Introduction

A cost that is suffered by a 3rd party due to an economic transaction is known as a negative externality.
Within a particular transaction, both the consumer and producer are the first and second groups, whereas
the third party incorporates any organization, individual, property owner, or asset that is by affected
indirectly. However, externalities are additionally alluded to as effects of a spill over, and a negative
externality is likewise alluded to as a cost that is external. An external cost, for example, the expense of
contamination from the production of industries, results in the MSC curve i.e. marginal social cost higher
than the MPV i.e. private marginal cost(Batabyal and Nijkamp, 2014). The socially productive yield is the
place MSB = MSC, at Q1, which is a lower yield than the equilibrium output for market, at Q.

Net Welfare Loss

More than this, the net welfare loss can exist in two circumstances. Firstly, it exists when the marginal
cost for society of a specific economic activity, for example, the manufacturing of 200000 personal
computers, is more noteworthy than the society's marginal benefit. Besides, it can exist when the
marginal benefit in accordance with the economic activity, for example, the production of 50,000m
personal computers, is more noteworthy than the marginal expense.

Example
Case in point, it is assumed that there is a computer manufacturer for which there is a lot of atmospheric
pollution and then the free market equilibrium will happen when marginal private costs are equal to
marginal private benefit, at the value P and output Q. The equilibrium will be at point A. On the other
hand, on the off chance that external costs are added then the socially effective output will be Q1 i.e. at B.

The marginal socials at C are definitely more higher than marginal social benefits i.e. at A so there is
definitely a net loss. Case in point, if the marginal social benefit at An is 5m, and the marginal social
expense at C is 10m, then the net welfare loss of this yield is 5m. Truth be told, there is a net welfare
loss i.e. any yield in the middle of Q1 and Q, and the region for all the welfare loss is the zone ABC.
Accordingly, in accordance with the welfare, markets over-produce merchandise that creates external
costs(Belleflamme and Toulemonde, 2009).

Taxes and Governmental Intervention

In accordance with the taxes on negative externalities, they are planned to make producers or consumer
to pay the good's social cost. This lessens utilization and makes an all the more socially effective result.
Without an assessment, there will be over consumption which implies that at Q1, D=S on the grounds that
individuals overlook the external expenses.

It would be Difficult to quantify the level of negative externality e.g. what is the expense of contamination
from any particular car(Berghel, 2014). In the event that Demand is inelastic then higher taxes won't
lessen much of the demand. Taxes will bring about disparity. There would be an administration cost
emulated by the possibility of avoidance. E.g. with duty on discarding trash there has been an increment

in fly tipping (unlawful Dumping of waste) and it might be hard to choose who is bringing about
contamination. However, it is has some advantages as well. It results in the provision of incentives that
decrease the negative externalities like pollution and that the cars are found to be more efficient in terms
of fuel. There could be a social efficiency(Bustos, n.d.). Apart from this, tax can raise governmental
revenue. The intervention by the Government is important to help price the negative externalities.
Governments can either utilize regulation (e.g. outlaw an activity) or utilize the market solutions. By
initiating arrangements, for example, contamination punishments, allowing common claims by private
parties to recoup harms for careless activities, and collecting environmental taxes, governments can
attain to two things. In the first place, these regulations recuperate trusts to help alter the harm brought
about by negative externalities. Second, these acts help put a monetary cost on social expenses. With
that data, organizations can land at a more precise figure for production costs. Organizations can then
abstain from the production of products whose money related and social expenses surpass the returns on
a financial basis.

Externality in Australian Sugar Industry

Externalities speak to a wider benefits and costs, which are not typically included in charges and prices.
The environmental externalities that are associated with the sugar industry utilization of the land, likewise
imparted to other intensive horticultural commercial ventures, incorporate the diffuse source
contamination issues emerging from run-off of pesticides, mill effluent and fertilizers. Furthermore, it
distinguishes two wellsprings of externality that are having an association with the production of cane in
Australia: production area expansion; and also an additional increase within the intensities of production
on the existing areas. Development of the industry of sugar taking after 1991 in accordance with the
partial deregulation prompted a developing number of disputes within an environment, and pulled in
attention amongst a quickly developing urban populace in the locale. Analysts likewise recognize various
ecological issues joined with the sugar business(Dr.S.A.NAYAKAWADI, 2012). The most problems that
are to be addressed emerge from a development of the land area allotted for farming of the cane. Without
watchful planning, development can make issues, for example, adjusting the current seepage system,
including wetlands, inadequately depleted waterfront fields and seaside conduits; clearing of basic
environment and huge vegetation groups; interruption to amphibian life, water streams and breeding
grounds for fish; and fragmentation of prior integral native habitat.

