Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
HAIZHONG LI*
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Tsinghua University
Beijing, 100083, People's Republic of China
e-mail: hli@math.tsinghua.edu.cn
AND
LUC VRANCKEN ~
ABSTRACT
Let N n (4c) be an n-dimensional complex space form of constant holomorphic sectional curvature 4c and let x: M n -+ Nn(4c) be an n-dimensional
Lagrangian submanifold in N n (4c). We prove that the following inequality always hold on Mn:
[Vh] 2 > n ~ 2 1 V l - / ~ [ 2,
where h is the second fundamental form and H is the m e a n curvature
of the submanifold. We classify all submanifolds which at every point
realize the equality in the above inequality. As a direct consequence of
our Theorem, we give a new characterization of the Whitney spheres in
a complex space form.
224
H. LI AND L. VRANCKEN
Isr. J. Math.
1. I n t r o d u c t i o n
Let Nn(4c) be a complete, simply connected, n-dimensional Kaehler manifold
with constant holomorphic sectional curvature 4c. When c = 0, Nn(4c) = ca;
when c > O, Nn(4c) = cpn(4c); when c < O, Nn(4c) = CH~(4c). Let x: M --+
Nn(4c) be an immersion from an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold M into
N n(4c). M is called a L a g r a n g i a n s u b m a n i f o l d if the complex structure J
of N ~ (4c) carries each tangent space of M into its corresponding normal space9
In order to state our results, we introduce the following examples.
Example 1: W h i t n e y s p h e r e in C n (see [18], [1], [3]). It can be defined as
the Lagrangian immersion of the unit sphere S n, centered at the origin of R n+l ,
in C n, given by (up to translation and scaling)
(19
1
O : S ~ - ~ C ~, ~ ( x l , . . . , X ~ + l ) - l + x n + 2 1 (x l , x l x n + l , " "" 'Xn'XnXn+l) 9
From a Riemannian point of view, this Lagrangian sphere plays the role of the
round sphere in the Lagrangian setting.
Example 2: W h i t n e y s p h e r e s in CP~(4) (see [2], [4], [9])9 They are a oneparameter family of Lagrangian spheres in Cpn(4), given by
O0:S ~--+CP~(4),
(1.2)
II 0
(I)(Xl,...
0>0,
C~ ..~ 80Xn+
2 2 1
]'
Oo(xl,
Xn+l)=I-i~
9 '',
0 > 0,
(xl'''''xn)'sOcO(1-+x2+l)--ixn+l~
'
~2 ---2-2
]'
\88 "~ iCOXn+l
~0 T C O ~ n + 1
225
RHn-1 ~ C H ~ ( - 4 ) ,
fl 9 (0,7r/4],
given by
(1.4)
q~(eU,y) = II o (
1
t (cos/~ cos t - isinflsint;y) )
sin fl cos t + i cos fl sin
p > 0,
given by
(1.5)
(2
(~(L'2+t 2) +2lx[ 2 + i g ~ t )
where el = 31 ( 0 , . . . , 0 , 1 , - 1 ) , e~ = ~1 ( 0 , . . . , 0 , 1 , 1 ) .
In [5] and [18], and for any Lagrangian submanifold of the complex Euclidean
space C n, the complex projective space CI?n or the complex hyperbolic space
CIEn , the following universal inequality was obtained:
[h[~ > 3n2 [H[2,
-n+2
where h is the second fundamental form and H is the mean curvature vector.
Moreover, it was shown that a Lagrangian submanifold realizes at every point
the equality in the above inequality if and only if it is totally geodesic or one of
the above examples.
In this paper, we prove the following result.
MAIN THEOREM:
manifold. Then
(1.6)
where h is the second fundamental form and H is the mean curvature vector
of the submanifold. Moreover, the equality holds at every point in (1.6) if and
only if either
k* = 0,1 < i , j , k , l <_ n;
(t) M has parallel second fundamental form, i.e., hiy,~
or
226
H. LI AND L. VRANCKEN
Isr. J. Math.
3n 2
n+2
IV
(1.2).
(3) In case c = - 4 , x ( M ) is one of the Whitney spheres in C H n ( - 4 ) , given
by (1.3).
Remark 1.1: In [11], [12], [13], the authors established the similar inequality
(1.6) for n-dimensional submanifolds in an (n +p)-dimensional unit sphere S n+p
in different contexts.
