Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Survey
September 2014
An Uphill Battle
A majority of job seekers have negative feelings about the job search process.
80%
Stressful
78%
Discouraging
71%
Painful
60%
Efficient
49%
Promising
Exciting
42%
38%
Satisfying
35%
Easy
35%
Unresponsive Employers
Job seekers are frustrated by the inability of companies to respond in a timely
fashion:
Expectation
Reality
60%
55%
20%
19%
62%
Reality
51%
51%
46%
41%
28%
16%
14%
Reality
51%
46%
40%
38%
24%
21%
15%
13%
Application Obstacles
A clear majority (60%) of job seekers feel that the online job application
process is more challenging than other common forms:
60%
Mortgage
48%
Health insurance
46%
College
36%
Student loan
32%
Grad school
27%
Government ID
20%
Credit card
Online dating
19%
13%
*Respondents were asked to choose their top three answers.
2014 Jibe. All Rights Reserved.
30%
Go on a blind date
30%
22%
19%
12%
12%
None of these
36%
Basic Demands
Job seekers feel that the online application experience is too complicated and
desire something better.
Clear
User-friendly
Easy
40%
Fast
10
11
12
Experience Matters
54%
say that candidate
experience is
important
36%
find it challenging
to improve candidate
experience
13
Tools of Engagement
A majority of HR professionals feel that candidates are extremely ambivalent and
disconnected throughout the application process.
56%
55%
Additionally, nearly two in five feel its hard to keep candidates engaged throughout
the application process (35%) and communicate effectively with them at each step
(34%).
2014 Jibe. All Rights Reserved.
14
48%
would change the
application process
based on candidate
feedback
30%
find it difficult to
incorporate candidate
feedback into system
changes
15
HR professionals and
job seekers alike are
frustrated with the tools
they have today.
16
Deep Dissatisfaction
A majority of HR professionals say that their current technology doesnt deliver
what they need.
Intuitive
Easy to customize
58%
Money-saving
53%
Time-saving
In fact, nearly three in ten (27%) HR professionals agree that the tools they have
right now get in the way of their ability to do their jobs instead of actually
making them better at what they do.
2014 Jibe. All Rights Reserved.
17
Tracking Poorly
Almost two in three (64%) express some dissatisfaction with or plans to
replace their current applicant tracking system (ATS).
Many dissatisfied customers cite issues with customization, integration, ease
of use, and performance.
Cumbersome,
complicated, and
slow.
Often delays the
hiring process by
enough time that we
have lost potential
candidates.
We get people,
but not the
best.
Too manual.
2014 Jibe. All Rights Reserved.
Difficult to customize,
performance is slow,
and metrics are
impossible to obtain.
Mobile Expectations
Job seekers are happy to let
smartphones aid their search:
20
Convenient:
62%
Fast:
49%
23%
21
Roadblocks to Adoption
While job seekers are open to the idea of applying for positions on a mobile
platform, 88 percent admit they have concerns about this process:
Making mistakes or errors
55%
Uploading my resume
51%
Formatting my resume
51%
46%
41%
39%
38%
37%
Other
26%
3%
22
Crucial Offering
Job seekers and HR professionals agree that mobile optimization is a priority.
Seventy-six percent of HR professionals say its important that candidates
feel the application process is mobile optimized.
Job seekers agree: more than half (55%) feel its important that the online
application process is optimized for mobile.
76%
55%
of HR professionals stress
the importance of an
application process thats
mobile optimized
23
Coming Up Short
Companies are struggling to meet the mobile expectations of todays job seeker.
Nearly a third (27%) of HR professionals at companies with 500+ employees
havent optimized anything job search-related for mobile devices.
Thirty-six percent also admit that if they were in a candidates shoes, they
wouldnt be able to describe the application process at their company as
mobile-optimized.
27%
of those at companies with 500
people or more report that nothing
is mobile optimized.
2014 Jibe. All Rights Reserved.
24
43%
35%
33%
Internal resistance
32%
25%
24%
4%
25
Data Headaches
Almost two in three (62%) HR
professionals dont feel they can
easily extract data or metrics from
their current recruiting tools to
make key decisions.
62%
cant easily extract data
or metrics from their
recruiting tools
32%
usually have to request
a manual data export
from another person
26
Uneasy Analytics
Talent acquisition professionals
report that they spend an
average of 32 hours per month
manually sorting through or
manipulating data, an increase
from the 24 hours a month
reported in 2013.*
27
Flying Blind
Talent acquisition professionals are unable to track key metrics used to guide
hiring decisions.
58%
56%
Quality of hire
54%
Time to fill
49%
Applicant source
42%
28
46%
44%
29
An inferior candidate
experience can deter quality
hires and impact a
companys bottom line.
30
31
60%
32
Negative Impacts
One in three (33%) HR professionals believe that if candidates werent able to
apply for jobs on their smartphones, theyll be less interested in working for
that company. Two in ten (20%) job seekers go so far as to say that they
wouldnt fill out an online job application if they couldnt do it on a mobile
device.
Many HR professionals also imagine that mobile hiring limitations will lead to
negative company feedback shared by applicants among their friends and
family (21%) and publicly on social media (21%).
A quarter (25%) of HR professionals think that not being able to apply for jobs
using a smartphone might even prevent candidates from buying products or
services from that organization.
33
Adverse Effects
Additionally, 37 percent of HR
professionals are concerned about their
companys application process deterring
quality hires and with good reason:
Over a third (34%) of job seekers confirm
that if they had issues filling out an online
application, for example, theyd never
apply for a job there again, tell others to
similarly avoid the company, or even
steer clear of supporting the company
with their time or money.
If an online
application
gave them
trouble, 34%
would:
Never apply to the
company again
Methodological Notes
The Jibe Recruitment Survey was conducted between August 13th and August 22nd, 2014 among two
audiences using an e-mail invitation and an online survey: 1,025 active and passive job seekers ages 18 and
over; and 306 HR professionals from companies with 100+ employees and $50M or more in revenue and who
are either on the front lines of recruitment or are decision-makers who have budget authority in talent
acquisition.
Results of any sample are subject to sampling variation. The magnitude of the variation is measurable and is
affected by the number of interviews and the level of the percentages expressing the results.
For the job seeker study, the chances are 95 in 100 that a survey result does not vary, plus or minus, by more
than 3.1 percentage points from the result that would be obtained if interviews had been conducted with all
personas in the universe represented by the sample. The margin of error for any subgroups will be slightly
higher.
For the HR audience study, the chances are 95 in 100 that a survey result does not vary, plus or minus, by
more than 5.6 percentage points from the result that would be obtained if interviews had been conducted with
all personas in the universe represented by the sample. The margin of error for any subgroups will be slightly
higher.
*The 2013 Jibe Recruiter Survey was conducted between July 31st and August 14th, 2013 among 101 staffing
and recruiting professionals, using an email invitation and an online survey. The margin of error was +/- 9.8
percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level.
2014 Jibe. All Rights Reserved.
35
Thank You
www.jibe.com
9/5/2014
36