Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

43 / Monday, March 6, 2006 / Notices 11233

NUCLEAR REGULATORY Copies of the request are available shall be served by the requestor or
COMMISSION electronically through ADAMS and can petitioner upon the applicant, the Office
be accessed through the Public of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear
Request for a License to Import Electronic Reading Room (PERR) link Regulatory Commission, Washington,
Radioactive Waste http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/ DC 20555; the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear
index.html at the NRC Home page. Regulatory Commission, Washington,
Pursuant to 10 CFR 110.70(C) ‘‘Public A request for a hearing or petition for DC 20555; and the Executive Secretary,
notice of receipt of an application,’’ leave to intervene may be filed within U.S. Department of State, Washington,
please take notice that the Nuclear 30 days after publication of this notice DC 20520.
Regulatory Commission has received the in the Federal Register. Any request for The information concerning this
following request for an import license. hearing or petition for leave to intervene request follows.

NRC IMPORT LICENSE APPLICATION


Name of applicant, date of application, Country of
date received, application number, docket Description of material End use origin
number

Eastern Technologies, Inc., Ashford, AL, Class A radioactive waste consisting of Laundering and decontamination of pro- Mexico.
February 3, 2006. corrosion activation and mixed fission tective clothing and related products
products (predominantly Co-60, Co-58 used at the Laguna Verde Nuclear
and Mn-54) as contaminants on used Power Plant located in Mexico.
protective clothing and other items.
February 3, 2006
IW016
11005602

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (the Act), and the Commission’s Penetration Conductor Overcurrent
Dated this 24th day of February 2006 at regulations. Protective Devices LCO and Class IE
Rockville, Maryland. The Commission has made a Isolation Breaker Overcurrent Protective
Stephen Dembek, proposed determination that the Devices LCO requirements is consistent
Acting Director, Office of International amendment request involves no with the NRC Final Policy Statement on
Programs. significant hazards consideration. Under TS Improvements and 10 CFR 50.36. In
[FR Doc. 06–2094 Filed 3–3–06; 8:45 am] the Commission’s regulations in Title 10 part, the Final Policy Statement
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 provides screening criteria to evaluate
CFR), Section 50.92, this means that TS requirements for the purpose of
operation of the facility in accordance relocation to other licensee-controlled
NUCLEAR REGULATORY with the proposed amendment would documents. LCOs which do not meet
COMMISSION not (1) Involve a significant increase in any of the Final Policy Statement
the probability or consequences of an criteria and any 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(ii)
[Docket No. 50–354] accident previously evaluated; (2) create criteria may be proposed for relocation.
the possibility of a new or different kind The Primary Containment Penetration
PSEG Nuclear LLC; Notice of of accident from any accident Conductor Overcurrent Protective
Consideration of Issuance of previously evaluated; or (3) involve a Devices LCO and Class 1E Isolation
Amendment to Facility Operating significant reduction in a margin of Breaker Overcurrent Protective Devices
License, Proposed No Significant safety. As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), LCO requirements do not satisfy any of
Hazards Consideration Determination, the licensee has provided its analysis of the Final Policy Statement screening
and Opportunity for a Hearing the issue of no significant hazards criteria. The proposed changes do not
consideration, which is presented affect any operational characteristic,
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory below: function, or reliability of any structure,
Commission (NRC or the Commission) 1. Does the proposed change involve system, or component (SSC). Thus the
is considering issuance of an a significant increase in the probability consequences of accidents previously
amendment to Facility Operating or consequences of an accident analyzed are unchanged between the
License No. NPF–57 issued to PSEG previously evaluated? existing TS requirements and the
Nuclear LLC (the licensee) for operation Response: No. proposed changes.
of the Hope Creek Generating Station The proposed changes do not increase Based upon the above, the proposed
located in Salem County, New Jersey. the probability of any previously change will not involve a significant
The proposed amendment would evaluated accident. No safety function increase in the probability or
relocate the primary containment has been altered. The proposed changes consequences of an accident previously
penetration conductor overcurrent relocate the Primary Containment analyzed.
protective devices and the Class 1E Penetration Conductor Overcurrent 2. Does the proposed change create
isolation breaker overcurrent protective Protective Devices Limiting Condition the possibility of a new or different kind
devices from the Technical for Operation (LCO) and Class IE of accident from any accident
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Specifications to the Updated Final Isolation Breaker Overcurrent Protective previously evaluated?
Safety Analysis Report. Devices LCO requirements from the TS Response: No.
Before issuance of the proposed [technical specifications] to the Hope The proposed changes do not create
license amendment, the Commission Creek Generating Station Updated Final the possibility of a new or different kind
will have made findings required by the Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR). of accident from any accident
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended Relocation of the Primary Containment previously evaluated in the UFSAR. No

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:30 Mar 03, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM 06MRN1

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi