Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
UNIVERSITY
ACADEMIC UNIT OF
ADMINISTRATIVE AND HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
ENGLISH MAJOR
RESEARCH PLAN
TOPIC
ENGLISH SPEAKING IMPROVEMENT THROUGH THE DIRECT
INTERACTION BETWEEN NATIVE SPEAKERS AND (BI) STUDENTS
AT PRIMERO DE ABRIL EDUCATIVE UNIT DURING THE
ACADEMIC CYCLE APRIL 2014- AUGUST 2015.
AUTHOR:
Jeremin AdrianToscano Caisalitin
TUTOR
Encalada Trujillo Edgar
Latacunga Ecuador
2014-2015
1. PROBLEM STATEMENT
The Ecuadorian Government and the Ministry of Education are working in a
collective way with the purpose of developing the English languages
improvement as many in students as teachers in charge of this important area.
In Ecuador, with regard to the last evaluations made by the Education First (EF) to
more than 52.000 people between 18 and 19 years old, including students and
employees have get a score of 46.9 above 100 percent of the total score.
This has placed to Ecuador in the position number 48 with the lowest level in the
English language among of 60 countries. This has produced an alarming news
allowing to understand that the foreign English language is not so appreciated for
Ecuadorians young students.
It is so relevant to mention this, due to in 2012 the same evaluation made by
Education First (EF) positioned to Ecuador in the place 46 while in 2013 it has
positioned it in the 48 place, permitting thus to understand that from 2012 to 2013
instead of getting the best goals and scores in the English language, it has
produced a huge backward into this area.
On the other hand, the Ministry of Education in the Cotopaxi Province will
introduce to the Zones 3 Educational Institutions some professors who have been
specialized during 7 months in English countries through the Go Teacher
program with the only objective of getting important educational advances in the
English language area.
Zone 3 has 56 teachers who have successfully participated in the program "Go
Teacher" and who have returned to be located in the various educational
institutions with International Bachelorship, Milenniums Educational Units, and
more Educational Institutions that need the help and experience that can be
provided for this valuable human resource.
In this way will be benefited in great way the various Educational Institutions of
our province, in particular those which work with the International Bachelorship
(IB) as is the case of the Primero De Abril Educative Unit which is located in
the Cantn Latacunga.
This school has the opportunity to train and prepare young students of the
International Bachelorship (IB), an international fellowship program established
by the Ecuadorian Government and the Ministry of Education.
In this educational institution there is a large number of students that are still part
of the International Bachelorship, which could lose the total interest of this
program if the teachers do not establish methodologies more real and assertive
that improve the teaching of the English language.
It means that the students could lose the total interest on the English as a foreign
language if this language is limited and applied only within the four walls of the
classroom with fictitious dialogs and imaginary examples and whats more, with
only 5 hours a week. A possible solution to this issue would be that we make use
of the tourism resources that the province of Cotopaxi offers in order to carry to
our students to those sites and motivate them to have a meeting and a real
conversation with foreigner people and native speakers of the English language.
This method Direct speech will help to develop and improve the English
speaking skill language in the Ecuadorian youth, in particular the International
Bachelorship (IB) students from the Primero De Abril Educative Unit.
1.1.
CONTENT CONTRAINT
Which could be the advantages and disadvantages that the (PRE-BI) students will
get by keeping a real conversation with native English Speakers?
1.2.
JUSTIFICATION
This research will be carried out with the only objective of helping to develop and
improve the English speaking skill to the hundreds of learners who are studying in
the PRIMERO DE ABRIL Educative Unit.
With this investigation they will find a new alternative of learning this global
language.
The Practical contribution of this investigation will specifically solve the huge
problem that (PRE-BI) students have in their process of learning the English
language into this educational institution.
We do not have to forget that the principal beneficiaries of this project will be
the students of the (PRE-BI) program. This program in a principal way will
benefit to students to develop and improve their speaking skill.
If this project is applied with success, the (pre bi) students will get an incredible
experience with foreign native speakers.
On the other hand, for having a clear idea about how deep the problem in the
students is, we will make to students a survey related to their problem.
This investigation is quite different to others because of this project as a scientific
novelty is focused and will be applied specially in the (PRE-BI) students from the
PRIMERO DE ABRIL Educative Unit.