2. Preliminaries
fTxY=VxY+h(X,Y)
and
fTx~=-A~X+V~c~,
for tangent vector fields X, Y and normal vector field ~, where V is the
connection on the normal bundle. The second fundamental form h is related to
A~ by
(2.2)
W H I T N E Y S P H E R E S IN A C O M P L E X S P A C E F O R M
227
V~cJY : J V x Y ,
(2.3)
(2.4)
AjxY
- J h ( X , Y)
= AjyX.
h(X,Y),JZ
(2.5)
> is totally
< h(X, Y), J Z > = < h(Y, Z), J X > = < h(Z, X), J Y > .
el. : Jel~...,en*
-- flen.
Their dual frame fields are 01,..., 0n, the Levi-Civita connection forms, and
normal connection forms are Oij and 0i*j,, respectively.
Writing h(ei, ej) = ~ k hk~ ek*, (2.5) is equivalent to
k*
i*
j*
h i j = h k j = hik ,
(2.5)'
l < i,j,k
< n.
(2.7)
(2.8)
(2.9)
Ri*j*kl
j * __
J
k* , l < _ i , j , k , l < n ,
hk~l=hil,j
X-"r~i* ~J*
---- C(SjlSik -- 5jkSil) + ff_.~\,~mk,~ml
,hJ*~mp,hJ*),~il
i* j*
-- h m l h m k ),
k.
(2.10)
l
k"
Eh
l
;e.
"
l
228
H. LI AND L. V R A N C K E N
Isr. J. Math.
( V x h ) ( Y , Z ) = V ~ h ( Y , Z ) - h ( V x Y , Z) - h(Y, V x Z ) ,
(2.10)'
(2.11)
1 <_i , j , k , l <_n.
Rm*i*~p = Rmitp,
(2.13)
where hki~z; is defined by
(2.14)
k*
k*
P*
P
E H f O, = dH a + E Ht'Ot'k*'
(2.15)
where H k*
H ,lk* : - H , kI*
"
3. S o m e l e m m a s
We start with the following lemmas
LEMMA 3.1 (see Montiel-Urbano [14]): Let M be an n-dimensional Lagrangian
submanifold in Nn(4c). If p is a point of M, Sp the unit sphere in TpM and
f: Sp --+ R the function given by
f(e ) :
0.
then
Vol. 146, 2 0 0 5
229
Proof'.
and
(3.2)
From (3.1), we obtain that h(el, el) = AiJel, where A1 = f ( e l ) . Using (2.4),
this implies that el is an eigenvector of
AJe ~ .
basis { e l , . . . , en} of TpM which diagonalizes Aje~, i.e., Agelei = Aiei. So using
(2.4) we prove (i).
Now, using (3.2) one has that A1 >_ 2Ai for i E { 2 , . . . , n } . If A1 = 2Aj, for
some j C { 2 , . . . , n } , then d2fe~(ej,ej) = 0, and so dUfe~(ej,ej,ej) = 0. But
using (3.1), dUfe~(ej,ej,ej) = 6f(ej). This proves (ii).
|
When working at a point p of M, we will always assume that an orthonormal
basis is chosen such that Lemma 3.1 is satisfied.
LEMMA 3.2: Let x: M --+ N'~(4c) be an n-dimensional Lagrangian submanifold.
Then
3n2 i V l ~ l 2
'
I~h12 > n + 2
(3.3)
1 _< i, j, k, l _< n.
k*
k*
0 < IWl 2 := ~
(w~)2
= iVhl 2 _ _r ~_ 2 1 v
HI,
i,j,k,l
230
H . L I A N D L. V R A N C K E N
Isr. J . M a t h .
(3.7)
n 2 ( H f h j L + Hkj.5, l + H~*hij),
re+
l*
'
re
l*
'
l*
4"
k*
From (2.11), we have h~,k = hij,l
, therefore (3.8) and (3.9) imply
+Hl;hik q-Hl;(~ij,,.
1 _< i , j , k , l _< n.
1
n
#=n+2
(3.12)
e~(#) = 0,
(3.13)
/ : 2,...,n,
1 = 2,...,n.
el(#) = 0,
(3.15)
k*
W H I T N E Y S P H E R E S IN A C O M P L E X S P A C E F O R M
231
(3.16)
k*
k*
m*
k*
=e(~13 ~
(3.17)
~.k* ~
~pj~~"
~ ~)
+ e(h~j~kp
P* (~kl) T ff_~
~ ,Ojm,Olm,~ip
]~k* hn* l~n* -- ~
~ ,~jm,Omp,~il
~k* ]~n* ~n*
*
-- hij
m,n
m,n
E
m,n
m,n
m* n* n*
n* n*
+ E hij hm~hkp - E hijm* hmp
hkl"
m,n
m,n
k*
-----c(hlj
(~ip "[- h~( (~jp --
(3.18)
k*
_ ~hk*
m,n
k*
n*
n*
Z...,
hn* ~n*
m,n
k*
n*
r~*
+ E himhlmhjp - E himhmphj l
m~n
m,n
m* n* n*
n*
m~n
n*
m~n
e~(~)hkl -- 3 e l ( ~ ) h k ~
=c(2$l - ~1)5k, + ( - - 2 ~ l
+ 3 ~ 1 ~ -- )~.~klhkt,
el(#) = 0,
l = 2,...,n.
(3.21)
p # l,
p,l # 1,
232
H. LI AND L. VRANCKEN
Isr. J. Math.
which is equivalent to
(Ap-At)(AiAj%el-2AjelAj%el)=O, p # l ,
(3.21)'
p,l#l.
l=2,...,n.
Let y := AI - 2Al,l # 1; we have y _> 0 from Lemma 3.1. Thus we get from
(3.22)
(3.23)
y > 0.
(i) If - 4 c - A~ > 0, (3.23) has only one solution Yx > 0 and el (~) > 0.
(ii) If - 4 c - A2 < 0 and el (#) > 0, (3.23) has only one solution Yl > 0.
(iii) If - 4 c - A~ < 0 and el (#) < 0, (3.23) has two solutions Yl > 0 and Y2 > 0.
Therefore, from the definition of y and the above analysis, we conclude that
the solutions of (3.22) satisfy one of the following two cases:
CASE
i:
A2 =
(3.24)
A3 . . . . .
An.
CASE 2:
(3.25)
A2 . . . .
- At-4-1 # At+2 . . . . .
An.
Now we discuss Case 2 first and use the following convention about indices:
(3.26)
2<_a,b,c<r+l,
r + 1 _< a,/3,7_< n.
Ajeo ea = Aje~ea = O,
2 < a < r + l,
r+2<a<n.
Vol. 146, 2 0 0 5
Proof:
233
2 < a < r + 1,
r + 2 < a < n.
Thus we get Aje~ea E V(A1/2) (the eigenspace of Age1 with respect to eigenvalue A1/2).
el(#) = 0. Combining with (3.20), we get # is constant, which is a contradiction to our assumption. Thus we prove (3.27).
U, V, W E V()~2)
0<t<27r,
3<i<r+l.
3<i<r+l.
(3.30)
(-A22 + c + ~1~2)k2 = 0.
(3.32)
el(,)
k2 = 0.
234
H. LI AND L. VRANCKEN
Isr. J. Math.
(3.34)
Noting that f(e2) is the maximum value of f(v) on V(A2) and f(v) is an odd
function, we conclude that
(3.35)
f ( X ) =< h ( X , X ) , J X >= 0,
VX e V(A2).
a, b, c E R.
U, V, W E V(An)
Proos
(i) I f i = a , j = b , k = c o r i = a , j = / 3 ,
2 _< i , j , k <_n.
k=%weget
(3.36).
(ii) If i = a, j = b, k = a, we have from (2.2) and (3.27)
As the function # is globally defined and as el(#) r 0, we see that the vector
el is characterized as the normalised dual vector to the 1-form d#. This shows
that we can extend the vector el differentiably in a neighborhood of the point
235
p in such a way that at every point the function f attains a maximum at the
point p. As a consequence, the previous lemmas remain valid in a neighborhood
of the point p. We will denote the extensions of the vectors ei to vector fields,
and of the eigenvalues Ai to eigenfunctions, by using the same letters.
Under the same assumptions as in L e m m a 3.5, let
LEMMA 3.9:
A2 . . . . .
A j e l e i = Aiei,
Ar+l # Ar+2 . . . . .
An;
then
(3.38)
A1 -
3Aa
2 < a < r + 1,
iS constant,
and
(3.39)
Prod:
(3.40)
Aa-An
is constant,
r+2<a_<n.
hij'l
n+2
j*
k*
0,
1 < i, j, k, 1 < n.
(3.41)
l</<n.
h 1"
~i,z-~ n
n+
H 1,l. = 0 ,
2<i<n,
l</<n.
h 1.
115 - 3 h ~ l = 0 ,
l<l<n.
1"
From definition (2.10) and (3.37), we have h~[,l = el(A1), hii,l
= ez(Ai),
i = 2 , . . . , n, 1 < I < n. Thus we have from (3.43)
(3.44)
et(A, - 3Ai) = 0,
i = 2,...,n,
l</<n.
is constant,
A1-3A~
is constant,
2<a<r+1,
r+l<~<n.
236
H. LI A N D L, V R A N C K E N
Isr. J. M a t h .
LEMMA 3.10: Under the same assumptions as in Lemma 3.5, we get that
H =constant and ~Th = O, i.e., the second fundamental form h is parallel.
Proof:
(3.46)
Aa
K := Am - Aa = constant.
