Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

U.S.

Department of Justice
Executive Office for Immigration Review

Board ofImmigration Appeals


Office ofthe Clerk
5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2000
Falls Church, Virginia 22041

DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel - BOS


P.0. Box 8728
Boston, MA 02114

Name: PEREIRA, RAQUEL LUZIA FERR...

A 099-202-663

Date of this notice: 9/2/2015

Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case.
Sincerely,

DCWtL

aJVL)

Donna Carr
Chief Clerk
Enclosure
Panel Members:
Grant, Edward R.

Userteam: Docket

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit


www.irac.net/unpublished/index/
Cite as: Raquel Luzia Ferreira Pereira, A099 202 663 (BIA Sept. 2, 2015)

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC | www.irac.net

Gordon, Micol Mion Esq.


Immigration Solutions LLC
585 Boylston Street
Boston, MA 02116

U.S. Department of Justice

Executive Office for Immigration Review

Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Falls Church, Virginia 22041

File: A099 202 663 - Boston, MA

Date:

In re: RAQUEL LUZIA FERREIRA PEREIRA

SEP - 2 2015

APPEAL
ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Micol Mion Gordon, Esquire
APPLICATION: Reopening
The respondent has appealed the Immigration Judge's order, dated July 31, 2014, which
denied the motion to reopen her in absentia removal proceedings from a hearing held on
January 5, 2010. The record will be remanded to the Immigration Judge for the preparation of a
new decision.
We review an Immigration Judge's findings of fact for clear error; but questions of law,
discretion, and judgment, and all other issues in appeals, are reviewed de novo. 8 C.F.R.
1003.1(d)(3)(i), (ii).
After our review of the record, we find it necessary to remand the record for the preparation
of a new decision as we conclude the Immigration Judge's decision is inadequate for review.
The Immigration Judge denied the respondent's motion to reopen in a form order that is
incomplete, and by use of a stamp with a brief handwritten note on a copy of the respondent's
motion. Under these circumstances, we find it appropriate to remand the record to the
Immigration Judge for preparation of a decision that includes sufficient findings of fact and
conclusions of law for us to review. See, e.g., Matter of A-P-, 22 l&N Dec. 468 (BIA 1999).
Accordingly, the following order will be entered.
ORDER: The record is remanded to the Immigration Judge for the entry of a new decision.

Cite as: Raquel Luzia Ferreira Pereira, A099 202 663 (BIA Sept. 2, 2015)

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC | www.irac.net

IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS

..

.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
IMMIGRATION COURT
BOSTON,MA
)
)

RAQUEL LUZIA FERREIRA PEREIRA) IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS


A99 202 663
)
)

ORDER OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE


Upon consideration of Lamon Ferreira-De Oliveira's Motion to Rescind in Absentia
Removal Order andp.;open Proceedings, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the motion be
DGRANTED
ENIED because:
o DHS does not oppose the motion;
o A response to the motion has not been filed with the Court;
o Good cause has been established for the motion;
o The Court agrees with the reasons stated in the opposition motion
o The motion is untimely per-------------
O Other ----------------------Deadlines:
o The application for relief must be filed by______.:::::::'.::!._,_______
o The respondent must comply with OHS biometri
by_______________-#--------___.-,

ertificate __of Service This document was served by;_


Mail [
Personal Service -kJ J>lfS
/
To: [ ]Alien, [ ]Alien c/o Custodial Officer, en's Atty/Rep, ['-fBy: Court Staff
/

NI'

[] Date:

'8'/f!Z-,/) It/

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC | www.irac.net

IN THE MATTER OF:

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi