Scribd Logo
Importer

Bienvenue sur Scribd !

  • FR JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL DES SCIENCES de LA VIGNE ET DU VIN Effects of Traditional and Light Pruning On Viticultural and Oenological Performance of Bobal and Tempranillo Vineyards

    Transféré par

    International Organisation of Vine and Wine
    45 vues6 pages
    FR JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL DES SCIENCES de LA VIGNE ET DU VIN Effects of Traditional and Light Pruning on Viticultural and Oenological Performance of Bobal and Tempranillo Vineyards

    Titre original

    FR JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL DES SCIENCES de LA VIGNE ET DU VIN Effects of Traditional and Light Pruning on Viticultural and Oenological Performance of Bobal and Tempranillo Vineyards

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formats disponibles

    PDF ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd

    Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

    Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

    Signaler ce document
    FR JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL DES SCIENCES de LA VIGNE ET DU VIN Effects of Traditional and Light Pruning on Viticultural and Oenological Performance of Bobal and Tempranillo Vineyards

    Droits d'auteur :

    © All Rights Reserved
    Téléchargez comme PDF ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    45 vues6 pages

    FR JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL DES SCIENCES de LA VIGNE ET DU VIN Effects of Traditional and Light Pruning On Viticultural and Oenological Performance of Bobal and Tempranillo Vineyards

    Transféré par

    International Organisation of Vine and Wine
    FR JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL DES SCIENCES de LA VIGNE ET DU VIN Effects of Traditional and Light Pruning on Viticultural and Oenological Performance of Bobal and Tempranillo Vineyards

    Droits d'auteur :

