Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
MASTERY
I. INTRODUCTION
As one of the international language, the rule of English becomes crucial
nowadays. It plays a main role in information transformation from a nation to others.
In Indonesia it has been taught in Elementary School untill University. English is
devided into four skills that should be mastered by the students of every level of
Schools and Universities.
Learning a language especially English means we will talk about the basic
element of it, namely vocabulary. It is the most important one because language
consists of sequence of words. People cannot learn a language without learning
words. As Allen in Nurhayati (2003) says that vocabulary is an important factor in all
language teaching and it influences the achievement of the four language skill.
In addition, vocabulary is a foundation in learning English without vocabulary the
students cannot access the knowledge from what they read, the students do not
understand what people say because lack of vocabulary, etc. Nirwana (1996:3) states
that in learning a foreign language there are two things we really need to know there
are: word and how to put them together. Stressing its importance in language teaching
and reassessing some ways in which it is thought and learnt. The language
methodologists and linguists have increasingly paid their attention to the teaching of
vocabulary. Numerous competing methods of vocabulary acquisition have received a
great deal of attention, including the keyword method and the learning of word roots.
According to Atkinson in Susan R. Old (2001), “keyword method is mnemonic
technique in which a new word is associated with a similar sounding familiar word,
or keyword. A mental image is then formed linking the unfamiliar word to the
keyword. For example, if the new word is “celerity”, meaning “speed,” the keyword
could be “celery.” A mental image of a piece of celery flying through the air could
then be formed”.
Several studies have investigated the characteristics of the keyword method. For
example Hall, Wilson, and Patterson in Susan R. Old (2001) suggest that the keyword
method is most useful to less experienced learners, such as the young. They also
found that keywords provided by the experimenter yielded better recall than when
participants were required to create their own keywords. Further, recognizing word
roots is an important process in vocabulary learning and teaching roots to students
enhances their ability to infer meaning of certain vocabulary, the students who
learned roots through the keyword method were just as able, if not more so, to infer
meanings from roots as were students in free study and semantic conditions.
The object of the research is the first year student of English Department of
Tarbiyah and Teaching faculty UIN Alauddin Makassar. It consists of teen groups,
which were classified into five classes, PBI 1, PBI 2, are fused in one class and PBI 3,
PBI 4 are fused in one class, ect The sample of the research is the first year students
of English Department of Tarbiyah and Teaching Faculty UIN Alauddin Makassar,
where the researcher took one of the classes as sample, namely class PBI 3 and PBI 4
which consist of 40 students; in implement the method just 34 students were present.
In this research the researcher used purposive sampling technique, because this
research was just an experiment, which was to apply the keyword method in order to
know the effectiveness of it in teaching vocabulary. The location of the research was
at English Department of Tarbiyah and Teaching Faculty UIN Alauddin Makassar. It
is on Jl. Sultan Alauddin Makassar No. 63 Makassar, South Sulawesi. The research
was held on April 2007.
The instruments of the research that had been used were divided into three
activities, they are 1) Pre-Test, The pre-test was given to find out the initial ability of
the students before presenting the materials in the keyword method. 2)Treatment,
Treatment was given before the students do the post-test.. 3) Post-Test, Post-test was
given to find out the improvement of the students after presenting the materials
through the application of keyword method, the students do the post-test after getting
the treatment.
In collecting data, the writer followed the steps below: First, the writer gave pre-
test to know the students vocabulary ability before giving the treatment, by using
keyword method. Second, the writer gave post-test, but before giving post-test, the
writer gave treatments fourth meetings. In the treatment, the writer taught the students
using keyword method, the writer explained, what keyword method is?
In analyzing the data collected through the pre-test and post test, the researcher
used the procedure as follows:
1. The data collected through test is analyzed by using the classification as
follow:
a. 9,6 to 10 classified as excellent`
b. 8,6 to 9,5 classified as very good
c. 7,6 to 8,5 classified as good
d. 6,6 to 7,5 classified as fairly good
e. 5,6 to 6,5 classified as very fair
f. 3,6 to 5,5 is classified as poor
g. 0 to 3,5 is classified as very poor (Depdikbud, 1985:6)
2. Rate percentage of students` score
F
P= x 100 %
N
Notation: P = the percentage of the student respond
F = the frequency of the student respond
N = the total number of sample
3. Discover the mean score, the writer applied the formula:
X =
∑X
N
Total 34 100%
Table II shows that, after the treatment was given there were 3 (8.82%) out of 34
students in excellent classification, 15 (44.11%) of them were in very good
classification, 14 (41.18%) of the pupil were in good classification, and 2(5.89%) of
the students were in fairly good classification. It can be conclude that after the
treatment the students’ knowledge about vocabulary was in very good classification.
Table I and II indicated that, there were different score of pre-test and post-test. In
the pre-test the students’ knowledge was poor in vocabulary and after the treatment
the students’ knowledge was very good in vocabulary.
3. The students’ mean score of tests (pre-test and post test) is presented as
follow:
Table III
The mean score of the students’ tests (pre-test and post-test)
Type Of Test Mean Score
Pre-Test 5.39
Post-Test 8.57
Table III shows that the mean score of the students’ pre-test was 5.39 and the
mean score of the students’ post-test was 8.57. It describes that the mean score of the
students pre-test and post-test were different.
To know whether or not the difference of the mean score is statically difference at
the level of significance. The statically analysis of pre-test and post-test is presented
as follow:
Table IV
The t-test of the students’ knowledge
Variable T-Test Value T-Table
1 __ 2
X X 18.71 2.042
Based on the table above, the value of t-test was higher (18.71) than the value of
t-table (2.042). It means that the there is a significance between the result of the
students pre-test and post-test.
B. Discussion
Apropriate with the analysis of the data obtained from the students’ pre-test, the
means score is 5.39. It can be concluded that the students’ vocabulary is still low.
While, the students’ vocabulary based on post-test is 8.57. It means that the students’
post-test is higher that students’ pre-test.
Relating to the result above, it indicates that after giving the treatment by using
keyword method, the students had better achievement of vocabulary. This can be seen
through their score of pre-test and post-test (8.57>5.39).
The result of t-test showed that the value of the t-test (18.71) is higher than the
value of the t-table (2.042). It means that keyword method is effective in improving
the students’ vocabulary.according to the result the researcher concludes that the first
year students of English Department of Islamic state university of Alauddin Makassar
have better ability on vocabulary after having treatment through keyword method.
Gay, L, R (1981) “Educational Research”. New York; Bell and Howell Company.
Good, Carter Victor. (1959) “Dictionary of education” New York; Mc graw Hill.
Book.
Sudiyono, Anas Drs (1987) “Pengantar Statistic Pendidikan”. Jakarta; PT. Raja
Grafindo Persada..