Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

35320 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS: EFFECTIVE DATE: July 31, 2006. If no ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE
Office of the Secretary of comments are received, the proposal SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND
Transportation Information Services, will become effective on the above date. THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
Department of Transportation, 400 If comments are received, the comments To another Federal agency (a) with an
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC will be considered and, where adopted, interest in the record in connection with
20590; Federal Highway Administration the documents will be republished with a referral of a Freedom of Information
Office of Information Management, 400 changes. Act (FOIA) request to that agency for its
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kara
views or decision on disclosure, or (b)
20590; Director, Office of Spooner, Department of Transportation, in order to obtain advice and
Administration, Volpe National Office of the Secretary, 400 7th Street, recommendations concerning matters
Transportation Systems Center, 55 SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366– on which the agency has specialized
Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02142; 1965 (telephone), (202) 366–7373 (fax), experience or particular competence
Director, Transportation Safety Institute, kara.spooner@dot.gov (Internet that may be useful to DOT in making
6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma address). required determinations under the
City, Oklahoma 73169; Director, Office FOIA. See also Prefatory Statement of
of Administration, Saint Lawrence SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The General Routine Uses.
Seaway Development Corporation at Department of Transportation system of
records notice subject to the Privacy Act DISCLOSURE TO CONSUMER REPORTING
180 Andrews Street, Massena, New
AGENCIES:
York 13662–0520. of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, has
been published in the Federal Register None.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
and is available from the above POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,
Individuals seeking to determine mentioned address. RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND
whether their information is contained
DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
in this system should address written DOT/ALL 17
inquiries to the Department of STORAGE:
SYSTEM NAME:
Transportation Freedom Of Information Records are stored manually in file
Act and Privacy Act Office at 400 Freedom of Information Act and folders and electronically in databases.
Seventh Street, SW., Washington DC Privacy Act Case Files.
20590. Requests should include name, RETRIEVABILITY:
address and telephone number and SECURITY CLASSIFICATION: Records are retrieved by the name of
describe the records you seek. Unclassified, non-sensitive. the individual who made the request or
FOIA case tracking or control number.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: SYSTEM LOCATION:
Same as ‘‘Notification procedure.’’ These records are located at SAFEGUARDS:

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: Department of Transportation (DOT) Computer records are maintained in a
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and secure, password protected computer
Same as ‘‘System Manager. ‘‘
Privacy Act (PA) offices located in system. Paper records are maintained in
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: Washington, DC, as well as FOIA lockable file cabinets. All records are
Individuals provide their name and Coordination offices at regional maintained in secure, access-controlled
mailing address directly as part of the locations. areas or buildings.
request to obtain copies of publications.
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:
These requests are accepted by the
Department of Transportation, its SYSTEM: Records are retained according to the
operating administrations, and its Individuals who submit FOIA and PA National Archives’ General Records
contractors by telephone, fax, public requests and administrative appeals to Schedule 14 for FOIA request, appeal,
Web site, postal mail, and e-mail. DOT. control, reports and administrative files
and Privacy Act request, amendment
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: case, accounting of disclosure, control
None. This system contains records and and administrative files.
Dated: June 13, 2006. related correspondence on individuals SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:
Kara Spooner, who have filed requests for information
under the provisions of the Freedom of Freedom of Information Act Officer,
Departmental Privacy Officer.
Information Act and Privacy Act of Department of Transportation, 400 7th
[FR Doc. E6–9581 Filed 6–16–06; 8:45 am] Street, SW., Room 5432, Washington,
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
1974, including requests for review of
initial denials of such requests; copies DC 20590, for all elements of the
of requested records and records under Department of Transportation except the
administrative appeal. Federal Aviation Administration;
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Freedom of Information Act Officer,
Office of the Secretary AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM: Federal Aviation Administration, 800
5 U.S.C. 552, Freedom of Information Independence Avenue, Washington, DC
Privacy Act of 1974: System of Act, as amended, and 5 U.S.C. 552a, the 20591.
Records Privacy Act of 1974, as amended. NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT. Same as ‘‘System Manager.’’
PURPOSE(S):
ACTION: Notice to establish a system of
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

records. These records are maintained to RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:


process individuals’ requests made Same as ‘‘System Manager.’’
SUMMARY: DOT intends to establish a under the provisions of the Freedom of
system of records under the Privacy Act Information Act and Privacy Act of CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
of 1974. 1974. Same as ‘‘System Manager.’’

