Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 1

Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 3 Reading

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 92 92 >99% 8 46 46
2008-09 90 93 >99% 10 44 45
Native American 2007-08 * 94 * * * *
2008-09 * 94 * * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 97 * * * *
2008-09 * 97 >99% * * *
African American 2007-08 * 89 >99% * * *
2008-09 82 88 >99% 18 47 35
Hispanic 2007-08 * 90 * * * *
2008-09 86 91 >99% 14 43 43
White 2007-08 92 97 >99% 8 39 53
2008-09 95 97 >99% 5 45 51
Female 2007-08 * 94 >99% * * *
2008-09 88 94 >99% 12 44 44
Male 2007-08 83 91 >99% 17 43 39
2008-09 91 92 >99% 9 45 46
Special Education 2007-08 43 78 >99% 57 * *
2008-09 85 85 >99% 15 55 30
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient * 88 * * * *
2008-09 * 89 * * * *
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 89 89 >99% 11 39 50
2008-09 86 90 >99% 14 45 41
Migrant 2007-08 * 84 * * * *
2008-09 * 84 * * * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 2
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 3 Mathematics

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 70 82 >99% 30 46 24
2008-09 81 83 >99% 19 55 25
Native American 2007-08 * 83 * * * *
2008-09 * 86 * * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 94 * * * *
2008-09 * 95 >99% * * *
African American 2007-08 60 71 >99% 40 40 20
2008-09 74 74 >99% 26 55 19
Hispanic 2007-08 * 80 * * * *
2008-09 81 80 >99% 19 63 19
White 2007-08 75 90 >99% 25 53 22
2008-09 84 91 >99% 16 52 33
Female 2007-08 70 82 >99% 30 52 19
2008-09 78 83 >99% 22 51 28
Male 2007-08 70 83 >99% 30 39 30
2008-09 83 84 >99% 17 60 23
Special Education 2007-08 29 68 >99% 71 * *
2008-09 94 74 >99% 6 67 28
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient * 78 * * * *
2008-09 * 79 * * * *
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 67 77 >99% 33 44 22
2008-09 74 78 >99% 26 46 28
Migrant 2007-08 * 73 * * * *
2008-09 * 75 * * * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 3
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 4 Reading

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 92 82 >99% 8 79 13
2008-09 82 84 99 18 67 15
Native American 2007-08 * 84 * * * *
2008-09 * 86 * * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 93 * * * *
2008-09 * 93 * * * *
African American 2007-08 80 74 >99% 20 * *
2008-09 79 77 95 21 68 11
Hispanic 2007-08 * 77 * * * *
2008-09 87 80 >99% 13 83 4
White 2007-08 93 91 >99% 7 77 17
2008-09 82 92 >99% 18 63 19
Female 2007-08 87 84 >99% 13 78 9
2008-09 88 86 99 12 75 13
Male 2007-08 * 80 >99% * * *
2008-09 75 81 >99% 25 57 18
Special Education 2007-08 * 63 * * * *
2008-09 82 69 >99% 18 76 6
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient * 69 * * * *
2008-09 * 74 * * * *
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 87 75 >99% 13 80 7
2008-09 81 78 98 19 66 15
Migrant 2007-08 * 67 * * * *
2008-09 * 72 * * * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 4
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 4 Mathematics

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 85 83 >99% 15 77 8
2008-09 85 85 99 15 58 27
Native American 2007-08 * 83 * * * *
2008-09 * 85 * * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 95 * * * *
2008-09 * 95 * * * *
African American 2007-08 * 73 >99% * * *
2008-09 84 76 95 16 68 16
Hispanic 2007-08 * 80 * * * *
2008-09 83 83 >99% 17 57 26
White 2007-08 83 90 >99% 17 80 3
2008-09 86 91 >99% 14 56 29
Female 2007-08 78 83 >99% 22 * *
2008-09 84 85 99 16 58 26
Male 2007-08 94 83 >99% 6 75 19
2008-09 86 85 >99% 14 57 29
Special Education 2007-08 * 63 * * * *
2008-09 71 71 >99% 29 * *
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient * 75 * * * *
2008-09 * 79 * * * *
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 73 78 >99% 27 60 13
2008-09 83 80 98 17 60 23
Migrant 2007-08 * 74 * * * *
2008-09 * 78 * * * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 5
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 5 Reading

