Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Aim. The purpose of this longitudinal correlative study was to explore the degree, compare the differences and to detect the
relationships of uncertainty, social support and psychological adjustment for older cancer patients who were undergoing
surgery.
Background. While the number of the older cancer patients has been increasing, there has been little research exploring their
needs with respect to psychological adjustment during cancer treatment.
Design. The study used a pre-/postdescriptive design.
Methods. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 43 patients aged 6584 from six surgery wards in a medical centre in northern
Taiwan from Jaunary 2005May 2005. Participants were interviewed one to two days prior to surgery and interviewed again
one to two days before hospital discharge. Demographic data, Mishels Uncertainty Illness Scale, Hospital Anxiety and
Depression Scale and the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List were used to collect data.
Results. Uncertainty varied with cancer stage. At the time of surgery, the patients had moderate levels of uncertainty. There was
a significant decrease in uncertainty at the second data collection period before hospital discharge. In these participants, anxiety
was significantly associated with past medical history. The participants obtained social support from family members, physicians, nurses, relatives and other patients. Married patients had higher levels of social support than those without a spouse.
Significant relationships were found among uncertainty and anxiety and depression. Interestingly, a positive relationship
between anxiety and social support after surgery was also identified.
Conclusion. Increasing levels of social support could ameliorate the degree of uncertainty, anxiety and depression in older
cancer patients. Nurses should provide resources to establish an effective social network to older cancer patients who were being
treated surgically.
Relevance to clinical practice. These findings can assist nurses in understanding the psychological adjustment needs among older
cancer patients who were undergoing surgery and provide appropriate intervention in nursing care.
Key words: cancer, nurses, nursing, psychosocial, quantitative, surgical
Accepted for publication: 15 June 2008
Introduction
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 23112319
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02549.x
2311
The study
Aims
This study was undertaken in an attempt to:
1 Identify the levels of uncertainty, social support and psychological adjustment during the surgical treatment experience in older patients with cancer.
2 Compare the differences in uncertainty, social support and
psychological adjustment before and after surgery in these
patients.
3 Explore the relatedness among uncertainty, social support
and psychological adjustment during the period of the
surgery.
Terms
For this study, the key terms were defined as follows:
1 Older cancer patient is a patient age 65 or more, who has
been diagnosed by a physician as having cancer. In this
study, patients were hospitalised and their cancer was
being treated surgically.
2 Uncertainty refers to the older cancer patients uncertainty
of diagnoses, surgery, care systems and so on. In this study,
uncertainty was measured by the Chinese version of Mishels Uncertainty Illness Scale (MUIS; Sheu & Hwang
1996).
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 23112319
Patient perspectives
Methods
Research design
The study used a pre-/postdescriptive design. Participants
were recruited one to two days prior to surgery and
interviewed again one to two days before hospital discharge.
A 1014-day interval elapsed between the two data collection
periods.
Sample
Inclusion criteria for study participation included:
1 age 65 or more
2 no impairments in communication and able to communicate in Mandarian or Taiwanese
3 no history of mental illness
4 willing to participate as signified by signing an informed
consent.
Using procedures described by Cohen (1977), with a power
of 080, alpha of 005 and medium effect, with three variables
(uncertainty, social support and psychological adjustment),
the minimum sample required was determined to be 32
participants.
Using purposive methods (Polit & Sherman 1990), 58
participants were recruited from six general and colorectal
surgical wards of a medical centre located in northern
Taiwan from Jaunary 2005May 2005. Finally, the total
sample size was 43. Fifteen participants did not count for the
study sample because two of them were diagnosed with
benignant tumors, two participants had a further worsening
of physical condition and 11 did n0t complete the second
interview after surgery.
Research instruments
Demographic data
Demographic data included age, gender, education, religion,
medical history, surgical experience, marital status, living
status, surgical types, cancer stage, understanding of illness
and two open-end questions regarding the older cancer
patients feelings about their surgery.
Mishel Uncertainty Illness Scale
The Chinese version of MUIS was used in this study, which
was translated from English to Chinese by Sheu and
Hwang (1996). The MUIS is a 25-item scale that asks
participants to rate items on a five point scale that depicts
the two components of illness uncertainty: ambiguity and
complexity. This scale yields a single composite score, with
higher scores reflecting greater illness uncertainty. In this
study, the Cronbachs alpha is 088 for the total MUIS; it is
085 for the subscale of ambiguity and 077 for the
complexity part.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
The Chinese version of Zigmond and Snaiths HADS (1983)
was used, which was translated from English by Chen et al.
