Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Study on Energy-saving Control Strategy of Idling Stop System for City Bus
Daxing Huang
Ren He
II.
I.
INTRODUCTION
212
ENGINE STOP/START
Tidle
0) | ( dv / dt 0) & ( Pwheel 0)
(v
(1)
(2)
T id le
Q id le
Tidle
q i d le d t
(3)
Where
vehicle speed in m / s , dv / dt is the acceleration of the
vehicle in m / s , f is the rolling resistance coefficient, Pwheel is
Q
the wheel power in w a, idle is the total fuel consumption
q
at idling in L . idle is the fuel consumption at idling in L .
IV.
REGENERATIVE BRAKING
ma Gf
213
Cw u A u v 2
21.15
(4)
abrake
Pbrake
Cw u A u v 2
)/m
21.15
C u A u v2
(ma Gf w
) u va
21.15
(Gf
(5)
(6)
Ebrake
brake
dt
(7)
Where m is the vehicle mass in kg, v and va is the vehicle
speed in m / s , a is the acceleration of the vehicle
in m / s and abrake is the deceleration of the vehicle in m / s , f is
the rolling resistance coefficient, Pbrake is the braking power in
w and E is the braking energy in w , C is the aerodynamic
drag coefficient. A is the front area of the vehicle.
The total energy of regenerative braking utilizing BSG
that is:
2
brake
Ere _ brake
(U
BSG _ brake
(8)
Df
0, Dr
Df
1, Dr
(9)
When the braking force is supplied by the hydraulic
system alone, that is:
(10)
When the front braking force is supplied by the electric
motor, while the rear braking force is also involved by the
hydraulic system, that is:
Df
0, Dr
(11)
Bc 0
(12)
When the front axle brake by motor and hydraulic
system is done together, that is:
Df
Where
Df
Bc
, Dr
B
(13)
0.8
0.8
vehicle mass, kg
Fbf electric
Fbf electric
Fbf electric
aerodynamic drag
coefficient
front area of the
vehicle , m2
rolling resistance
coefficient
engine type:
YC6112ZLQ
Fbf hydraulic
Fbf electric
BSG:
(permanent-magnet
brushless DC motor)
transmission gear
final drive gear
wheel radius, m
7830
0.6
6.15
0.01
177KW
(2500 r/min)
682N.m
(1900 r/min)
10kW
(2500 r/min)
127 N.m
(1500 r/min)
5.32;3.00;
1.63;1.00;0.74
5.571
0.571
A. Test Cycles
Test cycles are used for homologation runs to determine
fuel consumption for new vehicles. To compare theses
cycles, average speed Vcyc and percentage of idling time tidle
are given in table 2.
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
215
(a) CYC_MANHATTAN
(b) CYC_ECE
Fuel consumption
(L/100Km)
Manhattan
ECE
WVUCITY
VI.
Manhattan
ECE
WVUCITY
average speed
Vcyc,km/h
10.98
18.26
13.59
model
64.31
33.59
46.53
58.83
30.21
42.06
CONCLUSION
(c) CYC_WVUCITY
Figure 8: Three test cycles
Test Cycle
conventional
Percentage of
idling time tidle,s
REFERENCES
35.9%
32.8%
30.3%
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
216