(2Aa+K)dAa=0,
a=2,...,r+l,
= 1E
h(ek,ek)
thus
(3.52)
H 1. = H,
H i* = 0,
i = 2,...,n.
H,11" = 0.
237
PROPOSITION 3.1: Let x: M --4 N'~(4c) be an n-dimensional Lagrangian submanifold. If (3.11) holds with # =constant, then # = 0 and M is of parallel
second fundamental form.
Proof: By the definition of #, (3.11) and (2.10)', we have
(3.54)
Ajelei = )~iei,
i , j , k > 2.
Then Jell I/4. We take a geodesic 7(s) passing through p in the direction of el.
Let { E l , . . . , En} be a parallel vector field along this geodesic 7(s), such that
Ei(p) = ei and E1 = ~/'(s). Then we have by use of (3.54)
< Ei,Ej > = 5ij,
0
-~s < h(E1,E1),JEi > = < (VE~h)(E1,E1),JEi >
=0,
i_>2,
and
0
0--~ < h(E1, Ei), JEj > = < (VEIh)(E1, Ei), JEj > = 0,
i#jk2.
Thus we have
<h(E1,E1),JEi >=<h(el,el),Jei >=0,
i>2,
i,j>2,
and
that is, we can write
(3.55)
AjE1E1 = ~1E1,
AjEIEi = ~iEi,
i ~_ 2.
By use of Ricci identities and the fact that # =constant, repeating the arguments
of the proof of (3.13) we can get that along 7(s) we have
(3.56)
i ~ 2.
00
~ss~l(s) = ~ss < h(E1, El), JE1 > = < (VElh)(E1,E1), JE1 > = 3#
238
and
(3.58)
o
H. LI AND L. VRANCKEN
Isr. J. Math.
0
Ai(s) = -~s < h(Ex,Ei),JEi > = < (VElh)(E1,Ei),JEi > = #,
By use of
that
(3.59)
(3.57)
(3.56)
i _> 2.
, ( c - 3 ~ + X~) = 0.
By use of (3.57) and (3.58), the first and second derivatives of (3.59) imply
6#2(A1 -/~i) = O,
i _> 2,
12# 3 = O,
k* ---- 0, i.e.,
from which we conclude that # = 0. From (3.11) we know that hij,l
M is of parallel second fundamental form.
|
4. P r o o f o f M a i n T h e o r e m
whereas the equality holds in (4.1) at every point if and only if one of the
following two cases occurs:
(i) M is of parallel second fundamental form;
(ii) for every point p belonging to an open dense subset of M there exists an
adapted Lagrangian frame field e l , . . . , en, el*,...,en* with el. parallel
to H such that the second fundamental form of M in Nn(4c) takes the
following form:
(4.2)
h(el,el) = ~le.,
h(e~,e~) . . . . .
h(el,ej)=A2ej.,
h(ej,ek)=O,
with
(4.3)
(~7xh)(Y,Z)=#(<Y,Z> JX+<X,Z>
and d# vanishes nowhere.
h(e~,en) = ~ e ~ . ,
2<j~k<_n,
JY+<X,Y>
JZ),
#r
Vol. 146, 2 0 0 5
239
and
(4.5)
(Ve~h)(el,el) = #Jei,
i >_ 2.
It is a direct check using (2.10)' and (4.2), (4.4) and (4.5) that this implies
(4.6)
el(A1) = 3#,
V e l e l -~ 0,
and
(4.7)
ei(A1) = 0,
Ve~el -
- - e l#,
A1 -- 2A2
i > 2.
(V~h)(e~,ei) = 3 # J e ,
i _> 2.
(4.9)
2~
1>2
=ei(A2)Jel + A1A2#
-2A-~ Je~ - 2 < el,Ve~e~ > A2Jei
=ei(A2)Jel +
3A2# Jei,
A1 - 2A2)
A2#
A1 - 2A2"
i > 2.
240
H. LI A N D L. V R A N C K E N
Isr. J. M a t h .
As # # 0, we have
(4.10)
A1 = 3A2.
n + 2
H2=n-~(n--1)R-
c,
(5.1)
Hk*
i*
,~ : H,k.
(5.2)
l < i , j , k , l < n.
(5.4)
L~jl = h~ - - - -n- ~ ( H
n+
i*
l <_i,j,l <_n,
Vol. 146, 2 0 0 5
241
Lijl,k =O,
(5.5)
l <_i,j,k,l < n,
then either
(1) M has parallel second fundamental form, i.e., h~],l = O, 1 <_ i,j, k, l <_ n;
or
(5.6)
Lijl = O,
1 <_ i , j , l <_ n.
242
H. LI AND L. VRANCKEN
Isr. J. Math.