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 89 89 >99% 11 64 26
2008-09 87 89 >99% 13 61 26
Native American 2007-08 * 91 * * * *
2008-09 * 89 * * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 95 * * * *
2008-09 * 95 * * * *
African American 2007-08 81 85 >99% 19 56 25
2008-09 92 85 >99% 8 77 15
Hispanic 2007-08 * 86 * * * *
2008-09 68 85 >99% 32 45 23
White 2007-08 96 95 >99% 4 68 28
2008-09 93 95 >99% 7 62 30
Female 2007-08 85 90 >99% 15 55 30
2008-09 90 90 >99% 10 60 29
Male 2007-08 93 88 >99% 7 70 22
2008-09 85 88 >99% 15 63 23
Special Education 2007-08 * 69 * * * *
2008-09 93 78 >99% 7 * *
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient * 72 * * * *
2008-09 * 72 * * * *
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 91 84 >99% 9 74 17
2008-09 80 84 >99% 20 60 20
Migrant 2007-08 * 76 * * * *
2008-09 * 76 * * * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 6
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 5 Mathematics

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 87 88 >99% 13 53 34
2008-09 88 90 >99% 12 53 35
Native American 2007-08 * 89 * * * *
2008-09 * 88 * * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 96 * * * *
2008-09 * 97 * * * *
African American 2007-08 88 80 >99% 13 56 31
2008-09 * 83 >99% * * *
Hispanic 2007-08 * 85 * * * *
2008-09 73 87 >99% 27 50 23
White 2007-08 85 94 >99% 15 50 35
2008-09 93 95 >99% 7 49 43
Female 2007-08 80 88 >99% 20 55 25
2008-09 86 90 >99% 14 50 36
Male 2007-08 93 87 >99% 7 52 41
2008-09 92 90 >99% 8 57 35
Special Education 2007-08 * 64 * * * *
2008-09 93 78 >99% 7 79 14
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient * 74 * * * *
2008-09 * 78 * * * *
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 91 83 >99% 9 57 35
2008-09 84 86 >99% 16 59 25
Migrant 2007-08 * 78 * * * *
2008-09 * 81 * * * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 7
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 5 Science

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 62 78 >99% 38 36 26
2008-09 75 82 >99% 25 45 30
Native American 2007-08 * 83 * * * *
2008-09 * 85 * * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 89 * * * *
2008-09 * 92 * * * *
African American 2007-08 44 67 >99% 56 31 13
2008-09 77 73 >99% 23 62 15
Hispanic 2007-08 * 73 * * * *
2008-09 45 77 >99% 55 27 18
White 2007-08 69 89 >99% 31 38 31
2008-09 85 92 >99% 15 47 38
Female 2007-08 50 76 >99% 50 40 10
2008-09 74 80 >99% 26 56 19
Male 2007-08 70 81 >99% 30 33 37
2008-09 78 84 >99% 22 33 45
Special Education 2007-08 * 55 * * * *
2008-09 50 61 >99% 50 29 21
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient * 54 * * * *
2008-09 * 61 * * * *
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 48 71 >99% 52 26 22
2008-09 60 75 >99% 40 42 19
Migrant 2007-08 * 63 * * * *
2008-09 * 67 * * * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 8
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 6 Reading

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 80 90 98 20 57 23
2008-09 91 90 97 9 53 38
Native American 2007-08 * 92 * * * *
2008-09 * 92 * * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 96 * * * *
2008-09 * 96 * * * *
African American 2007-08 79 86 >99% 21 63 16
2008-09 93 87 >99% 7 80 13
Hispanic 2007-08 76 87 94 24 61 15
2008-09 90 87 93 10 62 29
White 2007-08 88 95 >99% 13 53 34
2008-09 90 96 98 10 38 52
Female 2007-08 83 93 95 17 57 26
2008-09 87 91 98 13 58 29
Male 2007-08 78 87 >99% 22 57 22
2008-09 94 89 95 6 48 45
Special Education 2007-08 55 66 92 45 * *
2008-09 71 73 >99% 29 43 29
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient 72 69 90 28 61 11
2008-09 91 68 88 9 73 18
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 77 85 >99% 23 60 17
2008-09 86 86 96 14 62 25
Migrant 2007-08 * 78 * * * *
2008-09 * 78 * * * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 9
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 6 Mathematics

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 58 79 >99% 42 43 15
2008-09 71 79 99 29 45 26
Native American 2007-08 * 80 * * * *
2008-09 * 81 * * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 94 * * * *
2008-09 * 94 * * * *
African American 2007-08 58 67 >99% 42 42 16
2008-09 60 69 >99% 40 27 33
Hispanic 2007-08 55 75 >99% 45 45 9
2008-09 64 75 >99% 36 50 14
White 2007-08 63 87 >99% 38 44 19
2008-09 81 88 98 19 48 33
Female 2007-08 66 80 >99% 34 54 11
2008-09 64 80 >99% 36 47 16
Male 2007-08 53 78 >99% 47 35 18
2008-09 77 78 98 23 44 34
Special Education 2007-08 27 49 >99% 73 18 9
2008-09 57 59 >99% 43 * *
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient 61 59 >99% 39 56 6
2008-09 59 61 >99% 41 45 14
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 58 72 >99% 42 40 17
2008-09 65 73 >99% 35 42 23
Migrant 2007-08 * 68 * * * *
2008-09 * 66 * * * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 10
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 7 Reading

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 69 84 98 31 50 20
2008-09 76 84 94 24 52 24
Native American 2007-08 * 87 * * * *
2008-09 * 87 * * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 93 * * * *
2008-09 * 93 * * * *
African American 2007-08 55 78 >99% 45 50 5
2008-09 69 79 >99% 31 63 6
Hispanic 2007-08 67 79 94 33 53 14
2008-09 74 78 88 26 52 23
White 2007-08 78 91 >99% 22 47 31
2008-09 82 91 >99% 18 51 31
Female 2007-08 68 87 98 32 39 30
2008-09 77 86 94 23 52 25
Male 2007-08 70 81 97 30 59 11
2008-09 74 81 94 26 52 23
Special Education 2007-08 31 57 >99% 69 * *
2008-09 33 61 90 67 * *
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient 61 47 88 39 52 9
2008-09 66 48 80 34 51 14
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 65 77 96 35 45 20
2008-09 73 77 92 27 52 20
Migrant 2007-08 * 67 * * * *
2008-09 * 67 * * * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 11
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 7 Mathematics

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 58 75 >99% 42 53 5
2008-09 68 78 >99% 32 60 8
Native American 2007-08 * 78 * * * *
2008-09 * 78 * * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 93 * * * *
2008-09 * 93 * * * *
African American 2007-08 55 63 >99% 45 * *
2008-09 44 66 >99% 56 * *
Hispanic 2007-08 57 69 >99% 43 49 8
2008-09 73 73 >99% 27 72 1
White 2007-08 59 85 >99% 41 55 4
2008-09 71 87 >99% 29 51 20
Female 2007-08 58 76 >99% 42 53 5
2008-09 68 79 >99% 32 59 10
Male 2007-08 58 74 >99% 42 53 5
2008-09 67 77 >99% 33 60 6
Special Education 2007-08 31 43 >99% 69 * *
2008-09 11 56 >99% 89 * *
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient 48 46 >99% 52 43 4
2008-09 67 55 >99% 33 64 3
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 59 66 >99% 41 53 5
2008-09 65 71 >99% 35 56 8
Migrant 2007-08 * 61 * * * *
2008-09 * 67 * * * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 12
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 8 Reading