Apart from this, this kind of projects never has been carried out into this
educational institution with those students neither others.
This project will be feasible for doing because it does not need lots of money,
transport neither a great investment.
This is the great reason why this project might be carried easily out in contrast of
others which need enormous amounts of money or other resources.
4
2. THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
2.1.
BACKGROUND
The Educative Unit "Primero de Abril" has a high level of education which has
been forged day by day for more than 30 years of institutional life.
It is important to emphasize that this educational institution was the first to
include within its policy the (IB) program, International Baccalaureate which
supports all students who have a high level of qualification and wishing to make
their university studies outside the country
In spite of his prestige and his (IB) program, the "Primero de Abril" Educative
Unit has never carried out since its inception a program or project that help and
encourage the learning and improvement of the English language outside of the
educational establishment.
It means that it has not been focused on bringing to the students of the (BI) toward
the tourist places that the Cotopaxi province and the country offers so as to do
thus, they be able to have a direct contact with native Americans speakers so that
in this way the students can improve their English speaking skill.
There is no registration or documentary evidence that show us that The "Primero
de Abril" Educative Unit had ever carried out a project that helps students from
the (IB) to maintain a personalized contact and a real conversation with foreign
people from USA.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS
2.3.
Social language is the language of the playground. Researcher Jim Cummins calls
this language Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills or BICS (Cummins,
1981, 1996). Newcomers use BICS to function socially in hallways, classrooms,
school buses, and playgrounds. Cummins's research shows that it takes one to
three years for English language learners to reach the social language level of their
peers.
The context of social language is embedded. For example, if a student wants a
drink of water, he can ask for it by making a drinking motion and saying the word
water. Newcomers have support for BICS because they can use gestures, objects,
and pictures to help make the information comprehensible. English language
learners who are in the beginning stages are able to handle the following tasks:
Isobel's family is from Costa Rica. Her parents speak some English and are
literate in Spanish. When Isabel's teacher told them that they should speak English
at home, her parents became distressed. They tried to speak English with her at
the dinner table, but their conversations were stilted. Isobel's parents no longer felt
comfortable asking her about her school, classes, and homework in Spanish. They
stopped discussing books and the television news with her. Although the family
reverted to their native language at the dinner table after a week of hesitant
English, Isobel felt ashamed of her native language. She wished her parents spoke
English.
2.3.2. How Do Students Acquire Social Language?
Does social language need to be taught and practiced or do students pick it up
automatically on the playground or in the lunchroom? English language learners
may need to be specifically taught interpersonal skills such as how to greet
people, give and receive compliments, apologize, and make polite requests. They
also need to understand nonverbal language and the use of personal space. The
goal of Standard 1 of the 2006 Prek12 English language proficiency standards is
for ELLs to learn to communicate in English for social and instructional purposes
during the school day. This goal is important because many ELLs need to learn
the appropriate voice tones, volume, and language for different school settings.
For example, some ELLs speak to a teacher in the same way that they talk to a
peer, such as Min Ki in the next example.
Min Ki is a beginning ELL from Korea. Although his English is quite limited,
Min Ki is adept at picking up expressions on the playground. During recess one
day he learned to say Yeah, yeah, yeah. Whenever Ms. Chen, his classroom
teacher, gave directions, Min Ki would reply, Yeah, yeah, yeah. The teacher
finally had to ask an adult volunteer to explain to him that this is inappropriate
language for a child to use with an adult. In this setting, an adult had to teach
Min Ki that there is a difference between language used with an adult and
language used with friends on the playground.
Many newcomers in middle school and high school say that they are learning
academic language but have few opportunities to practice social language. Most
of their social interactions are with students with the same native language
background. In the next example, we look at Carmen and Diego and their social
language skills.
Carmen is an English language learner from the Dominican Republic who
attends a suburban middle school. She is a very good student who works hard and
has quickly acquired academic English; however, she socializes only with
classmates who speak Spanish. Her social language in English is slow and
hesitant. She has difficulty initiating a conversation in English. Her Brazilian
classmate Diego, on the other hand, is athletic and plays soccer with the boys
from his class. Because Diego interacts with many English-speaking teammates,
his social English is quite fluent.
