Fellow combatants, have you ever wondered why there still are plainly racially

distinguished groups (nationalities, races or wide racial groups of relative populations eg.
whites, blacks, Latins, Arabs, Jews etc) even within multicultural patchwork of peoples as
are the US, the Latin America countries, but also the nowadays multicultural and culturally
denationalised Europe?
Why is the cross-breeding rate in all those countries still remaining relatively low, instead of
the systems anti-racial propaganda and cultural one-way-formatting that is imposed to the
people by the terrorist-states, and aside the fact that a big percentage of non-whites has
today has risen class and educationally, therefore has surmounted the environmental
obstacles?
Have you even wondered why in modern societies, despite the collapse of traditional
cultural principles and the systems propaganda against nationalism, even from our school
years, the conjugal choice is done more often with national and racial criteria rather than
class or cultural as are education, profession etc unless the racial criterion is already met?
This article will try to answer these questions based on one of the most complete and
modern theories of evolution that have been developed during the latest 30 years, Richard
Dawkins theory (professor at Oxford University) of The Selfish Gene, which, as resulting
in a magnificent part of his theory, is also a nationalist gene.
Although, this article is basically a political one that is based in biology, and not a scientific
article as such. Certainly, there is one prerequisite in accepting this particular scientific
theory, as well its political extensions, which is the conviction that human behavior is
mainly genetically decided, that is defined as biological determinism (biological
determinism is not exactly a determinism as such, because it does not consider that genes
decide ones behavior aside what environment is grown in, but considers that genes define
ones behavior in a particular environment).
If one is gene-based to, for instance, compose music, they will not express it if they never
attend conservatory classes or they never learn to play a musical instrument, for either social
or economic reasons. Thus a scientifically valuable potential is lost is capitalism, since
children with genetically high mental or athletic potential cannot usually overcome the
hardest class barriers in a system in which knowledge is bought!
Firstly we must refer to the theories of evolution in general. Historically, Darwin is
considered as the father of evolution (although it is contested if it is really him who wrote
The Origins of Species or it was Wallace).
The theory of evolution in its primary form tells us among others that the species that
survive are those of which the genes have been endowed with the ability to conform in their
environment in the best possible way. Let us say that antelopes, for instance, that are
endowed with the proper musculature so as to run quickly, survive in a big percentage and
also leave many descendants, while others are eaten by their predators and are gradually
vanished from their population. Eventually centuries or millenia afterwards there are fast
antelopes, strong lions, eagles with extraordinary vision etc.
This was the primary theory of evolution, which considered the human as a biological
selection unit. Namely it considered that the species are conformed in their environment and
are meliorated when individuals of the same species bearing the desirable characteristics
survive and reproduce themselves.
But as every primary theory, this one had also many weaknesses that were noted later on
and then the neon-darwinean considerations began to grow. One fundamental weakness of

the primordial theory of evolution was altruism! Especially in human societies, as well as in
animal and insects societies, an individuals voluntary sacrifice is observed for the groups
benefit (parents sacrifice themselves for their descendants, revlutionaries for the sake of the
nation or the class they represent, herbivore mammals protect their littles by putting them in
the center of the herd so that the grown up ones that are farther out are at more risk, the
worker bees struggle for the benefit of their whole society without leaving any descendants
etc.). All this, according to the primary theory of evolution, was inconceivable since the
individuals with altruistic behavior that sacrifice themselves or are at permanent risk of
getting killed should vanish from evolutions process leaving fewer descendants to the point
of extinction. Instead, this is not happening whatsoever, rather these individuals survive and
reproduce themselves within corresponding populations.
So, here comes the selfish gene.
According to Dawkins theory, humans (and every other being) are designed merely as a
vehicle that brings with it its genome, which goes from one generation to the next, as it is
eternal and relatively unalterable, while the individual is perishable and of finite life.
Therefore biological choice as well acts on the genes and on individuals.
Genes are selfish because they have designed us to behave with solidarity to individuals
that have a big amount of common genes with us. So, if we die but out of our death three
of our brothers, who each have 50% of common genes with us, survive, the selfish genes
is resulted beneficiary after having lead us to sacrifice ourselves in relation to keeping our
lives and letting them die instead of us.
Surely, this selfish gene has designed us to risk our lives only if this is the last resort,
since it is preferable to it the survival of as many individuals to bring this particular
genome as possible or a part of it. We easily come to conclude that the more individuals
with common genome survive and reproduce themselves, the more our genes push us to that
direction.
Therefore the impulsive sacrifice in the benefit of our race, or at least the racial solidarity
through this particular theory, takes on a biological and evolutionary basis. Clearly, the
selfish gene is also a nationalist gene!!
Plus, according to this same theory it is clearly established that the gene establishes, during
the reproduction process, the racial characteristics of individuals with common genetic basis
to be alluring so as to perpetuate common genes, but surely not related individuals to avoid
incest, which produces faulty descendants.
Social Darwinism that is exalted by capitalists (although they shouldnt, for capitalism is
social Darwinisms distortion), which sets as a biological choice unit the individual, has
collapsed as a scientific theory a long time ago, while marxist evolutionary biologists accept
the team as a biological choice unit at one hand (Lewontin), but on the other they consider
that it could be composed by anything, mistaking the fact that the only units on which
biological choice acts, at nature are units with a big percentage of common genome, and
as for humans it is about what we would call national or racial groups.
As for the so-called class struggle and its relation with social Darwinism with capitalism, I
have to say that they merely confirm historically Dawkin's evolutionary theory.
First of all, the so called social mobility in capitalism is usually a horizontal one and rarely
vertical. It is statistically proved that in the USA the economic and professional rise of a

young person is mainly depended on their property and their parents profession, and much
less on their qualification and their general educational level. Social mobility is almost
always limited between different substratum of the same economic class, eg. from a builderworker to a middle-class constructor or from an officer to a lower executive member etc;
thus capitalism has nothing to do with survival and production of the genetically gifted ones,
with some exceptions.
It basically promotes the simply wealthy ones to more wealthy, since it rewards capital
possessing of any kind, and not labor, which is the only one that can be constituted as the
means of promoting the most capable ones. So, since the individual, that has been designed
from their selfish gene to desire the optimization of their kind, sees the stagnancy of their
race from the degenerated capitalist system, becomes a class revolutionary for the sake of
their nation. Apart from the well-known left-side nomenclature that yells at anything,
sometimes fairly, sometimes unfairly, for which I will discuss later on, no worker has ever
revolted against class rights of another race non-related to their nation!
I know that the idea that we are a vehicle of our genome, which is designed to merely pass
on to the next generation surely stranges many people, especially those in the so-called
nationalist area where sovereigns an acute romantic idealism, in addition with me who
stands for positivism (and biological reductionist as its subset) andintellectualism, namely
the conviction that all ideas are not only creations of intelligence, which (intelligence) is
mainly determined by the genes interacting with environment. Besides, positivism, with all
the theoretical instruments of modern science, has today left its old sterile form and can
anymore touch more delicate textures of human nature.
The hypothesis that the genes define an individuals behavior will be verified when the
genes affection on the function of the central nervous system will be able to be studied,
which as far as Im informed hasnt been done yet, and I am not a neurologist to keep up
with the latest news. Even so, aside the central nervous system, the question of soul as a
non-material entity, or a non-material entity regarding the forms of matter that we are
familiar with so far, is still pending, since on the question of matter the ideas of physics
are continuously evolving! Of course, even matter as such is nothing but an idea that we
own regarding the nature of all things, since finally everything is a mental representation in
our minds (for instance, for physicians, even matter particles are but functions with maths
characteristics).
Anyway, even for those who keep their faith to a clearly idealistic consideration of
national-socialism, its good to know that even from a scientific perspective there exists
an almighty evolutionary theory that supports it's ideas, regardless whether they dont
accept the mechanistic conception of life.
We must also mention that Dawkins accepts as equally powerful with the genes power, the
power of ideas, the eternal memes, as he calls them, which just like the genes, pass on
from one generation to the next traveling through time and space, mutating and evolving,
but without changing dramatically. Of course one could assert that memes result from
genes, which I personally accept, but the resulting question where did genes come from,
and life in general? is also pending for an answer, since science has still more ground to
cover on the subject!
One could say that the army of nation-assassin ideologies that have been grown during the
centuries, like economic liberalism (ideological foothold of capitalism) or communism and
anarchism (except for national-Bolsheviks) and the troops that support and consent them,
isnt the living proof that the theory above is faulty?

I believe not, for if we once again consider that an individuals worldview or that of a
groups within a nation is genetically defined, then obviously, as the mammals have
historically grown various masculine systems, until the survival of the mammals type that
carried the proper masculine system, while for some time there coexisted the carriers of
various mammal types, so it will be with us European national-socialists we are the groups
within each one's nation bearing the proper genes and are inspired by the proper memes,
so that the best possible form of our nations will prevail with our final victory, regarding
both the individual-bearers of national genes, and the community form that these individuals
will create.
Withing this community every nation-assassinating ideology will be vanished as a result to
biological choice. If we lose, though, this means that the national selfish-nationalist gene
was not capable to survive in regard to its competitive ones of the other nations'.
Similarly, this occurs for the whole white race. We must desire natures hardness on us
nationalists, for only in this way the needful biological choice will occur in our area so that
the future Europeans will firstly be all of them national-socialists, and secondly regard us as
a weathered type.
Nationally Socially Free
Spartacus
(translation Elina GK, original article in Greek)

Read more: http://spartakosns.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-nationalist-gene.html#ixzz2dNOF2rf8