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 89 93 99 11 58 31
2008-09 91 94 98 9 60 31
Native American 2007-08 * 95 * * * *
2008-09 * 96 >99% * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 97 * * * *
2008-09 * 96 * * * *
African American 2007-08 92 91 >99% 8 54 38
2008-09 82 93 >99% 18 77 5
Hispanic 2007-08 87 90 97 13 61 26
2008-09 91 92 95 9 65 26
White 2007-08 91 97 >99% 9 56 36
2008-09 94 98 >99% 6 48 46
Female 2007-08 89 95 98 11 62 27
2008-09 92 95 96 8 55 37
Male 2007-08 89 92 99 11 53 36
2008-09 91 93 99 9 65 26
Special Education 2007-08 81 73 >99% 19 65 15
2008-09 70 82 >99% 30 41 30
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient 87 62 95 13 70 16
2008-09 91 67 98 9 71 20
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 89 90 99 11 61 27
2008-09 91 91 98 9 62 29
Migrant 2007-08 * 85 * * * *
2008-09 * 85 * * * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 13
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 8 Mathematics

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 64 80 >99% 36 59 5
2008-09 67 83 99 33 59 9
Native American 2007-08 * 83 * * * *
2008-09 43 85 >99% 57 * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 94 * * * *
2008-09 * 95 * * * *
African American 2007-08 63 68 >99% 37 56 7
2008-09 55 73 >99% 45 * *
Hispanic 2007-08 60 75 >99% 40 58 2
2008-09 66 80 99 34 58 8
White 2007-08 69 89 >99% 31 61 8
2008-09 75 92 98 25 62 13
Female 2007-08 58 81 >99% 42 54 5
2008-09 62 83 98 38 52 11
Male 2007-08 70 79 >99% 30 65 6
2008-09 72 83 >99% 28 65 6
Special Education 2007-08 52 46 >99% 48 * *
2008-09 63 66 >99% 37 52 11
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient 60 47 >99% 40 59 2
2008-09 68 57 >99% 32 60 8
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 60 72 >99% 40 54 6
2008-09 67 77 >99% 33 60 7
Migrant 2007-08 * 68 * * * *
2008-09 * 72 * * * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 14
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 8 Science

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 38 67 99 62 34 4
2008-09 51 71 98 49 42 9
Native American 2007-08 * 72 * * * *
2008-09 43 76 >99% 57 * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 85 * * * *
2008-09 * 88 * * * *
African American 2007-08 35 54 >99% 65 32 3
2008-09 16 58 95 84 * *
Hispanic 2007-08 30 57 99 70 * *
2008-09 47 63 98 53 41 6
White 2007-08 52 82 >99% 48 41 11
2008-09 69 86 98 31 52 16
Female 2007-08 30 65 >99% 70 28 2
2008-09 50 69 98 50 41 9
Male 2007-08 46 69 99 54 40 6
2008-09 52 74 98 48 44 9
Special Education 2007-08 24 40 96 76 20 4
2008-09 46 50 >99% 54 38 8
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient 15 23 >99% 85 * *
2008-09 43 31 >99% 57 37 6
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 30 55 99 70 29 2
2008-09 48 61 99 52 42 6
Migrant 2007-08 * 47 * * * *
2008-09 * 52 * * * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 15
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 10 English Language Arts