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:46 Jun 16, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM 19JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices 35321

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: 92007, Los Angeles, California, 90009– use and management of the navigable
Those individuals who submit initial 2007. Telephone: 310/725–3614. airspace and air traffic control systems,
requests and administrative appeals Documents reflecting this FAA action or adversely affecting other powers and
pursuant to FOIA and PA, the agency may be reviewed in the Office of the responsibilities of the Administrator
records obtained in the process of Airports Division, 15000 Aviation prescribed by law.
responding to such requests and Boulevard, Room 3012, Hawthorne, Specific limitations with respect to
appeals, and DOT personnel who California, 90261. FAA’s approval of an airport noise
handle such requests and appeals. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This compatibility program are delineated in
notice announces that the FAA has FAR Part 150, section 150.5. Approval
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
given its overall approval to the Noise is not a determination concerning the
During the course of a FOIA or PA acceptability of land uses under Federal,
action, exempt materials from other Compatibility Program for Scottsdale
Airport, effective May 30, 2006. Under State, or local law. Approval does not by
systems of records may in turn become itself constitute an FAA implementing
part of the case records in this system. section 104(a) of the Aviation Safety and
Noise Abatement Act of 1979, as action. A request for Federal action or
To the extent that copies of exempt approval to implement specific noise
records from those ‘other’ systems of amended (herein after referred to as the
‘‘Act’’) [recodified as 49 U.S.C. 47504], compatibility measures may be
records are entered into the FOIA/PA required, and an FAA decision on the
case file, the same exemptions apply for an airport operator who has previously
submitted a Noise Exposure Map may request may require an environmental
those records, as are claimed for the assessment of the proposed action.
original systems of records which they submit to the FAA a Noise
Approval does not constitute a
are a part. Compatibility Program which sets forth
commitment by the FAA to financially
the measures taken or proposed by the
Dated: June 13, 2006. assist in the implementation of the
airport operator for the reduction of
Kara Spooner, program nor a determination that all
existing non-compatible land uses and
Departmental Privacy Officer. measures covered by the program are
prevention of additional non-compatible
[FR Doc. E6–9580 Filed 6–16–06; 8:45 am] eligible for grant-in-aid funding from the
land uses within the area covered by the
FAA under the Airport and Airway
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P Noise Exposure Maps. The Act requires
Improvement Act of 1982, as amended.
such programs to be developed in
Where federal funding is sought,
consultation with interested and requests for project grants must be
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION affected parties including local submitted to the FAA Airports Division
communities, government agencies, Office in Hawthorne, California.
Federal Aviation Administration
airport users, and FAA personnel. The City of Scottsdale submitted to
Approval of Noise Compatibility Each airport noise compatibility the FAA on October 13, 2004, the Noise
Program for Scottsdale Airport, program developed in accordance with Exposure Maps, descriptions, and other
Scottsdale, AZ Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part documentation produced during the
150 is a local program, not a Federal noise compatibility planning study
AGENCY: Federal Aviation program. The FAA does not substitute conducted from September 28, 1982
Administration, DOT. its judgment for that of the airport through October 13, 2004. The
ACTION: Notice. proprietor with respect to which Scottsdale Airport Noise Exposure Maps
measures should be recommended for were determined by FAA to be in
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation
action. The FAA’s approval or compliance with applicable
Administration (FAA) announces its disapproval of FAR Part 150 program
findings on the noise compatibility requirements on January 21, 2005.
recommendations is measured Notice of this determination was
program submitted by the City of according to the standards expressed in
Scottsdale, Arizona under the published in the Federal Register on
Part 150 and the Act and is limited to February 7, 2005.
provisions of Title I of the Aviation the following determinations:
Safety and Noise Abatement Act, as The Scottsdale Airport study contains
a. The Noise Compatibility Program a proposed noise compatibility program
amended, (Public Law 96–193) was developed in accordance with the
(hereinafter referred to as ‘‘the Act’’) and comprised of actions designed for
provisions and procedures of FAR Part phased implementation by airport
14 CFR part 150. These findings are 150; management and adjacent jurisdictions
made in recognition of the description b. Program measures are reasonably from September 28, 1982 to beyond the
of Federal and nonfederal consistent with achieving the goals of year 2009). It was requested that the
responsibilities in Senate Report No. reducing existing non-compatible land FAA evaluate and approve this material
96–52 (1980). On January 21, 2005, the uses around the airport and preventing as a Noise Compatibility Program as
FAA determined that the noise exposure the introduction of additional non- described in 49 U.S.C. 47504 (formerly
maps submitted by the City of compatible land uses; Section 104(b) of the Act). The FAA
Scottsdale under Part 150 were in c. Program measures would not create began its review of the program on
compliance with applicable an undue burden on interstate or foreign October 13, 2004 and was required by
requirements. commerce, unjustly discriminate against a provision of the Act to approve or
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date types or classes of aeronautical uses, disapprove the program within 180 days
of the FAA’s approval of the Noise violate the terms of airport grant (other than the use of new or modified
Compatibility Program for Scottsdale agreements, or intrude into areas flight procedures for noise control).
Airport is May 30, 2006. preempted by the Federal Government; Failure to approve or disapprove such
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: and program within the 180-day period shall
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

Michelle Simmons, Environmental d. Program measures relating to the be deemed to be an approval of such
Protection Specialist, Airports Division, use of flight procedures can be program.
Arizona Standards Section, AWP–623.4, implemented within the period covered The submitted program contained
Western-Pacific Region, Federal by the program without derogating thirty (30) proposed actions for noise
Aviation Administration, P.O. Box safety, adversely affecting the efficient abatement, land use planning and

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:46 Jun 16, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM 19JNN1

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi