32374 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.
107 / Monday, June 5, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
Maritime Advisory Committee for
Occupational Safety and Health
(MACOSH); Notice of Re-
Establishment
AGENCY:Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
Notice of re-establishment of
ACTION:
MACOSH.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
provisions of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA), as amended (5
U.S.C., App. 2), and after consultation
with the General Services
Administration (GSA), the Secretary of
Labor has determined that the re-
establishment of the Maritime Advisory
Committee for Occupational Safety and
Health (MACOSH) is in the public
interest. The Committee will better
enable OSHA to perform the duties
imposed by the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act), 84 Stat.
1590, 29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) Authority to
establish this Committee is found in
sections 6(b) and 7(b) of the OSH Act;
Section 41 of the Longshore and Harbor
Workers’ Compensation Act (33 U.S.C.
941), and other general agency authority
in Title 5 of the United States Code, and
29 CFR part 1912.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Maddux, Director, Office of Maritime
within the Directorate of Standards and
Guidance, U.S. Department of Labor,
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Room N–3609, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210; Telephone: (202) 693–2086.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Committee will advise OSHA on
matters relevant to the safety and health
of workers in the maritime industry.
This includes advice on maritime issues
that will result in more effective
enforcement, training, and outreach
programs, and streamlined regulatory
efforts. The maritime industry includes
employers in the shipbuilding, ship
repair, shipbreaking, longshoring, and
marine terminal industries.
The committee will function solely as
an advisory body and in compliance
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
with the provisions of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act and OSHA’s
regulations covering advisory
committees (29 CFR part 1912). The
Committee charter will be filed 15 days
from the date of this publication.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:33 Jun 02, 2006 Jkt 208001
II. Authority
Sections 6(b) and 7(b) of the
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (29 U.S.C. 655, 656), section 41 of
the Longshore and Harbor Workers’
Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 941), other
general agency authority in Title 5 of the
United States Code, and 29 CFR part
1912.
Elaine L. Chao,
Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. E6–8656 Filed 6–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the Arts; Arts
Advisory Panel—Notice of Change
Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub.
L. 92–463), as amended, notice is hereby
given that a teleconference application
review meeting of the Arts Advisory
Panel (AccessAbility section) to the
National Council on the Arts, previously
announced for June 7, 2006, will instead
be held on June 19, 2006, from 2 p.m.–
3 p.m. (EDT) from the Nancy Hanks
Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20506 (ending
time is approximate).
Closed meetings are for the purpose of
Panel review, discussion, evaluation,
and recommendations on financial
assistance under the National
Foundation on the Arts and the
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended,
including information given in
confidence to the agency. In accordance
with the determination of the Chairman
of February 27, 2006, these sessions will
be closed to the public pursuant to
subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title
5, United States Code.
Further information with reference to
these meetings can be obtained from Ms.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of
Guidelines & Panel Operations, National
Endowment for the Arts, Washington,
DC 20506, or call 202/682–5691.
Dated: May 29, 2006.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations,
National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. E6–8662 Filed 6–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
Submission for OMB review;
ACTION:
comment request.
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) has submitted the
following information collection
requirement to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. This is the second notice for public
comment; the first was published in the
Federal Register at 71 FR 4382, and no
comments were received. NSF is
forwarding the proposed renewal
submission to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for clearance
simultaneously with the publication of
this second notice. Comments regarding
(a) whether the collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of burden including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; or (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology should be
addressed to: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for National Science
Foundation, 725–17th Street, NW.,
Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503,
and to Catherine Hines, Acting Reports
Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Suite 295, Arlington, Virginia 22230 or
send e-mail to chines@nsf.gov.
Comments regarding these information
collections are best assured of having
their full effect if received within 30
days of this notification. Copies of the
submission(s) may be obtained by
calling 703–292–4414.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine Hines at (703) 292–4414 or
send email to chines@nsf.gov.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time,
Monday through Friday.
NSF may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number
and the agency informs potential
persons who are to respond to the
collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
05JNN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 107 / Monday, June 5, 2006 / Notices
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: New Project Data
Form.
OMB Control No.: 3145–New.
Abstract: The New Project Data Form
is a component of all grant proposals
submitted to NSF’s Division of
Undergraduate Education. This form
collects information needed to direct
proposals to appropriate reviewers and
to report the estimated collective impact
of proposed projects on institutions,
students, and faculty members.
Requested information includes the
discipline of the proposed project,
collaborating organizations involved in
the project, the academic level on which
the project focuses (e.g., lower-level
undergraduate courses, upper-level
undergraduate courses), characteristics
of the organization submitting the
proposal, special audiences (if any) that
the project would target (e.g., women,
minorities, persons with disabilities),
strategic foci (if any) of the project (e.g.,
research on teaching and learning,
international activities, integration of
research and education), and the
number of students and faculty at
different educational levels who would
benefit from the project.