(2000) with permission. The scale consists of 14 questions
with two subscales: anxiety (seven questions) and depression
(seven questions). Cronbachs alpha for the anxiety subscale
is 084 and 075 for the depression subscale.
Interpersonal Support Evaluation List
The Chinese version of ISEL translated by Wan (1997) was
used to measure social support. With permission from Wan,
the scale was modified to reflect the experience of the patients
in this study. The scale includes 16 questions that are divided
into four subscales: emotion, information, appraisal and
instrumental support. Emotional support refers to the feelings
of understanding and receiving. Informational support is the
provision of information to the patient during a time of
stress. Appraisal support refers to the patients ability to
reflect and self-evaluate and instrumental support refers to
material aid and assistance. The overall Cronbachs alpha of
the instrument is 094.
Data analysis
Data were analysed by SPSS for Windows version 120 (SPSS
Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) using frequency, percentage, range,
mean, SD, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U-test,
KruskalWallis test and Person product-moment collelation
coefficient.
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 23112319
2313
Results
Uncertainty
Demographic profile
The majority of patients were men (93%) with an average age
of 75 years (range: 653838; SD 501). Approximately half
(488%) had graduated from high school or had a higher
degrees. Most (698%) were married and lived with their
family (884%). Three quarters of the sample had a prior
medical history, with 535% having been hospitalised more
than twice. Most patients (628%) understood their state of
illness, with 442% in cancer stage III or cancer stage IV.
Almost all the participants (907%) underwent abdominal
surgery (Table 1).
Variable
Group
Demographic characteristics
Gender
Male
Female
Age
6574 years
7584 years
Education
Illiteracy/literacy
Primacy/junior high
school
Over senior high
school
Religious
No
Yes
Marital status
Single/widow
Married
Living status
Living with family
Alone/veterans home
Medical history
No
Yes
Hospitalised
0
Once
Over twice
Surgical experience
0
Once
Over twice
Awareness of
Yes
condiction
No
Disease characteristics
Surgical type
Abdomen
Abdomen and
colostomy
Cancer stage
0/I stage
II stage
III/IV stage
2314
n (%)
40
3
17
26
11
11
(930)
(70)
(395)
(605)
(256)
(256)
Range
Mean (SD)
65258375
7506 (501)
21 (488)
20
23
13
30
38
5
11
32
8
12
23
15
15
13
27
16
(465)
(535)
(302)
(698)
(884)
(116)
(256)
(744)
(186)
(279)
(535)
(349)
(349)
(302)
(628)
(372)
39 (907)
4 (93)
10 (233)
14 (326)
19 (442)
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 23112319
Patient perspectives
Variable
Before
surgery
After
surgery
p-value
Uncertainty (overall)
Ambiguity
Complexity
Social support (overall)
Family
Relatives
Patients
Physicians and nurses
Emotional support
Family
Relatives
Patients
Physicians and nurses
Informational support
Family
Relatives
Patients
Physicians and nurses
Appraisal support
Family
Relatives
Patients
Physicians and nurses
Instrumental support
Family
Relatives
Patients
Physicians and nurses
5960
3793
2167
7781
3688
1112
293
2688
2140
1044
370
112
614
1691
486
165
067
972
2479
1095
372
102
909
1472
1063
205
012
193
5563
3412
2151
8974
3921
1753
344
2956
2453
1019
619
116
700
1984
667
209
091
1016
2888
1119
626
116
1028
1649
1116
300
021
212
0032*
0003**
0631
0006**
0041*
0004**
0484
0128
0039*
0677
0001**
0954
0376
0091
0052
0222
0573
0213
0002**
0174
0004**
0711
0037*
0091
0065
0264
0524
0570
(877)
(633)
(340)
(2874)
(1076)
(1465)
(691)
(818)
(945)
(309)
(437)
(239)
(380)
(1024)
(527)
(370)
(219)
(228)
(748)
(272)
(498)
(240)
(329)
(609)
(291)
(364)
(054)
(215)
(1056)
(705)
(442)
(3001)
(1172)
(1470)
(682)
(865)
(931)
(331)
(435)
(208)
(368)
(1000)
(579)
(377)
(244)
(271)
(758)
(758)
(462)
(236)
(292)
(716)
(275)
(443)
(071)
(215)
Psychological adjustment
In this study, most of the participants reported no anxiety or
depression prior to surgery. After the surgery, anxiety
decreased from 11647% and depression decreased from
11670%. These differences were not significant. However,
medical history had a significant impact on anxiety at the two
data collection periods (p = 003). The anxiety average of
patients without a past medical history increased from 127
(SD 190) before surgery to 218 (SD 363) after surgery.