Social language comes easier to students who have real reasons to speak with their
classmates. Organized school activities such as sports teams, band, or chorus can
expose ELLs to social English.
Role playing, teacher modeling, peer modeling, and videos are all good tools for
teaching ELLs social
Mrs. Arena makes an everyday classroom routine a valuable lesson in social
interaction and small talk. As students leave the playground after school, they say
good-bye to each other using the same farewells modeled earlier by the teacher.
2.3.3. How Long Does It Take Students to Learn English?
Classroom teachers, administrators, and school board members frequently ask,
How long does it take a student to learn English? and How long should
students receive language support? Let's look at the research.
10
They wanted to find out how long it would take for students with no background
in English to reach the performance of a native speaker on norm-referenced tests
(50th percentile). In addition, they looked at variables such as socioeconomic
status, students' first language, programs used to learn English, and the amount of
formal schooling in students' primary language.
Thomas and Collier found that the most significant variable in how long it takes
for a student to learn English is the amount of formal schooling students receive in
their first language.
In one part of the study, Thomas and Collier researched a group of Asian and
Hispanic students from an affluent suburban school district. These students
received one to three hours of second-language support per day in a well-regarded
ESL program. These students generally exited the ESL program in the first two
years. All students were at or above grade level in native language literacy. For
this group, Thomas and Collier found these results:
Students ages 8 to 11 years old with two to three years of native language
language literacy.
Students who were below grade level in their native language also took 7 to 10
years to reach the 50th percentile. Many of these students never reached
grade-level norms.
These data held true regardless of the home language, country of origin, or
socioeconomic status.
(Haynes, 2007 )
11
12
Let us first understand in short about learning, teaching and then teaching-learning
relation.
Learning can be defined as the relatively permanent change in an individual's
behavior or behavior potential (or capability) as a result of experience or practice
(i.e., an internal change inferred from overt behavior). This can be compared with
the other primary process producing relatively permanent change that results from
biological growth and development. Therefore, when we see a relatively
permanent change in others, or ourselves we know that the primary cause was
either maturation (biology) or learning (experience). As educators, there is nothing
we can do to alter an individuals biology; the only influence open to use is to
provide an opportunity for students to engage in experiences that will lead to
relatively permanent change.
Teaching then, can be thought of as the purposeful direction and management of
the learning process. Note that teaching is not giving knowledge or skills to
students; teaching is the process of providing opportunities for students to produce
relatively permanent change through the engagement in experiences provided by
the teacher.
(Scribd, s.f.)
2.6. SPEAKING SKILL DEVELOPMENT
Talking about the development of speaking skills during a teaching- learning
process, it is necessary to consider a great number of factors that influence this
process. Oral production, the process of communication, number of interlocutors,
interaction patterns, an amount of information processed, time span, teacher,
student, the conditions under which all these elements mutually interact are only a
small part of what developing speaking skills makes. It is impossible to discuss all
the factors related to this process in the thesis; therefore, an attention will be
focused only on selected areas.
As it has just been suggested, there are several aspects that contribute to the
development of students speaking skills, one of them being, I personally believe,
the effective organization of activities.
13
14
Next part includes theoretical suggestions of the individual stages that should be
taken into consideration when organizing activities focused on the development of
speaking skills.
The practical section contains research which tries to prove the practical use of the
theoretical notes concerning one selected stage of the activity in English lessons at
Czech elementary schools.
Speaking skills, like listening skills, are often neglected in the classroom or
teachers assume that they are an area that does not require instruction or
facilitation. In order to communicate effectively through speaking, children must
exhibit fluency, clarity, and an awareness of audience.
Such verbal
15
These roles include being a teacher, a course designer and class material
developer, a collaborator, a researcher, and an evaluator. Nunan (1987) makes
various observations about teachers who develop curriculums and points out that
developing the curriculum requires time, skill, and support.
Nunan recognized that issues such as these are vital for teachers faced with the
daunting task of developing curricula. Important issues in ESP curriculum design
are the abilities required for success ful communication in occupational settings,
content language acquisition versus general language acquisition, heterogeneous
versus homogenous learner groups, and materials development. (Nunan,1987)
Further, the acquisition of English for Tourism Purposes (ETP) must take into
account these various factors within an international context. Hutchinson and
Waters (1987) discuss international historical events and the emergence of English
as the international language and the subsequent development of ESP.
English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and English for Occupational Purposes
(EOP) are, however, different in terms of focus. This particularly insightful idea is
pointed out by Cummins (1979). Notions of cognitive academic proficiency
versus basic interpersonal skills, though often intermingled, need to remain
separate in terms of focus. Due to this fact, a curriculum concerning English for
the international tourism and service industry must be carefully created to suit
specific learners needs.
Indeed, English for Tourism Purposes (ETP) courses must be specifically
designed. The third and final type of ESP identified by Carver (1983) is English
with specific topics. Carver contends that emphasis shifts from purpose to topic.
This category is uniquely concerned with anticipated future English needs of, for
example, tourism professionals in the workplace. There should be an integral
component of such courses or programs which focus on situational language. This
situational language has been determined based on the interpretation of results
from needs analysis of authentic language used in target workplace settings. Base
vocabulary, situational expressions, and formulaic expressions for various tourism
related professions must be taught at an early stage of the learning process.
English for Tourism Purposes courses should take all of this into account.
16
The three features common to ESP courses identified by Carver (1983) are
authentic material, purposerelated orientation, and selfdirection. If we also
consider DudleyEvans (1987) claim that ESP should be offered at an
intermediate or advanced level, use of authentic learning materials is advisable.
The use of authentic content materials may be a crucial feature of ESP,
particularly in self -directed study and research tasks. This holds especially true
for learners of English for Tourism Purposes (ETP).
Purposerelated orientation refers to the simulation of communicative tasks
required of the target setting. Selfdirection is also characteristic of ESP courses
in that the . . . point of including selfdirection is that ESP is concerned with
turning learners into users (Carver, 1983, p.134). In order for selfdirection to
occur, the pupils must have a certain degree of freedom to decide when, what, and
how they will study. Empowering learners with such flexibility will stimulate
motivation. English for Specific Purposes requires a comprehensive needs
analysis. This is particularly true for students who are studying English for the
international tourism and service industry and students who are studying in an
English for Tourism Purposes program.
As there are various places of potential employment, the educator must center
focus on a particular learners future occupational desires.
Learner centered approaches to lessons; materials and syllabus design advocate
the involvement of pupils. Student fronted language learning must allow learners
to express their views on their educational needs and desires for learning the
language, their preferred learning styles (Willing, 1988), their philosophy and
beliefs about language learning, and or their preferred activity types
(Barkhuisen,1998). In keeping with a learner centered or communicative
approach, goals are focused on students and their success. Jones (1990) addresses
one of the core conundrums, however, in that ESP teachers find themselves in a
situation where they are expected to produce a course that exactly matches the
needs of a group of learners, but are expected to do so with no, or very limited,
preparation time (Jones, 1990, p. 91). In reality, many instructors are not
provided with ample time for needs analysis, materials research and materials
development.
17
others
to speak expressively with feeling and emotion and avoid the monotone
to speak effectively in different situations: with individuals, small groups, and
To achieve these goals, the teacher organized her instructional program around
two criteria: a positive, receptive teacher attitude and a physical environment
conducive to language use.
2.8.1.
When a teacher makes use of activities that have been specially designed to
incorporate several language skills simultaneously (such as reading, writing,
listening, and writing), they provide their students with situations that allow for
well-rounded development and progress in all areas of language learning.
The four skills work in tandem when the activities that require their use are
designed to support learners in the process of learning, creating and producing a
specific product. Four approaches in particular are structured so that the four skills
can be used simultaneously. These approaches are: the focal skill approach,
content-based instruction, task-based instruction and the project-based approach.
Most oral language instruction takes place indirectly; that is, the teacher creates
the positive climate and the motivational activity, and the students do the rest.
2.8.1.1.
18
The teacher seeks to engage children in talk with other children in a relaxed
atmosphere. Socialization skills as well as language are enhanced when students
engage in conversations and discussions. Conversation is informal,
Spontaneous, and relatively unstructured. Discussion is more formal and usually
topic-centered talk. It focuses on a specific topic or purpose. Both are similar in
that they build on the students home-learned experiences and serve to give
practice in pronunciation, fluency, expression, and vocabulary. They also help
children build confidence to express themselves orally.
