Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
JRC2008
April 22-23, 2008, Wilmington, Delaware, USA
JRC2008-63016
INCREASE OF EFFICIENCY IN WIRELESS TRAIN CONTROL SYSTEMS
(ETCS LEVEL 2) BY THE USE OF ACTUAL PACKET-ORIENTED TRANSMISSION
CONCEPTS
Simon F. Ruesche
Institute of Communications Technology
Leibniz Universitt Hannover
Hannover, Germany
Jan Steuer
Institute of Communications Technology
Leibniz Universitt Hannover
Hannover, Germany
simon.ruesche@ikt.uni-hannover.de
jan.steuer@ikt.uni-hannover.de
Klaus Jobmann
Institute of Communications Technology
Leibniz Universitt Hannover
Hannover, Germany
klaus.jobmann@ikt.uni-hannover.de
ABSTRACT
The European Rail Transport Management System
(ERTMS) was introduced by the European Union (EU) to
harmonize the nearly 18 different national train control systems
which are currently in use, to accelerate the interoperability of
the passenger- and freight-transport and, finally, to increase the
utilization of tracks by dynamic train control. The essential
components of ERTMS are the train-specific, cellular,
professional mobile radio system GSM-R (GSM-Railway) and
the so-called European Train Control System (ETCS) which
provides, by its second expansion stage (ETCS Level 2), the
control- and signalling-information between the train and the
related control location via GSM-R in a connection-oriented
and wireless way. This wireless and connection-oriented
approach will be the bottleneck of the system, which
considerably limits the possible number of voice- and dataconnections in each cell at the same time and will cause a
deadlock of the system, if the number of users will rapidly
increase (e.g. accidents, freight depots, lines with a high and
dynamic volume of traffic). Within this paper the first part of a
packet-switched approach is presented to counteract this
expected deadlock by taking into account that the GSM-R
infrastructure, which is often already installed by the national
railroad operators, also should be used to save the high capital
investment of those companies.
INTRODUCTION
The European Rail Transport Management System
(ERTMS) was introduced by the European Union (EU) to
harmonize the nearly 18 different train control systems which
are currently in use in the EU, to accelerate the interoperability
of the passenger- and freight-transport and, finally, to increase
the utilization of tracks by dynamic train control. The essential
components of ERTMS are the train-specific, cellular,
professional mobile radio system GSM-R (GSM-Railway) and
the so-called European Train Control System (ETCS) which
provides, by its second expansion stage (ETCS Level 2), the
control- and signalling-information between the train and the
related control location via GSM-R in a connection-oriented
and wireless way. This wireless and connection-oriented
approach will be the bottleneck of the system, which
considerably limits the possible number of voice- and dataconnections in each cell at the same time and will cause a
deadlock of the system, if the number of users will rapidly
increase. Regarding this fact in special operations scenarios
(e.g. accidents, freight depots, lines with a high and dynamic
volume of traffic) this connection-oriented system will not
ensure the availability of voice-, data- and managementservices at the same time and the same level of priority.
Regarding this fact a packet-switched approach should be
VLR
HLR
AUC
BSC
MSC
ISDN
BSC
RBC
HLR
AUC
PCU
EIR
ISDN
MSC
BSC
SGSN
EIR
BSC
GGSN
IP/X.25
PCU
PDU Size
184 bit
271 bit
315 bit
431 bit
1
9.05
13.4
15.6
21.4
2
18.1
26.8
31.2
42.8
3
27.15
40.2
46.8
64.2
4
36.2
53.6
62.4
85.6
5
45.25
67
78
107
6
54.3
80.4
93.6
128.4
7
63.35
93.8
109.2
149.8
8
72.4
107.2
124.8
171.2
The coding scheme CS-1 is the most robust and is the standard
coding scheme within the following simulation scenarios
because the transmission channel within a railroad environment
is really worse.
The following Fig. 3 shows, finally, the enhanced
simulation environment regarding the focused GPRS-R Packet
Transmission Module.
BSC
SGSN
GGSN
PCU
BSC
IP/X.25
EIR
RBC
OBU
MT2
GSM-R
ISDN
NT
I-GSM
RBC
I-FIX
95%
<6 s
------
Value
100%
< 8.5 s
< 10-3
< 500 ms
< 10-4/h
<1 0-3/h
> 40 s
Delay Class
1
2
3
Best Effort
Value
1 to 15
30 Bytes
5 Seconds
CS-1
1/7
1 hour
20 Meters
5 Meters
160
140
120
100
1 MS
80
15 MS
60
40
20
3492
3276
3060
2844
2628
2412
2196
1980
1764
1548
1332
900
1116
684
468
36
252
115
110
105
100
95
90
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
Number of MS
Parameter
Total Number of MS
ETCS Telegram
Length(Bytes)
Transmission Period
Coding Scheme
Data slots/Voice slots
Simulation time
Value
1
10
90
20
100
30
128
40
200
50
300
60
500
70
750
80
1000
5 Seconds
CS-1
1/7
1 Hour
99
98
97
2000.00
1800.00
1600.00
1400.00
1200.00
1000.00
800.00
600.00
400.00
200.00
0.00
96
95
94
93
92
5
7.5
10
12.5
15
20
30
60
1000
750
500
300
200
128
90
100
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Mean delay
100.31 ms
270.25 ms
929.12 ms
1851.11 ms
Value
1
30 Bytes
5 Seconds
CS-1
1/7
1 Hour
55 Meters
Value
1
30 Byte
5
CS-1, CS-2, CS-3, CS-4
1/7
1 Hour
55 Meters
CS1
CS2
60.00
CS3
CS4
40.00
20.00
0.00
1
GGSN
GPRS
GPRS-R
GSM
GSM-R
GUI
HLR
IP
ISDN
LLC
LOS
MAC
MS
MSC
MT2
NT
OBU
PCU
PDP
PDU
QoS
RBC
RLC
SGSN
VLR
REFERENCES
[1] Schwartz, M., 2005, Mobile Wireless Communications,
Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
[2] EuroRadio Interface Group, 2003, Radio Transmission
FFFIS for EURORADIO, UIC, Paris
[3] EIRENE, 2006, EIRENE System Requirements
Specification, UIC, Paris
[4] Kalden, R. A., 2004, Mobile Internet Traffic Measurement
and Modeling Based on Data from Commercial GPRS
Networks, Wissenschaftsverlag Mainz, Aachen
[5] Scheibenbogen, M., 2001, Dynamische Kanalvergabe in
zellularen Funknetzen, Wissenschaftsverlag Mainz, Aachen
[6] Ng, R. and Trajkovic, L., 2004, Simulation of General
Packet Radio Service Network, OPNET Technology Inc.,
Washington DC
[7] Christiansen H., 2004, A tool for GPRS end-to-end
performance modeling, OPNETWork 2004, Washington DC
[8] EIRENE, 2003, Subset-093 GSM-R Interfaces Class 1
Requirements, UIC, Paris
[9] EIRENE, 2006, EIRENE Functional Requirements
Specification, UIC, Paris
10