    © All Rights Reserved
    Téléchargez comme PDF ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    sur 6
    EFFECTS OF TRADITIONAL AND LIGHT PRUNING ON VITICULTURAL AND OENOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE OF BOBAL AND TEMPRANILLO VINEYARDS, Podro PEREZ-BERMUDEZ", Manvel OLMO; Jaime GIL? Lorezo GARCIA-FERRIZ, ‘Carmen OLMO™, Rafael BOLUDA' and Isabel GAVIDIA' 1: Departament de Biologia Vege, Universi deValeoi av Vice A. Esl, ‘6100 Bujsot (Vaeai), Spain 2: Rodega Sia Nort 46340 Roque (Valen), Sala 3: $AT 212 CV. Fortes, 46330 Camporobes (Valea) Spla 4: Servo Agric de Conon, 4640 Regu (Valens, Spa Atwcract ‘Alm: Light pig my ingrove vie yi and quai, thea vineyard espouses we valle. Weasel the eles of ton maa pring wd mete Tigh prasiog on the viticultural nd cesological performance of Vis vinifera cv. Bobal and ev ‘Tenorio. ‘cies ects praevia CConeasion: Mechanic ight panne, tadtonal ‘staal ping offers pte beets 0 higher Yili ower hse and ery weighs 240% ecto Fs praning cons ad production of wines wih lower ‘lca we isis soar sd pee. ‘Siguiennee end ipa ofthe study: No deine he tle rang pape haters wat nd te ines dvving fom these grapevines fee yond ocelopel chisel Tigh pring may prove a sual elt rion te ‘be Yep cle we seduced by te cate ‘hang te Use Ree eon Key words: grape sd wine quality. gpevn il, ivi i proig Ve eet Résune Object La tale mage lie du vigble pest senor rosacea até des vgs, len go [esas soit vars, Now ven coma es ts de cate alegre etc de tile raitonnele Soe sur es perma ices «ono Var najere cv Boba ect. Tecra Méthode raat: De 2008 201, vibes de ‘Boba Tenpral out oui des cages Se tale tcaiue gee oud ale taal ples ste Lex ft Ge eo chi deal oo ‘ering pout la predutoon de ruts designe os I igs, in ue pou es casters 6 ‘sis vn ex deux types de cls on a es ‘lia similares es pene, svat alo ‘lesnquemen, eden ers ane sped) redton dean ease an lpr fle manque ee a rogue! ps de pape ‘ce des air par peri) ker earetertigs ogg de iin ot tm pos afte ae ‘Concsion: La we mage geen compris tec alle tadtonsele, ete pasews beet se agen ge 80% de le proc peat Ents des plates; une dimiuton du poids det 940% de ecto dae oa dei til tn rodution de tne ave uae Inte encarta ot en conserva i cole ‘ines pes: Sguication et impact de ade: Avcinft népet EB encod en artergos dea ‘eksnignemet ete in proven Sos gables ‘Stent ce emcscarscentgaes nologies alle Ire pet Son won ot adapt prongs = fle vigiai det vigne, qth elt pares ‘hinges lng ela regon Ge Ul Rego. Mota: quait du inet duit, production de ‘gules, icons, tle mécanique lore, ‘pear dela vise ase eed hay 2014 esd mara rece let 015 cna an peceee 4 ge 215.0. 15 154 15. evype vara ina Bant Pc j | ! 7 i i i I e i i & i i ; i 7 i hve been rounded oft the mean valet ofthe fur guar experent 20082013) ‘Solar and pring yields om "Tota covine i ‘Salary (cena) Requiceneats Praning ety 280: 4ba=70 By 10000 (ens ba) 1 pane + rato (by) MP echasicl prep) 0 GsxSdays—m95_325-2500-01 1250(equv.05ta) 65x 2daye 1 person (ly) MP cual tuched op) 08 200-2500 Me 6s 500 ei. 0.2) 1 pero ay) . INTRODUCTION ‘The inact of crop management, climate and sil con the quality of musts and wines i the basis of ‘auch dlscussion about grapevine (Jackson and Lombard, 1993 ; Keller, 2005; Guerra and Steenwerth, 2012). A sustainable vineyard ‘masagement would help reduce input, while cnlanei ing yield quanity and Prof. Winkler conducted {he greatest nberent productivity (sce Laks, 1959), Un he late 20° century, the cormetial sgplcaton of ight or miial mechanical pang ‘war delayed and limited technologically In the 1960's, mechanical prong techniques ctended rapdy to diferent winegowing repions because, ‘naty counties, band pruning represent 30 % of yenly wine grape production cost nally, Tight proning proved sucessful later, Rowever, resjonevarlbilty became evden. The aritions fcc in inimally-pruned vines (incompatible limate conditions; different grapevine culivars ‘eacon) meat that twas necessary to understand trhnt was actually happening (QeCarthy 28d {Giri 1990; Clinger ta, 2005). Several works have reported that ight mechanical praning not oaly increases yield, but dso cuts Vioeyards menagoment costs (Reynolds and ‘Ward, 2001; Archer and Van Schley, 2007; ‘Main abd Moris, 2008; Cngeleter, 203). Some of he sboveteé works also mention bat light ring produces more smaller-sizd bunches abd fay modify must oenological characteris [Novethels, the resus vay in acordace with ‘geoevoe vigour and grape clvar Cems etal, 2013), Research done over the lst 30 years hat ‘shown at there fa ples develop iegatd systems to stabilize the yield and quality of ‘vineyards across season, bu also thar ann ‘raabiity, largely dependent on envireameatal ‘onlin is moh gene tha ta which ean be ‘ctieved by modifying management practices (Cingeet, 2010), “This work sims to characteris the behviour of uhttovous Bobal gape vai, which occupies ‘mor than 70% ofthe til grapevine area inthe Denomination by Origin (0.0. Utiel-Requens (Vilenia, Spain), as compaced with the well- Jaca Tempello variety, Bobs and Tenranillo vineyards were subjected to tradition hand ‘ring o ght rechiicl pring wih view t ‘Table 2-Tflaence of mechanics (MP) radon! prening (TP) Ya Panneen “oulyiell—_ Nanterof 7 i Cater ormin mates Tiley enn Bonar 35 9% own 2308 Bota (TP) 60 na 102.780 Tenpeilo OF) 37 Me 1a te Tempra TP) te 20 201s ag te of ay 08 01) inti py, en vow wand nw Ft ‘cS kara puna nt ane ep ees ed oe coo sessing the effects on the viticultural and ‘seaologial perfomance of tes grapevines [MATERIALS AND METHODS 1. Study ste and experiment description From 2008 02011 he test reported in this work ‘were done ina commercial vineyard (Pueteoca) Tecate at (Valencia, E, Spin, UTM $310, 980 m above se level) wih the DO. Uiel- ‘Requt se. This industrial winery eating ll the aspects of susunable measures in Wineowing to pode ecologial wines ‘Type sits in the region at apie Caitols (PAO, 2018 wits roe ype Ap Bk Cl, ad re muniy calcareous given parent atti] haractristies. Soils preseated an antbropie Singnoniehodzon (Ap, 035 om pty can: cae haan (Bw S85 em dp sd ec horizon (Ck, 58-80 cm depih) According to. Thorsthweite® climate cissifieaton (Torna, 1948), imate is Medierancan ‘i continental infoeace, and dy subtumi ‘Average anal temperature in is vineyards 13 Cag nm ln 40.50 rn tha the soi enpetesepine Mes, wheres stl rosa regime is Xen (Roca Pete el, 208). Varietals Fis vinifera L. ev. Bobal and ev. ‘empanillo, gated on Richter 110, were chosen fortis study The vineyards sve planted in 1997 and vies were spaced at 138m x 2.85 m (prox. 2,800 vines/ha) Spur pruned grapevines were trained in permanent bilateral cordoas. The vineyards received gion merely wo avoid water efits, and the total vlume of water was apeos Boal Teaprailo Parner MPTP eT Bix 12a OIG 24a 232% Suge (@ine 7600 aa E36 628 mH SMa 35 eae Tiouuble acidity IL) 67 6556 5458 5.340 ‘ot pyphenolindex Gln 9 Gla 73H Kang) 1624 1798 19510 2185 AssimableN gl) 2500 _25ta_24tn_2570 ‘Duy age mesyleof fuyar 08 201) wh vie ‘Silane rr coh caren peer eee SEES ests es np") 500-700 ma ditbued as tee imine per yeas Four experimental plas, each pot consisting Of six vine ows, were delimited in the Bbal and ‘Tempranillo vineyards. For the samp ing snd nalycl determinations, thiry vinetalva over fix rows were seleted, Forte statistical nays the five vinesfrow chosen forthe azaytiesl ‘eteminations were considered celica un in other words, there were six replicntesp ‘weament, calvaran year Both vineyards underwent mechanical light pring (MP) or waiional severe manual pring (TP) with traditional soit tillage bare floor. Prune canes were removed, weighed, rued snd then returned to vineyard soils. During manual ‘PREZ BERMODEZ a ‘Table 4 Vegetative vgnar of Boba andTemprani vines subjected to mechani (MP) or raianal praning (TP) over 4 yeas (2008201). ‘Gar orang meta) 2008 200920102011 Bomar) Boba TF) Tempio (MP) Tempel TP) Tadd 9.8 Tad 1asd Tab 658 638660 TOs 10s 2s 1208 600660 68a 670 ae ef pins we fe eso ee sie pr it Free, he aa nd we Sih Sane tity oe talonp= 009) pruning, 85-90 % of vine annual growth was Femoved and 6-8 two-bud spurs (approx. 12-16 bdsvin) were retained pr vine Light pruning vias cared outwith a waco equiped wih {sco pespruner (elle). Then, spur pe were ‘manvally touched vp. In light pruning, 10-12 Jonge pas, with 4 buds per spur were retained ox cach vine (epprox. 40-48 bude). Grapes from both ulivae were always hand: picked daring the Fist wo weeks of Octaber (2008 {0 201), which was the mot appropri ine for rape harvest according to the data for fechnological maturity represented by the ‘messurements of must sugar comets, colour and DHL The preciton of rain and grapes satay ondition were also considered to determine ‘rest time, 2. Evaluation of the pruning technique with respect vine performance and grape quality The two techniques described above were employed on Temprailo and Bobal grapevines ring winter dormancy over four yours amr, 2008 to 2011, Sixty Botl and sity Tempranillo vines were anlyed in fur coasectve years to Aetermine vine yield, vine vigour and grape charters Fine yeld, Total yield (Fruit weight) and total numberof clusters per vine were recorded at Fares. These yield dita were wed fo cael the ‘mean weight ofthe Botal or Tempranillo clusters. Mean berry weight wax determined by selecting rapes randomly fom dffereat clusters. There ‘ero six replicas ee pruning weaent, cultivar tnd yar, and each replication unit consisted of 100 bers, Bein were weighed on « Ker balance (Gapsity 120, precision 0.01) Se I ine vegetative vigour The vegetative vigour of he 120 vines under study was measured by

    Vous aimerez peut-être aussi