FREE ENERGY

The Political, Social, and Economic Implications of The N Machine / Space Power Generator
by Bruce De Palma

It is said: "The whole Universe and created world is a thought in the mind of God."
- The Gospel of Sri
Ramakrishna
If that be the case, wouldn't He want it to be the finest show in town?

As a long time worker in the field of Free Energy physics, and the inventor of the N machine
which extracts energy from the Free Energy field of Space, sooner or later I would have to face
the political nature of progress. It is not simply enough to violate the established laws of physics
with a new experiment. (1)
We are facing at the close of the 20th century a situation unique in the history of the world. In the
past the inventor had to serve the requirements of a vital and expanding society. The telegraph,
the telephone, long distance communication, the railroad and automobile covered the globe and
finally satellite communications making a truly global and planetary society. With the coming of
the global society the planetary Earth became a floating island in space with only resource wars
on the horizon as a foreshadowing of things to come.
Limitation of resources as opposed to development of uncharted territory poses a new challenge
to the inventor. In the case of Free Energy, it is not a case of being able to accomplish something
which had not been done before but being able to accomplish the same things which had been
done before without consumption of gas, coal or oil or the pollution of natural resources by
exhaust fumes or combustion by-products.
Take the case of the electric car. An automobile which could exceed the presently accepted
performance while not consuming or burning oil or gas - which could be switched on before a
journey and off after reaching your destination. The power unit for such a machine would extract
its energy directly from space without noise or pollution.
With the growth of society limited by the finite planetary surface area the Space Power
Generator offers the only hope for avoidance of resource wars. In fact, planetary renewal can be
affected with the availability of unlimited non-consumptive and non-polluting Space Power. It
must be recognized that advancement in society always means less manual labor and that finally
we must accept the condition of un-employment as the fulfillment of the nature of progress itself.
A new source of energy in our society, a new prime mover, can make possible a new kind of
independence. A kind of independence for the common man where he can take pride that he has
fulfilled his role in free society and now he can make his own life in the certainty of a new

source of prime energy which can make him independent of the feeling that he must take orders
from someone else in order to feel he has a job.
That total un-employment is the ultimate goal of capitalistic society. When all the natural forces
of Nature have been harnessed man is released from the state of slavery. At this point politics
becomes a form of state or option from which he can launch his platform to the stars.
If energy and transportation costs were zero, society would center around quality of life, small
communities would form in which all basic life support requirements would be met locally.
Money would still be required to purchase manufactured high-tech items and money could be
earned through sale of community grown or manufactured goods.
A political administration would be elected to provide global planetary coordination for projects
outside the scale of simple community organization. This does not imply the necessity of a
global one-world government; a loose federation of autonomous states and countries would be
sufficient.
In our present 1993 society Mammon has been elevated to the position of a god, i.e. nothing can
be accomplished without money. The challenge is to replace promises on paper with real quality
of life.
When Isaac Newton formulated his "Principia Mathematica" in the late 1600's he violated his
own admonition "Hypotheses non Fingo", "I make no hypotheses" in his third law of motion:
"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." This statement implies there is an
"equal" and "opposite" reaction to every action. The statements "equal" and "opposite" are in
themselves an hypothesis, since every experiment in physics would have to be tested, including
experiments not yet to be done, in the future, to substantiate the truth of such a statement.
Newton's first two laws, the law of inertia, and the law of mass, are laws of experimental
observation which define inertia and mass and do not in themselves include a foreshadowing of
the results of those experiments, to wit equal and opposite. Einstein, whose theories are based on
the definitions of Newton's 1st and 2nd laws and the conservation laws which grow out of the
hypothesis of the third law, are in themselves a conjecture resting on the hypothesis of equality
of action and reaction.
Free Energy transduced through the reactionless self-running electric engine will replace all
other forms of internal combustion machines. Society will reformulate itself around the new
reactionless prime mover. Man and his activities will hitch themselves to the very wheelwork of
the Universe, the forces which cause the planets to rotate and move in circular orbits around the
Sun.

REFERENCES
(1) Magnetism as a Distortion of a Pre-Existent Primordial Energy Field and the Possibility of
Extraction of Electrical Energy Directly from Space, Bruce de Palma; the proceedings of the

26th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC), August 4-9, 1992,
Boston, Massachusetts; sponsored by The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
(IEEE).

Next Paper
Back to Homepage