Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Amanda M. Labrado
ENGL 100
Prof. Webb
2/28/10
An Analysis of Rhetoric
fictional narrative about an experienced teacher named Horace Smith. Horace works at Franklin
High School, and over the years he has witnessed the problems that force teachers to make
compromises, hindering their ability to produce great students. Horace wishes to change these
problems, and even has given up the option of retirement to do so; however, neither he, nor his
colleagues have any power to change the system, and if the system were to be changed, anything
altered would affect everything else, for all parts of the school system are interconnected. In his
narrative, Sizer uses Horace’s character to argue that high schools are often “not nearly what
[they] could be”(179), and that even though many high schools may be seen in a “good light” by
their surrounding communities, “The good light in which [a] community sees [a] school is not
deserved”(179). Sizer successfully persuades his audience to believe these arguments by using
Horace as an appeal to emotion; his readers can readily believe Horace, hold interest in Horace’s
character throughout the presentation of the argument, and can feel pity for Horace in a way that
[year old…] veteran English teacher” who, “among parents and graduates, […] is widely
considered a star faculty member” and is “respected by his colleagues” who “find him the
professional’s professional, even to a fault (179),” from this, the reader can surmise that Horace
High school who is respected by both parents and graduates. These distinctions convince the
reader that Horace is readily believable, might even be similar to someone they know, or is the
2
person the reader would like to be, causing the reader to want to believe Horace. Also, the reader
is able to recognize the reasons why the “good light is not deserved” by seeing the school’s
problems through Horace’s eyes; their opinion on the argument is influenced by the tone of the
narrative, because understanding Horace’s perspective allows them to concur their judgment
with Sizer’s argument that High schools “are not nearly what they could” be statement. Sizer’s
use of this type of familiarity to appeal to emotion, in the beginning of the story, is immensely
effective because he grabs the reader’s attention and interest before they have even heard the
argument. Sizer is at a great advantage here, because after he has the reader’s attention, he can
present his argument without almost any negative expectations from the audience; he has gained
characteristics of someone the audience can relate to, he has given them something to look
forward to: Characteristics that they are familiar with because they see them in their everyday
surroundings. Sizer essentially uses common ground to induce acquiescence toward his
a. When Sizer asserts that students bargain with their teachers for less work, “The kids
play a game with the school, making deals with us, striking bargains. What will be on the
test, Mr. Smith?” (180). Most teachers can say they have had this experience because I
myself have done it to them, and so do other students all the time, teachers just might not
think of it as “bargaining”.
b. When Sizer discusses the lack of one-on-one time that is “valuable for students”(182),
“Horace knows he should insist on a writing assignment from [them] every day […] but
with 120? Impossible 182).” Teachers know they need more time with their students and
do try to spend as much time as possible with them, but they know that it is almost
3
impossible to do so adequately with such a large load of students; they understand how
Horace feels.
c. When Sizer presents the fact that “age grading hurts kids (183)”: many teachers notice
the differences in maturity or intelligence among students, but they may not have thought
of changing the system to where students are separated by their intellect; therefore, the
reader can now see eye-to-eye wit Horace, because he has great ideas, but the question
Finding familiar ground with his audience and frequently referring back to it, allows Sizer to
hold the attention of his audience throughout the presentation of his argument. This technique
also allows him to control the thoughts of his audience on his argument by triggering their
emotions instead of their logic, for example, Sizer brings up the hardships Horace faces outside
of Franklin High school to make the audience feel pity for him, in turn, making them wish to
change the system so that other teachers won’t have to suffer the same things, “And this in
addition to all the rest he has to do outside those contact hours in class with the kids, not to
mention his evening work at the family’s liquor store to help meet the household bills” (Sizer
182). All Sizer needs to gain their support is an instance where someone suffers and Horace
reacts, like those instances presented above; Sizer uses an appeal to emotion, instead of logic, to
create a logical fallacy. Although they are generally used in politics to persuade a group to act a
certain way, Sizer has successfully used an appeal to emotion to gain the support of his audience,
and within them, create a desire to better the high school education system.