Here are some classroom guidelines:
Speak loud enough to be heard in your group but not so loud as to disturb
others.
Only one person speaks at a time.
While one person is speaking, the other members of the group must actively
relation to the following two key success factors contributing to the creation of a
rich English language environment for students:
Raising students' motivation and interest in English learning; and
Widening students' learning space (physical and cognitive) through effective
learning and teaching strategies, flexible curriculum planning and timetabling (to
make allowance for life-wide learning and co-curricular activities), and effective
deployment of resources.
2.8.2. Raising students' motivation and interest
All students should be helped to become aware that better English would allow
them to communicate with a wider range of people. Their enhanced interest in
learning English does not only open up opportunities for work and study, but more
importantly, it provides them with greater opportunities for pleasure and
enjoyment in their personal life.
Suggestions:
(Adapted from those in the Final Report of Language Education Review of the
Standing Committee on Language Education and Research (SCOLAR, 2003))
When students like the subjects, they are more motivated to learn. Teaching
methods which arouse students' interest such as providing more learning
activities and making use of multi-media learning and teaching resources
widely used.
Schools should provide more opportunities for the use of English. The
promotion of learner autonomy and Self-Access Language Learning (SALL)
encourages students to take responsibility for their own learning as well as
20
2.8.3. Widening
students'
learning
space
providing
additional
corner.
Using a lot of reading and listening / viewing materials which are in use
around the school premises or community resources for classroom or cocurricular language activities, e.g. promoting reading to learn through building
in a morning reading time, using cross-curricular learning materials (e.g. those
provided by EDB), articles in magazines, youth radio programs (such as Teen
Time or Song Bird) or advertisements / public announcements or selected
programs on television for further language activities (e.g. debates, public
speaking or dramatic re-presentations).
21
Using the classrooms, display boards, walls, etc. in the school to display
students' work, language learning resources, and information related to
language learning activities or using the covered playground for activities that
facilitate the use of English, e.g. English Caf? a simulated excursion or visit.
Developing a trilingual language environment in the school, by encouraging
the use of English outside the classroom among peers and between students
and teachers.
(bitstream, s.f.)
2.9. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Embed: In linguistic this word means to place a sentence inside another long one.
Newcomer: This word refers to someone who has recently started an activity or
recently arrived in a place.
Survival: This word refers to the state of continuing to live despite danger or
difficulties.
Monotone: In general the word monotone has the concept of a dull way of
speaking in which the tone of the sound remains its volume all the time.
Peers: Usually the word peer refers to someone who is the same age or has the
same social status as other person.
Autonomy: This word means or is related with the freedom for a country or an
organization to govern itself independently.
Theoretical: Principally this word concerns with the ideas on which a particular
subject is based, rather than with practice or experiment.
Excursion: This is a common Word that is related with a short journey made for
pleasure, especially one that has been organized for a group of people.
Collective: Commonly the word in English collective means done by all members
of a group of people involving a whole group or society.
Performance: In the English language this word is the act of performing a play,
concert or some other form of entertainment.
Disturb: This word has the sense of interrupting someone when they are trying to
work or do anything.
22
Playgrounds: It is a simple word that refers to an outdoor area where children can
play especially in a park or at a school.
Engage: This word is not so common so the concept of this word is to succeed in
attracting and keeping somebodys attention and interest.
Survey: Particularly the principal concept of the word survey is an investigation
of the opinions, behavior, etc. of a particular group of people which is usually
done by asking them questions.
Patterns: This word is so common into the academic vocabulary that is the
regular way in which something happens or is done.
3.
Variable operationalization
Methodological Design
Types of investigation
Methodology
3.1.
VARIABLES OPERATIONALIZATION
It is a process which is passed from the abstract level of research to an operational
level, translating each variable directly observable and measurable events in the
context in which the object of study is located.
23
VARIABLE
DEPENDIE
NTE
Native
speaker
interaction.
CONCEPTUALIZA DIMENSION
TION
The native
speaker
interaction refers
to the ability of
communicating
each other.
It means, that a
non-native English
speaker be able of
maintaining a real
conversation with
an English native
speaker.
Speakers role.
Teachers role.
Speaking skill.
Teaching learning
environment.
Speakers
interaction.
INDICATORS PARAMETERS
ITEMS.