Respondents: Investigators who
submit proposals to NSF’s Division of
Undergraduate Education.
Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: 2,500.
Burden on the Public: 20 minutes (per
response) for an annual total of 833
hours.
Dated: May 31, 2006.
Catherine J. Hines,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, National
Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 06–5103 Filed 6–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:33 Jun 02, 2006 Jkt 208001
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–277 and 50–278, License
Nos. DPR–44 and DPR–56; Docket No. 50–
354, License No. NPF–57; Docket Nos. 50–
272 and 50–311, License Nos. DPR–70 and
DPR–75]
In the Matter of PSEG Nuclear LLC;
Exelon Generation Company, LLC;
(Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station,
Unit Nos. 2 and 3); (Hope Creek
Generating Station); (Salem Nuclear
Generating Station Unit Nos. 1 and 2);
Order Approving Transfers of Licenses
and Conforming Amendments
I the licenses, to the extent held by PSEG
PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG Nuclear)
owns Hope Creek Generating Station
(Hope Creek), a 57.41-percent interest in
Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit
Nos. 1 and 2 (Salem), and a 50-percent
interest in Peach Bottom Atomic Power
Station, Unit Nos. 2 and 3 (Peach
Bottom). Exelon Generation Company,
LLC (EGC) owns the remaining interests
in Salem and Peach Bottom. PSEG
Nuclear holds the Facility Operating
License, No. NPF–57, for Hope Creek,
co-holds the Facility Operating
Licenses, Nos. DPR–70 and DPR–75, for
Salem, and co-holds the Renewed
Facility Operating Licenses, Nos. DPR–
44 and DPR–56, for Peach Bottom, and
is authorized to possess, use, and,
except for Peach Bottom, operate the
facilities in accordance with the terms
and conditions of the licenses. EGC is
the other co-holder of the Renewed
Facility Operating Licenses for Peach
Bottom, and is authorized to possess,
use and operate Peach Bottom, and is
the other co-holder of the Facility
Operating Licenses for Salem, and is
authorized to possess Salem. Hope
Creek and Salem are located in Salem
County, New Jersey, and Peach Bottom
is located in York and Lancaster
Counties, Pennsylvania.
II
By letter dated March 3, 2005, as
supplemented by letters dated May 24
and October 5, 2005, EGC submitted an
application requesting approval of
direct license transfers that would be
necessary in connection with the
transfer of the ownership interests held
by PSEG Nuclear in Peach Bottom to
EGC. By letter dated March 4, 2005, as
supplemented by letters dated May 24
and October 6, 2005, PSEG Nuclear
submitted an application requesting
approval of direct license transfers that
would be necessary in connection with
the transfer to EGC of the ownership
interests held by PSEG Nuclear in Hope
Creek and Salem, and the transfer of
PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
32375
operating authority from PSEG Nuclear
to EGC.
All of the foregoing requests for
approval are associated with the
proposed merger of Public Service
Enterprise Group (the ultimate parent
company of PSEG Nuclear) into Exelon
Corporation (the ultimate parent
company of EGC). Upon completion of
the merger, Exelon Corporation will
change its name to Exelon Electric & Gas
Corporation (EEG). EEG will then
restructure its organization.
EGC and PSEG Nuclear also requested
NRC’s approval of conforming
administrative license amendments that,
in general, would reflect the transfers of
Nuclear, to EGC. No physical changes to
the facilities or operational changes
were proposed in the applications. After
completion of the proposed license
transfers, EGC would be the sole owner
and operator of the facilities.
EGC and PSEG Nuclear requested
approval of the transfers of the facility
operating licenses and conforming
license amendments pursuant to
Sections 50.80 and 50.90 of Title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR). Notices of the requests for
approval and an opportunity for a
hearing were published in the Federal
Register on August 2, 2005 (70 FR
44389, 70 FR 44397, and 70 FR 44398).
One petition for leave to intervene
pursuant to 10 CFR 2.309 was received
on August 21, 2005, from Mr. Eric
Joseph Epstein. By Memorandum and
Order CLI–05–26, dated October 26,
2005, the Commission rejected Mr.
Epstein’s claim of standing and
consequently dismissed the proceeding.
The Commission directed the NRC staff
to consider Mr. Epstein’s contentions
and supplemental filing dated October
7, 2005, as if they were ‘‘written
comments’’ under 10 CFR 2.1305. The
written comments have been considered
by the NRC staff in connection with the
issuance of this Order.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80, no license,
or any right thereunder, shall be
transferred, directly or indirectly,
through transfer of control of the
license, unless the Commission shall
give its consent in writing. Upon review
of the information in the applications
and other information before the
Commission, and relying upon the
representations and agreements
contained in the applications, the NRC
staff has determined that EGC is
qualified to hold the licenses for Hope
Creek, Salem, and Peach Bottom as
proposed in the applications, and that
the transfers of the licenses as proposed
in the applications are otherwise
consistent with applicable provisions of
05JNN1