Market Structure
Sugar Industry is one of the nearest paragons of a perfect competition in this present reality. With endless
sugar producers over the businesses and with just about insignificant extent of differentiation between the
sugar industry and products is essentially a price taker.

Key Characteristics of Perfect Competition

Following are the key characteristics of the perfect competition:
1. There is immaculate learning, with no time lags or any information failure. Information is openly
accessible to all members, which implies that there is a minimal risk and the entrepreneur's role is
quite limited.
2. There are no obstructions to make an entrance in the market or exit out.
3. No single firm can impact the price within the market, or economic situations. The single firm is
said to be a taker of the price, taking its cost from the entire industry.
4. There is no requirement for government regulation with the exception to make competitive
markets.
5. The single firm takes its price from the business, and is, therefore, alluded to as a price taker. The
business is made out of all organizations in the business and the price within the market is the
when the market supply meets the market demand.

Governmental Intervention
The organizations ought to get ready for imposed governmental change to the way the business is
operated including regulations on sugar-sweetened foods, tariff or more noteworthy greater opportunities
for customers to self-direct sugar utilization by giving "healthier" options incorporating items fabricated
with non-sugar sweeteners(Laengle and Loyola, 2010). At last, the investment banks accept levy would
be the best approach and will give the best result. The governmental calls to intercede to manage
overabundance sugar utilization have been contrasted with the anti-smoking movement.

Externalities influence on the market outcome

An externality is an impact of a choice on a 3rd party not considered by the maker of decisions. One
illustration that comes to the mind is another business opening in a range. The choice of where to place a
new business is a critical choice for the organization. At the same time, over the span of settling on that
choice, they won't consider each option. Case in point, a portion of alternate organizations in the range
may encounter bigger deals on the grounds that the new business will convey more individuals to the
territory. An externality can be certain or negative. A negative externality is negative when the choice is
unfavorable to those outside the decision. A positive externality happens when the impact of a choice is
useful to others outside the choice. In the first place the regulations recuperate trusts to help
alter the harm brought about by negative externalities. Governments can either utilize
regulation (e.g. Second, these acts help put a monetary cost on social expenses. outlaw an
activity) or utilize the market solutions. With that data, organizations can land at a more
precise figure for production costs. By initiating arrangements, for example, contamination
punishments, allowing common claims by private parties to recoup harms for careless
activities, and collecting environmental taxes, governments can attain to two things.
Organizations can then abstain from the production of products whose money related and
social expenses surpass the returns on a financial basis (Nagler, 2013).

Dealing with Externalities

Government can assume a part in diminishing negative externalities by taxing the goods when the
production can generate costs of the spillover. This taxation successfully builds the expense of delivering
such products. The higher expense, then, better mirrors the genuine expense of production on the
grounds that it incorporates the overflow costs. Thus, such assessment endeavors to make the maker
pay for the full production cost (NAGLER, 2011). The utilization of such a tax is called the internalization
of externality.

References

Batabyal, A. and Nijkamp, P. (2014). Positive and Negative Externalities in

Innovation, Trade, and Regional Economic Growth. Geographical Analysis,
46(1), pp.1-17.
Belleflamme, P. and Toulemonde, E. (2009). NEGATIVE INTRA-GROUP
EXTERNALITIES IN TWO-SIDED MARKETS. International Economic
Review, 50(1), pp.245-272.
Berghel, H. (2014). Moral Hazards, Negative Externalities, and the Surveillance
Economy. Computer, 47(2), pp.73-77.
Bustos, l. (n.d.). Market Separation, Negative Consumption Externalities and Capacity
Constraints.SSRN Journal.
Dr.S.A.NAYAKAWADI, D. (2012). Impact of Sugar Industry Environment on
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate of Sugar Industry Workers. IJSR, 3(7), pp.515516.
Laengle, S. and Loyola, G. (2010). Bargaining and negative externalities. Optim Lett,
6(3), pp.421-430.
Nagler, M. (2013). The Strategic Significance of Negative Externalities. Manage.
Decis. Econ., 35(4), pp.247-257.
NAGLER, M. (2011). NEGATIVE EXTERNALITIES, COMPETITION AND
CONSUMER CHOICE*. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 59(3), pp.396421.