INS
NT
Sur
to
be:
facilitator,
guide,
facilitator,
to talk English?
Do you consider that the environment is
important to the teaching-learning process
24
VARIABLE
INDEPENDI
ENTE
English
speaking
improvement
.
CONCEPTUALIZATI
ON
DIMENSION
INDICATORS PARAMETERS
ITEMS.
INSTR
Survey
Fluency.
Clear
communication.
The correct use of
grammar.
Understandable
message.
Native accent.
fluency in speaking?
According to your point of view, is
it
necessary
communication
language
to
a
of
clear
the
develop
English
a
good
speaking?
With regard to your knowledge,
would the correct use of grammar
help to have a high level of
speaking?
Which option would be the most
likely
to
develop
message
understandable in English?
Do you think that the accent of the
native speaker influences into the
learning of the English language?
25
26
3.1.
METHODOLOGYCAL DESIGN
for
further
research.
Paving
the
way
for
new
studies.
Therefore, the draft must specify the reasons why the proposed study is exploratory.
Explanatory: It aims to test causal or explanatory hypotheses, for example
identification and analysis of causal (independent variables) and their results, which
are expressed in verifiable facts (dependent variables). Therefore, it becomes
important setting variables in which there is a level of complexity whose occurrence
and results determine explanations that contribute to scientific knowledge.
3.1.2. METHODOLOGY
This investigation is not an experimental one because researchers will not prove a
hypothesis or make experiments in any laboratory. That is why; this research is based in
the descriptive method which deals with detailing phenomena, situations, contexts and
events. Moreover it details how they are and how they manifest.
It looks for specifying the properties, characteristics, and profiles of individuals, groups,
communities, processes, objects or any other phenomenon that is subject to analysis.
It means to measure, assess or collect data concepts (variables), aspects, dimensions or
components of the phenomenon to investigate.
What is more this research will be based in this method because its characteristics
describes what the researchers need for giving a solution to the analyzed problem.
27
3.2.3
At Primero de Abril high school there are 40 English teachers that are in charge of
International Bachelorship program, also there are 15 more English teachers that work
in a general way in this institution and finally there are 4 authorities. This is a
representative sample size in this research; thus, it will be feasible work having an
appropriate population that represents all sample size.
28
POPULATION
NUMBER
Authorities
Teachers
15
22
TOTAL
59
3.2.4.1.
SURVEY:
4.
CHAPTER I
30
4.2.
CHAPTER II
4.3.
CHAPTER III
Justification
Objectives
Operational Plan proposal
Overall results of the implementation of the proposal
5. ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
5.1.
RESOURCES
HUMAN RESOURCES
MATERIAL
TECHNOLOGICAL
Authorities
RESOURCES
Photocopies
Laptop
RESOURCES
Teachers
Sheets of paper
Pen drives
Students
Books
Printer
31
Researcher
Pens
Internet
Cellphone
Children
5.2.
BUDGET
ITEM
QUANTITY
COST
Transportation
$50.00
Internet service
$60.00
Photocopies
1500
$30.00
Printings
300
$35.00
Unexpected expenses
$80.00
TOTAL
$255.00
32
6.
CHRONOGRAM
33
ACTIVITY
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
34
8. ANNEXES
1. Which of the following do you think is the most appropriate role for students to
develop their speaking?
a. Be creative
b. Be Questing
c. Be Reflective
d. Be critical
e. All of the above
2. Do you agree that the role of the teacher must be: facilitator, guide, facilitator,
researcher, and evaluator to assist the learning of the English language?
Yes
NO
PERHAPS
3. According to his knowledge, what kind of skills are useful for developing the
ability to talk English?
Speaking _____ listening _____
Reading _____ writing_____
35
Perhaps
5. Do you think that the interaction of the English with native speakers will help to
improve the speaking skill in the students?
Yes
NO
PERHAPS
6. Which strategies and sources do you think should the students use to improve
their fluency in speaking?
a. Read books
b. Listen audios
c. practice all the time
d. All of the above
7. According to your point of view, is it necessary a clear communication of the
English language to develop a good speaking?
Yes
NO
Perhaps
36
8. With regard to your knowledge, would the correct use of grammar help to have a
high level of speaking?
Yes
NO
Perhaps
NO
Perhap
37
38