of F-statistics
0.001
Adjusted R
SE of the estimate
2.22929
Results of both regression analyses revealed that the oil palm plantations were focusing
on activities and strategies to improve the overall performance of their activities. Most of
the respondents agreed that the application of KM initiatives have indeed contributed
significantly to this cause. By building value-added initiatives around the primary
activities, the oil palm plantations have efficiently push products and services to market
and offer more value to their customers. Thus, adding value in supply chain activities
using KMS tends to establish a close relationship that makes it easier for the supply chain
players to work together and arrive at a common goal of meeting the needs of the
customers.
SCM has become a successful strategy to link effectively all trading partners and ensure
cost-effective and timely movement of materials from raw material suppliers to final
customers of the finished products. To remain competitive, companies are constantly
faced with challenges to reduce time to market, improve product quality and slash
production costs and lead times. The introduction of information and communication
technologies and the availability of internet technologies in the market have helped
companies to achieve greater efficiency of their supply chain activities and remain
competitive in the industry where they operate. Using advanced internet-based KMS
offers a controlled knowledge sharing environment, where business data and processes
can be used effectively which is important for competing in a challenging business
environment.
Results of this study clearly supported the notion that the application of KMS with IT
as the enabler has significant and positive impacts on increasing the performance of
organisations. In the MPOI, KMS with a strong IT support has played a significant role in
supporting supply chain activities. The study revealed that most of the oil palm managers
agreed that the KMS have, to some degree, helped the oil palm plantations increased their
performance. However, the overall mean score, ranging from 2.76 to 2.94 out of 4.0, was
119
relatively low. This shows that current activities and strategies undertaken by the
plantations have not completely achieved the potential improved performance they hoped
for. One reason is that the oil palm plantations have limited access to IT facilities and
infrastructure, which tend to limit the application of KM initiatives. Based on the
findings, the oil palm plantations could further improve performance of their supply
chain activities by applying KM practices more vigorously using the available IT
infrastructure. Increasing the skills of managers and staffs in effective KM application is
important and this can be done by conducting more training sessions and ensuring that
they use it as part of their routine work process. The existing IT infrastructure and
accessibility to internet facilities should be upgraded so that KMS can be applied more
effectively to improve performance at all stages of the supply chain of the oil palm
plantations. The findings are also useful to other researchers, IT companies and policy
makers to design a better IT infrastructure capabilities and policies. Findings of the
current study relied heavily on the returned mail questionnaires. The percentage of
returned questionnaires was lower than expected. The managers responses were also not
verified. For future studies, we would suggest the number of responses and usable
questionnaires be increased by conducting personal visits and interviews with
respondents.
References
Alshawi, S. (2001) Logistics in the internet age: towards a holistic information and processes
picture, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp.235241.
Babbie, E. (1995) The Practice of Social Research (5th ed.). California: Wadsworth Publishing
Company.
Beamon, B.M. (1999) Measuring supply chain performance, Int. J. Operations and Production
Management, Vol. 19, No 3, pp.275292.
Beierlein, J.G. and Miller, C.A. (2000) Performance Measures, and Measurement in Supply Chains
in the Food System. Chicago, IL: The IAMA Agribusiness Forum. Available at:
Borade, A.B. and Bansod, S. (2008) The discipline of supply chain management: a systematic
literature review, The ICFAI Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. V, No. 1, pp.726.
Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.J. and Stank, T.P. (2000) Ten mega-trends that will revolutionize supply
chain logistics, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp.116.
Bradley, P. (2000) Logistics and e-commerce, Logistics Management and Distribution Report,
Vol. 39, No. 2, pp.3940.
Brelin, R. (1998) Customer satisfaction: improve supply chain to enhance quality, Chain Store
Age, Vol. 74, No. 11, p.104.
Chan, F.T.S. and Chan, H.K. (2008) A survey in practicing supply chain management of Hong
Kong industries, Int. J. Business Systems and Research, Vol. 2, No 2, pp.166195.
Dreyer, D.E. (2000) Performance measurement: a practitioners perspective, Supply Chain
Management Review, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp.6268.
Dwivedi, A. and Butcher, T. (2008) Supply Chain Management and Knowledge Management:
Integrating Critical Perspectives in Theory and Practice (Eds.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fantazy, K.A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U. and Mishra, S. (2009) The impact of strategy and
information systems flexibility on the supply chain performance: a path analysis approach
Int. J. Business Systems and Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.119133.
Gottschalk, P. and Karlsen, J.T. (2008) Mobilisation of strategic information technology resources:
the influence of knowledge sharing on information technology governance, Int. J. Business
Systems and Research, Vol. 2, No 3, pp.227243.
120
Handfield, R.B. and Bozarth, C.C. (2006) Introduction to Operations and Supply Chain
Management. New Delhi: Pearson Education, Inc.
Hill, J.M. (1999) The new supply chain equation, Modern Material Handling, Vol. 54, No. 12,
pp.41. Available at: http://agecon.tamu.edu/iama/2000Congress/2000_forum_papers.htm;
http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/facukty/dave.pyke/download/teach-supply-chain.pdf Last
retrieved on 5 January 2009.
Hoon, T.H., Jantan, M. and Ramayah, T. (2004) Knowledge Management: An Exploratory Study
on Malaysian Organizations, Available at: http://www.kmtalk.net. Last retrieved on 7
December 2009.
Hult, G.T.M., Ketchen Jr., D.J. and Slater, S.F. (2004) Information processing, knowledge
development, and strategic supply chain performance, Academy of Management Journal,
Vol. 47, No. 2, pp.241253.
Johnson, J.C. and Wood, D.F. (1996) Contemporary Logistics (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Johnson, M. and David, P. (1999) A Framework for Teaching Supply Chain Management.
Available at:
Kanji, G.K. and Wong, A. (1999) Business excellence model for supply chain management, Total
Quality Management, Vol. 10, No. 8, pp.11471168.
King, W.R. (2007) Keynote paper: knowledge management: a systems perspective, Int. J.
Business Systems and Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp.528.
Kumaraswamy, M.M., Palaneeswaran, E. and Humphreys, P. (2000) Selection matters in
conclusion supply chain optimization, Int. J. Physical Distribution and Logistics
Management, Vol. 30, No. 7, pp.661680.
Lancioni, R.A., Smith, M.F. and Oliva, T.A. (2000) The role of the internet in supply chain
management, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 29, pp.4556.
Lankford, W.M. (2004) Supply chain management and the internet, Online Information Review,
Vol. 28, No. 4, pp.301305. Last retrieved on 7 May 2009.
Lau, H.C.W. and Lee, W.B. (2000) On a responsive supply chain information system, Int. J.
Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 30, No. 7, pp.598610.
Lee, H.L. (2000) Creating value through supply chain integration, Supply Chain Management
Review, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp.3036.
Lin, Y., Yu, P. and Lin, C. (2008) Assessing the applicability of collaborative procurement
systems, Int. J. Business Systems and Research, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp.365386.
Malone, D. (2002) Knowledge management: a model for organisational learning, Int. J.
Accounting, Information Systems, Vol. 3, pp.111123.
Marwick, A.D. (2001) Knowledge management technology, IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 40
No. 4, pp.814830.
McLaughlin, S. (2009) Improving supply chain performance through the implementation of
process related knowledge transfer mechanisms, Int. J. Knowledge Management, Vol. 5,
No. 2, pp.6486.
Michael, T.J., David, C.Y. and Marcus, B. (2002) Exploring the rationales for ERP and SCM
integration, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 102, No. 1, pp.2634.
Mohayidin, M.G., Nor Azirawani, M., Norfaryanti, K. and Mar Idawati, M. (2007) The application
of knowledge management in enhancing the performance of Malaysian universities, The
Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp.301312.
Pillania, R.J. (2007) Organisational issues for knowledge management in SMEs Int. J. Business
Systems and Research, Vol. 1, No 3, pp.367379.
Poirier, C.C. (1999) Advanced Supply Chain Management: How to Build a Sustained Competitive
Advantage. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, V. (2004) Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value
creation, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp.514.
121
Premkumar, G.P. (2000) Interorganization systems and supply chain management: an information
processing perspective, Information Systems Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp.5669.
Ricks, D., Woods, T. and Sterns, J. (1999) Improving Vertical Coordination of Agricultural
Industries through Supply Chain Management, Staff Papers No 11513, Department of
Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, Last Retrieved on 7
May 2009, Available at: http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/agsmidasp/11513.htm.
Sahay, B.S., Gupta, J.N.D. and Mohan, R. (2006) Managing supply chains for competitiveness:
the Indian scenario, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1,
pp.1524.
Sekaran, U. (2000) Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. New York: John
Wiley & Sons.
Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P. and Simchi-Levi, M. (2003) Designing and Managing the Supply
Chain: Concepts, Strategies and Case Studies. Singapore: Erwin Mc-GrawHill.
Slywotzky, A.J. and Morrison, D.J. (1997) The Profit Zone. New York: Wiley.
Soni, G. and Kodali, R. (2008) Evolution of supply chain management: developments in academia
and industry, The ICFAI University Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 5, No. 4,
pp.740.
Sunil, C. and Peter, M. (2001) Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and Operations,
Asia: Pearson Education.
Tehraninasr, A. and Raman, M. (2009) Knowledge management obstacles in Malaysia: an
exploratory study, Public Sector ICT Management Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.1520.
Thomas, Y.C., Jaroslaw, B. and Norbert, W. (2004) Intellectual property management: a
knowledge supply chain perspective, Business Horizons, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp.3744.
Tiwana, A. (1999) The Knowledge Management Toolkit: Practical Techniques for Building a
Knowledge Management System. London: Pearson Education.
Wadhwa, S. and Saxena, A. (2005) Knowledge management based supply chain: an evolution
perspective, Global Journal of e-Business and Knowledge Management, Vol. 2, No. 2,
pp.1329.
Walters, D. and Lancaster, G. (1999) Value-based marketing and its usefulness to customers,
Management Decision, Vol. 37, No. 9, pp.697708.
Webb, J. and Gile, C. (2001) Reversing the value chain, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 22,
No. 2, pp.1317.
Wong, K.Y. (2008) An exploratory study on knowledge management adoption in the Malaysian
industry, Int. J. Business Information Systems, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp.272283.
Wu, D.J. (2001) Software agents for knowledge management: coordination in multi-agent supply
chains and auctions, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp.5164.