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 81 86 97 19 77 5
2008-09 80 87 96 20 74 6
Native American 2007-08 * 86 * * * *
2008-09 * 90 * * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 93 * * * *
2008-09 * 93 * * * *
African American 2007-08 75 80 96 25 * *
2008-09 76 83 >99% 24 68 8
Hispanic 2007-08 81 81 96 19 76 6
2008-09 79 82 94 21 73 6
White 2007-08 84 91 99 16 79 5
2008-09 84 93 >99% 16 78 6
Female 2007-08 87 89 97 13 81 6
2008-09 86 90 96 14 79 7
Male 2007-08 75 82 96 25 72 3
2008-09 73 84 96 27 68 5
Special Education 2007-08 58 58 >99% 42 56 2
2008-09 52 62 98 48 50 2
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient 77 45 93 23 74 3
2008-09 77 45 91 23 73 4
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 80 79 96 20 75 6
2008-09 77 81 95 23 72 5
Migrant 2007-08 * 75 * * * *
2008-09 83 76 86 17 * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 16
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 10 Mathematics

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 41 62 >99% 59 36 5
2008-09 45 65 >99% 55 40 4
Native American 2007-08 * 63 * * * *
2008-09 * 69 * * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 86 * * * *
2008-09 * 88 * * * *
African American 2007-08 19 45 >99% 81 14 5
2008-09 20 49 >99% 80 18 2
Hispanic 2007-08 40 53 >99% 60 35 5
2008-09 45 57 >99% 55 42 3
White 2007-08 50 75 >99% 50 45 4
2008-09 52 77 98 48 44 8
Female 2007-08 38 62 >99% 62 33 5
2008-09 43 65 >99% 57 39 4
Male 2007-08 44 62 >99% 56 39 5
2008-09 47 64 99 53 42 5
Special Education 2007-08 23 30 >99% 77 21 2
2008-09 26 39 >99% 74 * *
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient 37 28 >99% 63 36 1
2008-09 42 32 >99% 58 39 3
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 43 50 >99% 57 39 4
2008-09 45 54 99 55 42 3
Migrant 2007-08 * 47 * * * *
2008-09 20 50 >99% 80 * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 17
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Grade 10 Science

District % of State % of
Students Students
Percent of Students in District at Each
Met Met
Achievement Level
Standard Standard
(Proficient) (Proficient) % %
and and Tested % Met %
Commended Commended (In Not Meeting Standard Commended
(Advanced) (Advanced) District) Standard(Basic) (Proficient) (Advanced)
Student Groups Year
All Students 2007-08 47 63 99 53 43 4
2008-09 47 65 98 53 43 4
Native American 2007-08 * 69 * * * *
2008-09 * 75 * * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 2007-08 * 82 * * * *
2008-09 * 84 * * * *
African American 2007-08 26 47 97 74 * *
2008-09 23 50 >99% 77 20 3
Hispanic 2007-08 41 52 >99% 59 38 3
2008-09 39 54 98 61 36 3
White 2007-08 63 80 >99% 37 56 7
2008-09 70 82 98 30 63 7
Female 2007-08 42 60 99 58 38 4
2008-09 41 62 97 59 38 4
Male 2007-08 52 66 >99% 48 48 5
2008-09 53 68 >99% 47 49 5
Special Education 2007-08 40 35 >99% 60 37 2
2008-09 36 41 >99% 64 * *
Limited English 2007-08
Proficient 35 19 >99% 65 34 1
2008-09 33 21 97 67 * *
Economically 2007-08
Disadvantaged 48 49 >99% 52 45 3
2008-09 43 52 99 57 41 2
Migrant 2007-08 * 41 * * * *
2008-09 20 42 >99% 80 * *
Texas 2009 NCLB Report Card 14:23 Tuesday, March 2, 2010 18
Part I – District Level: Student Performance for the District Compared to the State, Percent of Students Tested,
Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS ( 221801 )

Footnotes

Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.

Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For detailed information, please see the Explanation of NCLB School Report Card Data Masking Rules:
• http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/ayp/2009/src_masking.html.

Contact Information

Questions regarding Part I of the No Child Left Behind School Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting.
Contact us at (512) 463-9704 or performance.reporting@tea.state.tx.us.