Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

63 / Monday, April 3, 2006 / Notices 16553

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE contesting, among other things, the March 24, 2006.
Department’s valuation of black and David M. Spooner,
International Trade Administration color pencil cores. On September 1, Assistant Secretary for Import
[A–570–827] 2004, the Department filed a motion for Administration.
a voluntary remand with the CIT with [FR Doc. E6–4747 Filed 3–31–06; 8:45 am]
Notice of Decision of the Court of respect to the pencil core issue. On BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
International Trade: Certain Cased September 20, 2004, the CIT remanded
Pencils from the People’s Republic of this case to the Department to conduct
China further proceedings concerning the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
valuation of pencil cores. On December
AGENCY: Import Administration, 20, 2004, the Department issued its International Trade Administration
International Trade Administration, redetermination in which it recalculated (A–427–808)
Department of Commerce. the respondents’ dumping margins
SUMMARY: On March 7, 2006, the Court Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon
using a new surrogate value for pencil
of International Trade (CIT) sustained cores (i.e., 2001 MSFTI data, adjusted Steel Flat Products from France:
the Department of Commerce’s (the for inflation, rather than 2002 MSFTI Notice of Rescission of Antidumping
Department’s) voluntary data). The recalculated dumping Duty Administrative Review
redetermination regarding the 2001– margins are as follows: 4.21 percent for
2002 antidumping duty administrative AGENCY: Import Administration,
Shandong Rongxin Import & Export
review of certain cased pencils (pencils) International Trade Administration,
Company, Ltd., 5.63 percent for Orient
from the People’s Republic of China Department of Commerce.
International Holding Shanghai Foreign SUMMARY: On December 12, 2005, the
(PRC). In its redetermination, the
Trade Co., Ltd., and 16.50 for China Department of Commerce (the
Department selected a new surrogate
First Pencil Company, Ltd./Three Star Department) published a notice of intent
value for pencil cores which it used to
Stationery Industry Corp.. The PRC– to rescind an administrative review of
recalculate the respondents’ dumping
wide rate was not changed. See Final the antidumping duty (AD) order on
margins. Consistent with the decision of
Results of Voluntary Redetermination certain corrosion–resistant carbon steel
the United States Court of Appeals for
Pursuant to Court Order, December 20, flat products (CORE) from France for the
the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) in
2004. On March 7, 2006, the CIT period August 1, 2004, through July 31,
The Timken Company v. United States
and China National Machinery and sustained the Department’s decision, 2005. The Department received
Equipment Import and Export including the redetermination. See comments only from domestic
Corporation, 893 F. 2d 337 (Fed. Cir. China First Pencil Co., Ltd., et al v. interested parties. There were no
1990) (Timken), the Department is United States and Sanford Corporation, requests for a public hearing in response
publishing this notice of the CIT’s et al. Slip Op. 06–34. to the intent to rescind notice. The
decision which is not in harmony with Notification Department is rescinding this
the Department’s determination in the administrative review pursuant to
2001–2002 antidumping duty In its decision in Timken, the Federal section 351.213(d) of the Department’s
administrative review of pencils from Circuit held that, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. regulations.
the PRC. 1516a(e), the Department must publish EFFECTIVE DATE: April 3, 2006.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 3, 2006. notice of a CIT decision which is ‘‘not
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
in harmony’’ with the Department’s
Stephen Bailey or Dena Crossland at
Magd Zalok or Howard Smith at (202) determination. With respect to the
(202) 482–0193 or (202) 482–3362,
482–4162 or (202) 482–5193, valuation of pencil cores, the above–
respectively; AD/CVD Operations,
respectively; AD/CVD Operations, referenced CIT decision is not in
Office 7, Import Administration,
Office 4, Import Administration, harmony with the Department’s
International Trade Administration,
International Trade Administration, determination in the final results of the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 2001–2002 antidumping duty Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, administrative review of pencils from Washington, DC 20230.
Washington, DC 20230. the PRC. Therefore, publication of this
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
notice fulfills the Department’s
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
obligation under 19 U.S.C. 1516a(e). Background
Background The Department will continue to On August 19, 1993, the Department
On May 21, 2004, the Department suspend liquidation pending the published an AD order on CORE from
published in the Federal Register, the expiration of the period to appeal the France. See Antidumping Duty Order
final results of its 2001–2002 CIT’s March 7, 2006, decision, or, if that and Amendments to Final
antidumping duty administrative review decision is appealed, pending a Determinations of Sales at Less Than
of pencils from the PRC. See Certain ‘‘conclusive’’ decision by the Federal Fair Value: Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon
Cased Pencils from the People’s Circuit. Upon expiration of the period to Steel Flat Products, Certain Cold–Rolled
Republic of China; Final Results and appeal, or if the CIT’s decision is Carbon Steel Flat Products, Certain
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty appealed and the Federal Circuit’s Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat
Administrative Review; 69 FR 29266 decision is not in harmony with the Products and Certain Cut–to-Length
(May 21, 2004). In that review, the Department’s determination in the Carbon Steel Plate from France, 58 FR
Department used 2002 Monthly 2001–2002 antidumping duty 44169 (August 19, 1993). On August 1,
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES

Statistics of the Foreign Trade of India administrative review of pencils from 2005, the Department published a notice
(MSFTI) to value pencil cores. the PRC, the Department will publish in of opportunity to request an
During July 2004, several respondents the Federal Register a notice of administrative review of the AD order
in the 2001–2002 administrative review amended final results for the 2001–2002 on CORE from France for the period
filed complaints with the CIT administrative review of pencils. August 1, 2004, through July 31, 2005.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:30 Mar 31, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM 03APN1

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi