Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Figure 1. Location map of the study site with check dam and observation bore well.
Rainfall Total rainfall Water-level Specific yield Ponding recharge Time lapse* Percolation rate
Rainy day (mm) (mm) fluctuation (mm) (%) (mm) (h) (mm/h)
*Time lapse: Time interval between rainfall event and maximum water-level rise.
Figure 2. Hydrograph of bore well for September–November 2005 along with rainfall.
The study area experiences monsoonal sults in significant rise in water level due terrain through check dams with smaller
rainfall from June to October every year, to recharge from storage. catchments. The described attempt on re-
with an average annual rainfall of 650 mm. Also, an attempt has been made to relate charge evaluation through water-level
Five to six daily rainfall events which the percolation rate estimated from pond- response is a simple method for evalua-
generated run-off to the artificial re- ing recharge and the resultant water-level tion of pond recharge. The recharge esti-
charge structure were considered to investi- rise. A linear relationship was observed mated by this method yielded values
gate the response of the aquifer to ponding indicating that repeated filling of the similar to those of percolation tank re-
during the study period. Recharge from check dam enhances groundwater recharge charge evaluated using injected tritium
the check dam storage and subsequent from storage. The linear relation obser- and environmental chloride methods 8,9.
water-level change were critically ana- ved is similar to the relationship establi- However, careful site selection through
lysed by selecting time window-frames shed between natural recharge and water- scientific investigations and harvesting in
from continuous water-level record. The table fluctuations 5,6. The natural recharge a cascading manner along a drainage
hydrograph for the period from 8 Sep- estimated using the tritium technique channel would result in high efficiency
tember to 3 November 2005 exhibiting over several granitic watersheds revealed in groundwater recharge through artifi-
water level in pulse mode rise with re- that only 5–8% of rainfall contributes cial recharge methods.
spect to rainfall is shown in Figure 2. An towards recharge7. However, when we
attempt on correlating the rainfall amount calculate the percentage of recharge due
and subsequent rise in water level yielded to cyclic ponding with respect to rainfall, 1. Rolland Andrade, Muralidharan, D. and
an exponential relation indicating that it varied from 27 to 40%, showing the Rangarajan, R., Curr. Sci., 2005, 89, 677–
daily rainfall exceeding 40 mm/day re- advantage of ponded recharge in granitic 681.