Patients with a medical history had a decrease in anxiety,
from 488 (SD 482) before surgery to 284 (SD 376) prior to
discharge.
Social support
Variable
Anxiety level
Before surgery
After surgery
Depression level
Before surgery
After surgery
Overall
uncertainty
Ambiguous
uncertainty
Complexity
uncertainty
0480**
0411**
0489**
0509**
0328*
0168
0386*
0376*
0411**
0406**
0232
0250
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 23112319
2315
Variable
Social support
before surgery
Uncertainty level
Overall
0186
Ambiguity
0175
Complexity
0154
Anxiety and depression level
Anxiety
0178
Depression
0291
Social support
after surgery
0249
0096
0443**
0303*
0071
Discussion
The uncertainty of illness
Participants had a moderate level of uncertainty overall prior
to surgery. Compared with the mean uncertainty score (664)
documented by Sheu et al. (1998), the mean uncertainty score
of the present study was lower. Tsai et al. (1999) noted that
uncertainty seems to decrease with age, while younger
patients have higher levels of uncertainty. The results of this
study corroborate this finding. It may be because the
participants in this study are over 65. Many of the participants said that because they are so old, they tend not to
worry and leave everything to the doctor. Near the end of life,
when they have fewer unfinished duties and obligations, they
felt less uncertainty than when they were younger.
In this study, after surgery, the uncertainty score was in the
low middle range. This finding is similar to that of Tsai
(2003) with a mean uncertainty score of 572 for women
diagnosed with breast cancer who were treated with surgery.
The findings of the present study demonstrate that after
surgery, uncertainty in these older participants was similar to
the uncertainty level of other patients.
During the surgery, the source of uncertainty is primarily
ambiguity, which shows that the patient facing surgery
cannot predict or handle his/her own illness and the outcome
of the surgical treatment. After the surgery, the patients
worry about what will happen when they return home, i.e.
will they be able to manage and cope (Galloway & Graydon
2316
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 23112319
Patient perspectives
Limitations
Owing to constraints of funds and time, this longitudinal
correlative study collected participants before their surgery
and near the time of discharge from only six wards of general
surgery and colorectal surgery in a medical centre. Longer
follow-up, with the patients in their homes in the community,
would provide a broader picture of their experience. In
addition, findings will be enhanced with data collected from
a wider range of settings, types of surgery and number of
participants.
Another limitation of this study was the fact that the
majority of participants (93%) were men. This is partly
accounted for by the fact that the sites used for participant
recruitment treat primarily male patients. Another interesting
reason was that family members of female patients perceived
the women would be psychologically harmed by participation and refused permission. According to some reports,
gender influences uncertainty, social support and psychological adjustment (Mishel 1981, Cheng 1996, Kim et al.
2002, Tsai 2003). Replication of this study would be
enhanced with more female participants.
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 23112319
2317
Conclusions
The findings of this study provides guidance for nurses
engaged in clinical practice as well as research.
Contributions
Study design: CYL, HRL; data collection and analysis: CYL,
HRL, ITK, MLC and manuscript preparation: CYL, HRL.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the participants and their family
members who shared their experiences as part of this study.
In addition, the authors acknowledge the funding support of
2318
References
Arora NK, Rutten LJF, Gustafson DH, Moser R & Hawkins RP
(2007) Perceived helpfulness and impact of social support provided
by family, friends and health care providers to women newly
diagnosed with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 16, 474486.
Bloom JR, Stewart SL, Johnstone M, Banks P & Fobair P (2001)
Sources of support and the physical and mental well-being of
young women with breast cancer. Social Science and Medicine 53,
15131524.
Chang WH, Huang MF & Chang SM (1989) The relation between
the adjustment strategy and health self evaluation of the senior
citizens in Taipei area. Chinese Journal of Public Health 9, 6882.
Chen ML, Chang HK & Yeh CH (2000) Anxiety and depression in
Taiwanese cancer patients with and without. Journal of Advanced
Nursing 32, 944951.
Cheng SZ (1996) Exploration of social support system for elderly in
aging society. Journal of Chinese Home Economics 25, 6676.
Clayton MF, Mishel MH & Belyea M (2006) Testing a model of
symptoms, communication, uncertainty and well-being, in older
breast cancer survivors. Research in Nursing and Health 29,
1839.
Cohen J (1977) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral
Sciences. Academic Press, New York.
Cohen S, Mermelstein R, Kamarck T & Hoberman H (1985) Measuring the functional components of social support. In Social
Support: Theory, Research and Applications (Sarason IG & Sarason BR eds). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 2137.
Council for Economic Planning and Development (2006) Population
Projections for Taiwan Area 2006-1051. Available at: http://
www.cepd.gov.tw/encontent/m1.asp (accessed 26 January 2008).
Dakof GA & Taylor SE (1990) Victims perceptions of social support: what is helpful from whom? Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology 58, 8089.
Department of Health, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (2008) Statistics of
Causes of Death. Available at: http://www.doh.gov.tw./EN2006/
DM/DM2_p01.asp (accessed 26 January 2008).
Department of Statistics, Ministry of the Interior (2008) Monthly
Bulletin of Interior Statistics: Resident Population by 5-year Age
Group. Available at: http://www.moi.gov.tw./stat (accessed 26
January 2008).
Devine D, Parker PA, Fouladi RT & Cohen L (2003) The association
between social support, instrusive thoughts, avoidance and
adjustment following an experimental cancer treatment. PsychoOncology 12, 453462.
Dirkson SR (2000) Predictng well-being among breast cancer survivors. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32, 937943.
Flanagan J & Holmes S (2000) Social perceptions of cancer and their
impacts: implications for practice arising from the literature.
Journal of Advanced Nursing 32, 740749.
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 23112319
Patient perspectives
Galloway SC & Graydon JE (1996) Uncertainty, symptom distress
and information needs after surgery for cancer of the colon. Cancer
Nursing 19, 112117.
Gil KM, Mishel MH, Belyea M, Germino B, Porter LS & Clayton M
(2006) Benefits of the uncertainty management intervention for
African American and White older breast cancer survivors: 20month outcomes. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 13,
286294.
Hinds G. & Moyer A (1997) Support as experienced by patients with
cancer during radiotherapy treatments. Journal of Advanced
Nursing 26, 371379.
Kim HS, Yeom HA, Seo YS, Kim NC & Yoo YS (2002) Stress and
coping strategies of patients with cancer: a Korean study. Cancer
Nursing 25, 425431.
Langford CP, Bowsher J, Maloney JP & Lillis PP (1997) Social
support: a conceptual analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 25,
95100.
Lee MY, Shaw CK, Sheu S & Change HT (2002) A study of breast
cancer patients uncertainty and impact factors. Tzu Chi Nursing
Journal 1, 5765.
Lindsey AM, Norbeck JS, Carrieri VL & Perry E (1981) Social
support and health outcomes in postmastectomy women: a review.
Cancer Nursing 4, 377384.
Makabe R & Nomizu R (2007) Social support and psychological and
physical states among Japanese women with breast cancer before
and after breast surgery. Onclogy Nursing Forum 34, 883889.
Mishel MH (1981) The measurement of uncertainty in illness.
Nursing Research 30, 258263.
Mishel MH (1988) Uncertainty in illness. Image The Journal of
Nursing Scholarship 20, 225232.
Mishel MH & Braden CJ (1988) Finding meaning: antecedents of
uncertainty in illness. Nursing Research 37, 98103.
Mishel MH, Hostetter T, King B & Graham V (1984) Predictors of
psychosocial adjustment in patients newly diagnosed with gynecological cancer. Cancer Nursing 7, 291299.
Mo HC (2003) Bio-Psychosocial Adjustment and Social Support of
Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Graduate School of Nursing,
National Yang-Ming University.
Polit DF & Sherman RE (1990) Statistical power in nursing research.
Nursing Research 39, 365369.
2009 The Authors. Journal compilation 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 23112319
2319