Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

14564 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

55 / Wednesday, March 22, 2006 / Notices

Electronic Comments SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s


COMMISSION Statement of the Purpose of, and
• Use the Commission’s Internet Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Change
[Release No. 34–53485; File No. SR–PCX–
rules/sro.shtml); or
2006–15] 1. Purpose
• Send an e-mail to rule-
comments@sec.gov. Please include File Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific The purpose of this proposed rule
No. SR–NSX–2005–09 on the subject Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and change is to make certain housekeeping
line. Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed changes to the PCX Schedule.
Rule Change To Make Certain Trade Related Charges
Paper Comments
Housekeeping Changes to Its On the present Schedule, in the
• Send paper comments in triplicate Schedule of Fees and Charges section entitled Trade Related Charges,
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, March 14, 2006. the rate table shows transaction fees for
Securities and Exchange Commission, different market participants. Presently
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the the Firm transaction fee is $0.10 per
Washington, DC 20549–1090. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 contract, the Broker/Dealers transaction
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 fee is $0.21 per contract and the Market
All submissions should refer to File notice is hereby given that on February
Number SR–NSX–2005–09. This file Makers transaction fee is $0.21 per
23, 2006, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. contract. Customers are not charged a
number should be included on the (‘‘PCX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the transaction fee. In this same table is the
Securities and Exchange Commission On-Line Comparison fee, which is
Commission process and review your (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule $0.05, assessed on all Firm, Broker/
comments more efficiently, please use change as described in Items I, II and III Dealer and Market Maker transactions.
only one method. The Commission will below, which Items have been prepared The On-Line Comparison fee is not
post all comments on the Commission’s by the Exchange. The PCX filed the assessed on Customer transactions.
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ proposed rule change pursuant to Since the On-Line Comparison fee is
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3 and the same for Firm, Broker/Dealer and
submission, all subsequent Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which Market Maker transactions, and is not
amendments, all written statements renders the proposal effective upon charged on Customer transactions, the
with respect to the proposed rule filing with the Commission. The PCX proposes to simplify the Schedule
change that are filed with the Commission is publishing this notice to by eliminating the separate On-Line
Commission, and all written solicit comments on the proposed rule Comparison fee and incorporating it
communications relating to the change from interested persons. into the transaction fees. Under the new
proposed rule change between the Schedule, the rate table will now show
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Commission and any person, other than the Firm transaction Fee of $0.15 per
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
those that may be withheld from the contract, the Broker/Dealer transaction
the Proposed Rule Change
public in accordance with the fee of $0.26 per contract and the Market
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be The PCX proposes to amend its Maker transaction fee of $0.26 per
available for inspection and copying in Schedule of Fees and Charges contract. The Customer transaction fee
the Commission’s Public Reference (‘‘Schedule’’) in order to make certain will remain at zero. While the published
Room. Copies of such filing also will be housekeeping changes to the Schedule. rate schedule will appear different than
available for inspection and copying at The text of the proposed rule change is it presently does, there is actually no net
the principal office of the Exchange. All available at NYSE Arca, at http:// change to the amount the Exchange
comments received will be posted www.archipelago.com/regulation/ assesses for trade related charges.
without change; the Commission does filings.asp and at the Commission. Order Cancellation Fee
not edit personal identifying II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s The PCX proposes to correct an error
information from submissions. You Statement of the Purpose of, and in the footnote associated with this fee.
should submit only information that Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule The PCX charges an OTP Firm a
you wish to make available publicly. All Change cancellation fee, under certain
submissions should refer to File conditions, when it cancels a certain
Number SR–NSX–2005–09 and should In its filing with the Commission, the number of orders in any given month.
be submitted on or before April 12, Exchange included statements In the footnote attached to this fee,
2006. concerning the purpose of, and basis for, under condition (i), where it reads ‘‘500
the proposed rule change and discussed contracts’’ the word ‘‘contracts’’ was
For the Commission, by the Division of
any comments it received on the mistakenly used instead of ‘‘orders.’’ In
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
proposed rule change. The text of these order to make the rule text consistent,
statements may be examined at the the PCX proposes to change the word to
Nancy M. Morris,
places specified in Item IV below. The now read ‘‘orders’’.
Secretary. PCX has prepared summaries, set forth
[FR Doc. 06–2793 Filed 3–17–06; 4:16 pm] in Sections A, B, and C below, of the 2. Statutory Basis
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

BILLING CODE 8010–01–P most significant aspects of such The PCX believes the proposed rule
statements. change is consistent with Section 6(b) of
the Act,5 in general, and furthers the
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,6
2 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
7 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 6 15.U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:47 Mar 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 22, 2006 / Notices 14565

in particular, in that it is designed to All submissions should refer to File published a Federal Register Notice
provide for the equitable allocation of Number SR–PCX–2006–15. This file with a 60-day public comment period
reasonable dues, fees and other charges number should be included on the on this information collection on
among its members and issuers and subject line if e-mail is used. To help the January 13, 2006. We are required to
other persons using its facilities. Commission process and review your publish this notice in the Federal
comments more efficiently, please use Register by the Paperwork Reduction
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
only one method. The Commission will Act of 1995.
Statement on Burden on Competition
post all comments on the Commission’s DATES: Please submit comments by
The PCX does not believe that the Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ April 21, 2006.
proposed rule change will impose any rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
burden on competition that is not submission, all subsequent within 30 days, to the Office of
necessary or appropriate in furtherance amendments, all written statements Information and Regulatory Affairs,
of the purposes of the Act. with respect to the proposed rule Office of Management and Budget, 725
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s change that are filed with the 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC
Statement on Comments on the Commission, and all written 20503, Attention DOT Desk Officer. You
Proposed Rule Change Received From communications relating to the are asked to comment on any aspect of
Members, Participants, or Others proposed rule change between the this information collection, including:
Commission and any person, other than (1) Whether the proposed collection is
Written comments on the proposed those that may be withheld from the necessary for the FHWA’s performance;
rule change were neither solicited nor public in accordance with the (2) the accuracy of the estimated
received. provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be burden; (3) ways for the FHWA to
III. Date of Effectiveness of the available for inspection and copying in enhance the quality, usefulness, and
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for the Commission’s Public Reference clarity of the collected information and
Commission Action Room. Copies of such filing also will be (4) ways that the burden could be
available for inspection and copying at minimized, including the use of
Because the foregoing rule change the principal office of the PCX. All electronic technology, without reducing
establishes or changes a due, fee, or comments received will be posted the quality of the collected information.
other charge applicable only to a without change; the Commission does All comments should include the
member imposed by the Exchange, it not edit personal identifying Docket number FHWA–2006–23551.
has become effective upon filing information from submissions. You FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the should submit only information that
Act 7 and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule Bob Davis, Department of
you wish to make available publicly. All Transportation, Federal Highway
19b–4 thereunder.8 At any time within submissions should refer to File
60 days of the filing of such proposed Administration, Office of Freight
Number SR–PCX–2006–15 and should Management and Operations, 400
rule change, the Commission may be submitted on or before April 12,
summarily abrogate such rule change if Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
2006. 20590. Office hours are from 7 a.m. to
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the For the Commission, by the Division of 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated except Federal holidays.
public interest, for the protection of authority.9
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Nancy M. Morris, Title: Certification of Enforcement of
the purposes the Act.
Secretary. Vehicle Size and Weight Laws.
IV. Solicitation of Comments [FR Doc. E6–4121 Filed 3–21–06; 8:45 am] OMB Control Number: 2125–0034
Interested persons are invited to BILLING CODE 8010–01–P (Expiration Date: July 31, 2006).
submit written data, views, and Background: Title 23, U.S.C., 141,
arguments concerning the foregoing, requires each State, the District of
including whether the proposed rule DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Columbia and Puerto Rico to file an
change is consistent with the Act. annual certification that they are
Comments may be submitted by any of Federal Highway Administration enforcing their size and weight laws on
the following methods: Federal-aid highways and that their
[Docket No. FHWA–2006–23551] Interstate System weight limits are
Electronic Comments consistent with Federal requirements to
Notice of Request for Extension of
• Use the Commission’s Internet be eligible to receive an apportionment
Currently Approved Information
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ of Federal highway trust funds. Section
Collection: Certification of
rules/sro.shtml); or 141 also authorizes the Secretary to
Enforcement of Vehicle Size and
• Send an E-mail to rule- require States to file such information as
Weight Laws
comments@sec.gov. Please include File is necessary to verify that their
No. SR–PCX–2006–15 on the subject AGENCY: Federal Highway certifications are accurate. To determine
line. Administration (FHWA), DOT. whether States are adequately enforcing
ACTION: Notice and request for their size and weight limits, each must
Paper Comments submit an updated plan for enforcing
comments.
• Send paper comments in triplicate their size and weight limits to the
SUMMARY: The FHWA has forwarded the FHWA at the beginning of each fiscal
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,


Securities and Exchange Commission, information collection request described year. At the end of the fiscal year, they
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., in this notice to the Office of must submit their certifications and
Washington, DC 20549–1090. Management and Budget (OMB) to sufficient information to verify that their
renew an information collection. We enforcement goals established in the
7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). plan have been met. Failure of a State
8 17 U.S.C. 240.19b–4(f)(2). 9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). to file a certification, adequately enforce

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:47 Mar 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi